• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel 14A Node Delivers 15% Improvement over 18A, A14-E Adds Another 5%

AleksandarK

News Editor
Staff member
Joined
Aug 19, 2017
Messages
2,651 (0.99/day)
Intel is revamping its foundry play, and the company is set on its goals of becoming a strong contender to rivals such as TSMC and Samsung. Under Pat Gelsinger's lead, Intel recently split (virtually, under the same company) its units into Intel Product and Intel Foundry. During the SPIE 2024 conference for optics and photonics, Anne Kelleher, Intel's senior vice president, revealed that the 14A (1.4 nm) process offers a 15% performance-per-watt improvement over the company's 18A (1.8 nanometers) process. Additionally, the enhanced 14A-E process boasts a further 5% performance boost from the regular A14 node, being a small refresh. Intel's 14A process is set to be the first to utilize High-NA extreme ultraviolet (EUV) equipment, delivering a 20% increase in transistor logic density compared to the 18A node.

The company's aggressive pursuit of next-generation processes poses a significant threat to Samsung Electronics, which currently holds the second position in the foundry market. As part of its IDM 2.0 strategy, Intel hopes to reclaim its position as a leading foundry player and surpass Samsung by 2030. The company's collaboration with American companies, such as Microsoft, further solidifies its ambitions. Intel has already secured a $15 billion chip production contract with Microsoft for its 1.8 nm 18A process. The semiconductor industry is closely monitoring Intel's progress, as the company's advancements in process technology could potentially reshape the competitive landscape. With Samsung planning to mass-produce 2 nm process products next year, the race for dominance in the foundry market is heating up.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site | Source
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
3,391 (0.82/day)
Location
Athens, Greece
System Name 3 desktop systems: Gaming / Internet / HTPC
Processor Ryzen 5 7600 / Ryzen 5 4600G / Ryzen 5 5500
Motherboard X670E Gaming Plus WiFi / MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (1) / MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (2)
Cooling Aigo ICE 400SE / Segotep T4 / Νoctua U12S
Memory Kingston FURY Beast 32GB DDR5 6000 / 16GB JUHOR / 32GB G.Skill RIPJAWS 3600 + Aegis 3200
Video Card(s) ASRock RX 6600 + GT 710 (PhysX) / Vega 7 integrated / Radeon RX 580
Storage NVMes, ONLY NVMes / NVMes, SATA Storage / NVMe, SATA, external storage
Display(s) Philips 43PUS8857/12 UHD TV (120Hz, HDR, FreeSync Premium) / 19'' HP monitor + BlitzWolf BW-V5
Case Sharkoon Rebel 12 / CoolerMaster Elite 361 / Xigmatek Midguard
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Chieftec 850W / Silver Power 400W / Sharkoon 650W
Mouse CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / CoolerMaster Devastator / Logitech
Keyboard CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / CoolerMaster Devastator / Logitech
Software Windows 10 / Windows 10&Windows 11 / Windows 10
A node that is not yet a reality is offering 15% improvements over a node that is not yet a reality.
 
Joined
Dec 29, 2010
Messages
3,809 (0.75/day)
Processor AMD 5900x
Motherboard Asus x570 Strix-E
Cooling Hardware Labs
Memory G.Skill 4000c17 2x16gb
Video Card(s) RTX 3090
Storage Sabrent
Display(s) Samsung G9
Case Phanteks 719
Audio Device(s) Fiio K5 Pro
Power Supply EVGA 1000 P2
Mouse Logitech G600
Keyboard Corsair K95
This shit about how great you're gonna be I swear it crap has got to stop being news. We get this crap in every industry, fake it till you make it BS.
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2020
Messages
1,000 (0.69/day)
Processor E5-4627 v4
Motherboard VEINEDA X99
Memory 32 GB
Video Card(s) 2080 Ti
Storage NE-512
Display(s) G27Q
Case DAOTECH X9
Power Supply SF450
5 nodes in 4 years. How it really is
10(7) has existed since 2018 now in latest plus(4) iterations 7 by now 6 years under the belt
7(4,3) is where 10(7) was in 2019 just starting
5(20A) remains to be seen and better be monolithic for desktop. server and mobil make as many chicklets as you want. I don't care, but don't you dare mess with desktop. 18/14/10 exist only in the labs. And surely beyond our wildest dreams and pay grade.
 
