• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Set Your Calendars: Windows 12 is Coming in June 2024 with Arm Support and AI Features

Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
27,347 (6.61/day)
Wonder if this means Windows on the new Macs.
Not laughing AT you, just laughing because that is both amusing and, because Windows on ARM is becoming a much better thing and plausible as a usable OS.
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 24, 2023
Messages
779 (1.48/day)
Location
127.0.0.1, ::1
System Name Naboo (2019)
Processor AMD 3800x
Motherboard Gigabyte Aorus Master V1 (X470)
Cooling individual EKWB/Heatkiller loop
Memory 4*8 GB 3600 Corsair Vengeance
Video Card(s) Sapphire Pulse 5700XT
Storage SSD 1TB PCIe 4.0x4, 2 TB PCIe 3.0
Display(s) 2*WQHD
Case Lian Li O11 Rog
Audio Device(s) Hifiman, Topping DAC/KHV
Power Supply Seasonic 850W Gold
Mouse Logitech MX2, Logitech MX Ergo Trackball
Keyboard Cherry Stream Wireless, Logitech MX Keys
Software Linux Mint "Vera" Cinnamon
I remember an real old german Proverb about Windows XP:

Windows XP. Gesehen, gelacht, Alt-F8.
Translated:
Windows XP, Seen, Laughed at, Alt-F8

Alt-F8 was a way to deinstall WinXP.
 
Joined
Jan 31, 2022
Messages
60 (0.06/day)
Based on WinXP and W7 ESU, you don't want to do this - it's more expensive than replacing your hardware to be compatible with whatever the current OS is. In this case, you'll need a TPM 2.0 module, likely enforced this time rather than "optional" in W11 with workarounds or Enterprise versions.

Realistically, there's a 3-6 month period between W12 launching and W10 going EOL, so most people have time to decide if they want to skip 11 entirely or avoid 12 until Microsoft make it less bad, depending on what state W12 launches in. Let's face it, Windows 11 was a bit of a disaster at launch - it took until the October 2022 patch to make it a valid successor to 10 (1 year after launch and almost 18 months after first public preview buids).
That assumes they plan to go into extended support for the old OS because of old hardware. What if they want to stay on the old OS because they don't want to use the new one.
It is quite possible they already have hardware that supports it.
It's not always about the cheapest method to stay up-to-date with security patches. Sometimes it's about the ability to continue using a known-good environment.
 
Joined
Mar 21, 2021
Messages
5,034 (3.81/day)
Location
Colorado, U.S.A.
System Name CyberPowerPC ET8070
Processor Intel Core i5-10400F
Motherboard Gigabyte B460M DS3H AC-Y1
Memory 2 x Crucial Ballistix 8GB DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) MSI Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Super
Storage Boot: Intel OPTANE SSD P1600X Series 118GB M.2 PCIE
Display(s) Dell P2416D (2560 x 1440)
Power Supply EVGA 500W1 (modified to have two bridge rectifiers)
Software Windows 11 Home
Not laughing AT you, just laughing because that is both amusing and, barbecue Windows on ARM is becoming a much better thing, possible.

Reason perhaps not to rush the next PC purchase?
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2020
Messages
9,340 (5.44/day)
Location
Louisiana
System Name Ghetto Rigs z490|x99|Acer 17 Nitro 7840hs/ 5600c40-2x16/ 4060/ 1tb acer stock m.2/ 4tb sn850x
Processor 10900k w/Optimus Foundation | 5930k w/Black Noctua D15
Motherboard z490 Maximus XII Apex | x99 Sabertooth
Cooling oCool D5 res-combo/280 GTX/ Optimus Foundation/ gpu water block | Blk D15
Memory Trident-Z Royal 4000c16 2x16gb | Trident-Z 3200c14 4x8gb
Video Card(s) Titan Xp-water | evga 980ti gaming-w/ air
Storage 970evo+500gb & sn850x 4tb | 860 pro 256gb | Acer m.2 1tb/ sn850x 4tb| Many2.5" sata's ssd 3.5hdd's
Display(s) 1-AOC G2460PG 24"G-Sync 144Hz/ 2nd 1-ASUS VG248QE 24"/ 3rd LG 43" series
Case D450 | Cherry Entertainment center on Test bench
Audio Device(s) Built in Realtek x2 with 2-Insignia 2.0 sound bars & 1-LG sound bar
Power Supply EVGA 1000P2 with APC AX1500 | 850P2 with CyberPower-GX1325U
Mouse Redragon 901 Perdition x3
Keyboard G710+x3
Software Win-7 pro x3 and win-10 & 11pro x3
Benchmark Scores Are in the benchmark section
No, feel free to buy a new PC or upgrade if you need better performance.
Hi,
Yeah really hell my old lappy was from 2009 lol
Still works "battery is shot only works plugged in" but core2duo with 3gb memory does fine on win-10 pro 32 bit but my new one is pretty nice.
I was way overdue for a upgrade.
 
