• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel 14th Gen Core Desktop Processors Don't Support Thunderbolt 5

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,297 (7.53/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
Intel earlier this week updated its desktop processor product stack with the introduction of the 14th Gen Core "Raptor Lake Refresh" processors. During our coverage of the processor, we erroneously mentioned that the processor supports the upcoming Thunderbolt 5 connectivity standard. Intel reached out to us for a correction, which revealed an interesting detail. Apparently, 14th Gen Core desktop processors do not support Thunderbolt 5, even though Intel has their own TB5 controller design codenamed "Barlow Ridge". However, these won't arrive before Q1 2024, the currently shipping "Maple Ridge" controller has only support for Thunderbolt 4. But even once Barlow Ridge is available, they will not be compatible with "Raptor Lake Refresh" socketed desktop processors.

Intel announced the Thunderbolt 5 standard in September, around the same time, it provided a technical reveal of its upcoming Core "Meteor Lake" mobile processors. The new standard provides a generational doubling in bandwidth to 80 Gbps (per direction), but relies on an exotic new feature called Bandwidth Boost. With this feature enabled, users get 120 Gbps of bandwidth in a particular direction, and 40 Gbps on its opposite direction.



Bandwidth Boost should come in handy when, for example, you are importing a large data set from a Thunderbolt 5-based external storage device to your local machine. In such a case, the receiving (Rx or inbound) bandwidth is boosted to 120 Gbps, while reducing the transmission (Tx or outbound) bandwidth to 40 Gbps. When exporting a large amount of data to this external Thunderbolt 5 storage device, the roles are reversed, where the Tx bandwidth is boosted at the expense of the Rx bandwidth.

It's important to take a moment to understand how Intel arrives at 80 Gbps as the default per-direction bandwidth of Thunderbolt 5, even when the underlying PCIe bandwidth of PCIe Gen 4 x4 adds up to 64 Gbps per direction—Thunderbolt is a complex bus, which combines a number of links besides PCIe, such as DisplayPort, which is how it arrives at its advertised bandwidth. So 80 Gbps is really just 64 Gbps of underlying PCIe bandwidth, and 120 Gbps is really just 96 Gbps, and the current Thunderbolt 4 that boasts of 40 Gbps/direction is really just 32 Gbps/direction PCIe.

Thunderbolt and USB4 are PCIe-based serial interconnect standards. Each PCIe lane has physical wiring for Rx and Tx. The way we understand Thunderbolt 5 Bandwidth Boost to work, for the ability to push 120 Gbps through a PCI-Express 4.0 x4 connection between the "Barlow Ridge" controller and the processor's PCIe root complex, the root complex should be able to re-task both sub-lanes of two of the four PCIe lanes for either purely-Tx or purely-Rx. This probably requires some awareness at the end of the PCIe root complex that's part of the processor's uncore.


In the Intel slide above, the company details how Bandwidth Boost works at the Thunderbolt 5 link layer. Two 40 Gbps links per direction normally make up the 80 Gbps per-direction bandwidth of Thunderbolt 5. With Bandwidth Boost enabled, three out of four links are loaded toward one direction to make 120 Gbps, while the last link is in the opposite direction. As for which direction gets the Bandwidth Boost depends entirely on the application, as detailed in the examples above. You get get a 120 Gbps high-speed transmit with a 40 Gbps receive, or a 120 Gbps high-speed receive with a 40 Gbps transmit. The second image drawn by us, illustrates how the PCIe backend works between the Thunderbolt 5 host controller and the PCIe root complex.

Without this uncore-level awareness, for Thunderbolt 5 to be able to push 120 Gbps to a downstream device, there needs to be a PCIe Gen 4 x8 connection between the PCIe root and the "Barlow Ridge" host controller that can provide 160 Gbps of per-direction bandwidth, which is both undesirable and unlikely, as all prior generation discrete Thunderbolt controllers by Intel have used a PCIe x4 connection to the platform.