Joined
Nov 11, 2020
Messages
460 (0.31/day)
Location
Earth, Solar System, Milky Way Galaxy, Local Group
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
Motherboard Asus TUF Gaming B550M-Plus (Wi-Fi)
Cooling Thermalright PA120 SE; Arctic P12, F12
Memory Crucial BL8G32C16U4W.M8FE1 ×2
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ RX 6600 XT
Storage Kingston SKC3000D/2048G; Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-000L2; Seagate ST1000DM010-2EP102
Display(s) AOC 24G2W1G4
Case Sama MiCube
Audio Device(s) Somic G923
Power Supply EVGA 650 GD
Mouse Logitech G102
Keyboard Logitech K845 TTC Brown
Software Windows 10 Pro 1903, Dism++, CCleaner
Benchmark Scores CPU-Z 17.01.64: 3700X @ 4.6 GHz 1.3375 V scoring 557/6206; 760K @ 5 GHz 1.5 V scoring 292/964
A node that is not yet a reality is offering 15% improvements over a node that is not yet a reality.
Exactly. Intel have been creating this hype for quite some time now.
Question is for what? like attracting funds?
 
Joined
Apr 26, 2023
Messages
129 (0.21/day)
5 nodes in 4 years. How it really is
10(7) has existed since 2018 now in latest plus(4) iterations 7 by now 6 years under the belt
7(4,3) is where 10(7) was in 2019 just starting
5(20A) remains to be seen and better be monolithic for desktop. server and mobil make as many chicklets as you want. I don't care, but don't you dare mess with desktop. 18/14/10 exist only in the labs. And surely beyond our wildest dreams and pay grade.
I think 18A is just tweaked 20A both previously knew as 5nm, like 3 is tweaked 4, or rather 4 is beta version of 3 and 20A is beta version of 18A.
They realised, they went too far with new naming, so next generation will be 14A and 14A-E previously knew as 3nm.
On the other hand I think they invested more money in development of 20A/18A so it will come to the market quicker than 10/7 and 4/3. So probably in 2027 they will have good yields and performance 18A comparable to TSMC N3.
 
Joined
Nov 8, 2017
Messages
229 (0.09/day)
A node that is not yet a reality is offering 15% improvements over a node that is not yet a reality.
I mean, Lunar Lake is using 18A. And it seems that there are already a few lunar lake prototypes in the wild (I would hope so for a 2024 release :D) . TSMC was already talking about a 15% improvement for their 2nm in 2022, before 3nm was available on commercial products
An Intel Lunar Lake prototype pops up in the SiSoft Sandra database, throws down an early gauntlet, and leaves in a cloud of mystery | PC Gamer

If it turns out that this allegedly 18A wafer was a fake, (meaning a canceled/delayed by one-year Lunar Lake) I will rename myself Pat The clown :D
1710186705932.png
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 7, 2020
Messages
145 (0.09/day)
14A is such a bad name, looks like an iteration of 14++++
Since it's just a name, 15A would have been so much better, since it has a 15% improvement, just like the good old kabylake times, with its 15% improvement over skylake.
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2020
Messages
1,000 (0.69/day)
Processor E5-4627 v4
Motherboard VEINEDA X99
Memory 32 GB
Video Card(s) 2080 Ti
Storage NE-512
Display(s) G27Q
Case DAOTECH X9
Power Supply SF450
14A is such a bad name, looks like an iteration of 14++++
Since it's just a name, 15A would have been so much better, since it has a 15% improvement, just like the good old kabylake times, with its 15% improvement over skylake.
It seems but there is 10A and 7A shortly after. And 15-20% density each step until it's the end subatomic level. Sram Cell is stuck at 0.0199 mum2 anyway so no more caches only brute force clock speed.

I'm thinking 18A is 7Ghz capable and 14A 8 GHz all core boost at iso power.
 
Joined
Dec 17, 2020
Messages
140 (0.10/day)
It seems but there is 10A and 7A shortly after. And 15-20% density each step until it's the end subatomic level. Sram Cell is stuck at 0.0199 mum2 anyway so no more caches only brute force clock speed.

I'm thinking 18A is 7Ghz capable and 14A 8 GHz all core boost at iso power.
To cool it you will need something like this:
 
Joined
May 3, 2018
Messages
2,881 (1.19/day)
Well we need more competition for TSMC and Scamsung has been a major let down as usual. I hope for one things turn out well for Intel's fabs.
 
Top