Joined
Mar 21, 2021
Messages
5,034 (3.81/day)
Location
Colorado, U.S.A.
System Name CyberPowerPC ET8070
Processor Intel Core i5-10400F
Motherboard Gigabyte B460M DS3H AC-Y1
Memory 2 x Crucial Ballistix 8GB DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) MSI Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Super
Storage Boot: Intel OPTANE SSD P1600X Series 118GB M.2 PCIE
Display(s) Dell P2416D (2560 x 1440)
Power Supply EVGA 500W1 (modified to have two bridge rectifiers)
Software Windows 11 Home
Joined
Oct 2, 2020
Messages
938 (0.63/day)
System Name ASUS TUF F15
Processor Intel Core i7-11800H
Motherboard ASUS FX506HC
Cooling Laptop built-in cooling lol
Memory 24 GB @ 3200
Video Card(s) Intel UHD & Nvidia RTX 3050 Mobile
Storage Adata XPG SX8200 Pro 512 GB
Display(s) Laptop built-in 144 Hz FHD screen
Audio Device(s) LOGITECH 2.1-channel
Power Supply ASUS 180W PSU
Mouse Logitech G604
Keyboard SteelSeries Apex 7 TKL
Software Windows 10 Enterprise 21H2 LTSC
the joke was more like: xp-good, vista-bad, 7-good, 8-bad, 10-?
I wouldn't say 10 managed to be good, it's just 7 with updates and DX12 and a lot of added bloat, but sure it wasn't as bad as 8 or 11.
vista was bad for losers with their pentiums and celerons...
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
27,347 (6.61/day)
And therein lies my dilemma, a Core 2 Quad with a solid state drive is good and snappy.
It's not "officially" supported and is old hardware. Granted, you know me, I'm all for using the hardware you have in the way you want too, but at this point in time a Core2Quad is showing it's age more than just a little bit. While you know I've tested running a C2Q with Win11 and it runs well, I did it only to see if it could be done, not to daily drive it. The Core2 line up really should be considered a retro platform for running XP. If you want to get into something reasonably modern, X79 is a good platform to fall back on.
 
Joined
Jan 5, 2006
Messages
18,585 (2.70/day)
System Name AlderLake
Processor Intel i7 12700K P-Cores @ 5Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte Z690 Aorus Master
Cooling Noctua NH-U12A 2 fans + Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme + 5 case fans
Memory 32GB DDR5 Corsair Dominator Platinum RGB 6000MT/s CL36
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio
Storage Samsung 980 Pro 1TB + 970 Evo 500GB + 850 Pro 512GB + 860 Evo 1TB x2
Display(s) 23.8" Dell S2417DG 165Hz G-Sync 1440p
Case Be quiet! Silent Base 600 - Window
Audio Device(s) Panasonic SA-PMX94 / Realtek onboard + B&O speaker system / Harman Kardon Go + Play / Logitech G533
Power Supply Seasonic Focus Plus Gold 750W
Mouse Logitech MX Anywhere 2 Laser wireless
Keyboard RAPOO E9270P Black 5GHz wireless
Software Windows 11
Benchmark Scores Cinebench R23 (Single Core) 1936 @ stock Cinebench R23 (Multi Core) 23006 @ stock
Joined
May 3, 2019
Messages
2,031 (1.01/day)
System Name BigRed
Processor I7 12700k
Motherboard Asus Rog Strix z690-A WiFi D4
Cooling Noctua D15S chromax black/MX6
Memory TEAM GROUP 32GB DDR4 4000C16 B die
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 3080 Gaming Trio X 10GB
Storage M.2 drives WD SN850X 1TB 4x4 BOOT/WD SN850X 4TB 4x4 STEAM/USB3 4TB OTHER
Display(s) Dell s3422dwg 34" 3440x1440p 144hz ultrawide
Case Corsair 7000D
Audio Device(s) Logitech Z5450/KEF uniQ speakers/Bowers and Wilkins P7 Headphones
Power Supply Corsair RM850x 80% gold
Mouse Logitech G604 lightspeed wireless
Keyboard Logitech G915 TKL lightspeed wireless
Software Windows 10 Pro X64
Benchmark Scores Who cares
Never really had a problem with windows. I just use what is available, not a chance of me running linux, too much farting about. Never had any trouble with 11, ran it since i built this rig in nov 21, with not a single BSOD(no lie) Not switching around win vers for a few more or less fps, if you have a high end rig, your game performace should be good enough anyway. Not really a great fan of all the AI crap though, if i wanted that, i'd just take a massive OD and get myself put on life support. I'll certainly take a look at 12 though and if its a bot sausage i'll just stick to 11.
 