Intel also stated that when "Barlow Ridge" does come out in Q1 2024, it will have compatible processors at launch, without stating what those processors are. It's possible that Intel is updating its mobile processor stack, and those processors will support Thunderbolt 5 the way Intel intends it (including the Bandwidth Boost feature). Intel already provided a technical deep-dive of its upcoming Core "Meteor Lake" mobile processor, without mentioning product launch dates. The 2024 International CES (January) provides Intel with the perfect opportunity to launch new processors. Intel put out this statement as an October 19 editor's note in its newsroom article announcing the 14th Gen Core desktop processors:
While some processors in the Intel Core 14th Gen processor family will include support for Thunderbolt 5, Intel Core 14th Gen desktop processors, specifically, will not support it. The Intel Core 14th Gen launch announcement incorrectly said, "Intel Core 14th Gen desktop processors include support for … upcoming Thunderbolt 5 wired connectivity - supporting up to 80 Gbps of bi-directional bandwidth." Intel will share additional details on Intel Core 14th Gen CPUs that support Thunderbolt 5 at a later date.

The above Intel statement says that some 14th Gen processors will support Thunderbolt 5, but not the 14th Gen Core desktop processors. Intel's "Meteor Lake" mobile processor does not come with 14th Gen Core branding, but debuts a new brand nomenclature, which leaves us with only one possibility, non-socketed 14th Gen Core processors, namely "Raptor Lake Refresh" mobile (-H and -HX). With "Meteor Lake" on the horizon, Intel may push "Raptor Lake Refresh" to the -H and -HX segments much in the same way as those segments in the 10th Gen were addressed by "Comet Lake," as "Ice Lake" handled the -U and -P segments. It's very likely that these "Raptor Lake Refresh-H/HX" processors are the ones that support Thunderbolt 5 from the 14th Gen using "Barlow Ridge" controllers, besides the upcoming "Meteor Lake" processors that have "Thunderbolt 5" integrated as part of its SoC tile.

Users on the 14th Gen Core socketed desktop platform can enjoy Thunderbolt 4 using motherboards or add-on cards that have Intel's "Maple Ridge" controller that's been in the market since 2020, which provides 40 Gbps per direction bandwidth. Thunderbolt 5 and AI Boost are two features that will only make it to socketed desktop platforms with Intel's next-generation processors. We know that "Meteor Lake" is confirmed not coming to socketed desktop platforms, which leaves us with "Arrow Lake-S," bound for the second half of 2024.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2005
Messages
5,847 (0.81/day)
Location
Ikenai borderline!
System Name Firelance.
Processor Threadripper 3960X
Motherboard ROG Strix TRX40-E Gaming
Cooling IceGem 360 + 6x Arctic Cooling P12
Memory 8x 16GB Patriot Viper DDR4-3200 CL16
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Ventus 2X OC
Storage 2TB WD SN850X (boot), 4TB Crucial P3 (data)
Display(s) 3x AOC Q32E2N (32" 2560x1440 75Hz)
Case Enthoo Pro II Server Edition (Closed Panel) + 6 fans
Power Supply Fractal Design Ion+ 2 Platinum 760W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Razer Pro Type Ultra
Software Windows 10 Professional x64
Intel rushing "14th gen" so hard that they're dropping worthwhile features left right and centre. Plus we're going to be in a nightmare scenario whereby some "14th gen" processors support TB5 and some don't, so consumers will be horribly confused. All because Intel has to launch SOMETHING this year, even if that something is utter rubbish.
 
Joined
Feb 1, 2019
Messages
3,666 (1.70/day)
Location
UK, Midlands
System Name Main PC
Processor 13700k
Motherboard Asrock Z690 Steel Legend D4 - Bios 13.02
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S
Memory 32 Gig 3200CL14
Video Card(s) 4080 RTX SUPER FE 16G
Storage 1TB 980 PRO, 2TB SN850X, 2TB DC P4600, 1TB 860 EVO, 2x 3TB WD Red, 2x 4TB WD Red
Display(s) LG 27GL850
Case Fractal Define R4
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster AE-9
Power Supply Antec HCG 750 Gold
Software Windows 10 21H2 LTSC
Thought thunderbolt was dead, what uses it?
 

