- Joined
- Oct 9, 2007
- Messages
- 47,297 (7.53/day)
- Location
- Hyderabad, India
System Name | RBMK-1000 |
---|---|
Processor | AMD Ryzen 7 5700G |
Motherboard | ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming |
Cooling | DeepCool Gammax L240 V2 |
Memory | 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X |
Video Card(s) | Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock |
Storage | Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB |
Display(s) | BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch |
Case | Corsair Carbide 100R |
Audio Device(s) | ASUS SupremeFX S1220A |
Power Supply | Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W |
Mouse | ASUS ROG Strix Impact |
Keyboard | Gamdias Hermes E2 |
Software | Windows 11 Pro |
In case you missed it, Sam Altman of OpenAI took the Internet by storm late last week with the unveiling of Sora, the generative AI that can congure up photoreal video clips based on prompts, with deadly accuracy. While Altman and his colleagues in the generative AI industry had a ton of fun generating videos based on prompts from the public on X; it became all too clear that the only thing holding back the democratization of generative AI is the volume of AI accelerator chips. Altman wants to solve this by designing his own AI acceleration hardware from the grounds up, for which he initially pitched an otherworldly $7 trillion in investment—something impossible with the financial markets, but one that's possible only by "printing money," or through sovereign wealth fund investments.
Jim Keller needs no introduction—the celebrity VLSI architect has been designing number crunching devices of all shapes and sizes for some of the biggest tech companies out there for decades, including Intel, Apple, and AMD, just to name a few. When as part of his "are you not entertained?" victory lap, Altman suggested that his vision for the future needs an even larger $8 trillion investment, Keller responded that he could design an AI chip for less than $1 trillion. Does Altman really need several trillions of Dollars to build a grounds-up AI chip at the costs and volumes needed to mainstream AI?
Altman's AI accelerator would need to be purpose built for his applications in order to beat the incumbent market leader NVIDIA at cost/performance, have all the necessary IP blocks in place to pull it off, and more importantly, ship at volumes high enough to realize the scale of what Altman wants to do. This would inevitably require some acquisitions, and the biggest of which would need to be a cutting-edge chip foundry company. It may not take trillions of Dollars to design an AI chip, but to have control over its production. This could require acquisition of an existing foundry company capable of the latest upcoming foundry nodes.
View at TechPowerUp Main Site | Source
Jim Keller needs no introduction—the celebrity VLSI architect has been designing number crunching devices of all shapes and sizes for some of the biggest tech companies out there for decades, including Intel, Apple, and AMD, just to name a few. When as part of his "are you not entertained?" victory lap, Altman suggested that his vision for the future needs an even larger $8 trillion investment, Keller responded that he could design an AI chip for less than $1 trillion. Does Altman really need several trillions of Dollars to build a grounds-up AI chip at the costs and volumes needed to mainstream AI?
Altman's AI accelerator would need to be purpose built for his applications in order to beat the incumbent market leader NVIDIA at cost/performance, have all the necessary IP blocks in place to pull it off, and more importantly, ship at volumes high enough to realize the scale of what Altman wants to do. This would inevitably require some acquisitions, and the biggest of which would need to be a cutting-edge chip foundry company. It may not take trillions of Dollars to design an AI chip, but to have control over its production. This could require acquisition of an existing foundry company capable of the latest upcoming foundry nodes.
View at TechPowerUp Main Site | Source