Joined
Nov 28, 2012
Messages
421 (0.10/day)
vista was bad for losers with their pentiums and celerons...
Vista was bad on any processor, including my AMD Athlon and My Intel Core 2 Duo both with 4 GB of RAM and decent GPUs.
Vista was not only slow but also buggy and unstable, I tried to use it for a few years but it never got any better.
When I moved to windows 7 with the same hardware it was like night and day.
 
Joined
Dec 25, 2020
Messages
6,509 (4.63/day)
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
System Name "Icy Resurrection"
Processor 13th Gen Intel Core i9-13900KS Special Edition
Motherboard ASUS ROG MAXIMUS Z790 APEX ENCORE
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S upgraded with 2x NF-F12 iPPC-3000 fans and Honeywell PTM7950 TIM
Memory 32 GB G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB F5-6800J3445G16GX2-TZ5RK @ 7600 MT/s 36-44-44-52-96 1.4V
Video Card(s) ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX™ 4080 16GB GDDR6X White OC Edition
Storage 500 GB WD Black SN750 SE NVMe SSD + 4 TB WD Red Plus WD40EFPX HDD
Display(s) 55-inch LG G3 OLED
Case Pichau Mancer CV500 White Edition
Power Supply EVGA 1300 G2 1.3kW 80+ Gold
Mouse Microsoft Classic Intellimouse
Keyboard Generic PS/2
Software Windows 11 IoT Enterprise LTSC 24H2
Benchmark Scores I pulled a Qiqi~
Vista was bad on any processor, including my AMD Athlon and My Intel Core 2 Duo both with 4 GB of RAM and decent GPUs.
Vista was not only slow but also buggy and unstable, I tried to use it for a few years but it never got any better.
When I moved to windows 7 with the same hardware it was like night and day.

No, Alex is correct. It was neither buggy nor unstable by the time Service Pack 2 released, quite contrary, and it was just as snappy as 7 ever was. On adequate hardware and equipped with a SSD, it was a very enjoyable OS, and I dare say better than whatever garbage 10 or 11 Microsoft has us deal with today. I believe that it's probably where Windows peaked as an OS entirely, and if you ask my personal opinion, Windows Vista Ultimate was probably the most complete edition of Windows that Microsoft has ever shipped. Windows 7 is nothing but a reskinned and slightly stripped version of Vista, the highlight essentially being the WDDM 1.1 improvements and the fact that UAC isn't a "full security" and "no security" toggle anymore, with the middle-ground option being then chosen as the default ever since.

The problem had always lied with OEMs releasing computers that were simply not powerful enough to provide a decent experience. I recall my mom had a 2 GHz, single-core AMD Turion64 laptop that was sold as "Vista Capable" that shipped with Home Basic and 512 MB of RAM. If I recall correctly it had a Radeon Xpress chipset or something like that, and it was barely fast enough to run Aero. That's why Vista "sucks". These were the computers the largest majority of people had at the time, and these were good for Windows XP at best.