TheLostSwede

News Editor
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
17,769 (2.42/day)
Location
Sweden
System Name Overlord Mk MLI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X670E Aorus Master
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 SE with offsets
Memory 32GB Team T-Create Expert DDR5 6000 MHz @ CL30-34-34-68
Video Card(s) Gainward GeForce RTX 4080 Phantom GS
Storage 1TB Solidigm P44 Pro, 2 TB Corsair MP600 Pro, 2TB Kingston KC3000
Display(s) Acer XV272K LVbmiipruzx 4K@160Hz
Case Fractal Design Torrent Compact
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply be quiet! Pure Power 12 M 850 W
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed
Keyboard Corsair K70 Max
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/yfsd9w
Joined
May 3, 2019
Messages
2,138 (1.04/day)
System Name BigRed
Processor I7 12700k
Motherboard Asus Rog Strix z690-A WiFi D4
Cooling Noctua D15S chromax black/MX6
Memory TEAM GROUP 32GB DDR4 4000C16 B die
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 3080 Gaming Trio X 10GB
Storage M.2 drives WD SN850X 1TB 4x4 BOOT/WD SN850X 4TB 4x4 STEAM/USB3 4TB OTHER
Display(s) Dell s3422dwg 34" 3440x1440p 144hz ultrawide
Case Corsair 7000D
Audio Device(s) Logitech Z5450/KEF uniQ speakers/Bowers and Wilkins P7 Headphones
Power Supply Corsair RM850x 80% gold
Mouse Logitech G604 lightspeed wireless
Keyboard Logitech G915 TKL lightspeed wireless
Software Windows 10 Pro X64
Benchmark Scores Who cares
it's a smaller display connector on a laptop
 

TheLostSwede

News Editor
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
17,769 (2.42/day)
Location
Sweden
System Name Overlord Mk MLI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X670E Aorus Master
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 SE with offsets
Memory 32GB Team T-Create Expert DDR5 6000 MHz @ CL30-34-34-68
Video Card(s) Gainward GeForce RTX 4080 Phantom GS
Storage 1TB Solidigm P44 Pro, 2 TB Corsair MP600 Pro, 2TB Kingston KC3000
Display(s) Acer XV272K LVbmiipruzx 4K@160Hz
Case Fractal Design Torrent Compact
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply be quiet! Pure Power 12 M 850 W
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed
Keyboard Corsair K70 Max
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/yfsd9w

seems to be pretty stable
1697812507237.png
 
Joined
Oct 28, 2012
Messages
1,194 (0.27/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 3700x
Motherboard asus ROG Strix B-350I Gaming
Cooling Deepcool LS520 SE
Memory crucial ballistix 32Gb DDR4
Video Card(s) RTX 3070 FE
Storage WD sn550 1To/WD ssd sata 1To /WD black sn750 1To/Seagate 2To/WD book 4 To back-up
Display(s) LG GL850
Case Dan A4 H2O
Audio Device(s) sennheiser HD58X
Power Supply Corsair SF600
Mouse MX master 3
Keyboard Master Key Mx
Software win 11 pro
Intel rushing "14th gen" so hard that they're dropping worthwhile features left right and centre. Plus we're going to be in a nightmare scenario whereby some "14th gen" processors support TB5 and some don't, so consumers will be horribly confused. All because Intel has to launch SOMETHING this year, even if that something is utter rubbish.
Not really saying that it's a good way of going about things, but I'm quite sure that the people who really have a need for TB5 will manage. Why you ask? Well even if Raptor Lake does support TB4, you can't just assume that the laptop will be equipped with it. You have to check the spec list to see if it does, and the thunderbolt version is listed in the specs list. There's a few 1500$ laptops who don't have TB at all, or only a specific SKU within the SKU got TB. Shopping for a PC has always been a clusterfuck, so if you are looking for a specific spec you have no choice but to check what you are actually getting.

And it's not like someone will make a TB5 desktop card when there isn't a single desktop CPU that support it atm :D
 
