• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

First NVIDIA RTX 5090 Performance View? Micron Knows Better

I'm starting to feel sorry for you people who can't grasp the obvious, it doesn't matter that they don't specify which GPUs they're using (Although, even a child would notice that they're respectively XTX, 4090 and 5090, given the known difference between the first two). What matters is that they are different GPUs, and the fact that they point to GPU performance as shady marketing for their GDDR technology, because they certainly aren't using the same GPU to isolate the difference the technology is supposed to bring.

Micron is already being destroyed by multiple lawsuits, if you don't know. I wouldn't be surprised if someone shoved another one up their backsides.
Says the guy that doesn't understand these are ballpark figures.
This is GDDR, you will never see several generations paired with the same GPU so that you can judge the actual difference. Didn't happen till now, won't happen in the future.
 
Says the guy that doesn't understand these are ballpark figures.
This is GDDR, you will never see several generations paired with the same GPU so that you can judge the actual difference. Didn't happen till now, won't happen in the future.
You're just talking more irrelevance, they're doing dirty marketing. They shouldn't even be citing GPU performance as a banner for their evolution in memory technologies. Especially the RT benchmark, this kind of marketing is embarrassing.

I'm going to be polite and assume that you don't want to understand the obvious, not that this is a serious cognitive limitation.
 
You're just talking more irrelevance, they're doing dirty marketing. They shouldn't even be citing GPU performance as a banner for their evolution in memory technologies. Especially the RT benchmark, this kind of marketing is embarrassing.

I'm going to be polite and assume that you don't want to understand the obvious, not that this is a serious cognitive limitation.
Seriously, what do you want them to cite? If you're not doing electrical engineering, the important parameters about RAM are bandwidth and latency. If they stuck to those, you'd be crying "sure, they boast about raw bandwidth increase, but what about real world performance".

It's just a marketing presentation plus TPU's speculation. You just look like a fool when you keep posting that it shouldn't be taken at face value.
 
All of this discussion is kinda pointless since AMD will not offer any competition and the 5090 will be min. $2999 and only 0.01% of gamers will afford it.

Would like to see the estimates on the 5080/5070 though.
 
All of this discussion is kinda pointless since AMD will not offer any competition and the 5090 will be min. $2999 and only 0.01% of gamers will afford it.

Would like to see the estimates on the 5080/5070 though.
According to micron all AMD needs to compete is update the MCDs to gddr7 and triple the performance of RDNA3
 
American company listed on the stock exchange. 100% sure that it is subject to legal action, I've seen lawsuits filed for much less. What is your argument? Saying that lying to the market is a legal practice?

If you knew what you’re talking about you’d know you’d have to have standing to file a suit. In this case, you’d have to show the specific damages the (alleged) misrepresentation caused you. And it has to be actual money you lost, not some theoretical thing like “loss of confidence” or “emotional stress”.
 
If you knew what you’re talking about you’d know you’d have to have standing to file a suit. In this case, you’d have to show the specific damages the (alleged) misrepresentation caused you. And it has to be actual money you lost, not some theoretical thing like “loss of confidence” or “emotional stress”.
That's easy. Have you seen the lawsuits that are successfully filed in the US?

"A company led by children presented these impressive benchmarks showing a revolutionary advance in RT, linking them to its memory technology, and I, as a layman, was urged to invest 90% of my money, because I thought they had an edge over the competition. Subsequent years have shown that the company's technology is the same as the rest, and the parallel made was fictitious. Micron shrank to 1/3 of its value over the period."
 
Did I miss any pics? Nowhere in the picture is any kind of GPU mentioned. What's the point of this article other than make pointles assumptions.
 
You just look like a fool when you keep posting that it shouldn't be taken at face value.
Bigtime, and yet the stubbornness and unwillingness to relent on it at all are an even worse trait.
If you knew what you’re talking about you’d know you’d have to have standing to file a suit.
Bingo.
 
wow, TY, Captain Obvious
I can tell you more, GDDR8 will be more faster, so, as some say: "let's not buy this gen, just wait forever for every newer gen hardware":roll:
 
Finished testing a RTX 5090 in its best case environment.. It has a max OC of 600w (only 25w extra or 4.3%) and having much smaller heatsink and fan after doing a couple Speedway runs heatsoak occurred faster and took longer to cooldown. Also, the rest of the components with the extra 200w of heat in the case made the DDR5 XMP profile become unstable.

When comparing with a Asus RTX 4090 TUF Gaming OC card has an actual default boost of 2790mhz core which had a quick OC to 3000-3060mhz core and +1100mem for the last 1.5 years. Or 22% faster than typical min 4090 box speed.

When doing Speedway, it got to 13k and eventually 13.5k at max OC and running it on an open desk with sub zero degree frost free air blasting on the card.

With a grand improvement of 8% ... Leather Jacket Man might be incorrect with the statement of a RTX 5070 12gb 192bit bus being equal to a 384bit 24gb RTX 4090 .......even with GDDR7 vs
 
Back
Top