By early 2007, the fastest computers you could buy were equipped with the Core 2 Quad Q6600 and Extreme QX9700, a little later with the original AMD Phenom processor. Needless to say those processors that we fondly look as relics of the past today were insanely high end and insanely expensive beyond the means of the vast majority of people at the time.
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2020
Messages
9,340 (5.44/day)
Location
Louisiana
System Name Ghetto Rigs z490|x99|Acer 17 Nitro 7840hs/ 5600c40-2x16/ 4060/ 1tb acer stock m.2/ 4tb sn850x
Processor 10900k w/Optimus Foundation | 5930k w/Black Noctua D15
Motherboard z490 Maximus XII Apex | x99 Sabertooth
Cooling oCool D5 res-combo/280 GTX/ Optimus Foundation/ gpu water block | Blk D15
Memory Trident-Z Royal 4000c16 2x16gb | Trident-Z 3200c14 4x8gb
Video Card(s) Titan Xp-water | evga 980ti gaming-w/ air
Storage 970evo+500gb & sn850x 4tb | 860 pro 256gb | Acer m.2 1tb/ sn850x 4tb| Many2.5" sata's ssd 3.5hdd's
Display(s) 1-AOC G2460PG 24"G-Sync 144Hz/ 2nd 1-ASUS VG248QE 24"/ 3rd LG 43" series
Case D450 | Cherry Entertainment center on Test bench
Audio Device(s) Built in Realtek x2 with 2-Insignia 2.0 sound bars & 1-LG sound bar
Power Supply EVGA 1000P2 with APC AX1500 | 850P2 with CyberPower-GX1325U
Mouse Redragon 901 Perdition x3
Keyboard G710+x3
Software Win-7 pro x3 and win-10 & 11pro x3
Benchmark Scores Are in the benchmark section
Hi,
Yeah I like the word play here

Issue is deliveries not ordered can be refused or returned to shipper
This crapware is forced because in normal means can only be turned off
 
Joined
Nov 28, 2012
Messages
421 (0.10/day)
No, Alex is correct. It was neither buggy nor unstable by the time Service Pack 2 released, quite contrary, and it was just as snappy as 7 ever was. On adequate hardware and equipped with a SSD, it was a very enjoyable OS, and I dare say better than whatever garbage 10 or 11 Microsoft has us deal with today. I believe that it's probably where Windows peaked as an OS entirely, and if you ask my personal opinion, Windows Vista Ultimate was probably the most complete edition of Windows that Microsoft has ever shipped. Windows 7 is nothing but a reskinned and slightly stripped version of Vista, the highlight essentially being the WDDM 1.1 improvements and the fact that UAC isn't a "full security" and "no security" toggle anymore, with the middle-ground option being then chosen as the default ever since.

The problem had always lied with OEMs releasing computers that were simply not powerful enough to provide a decent experience. I recall my mom had a 2 GHz, single-core AMD Turion64 laptop that was sold as "Vista Capable" that shipped with Home Basic and 512 MB of RAM. If I recall correctly it had a Radeon Xpress chipset or something like that, and it was barely fast enough to run Aero. That's why Vista "sucks". These were the computers the largest majority of people had at the time, and these were good for Windows XP at best.

By early 2007, the fastest computers you could buy were equipped with the Core 2 Quad Q6600 and Extreme QX9700, a little later with the original AMD Phenom processor. Needless to say those processors that we fondly look as relics of the past today were insanely high end and insanely expensive beyond the means of the vast majority of people at the time.
Ah yes, the very common SSDs in 2007... you guys can't be serious right?
Not to mention SP2 was released over 2 years after the original Vista and only a few months before 7.
It wasn't just low end laptops and OEMs having issues with Vista.
 
Joined
Dec 25, 2020
Messages
6,509 (4.63/day)
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
System Name "Icy Resurrection"
Processor 13th Gen Intel Core i9-13900KS Special Edition
Motherboard ASUS ROG MAXIMUS Z790 APEX ENCORE
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S upgraded with 2x NF-F12 iPPC-3000 fans and Honeywell PTM7950 TIM
Memory 32 GB G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB F5-6800J3445G16GX2-TZ5RK @ 7600 MT/s 36-44-44-52-96 1.4V
Video Card(s) ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX™ 4080 16GB GDDR6X White OC Edition
Storage 500 GB WD Black SN750 SE NVMe SSD + 4 TB WD Red Plus WD40EFPX HDD
Display(s) 55-inch LG G3 OLED
Case Pichau Mancer CV500 White Edition
Power Supply EVGA 1300 G2 1.3kW 80+ Gold
Mouse Microsoft Classic Intellimouse
Keyboard Generic PS/2
Software Windows 11 IoT Enterprise LTSC 24H2
Benchmark Scores I pulled a Qiqi~
Ah yes, the very common SSDs in 2007... you guys can't be serious right?
Not to mention SP2 was released over 2 years after the original Vista and only a few months before 7.
It wasn't just low end laptops and OEMs having issues with Vista.