Joined
Jul 10, 2017
Messages
2,671 (0.98/day)
Well, at least they don't suffer from the lack of vulnerabilities, so I guess it balances out?
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,843 (3.95/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
Processors released in October don't support standard finalized in September. Really, that's a surprise?
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
3,391 (0.82/day)
Location
Athens, Greece
System Name 3 desktop systems: Gaming / Internet / HTPC
Processor Ryzen 5 7600 / Ryzen 5 4600G / Ryzen 5 5500
Motherboard X670E Gaming Plus WiFi / MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (1) / MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (2)
Cooling Aigo ICE 400SE / Segotep T4 / Νoctua U12S
Memory Kingston FURY Beast 32GB DDR5 6000 / 16GB JUHOR / 32GB G.Skill RIPJAWS 3600 + Aegis 3200
Video Card(s) ASRock RX 6600 + GT 710 (PhysX) / Vega 7 integrated / Radeon RX 580
Storage NVMes, ONLY NVMes / NVMes, SATA Storage / NVMe, SATA, external storage
Display(s) Philips 43PUS8857/12 UHD TV (120Hz, HDR, FreeSync Premium) / 19'' HP monitor + BlitzWolf BW-V5
Case Sharkoon Rebel 12 / CoolerMaster Elite 361 / Xigmatek Midguard
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Chieftec 850W / Silver Power 400W / Sharkoon 650W
Mouse CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / CoolerMaster Devastator / Logitech
Keyboard CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / CoolerMaster Devastator / Logitech
Software Windows 10 / Windows 10&Windows 11 / Windows 10
Thought thunderbolt was dead, what uses it?
In many reviews the lack of TB support is described as a (big) disadvantage for AMD based laptops. Even if it's real significance is limited, it is used in marketing.
 
Joined
Nov 6, 2016
Messages
1,773 (0.60/day)
Location
NH, USA
System Name Lightbringer
Processor Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard Asus ROG Strix X470-F Gaming
Cooling Enermax Liqmax Iii 360mm AIO
Memory G.Skill Trident Z RGB 32GB (8GBx4) 3200Mhz CL 14
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 5700XT Nitro+
Storage Hp EX950 2TB NVMe M.2, HP EX950 1TB NVMe M.2, Samsung 860 EVO 2TB
Display(s) LG 34BK95U-W 34" 5120 x 2160
Case Lian Li PC-O11 Dynamic (White)
Power Supply BeQuiet Straight Power 11 850w Gold Rated PSU
Mouse Glorious Model O (Matte White)
Keyboard Royal Kludge RK71
Software Windows 10
I don't understand why they had to make TB5 so complicated? It should just be a PCIe 5.0x4 link...the marketing demands it (PCIe 5.0 /TB5) and there should only be that standard (so we dont see things like we did with TB3 and dell selling laptops with a TB3 controller that only as 3.0x2 lanes) ...meaning it can't be called TB5 without 128Gbps bidirectional bandwidth to avoid the complicated nightmare that Displayport 2.0/2.1 one is (and USB 3.2) with three different tiers of bandwidth and different cables with different capabilities.

A 5.0x4 link would have brought most eGPUs to desktop parity, would allow all sorts of external monitors and high refresh, would have been plenty for consumer external storage for years, etc....
 

TheLostSwede

News Editor
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
17,769 (2.42/day)
Location
Sweden
System Name Overlord Mk MLI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X670E Aorus Master
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 SE with offsets
Memory 32GB Team T-Create Expert DDR5 6000 MHz @ CL30-34-34-68
Video Card(s) Gainward GeForce RTX 4080 Phantom GS
Storage 1TB Solidigm P44 Pro, 2 TB Corsair MP600 Pro, 2TB Kingston KC3000
Display(s) Acer XV272K LVbmiipruzx 4K@160Hz
Case Fractal Design Torrent Compact
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply be quiet! Pure Power 12 M 850 W
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed
Keyboard Corsair K70 Max
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/yfsd9w
I don't understand why they had to make TB5 so complicated? It should just be a PCIe 5.0x4 link...the marketing demands it (PCIe 5.0 /TB5) and there should only be that standard (so we dont see things like we did with TB3 and dell selling laptops with a TB3 controller that only as 3.0x2 lanes) ...meaning it can't be called TB5 without 128Gbps bidirectional bandwidth to avoid the complicated nightmare that Displayport 2.0/2.1 one is (and USB 3.2) with three different tiers of bandwidth and different cables with different capabilities.

A 5.0x4 link would have brought most eGPUs to desktop parity, would allow all sorts of external monitors and high refresh, would have been plenty for consumer external storage for years, etc....
Because they couldn't be worse than USB4 2.0 or whatever it's called?
Also, it's something of a cable speed limit based on the amount of available data pairs before a new connector will be needed again.

