• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

ASML High-NA EUV Twinscan EXE Machines Cost $380 Million, 10-20 Units Already Booked

AleksandarK

News Editor
Staff member
Joined
Aug 19, 2017
Messages
2,606 (0.98/day)
ASML has revealed that its cutting-edge High-NA extreme ultraviolet (EUV) chipmaking tools, called High-NA Twinscan EXE, will cost around $380 million each—over twice as much as its existing Low-NA EUV lithography systems that cost about $183 million. The company has taken 10-20 initial orders from the likes of Intel and SK Hynix and plans to manufacture 20 High-NA systems annually by 2028 to meet demand. The High-NA EUV technology represents a major breakthrough, enabling an improved 8 nm imprint resolution compared to 13 nm with current Low-NA EUV tools. This allows chipmakers to produce transistors that are nearly 1.7 times smaller, translating to a threefold increase in transistor density on chips. Attaining this level of precision is critical for manufacturing sub-3 nm chips, an industry goal for 2025-2026. It also eliminates the need for complex double patterning techniques required presently.

However, superior performance comes at a cost - literally and figuratively. The hefty $380 million price tag for each High-NA system introduces financial challenges for chipmakers. Additionally, the larger High-NA tools require completely reconfiguring chip fabrication facilities. Their halved imaging field also necessitates rethinking chip designs. As a result, adoption timelines differ across companies - Intel intends to deploy High-NA EUV at an advanced 1.8 nm (18A) node, while TSMC is taking a more conservative approach, potentially implementing it only in 2030 and not rushing the use of these lithography machines, as the company's nodes are already developing well and on time. Interestingly, the installation process of ASML's High-NA Twinscan EXE 150,000-kilogram system required 250 crates, 250 engineers, and six months to complete. So, production is as equally complex as the installation and operation of this delicate machinery.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site | Source
 
Joined
Jul 21, 2016
Messages
101 (0.03/day)
Damn, we went from 193nm lasers to 13nm and now to 8nm

These are going to be some very clean cuts

Should we expect 7GHz?
 
Joined
Jul 15, 2020
Messages
1,021 (0.64/day)
System Name Dirt Sheep | Silent Sheep
Processor i5-2400 | 13900K (-0.02mV offset)
Motherboard Asus P8H67-M LE | Gigabyte AERO Z690-G, bios F29e Intel baseline
Cooling Scythe Katana Type 1 | Noctua NH-U12A chromax.black
Memory G-skill 2*8GB DDR3 | Corsair Vengeance 4*32GB DDR5 5200Mhz C40 @4000MHz
Video Card(s) Gigabyte 970GTX Mini | NV 1080TI FE (cap at 50%, 800mV)
Storage 2*SN850 1TB, 230S 4TB, 840EVO 128GB, WD green 2TB HDD, IronWolf 6TB, 2*HC550 18TB in RAID1
Display(s) LG 21` FHD W2261VP | Lenovo 27` 4K Qreator 27
Case Thermaltake V3 Black|Define 7 Solid, stock 3*14 fans+ 2*12 front&buttom+ out 1*8 (on expansion slot)
Audio Device(s) Beyerdynamic DT 990 (or the screen speakers when I'm too lazy)
Power Supply Enermax Pro82+ 525W | Corsair RM650x (2021)
Mouse Logitech Master 3
Keyboard Roccat Isku FX
VR HMD Nop.
Software WIN 10 | WIN 11
Benchmark Scores CB23 SC: i5-2400=641 | i9-13900k=2325-2281 MC: i5-2400=i9 13900k SC | i9-13900k=37240-35500
Is this some kind of a record for a single civilian product?
 

AleksandarK

News Editor
Staff member
Joined
Aug 19, 2017
Messages
2,606 (0.98/day)
There are others. Nikon and Canon both produced similar equipment pre-EUV. But, yeah, ASML is alone in the EUV realm because, according to Wikipedia, Nikon and Canon were both denied the licence to the basic research on EUV.
Canon also wants a piece of the pie, but using a bit different approach. Hopefully someone picks up on it.
 
Joined
Jan 13, 2011
Messages
221 (0.04/day)
There are others. Nikon and Canon both produced similar equipment pre-EUV. But, yeah, ASML is alone in the EUV realm because, according to Wikipedia, Nikon and Canon were both denied the licence to the basic research on EUV.
Irrc
The US heavily invested into EUV and blocked Japanese companies out of all the government money and research. US was the world leader in lithography machines until Japanese lithography machines started winning outright. Japan leaned to proximity x-ray for the next big process. Japan later pivoted to EUV but it was too little too late. ASML benefited from this being allowed to participate in the EUV LLC and eventually buy SVG, buying their way into the US's research and dying lithography industry. ASML did pull off being able to completely commercialize it but they benefited from being able to dip into US and EU money. This is also why the US retains some control on ASML's EUV machines.
 
Joined
Feb 11, 2020
Messages
250 (0.14/day)
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 26, 2021
Messages
1,653 (1.50/day)
Location
Mississauga, Canada
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Motherboard ASUS TUF Gaming X570-PRO (WiFi 6)
Cooling Noctua NH-C14S (two fans)
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3200
Video Card(s) Reference Vega 64
Storage Intel 665p 1TB, WD Black SN850X 2TB, Crucial MX300 1TB SATA, Samsung 830 256 GB SATA
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG27, and Samsung S23A700
Case Fractal Design R5
Power Supply Seasonic PRIME TITANIUM 850W
Mouse Logitech
VR HMD Oculus Rift
Software Windows 11 Pro, and Ubuntu 20.04
I don't think I'd call it heavily invested when there is no US companies building such machines. And doesn't look like there has been for a long time - https://www.nytimes.com/1993/06/06/...on-a-chip-making-tool-but-does-it-matter.html

Huh, and looks like SVG was a late comer and maybe never really built much anyway - https://www.nytimes.com/1990/02/13/business/low-tech-company-in-high-tech-gamble.html
The foundational research for EUV was done in the USA and the USA blocked Nikon and Canon from joining that effort. For a long time, the Japanese were the leaders in lithography.
 
Joined
Feb 11, 2020
Messages
250 (0.14/day)
The foundational research for EUV was done in the USA and the USA blocked Nikon and Canon from joining that effort. For a long time, the Japanese were the leaders in lithography.
That doesn't make it "heavily invested" though.

EDIT: Hehe, reading that EE Times article suggests the agreed commitments weren't upheld in the end. AFAIK, the production of equipment and primary components are all EU based. Certainly the equipment hasn't been assembled in USA like promised.
 
Last edited:
Top