Not in 2007, but by 2008 and the time SP2 released, they were beginning to become a thing in higher-end builds. It just proves my point, Vista was released at a point in time where the market just wasn't ready for it. Vista ran well if you had about the most powerful hardware available at the time. But on an average computer? Good luck. That was its only dealbreaker problem. I have a feeling you wouldn't pass the Mojave experiment if it was applied to you even today.

 
Joined
Nov 28, 2012
Messages
421 (0.10/day)
Not in 2007, but by 2008 and the time SP2 released, they were beginning to become a thing in higher-end builds. It just proves my point, Vista was released at a point in time where the market just wasn't ready for it. Vista ran well if you had about the most powerful hardware available at the time. But on an average computer? Good luck. That was its only dealbreaker problem. I have a feeling you wouldn't pass the Mojave experiment if it was applied to you even today.

Vista was released at a point in time when Vista wasn't ready. The bad reputation was earned in part by the higher requirements but also by the bloat and bugs that they had to fix over the years, no matter how much microsoft moans about their unfair treatment.
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2020
Messages
938 (0.63/day)
System Name ASUS TUF F15
Processor Intel Core i7-11800H
Motherboard ASUS FX506HC
Cooling Laptop built-in cooling lol
Memory 24 GB @ 3200
Video Card(s) Intel UHD & Nvidia RTX 3050 Mobile
Storage Adata XPG SX8200 Pro 512 GB
Display(s) Laptop built-in 144 Hz FHD screen
Audio Device(s) LOGITECH 2.1-channel
Power Supply ASUS 180W PSU
Mouse Logitech G604
Keyboard SteelSeries Apex 7 TKL
Software Windows 10 Enterprise 21H2 LTSC
No, Alex is correct. It was neither buggy nor unstable by the time Service Pack 2 released, quite contrary, and it was just as snappy as 7 ever was. On adequate hardware and equipped with a SSD, it was a very enjoyable OS, and I dare say better than whatever garbage 10 or 11 Microsoft has us deal with today. I believe that it's probably where Windows peaked as an OS entirely, and if you ask my personal opinion, Windows Vista Ultimate was probably the most complete edition of Windows that Microsoft has ever shipped. Windows 7 is nothing but a reskinned and slightly stripped version of Vista, the highlight essentially being the WDDM 1.1 improvements and the fact that UAC isn't a "full security" and "no security" toggle anymore, with the middle-ground option being then chosen as the default ever since.

The problem had always lied with OEMs releasing computers that were simply not powerful enough to provide a decent experience. I recall my mom had a 2 GHz, single-core AMD Turion64 laptop that was sold as "Vista Capable" that shipped with Home Basic and 512 MB of RAM. If I recall correctly it had a Radeon Xpress chipset or something like that, and it was barely fast enough to run Aero. That's why Vista "sucks". These were the computers the largest majority of people had at the time, and these were good for Windows XP at best.