Also, the asynchronous transfer mode will most likely just be for DP signals anyhow.
Keep in mind that Thunderbolt maxes out at USB 3.2 Gen 2 10 Gbps speeds, yet Intel forced a 20 Gbps mode for the USB4 spec that no-one really wanted.
 
Joined
Oct 18, 2013
Messages
6,263 (1.53/day)
Location
Over here, right where you least expect me to be !
System Name The Little One
Processor i5-11320H @4.4GHZ
Motherboard AZW SEI
Cooling Fan w/heat pipes + side & rear vents
Memory 64GB Crucial DDR4-3200 (2x 32GB)
Video Card(s) Iris XE
Storage WD Black SN850X 4TB m.2, Seagate 2TB SSD + SN850 4TB x2 in an external enclosure
Display(s) 2x Samsung 43" & 2x 32"
Case Practically identical to a mac mini, just purrtier in slate blue, & with 3x usb ports on the front !
Audio Device(s) Yamaha ATS-1060 Bluetooth Soundbar & Subwoofer
Power Supply 65w brick
Mouse Logitech MX Master 2
Keyboard Logitech G613 mechanical wireless
Software Windows 10 pro 64 bit, with all the unnecessary background shitzu turned OFF !
Benchmark Scores PDQ
All because Intel has to launch SOMETHING this year, even if that something is utter rubbish
^^THIS^^
I think intel should just change their name to "Clusterf*ck.com" and be done with it :D
 
Joined
Dec 25, 2020
Messages
7,013 (4.81/day)
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
System Name "Icy Resurrection"
Processor 13th Gen Intel Core i9-13900KS Special Edition
Motherboard ASUS ROG Maximus Z790 Apex Encore
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S upgraded with 2x NF-F12 iPPC-3000 fans and Honeywell PTM7950 TIM
Memory 32 GB G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB F5-6800J3445G16GX2-TZ5RK @ 7600 MT/s 36-44-44-52-96 1.4V
Video Card(s) ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX™ 4080 16GB GDDR6X White OC Edition
Storage 500 GB WD Black SN750 SE NVMe SSD + 4 TB WD Red Plus WD40EFPX HDD
Display(s) 55-inch LG G3 OLED
Case Pichau Mancer CV500 White Edition
Audio Device(s) Apple USB-C + Sony MDR-V7 headphones
Power Supply EVGA 1300 G2 1.3kW 80+ Gold
Mouse Microsoft Classic Intellimouse
Keyboard IBM Model M type 1391405 (distribución española)
Software Windows 11 IoT Enterprise LTSC 24H2
Benchmark Scores I pulled a Qiqi~
Of course it doesn't, Intel should have been honest and told everyone the truth: their 14th gen CPUs aren't new and aren't worthy of being called a generation, they're anything but that! Without as much as a new stepping, let alone any redesign or change, anyone who's buying a 14900K today could have done so as far back as January when Intel released the 13900KS, and could have a chip that comes at 95% of the clock speed a year ago. They're all the same.
 
Joined
Aug 25, 2021
Messages
1,182 (0.97/day)
I don't understand why they had to make TB5 so complicated? It should just be a PCIe 5.0x4 link...
It cannot be PCIe Gen5 x4, as this link at 128 Gbps, 32 Gbps per lane, exceeds physical capability of each TX/RX data lane in TB5 PHY, which is 20 Gbps. It needs to be PCIe Gen4 x4.

Also, it's something of a cable speed limit based on the amount of available data pairs before a new connector will be needed again.
This.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 24, 2021
Messages
281 (0.21/day)
Why not just use a pcie5.0x4 root complex? The usb4v2 spec has a revision to specifically allow for pcie5.0. Seems like that would’ve been easier and cleaner to allow for up to 128 Gbps bandwidth.

from section 11.2 (Version 2.0 with Errata and ECN through June 29, 2023)
“An Internal PCIe Port shall be compatible with the PCI Express® Base Specification, Revision 4. An Internal PCIe Port may be compatible with the PCI Express® Base Specification, Revision 5.0.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 18, 2005
Messages
5,847 (0.81/day)
Location
Ikenai borderline!
System Name Firelance.
Processor Threadripper 3960X
Motherboard ROG Strix TRX40-E Gaming
Cooling IceGem 360 + 6x Arctic Cooling P12
Memory 8x 16GB Patriot Viper DDR4-3200 CL16
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Ventus 2X OC
Storage 2TB WD SN850X (boot), 4TB Crucial P3 (data)
Display(s) 3x AOC Q32E2N (32" 2560x1440 75Hz)
Case Enthoo Pro II Server Edition (Closed Panel) + 6 fans
Power Supply Fractal Design Ion+ 2 Platinum 760W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Razer Pro Type Ultra
Software Windows 10 Professional x64
Processors released in October don't support standard finalized in September. Really, that's a surprise?
Processors that don't need to be released in October because they offer no advantage over their "predecessors" in any way, nor are their any new processors going to be released by their competitor, so it makes zero sense to release them now when you could release then in January and have them include a standard finalized in September that makes them a somewhat compelling buy.

There, fixed.
 
Joined
Apr 24, 2021
Messages
281 (0.21/day)
Processors that don't need to be released in October because they offer no advantage over their "predecessors" in any way, nor are their any new processors going to be released by their competitor, so it makes zero sense to release them now when you could release then in January and have them include a standard finalized in September that makes them a somewhat compelling buy.

There, fixed.
Intel has been releasing desktop CPUs in the fall for a few years now. Alder lake. Raptor lake. Raptor lake.1 aka 14th gen.
 
Joined
Sep 23, 2022
Messages
1,288 (1.57/day)
anyone who's buying a 14900K today could have done so as far back as January when Intel released the 13900KS, and could have a chip that comes at 95% of the clock speed a year ago. They're all the same.
Except now they can do it for $200-$300 less.

I guess you lose the "S" which obviously is the only way to maintain your l337 status and be xtreem.

It's horrible that intel has offered (minimally)more for less money. Dirty bastards.
 
Joined
Aug 18, 2022
Messages
366 (0.43/day)
Except now they can do it for $200-$300 less.

I guess you lose the "S" which obviously is the only way to maintain your l337 status and be xtreem.

It's horrible that intel has offered (minimally)more for less money. Dirty bastards.
At least Intel are now done with generations. In future their chips will just have numbers like 135, 155 and 185. In a couple of years will people be arguing that the 205 isn't really a 200 series it's just a refreshed 185...
 
Joined
Jun 18, 2021
Messages
2,569 (2.00/day)
Thunderbolt docks are stupidly overpriced and among the photographers(around 14 are Mac users) hardly 1 of them has spent any money on a thunderbolt dock. Rest of them rely on traditional USB hubs to get USB-A ports.

And that's the real tragedy, until thunderbolt accessories become affordable so anyone feels they're worth buying they'll continue to be a niche in the market, which will make them continue to be expensive. About the only real market for thunderbolt are offices and professional environments where price doesn't really matter (it's a write off anyway) but the feature set does.

there should only be that standard (so we dont see things like we did with TB3 and dell selling laptops with a TB3 controller that only as 3.0x2 lanes)

That was already fixed with thunderbolt 4

A 5.0x4 link would have brought most eGPUs to desktop parity, would allow all sorts of external monitors and high refresh, would have been plenty for consumer external storage for years, etc....

Only a problem if you use the eGPU with the internal monitor, otherwise it's fine.

Of course it doesn't, Intel should have been honest and told everyone the truth: their 14th gen CPUs aren't new and aren't worthy of being called a generation, they're anything but that! Without as much as a new stepping, let alone any redesign or change

There's at least one change - the name - and that's the only one that really matters. OEMs demand a new processor so they can refresh their designs and claim all improvements imaginable no matter how stale the performance has been for the last couple years.
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,843 (3.95/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
Processors that don't need to be released in October because they offer no advantage over their "predecessors" in any way, nor are their any new processors going to be released by their competitor, so it makes zero sense to release them now when you could release then in January and have them include a standard finalized in September that makes them a somewhat compelling buy.

There, fixed.
This was always going to be a refresh. If you start messing with the silicon, then it's not a refresh anymore.

And they certainly offer advantages: reduced power draw, minor speed bumps and 4 more E-core for the 14700k. Quite hefty for a refresh, imho, even if far from what one would expect from a new generation (which these are not).
 
Top