By early 2007, the fastest computers you could buy were equipped with the Core 2 Quad Q6600 and Extreme QX9700, a little later with the original AMD Phenom processor. Needless to say those processors that we fondly look as relics of the past today were insanely high end and insanely expensive beyond the means of the vast majority of people at the time.
in Vista times I bought Dell Vostro 500 laptop with Celeron 430 and 1 GB RAM. I slapped in Core2Duo T8100, 2x2GB RAM and SSD. Vista "flied" like ya new Ryzens with Win 11 nowadays...:D
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2020
Messages
9,340 (5.44/day)
Location
Louisiana
System Name Ghetto Rigs z490|x99|Acer 17 Nitro 7840hs/ 5600c40-2x16/ 4060/ 1tb acer stock m.2/ 4tb sn850x
Processor 10900k w/Optimus Foundation | 5930k w/Black Noctua D15
Motherboard z490 Maximus XII Apex | x99 Sabertooth
Cooling oCool D5 res-combo/280 GTX/ Optimus Foundation/ gpu water block | Blk D15
Memory Trident-Z Royal 4000c16 2x16gb | Trident-Z 3200c14 4x8gb
Video Card(s) Titan Xp-water | evga 980ti gaming-w/ air
Storage 970evo+500gb & sn850x 4tb | 860 pro 256gb | Acer m.2 1tb/ sn850x 4tb| Many2.5" sata's ssd 3.5hdd's
Display(s) 1-AOC G2460PG 24"G-Sync 144Hz/ 2nd 1-ASUS VG248QE 24"/ 3rd LG 43" series
Case D450 | Cherry Entertainment center on Test bench
Audio Device(s) Built in Realtek x2 with 2-Insignia 2.0 sound bars & 1-LG sound bar
Power Supply EVGA 1000P2 with APC AX1500 | 850P2 with CyberPower-GX1325U
Mouse Redragon 901 Perdition x3
Keyboard G710+x3
Software Win-7 pro x3 and win-10 & 11pro x3
Benchmark Scores Are in the benchmark section
Vista was bad on any processor, including my AMD Athlon and My Intel Core 2 Duo both with 4 GB of RAM and decent GPUs.
Vista was not only slow but also buggy and unstable, I tried to use it for a few years but it never got any better.
When I moved to windows 7 with the same hardware it was like night and day.
Hi,
I had vista for like 45 days before I got two free upgrades from the oem's I bought the machines from
Core2duo laptop with 3gb and 32bit
Core2quad mini desktop with 4gb and 64 bit

Both were just fine on either vista or win-7
Worst I noticed on win-7 is libraries bs but vista I thought was just a polished x-p.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
7,473 (1.77/day)
I slapped in Core2Duo T8100, 2x2GB RAM and SSD.
SSD's weren't even close to being affordable till at least half a decade later. I get the point that Vista wasn't as bad as it's made out to be but the part about having/needing SSD is BS as well ~ they only started getting mildly affordable around 2012-14 at best & anyone asking you to buy "enthusiast" level tech to make your system better(?) has just lost it!
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 20, 2020
Messages
9,340 (5.44/day)
Location
Louisiana
System Name Ghetto Rigs z490|x99|Acer 17 Nitro 7840hs/ 5600c40-2x16/ 4060/ 1tb acer stock m.2/ 4tb sn850x
Processor 10900k w/Optimus Foundation | 5930k w/Black Noctua D15
Motherboard z490 Maximus XII Apex | x99 Sabertooth
Cooling oCool D5 res-combo/280 GTX/ Optimus Foundation/ gpu water block | Blk D15
Memory Trident-Z Royal 4000c16 2x16gb | Trident-Z 3200c14 4x8gb
Video Card(s) Titan Xp-water | evga 980ti gaming-w/ air
Storage 970evo+500gb & sn850x 4tb | 860 pro 256gb | Acer m.2 1tb/ sn850x 4tb| Many2.5" sata's ssd 3.5hdd's
Display(s) 1-AOC G2460PG 24"G-Sync 144Hz/ 2nd 1-ASUS VG248QE 24"/ 3rd LG 43" series
Case D450 | Cherry Entertainment center on Test bench
Audio Device(s) Built in Realtek x2 with 2-Insignia 2.0 sound bars & 1-LG sound bar
Power Supply EVGA 1000P2 with APC AX1500 | 850P2 with CyberPower-GX1325U
Mouse Redragon 901 Perdition x3
Keyboard G710+x3
Software Win-7 pro x3 and win-10 & 11pro x3
Benchmark Scores Are in the benchmark section
Hi,
First couple 2.5" sata ssd's I got for win-7 were crucial mx100 128gb and they were nearly 100.us a pop lol
Both still work to this day and last I looked were still at 98% life in my core2duo laptop from 2009 hehe
One I put a winpe recovery media on it to use it instead of a slow flash drive :laugh:
 
Joined
Nov 28, 2012
Messages
421 (0.10/day)
Hi,
First couple 2.5" sata ssd's I got for win-7 were crucial mx100 128gb and they were nearly 100.us a pop lol
Both still work to this day and last I looked were still at 98% life in my core2duo laptop from 2009 hehe
One I put a winpe recovery media on it to use it instead of a slow flash drive :laugh:
wasn't the MX100 released in 2014 or something?
In 2008 you would have payed something like 500$ for 32 GB.
 
Top