• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

SK hynix's Partner Company Mimir IP Sues Micron

Nomad76

News Editor
Staff member
Joined
May 21, 2024
Messages
199 (3.75/day)
Mimir IP, a South Korean patent management company, bought around 1,500 chip-related patents from SK hynix in May. They have now filed a lawsuit against the U.S. memory company Micron, accusing it of using these patents without permission, TrendForce reported. If Mimir wins, they could get up to USD 480 million in damages. The lawsuit, filed on June 3, also targets Tesla, Dell, HP, and Lenovo for using Micron's products. The patents in question are related to circuits, voltage measurement devices, and non-volatile memory devices.

The case is being heard in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas and the US International Trade Commission. This is the first time a South Korean company that acquired patents from domestic chipmakers has filed a lawsuit against a US semiconductor company. Officials from the involved companies have not commented. Micron, Samsung, and SK hynix have been changing how they deal with their patents recently, so this is not really a surprise move. In March 2023, Micron transferred over 400 chip-related patents to Lodestar Licensing Group. In June 2023, Samsung transferred 96 US chip patents, including the right to file patent infringement complaints, to IKT, an affiliate of Samsung Display.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site | Source
 
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
13,566 (3.82/day)
Location
Sunshine Coast
System Name Lenovo ThinkCentre
Processor AMD 5650GE
Motherboard Lenovo
Memory 32 GB DDR4
Display(s) AOC 24" Freesync 1m.s. 75Hz
Mouse Lenovo
Keyboard Lenovo
Software W11 Pro 64 bit
Classic patent trolling.
 
Joined
Oct 18, 2013
Messages
5,786 (1.48/day)
Location
In the abyss, where all I can see is...nuthin !
System Name The Little One
Processor i5-11320H @4.4GHZ
Motherboard AZW SEI
Cooling Fan w/heat pipes + side & rear vents
Memory 64GB Crucial DDR4-3200 (2x 32GB)
Video Card(s) Iris XE
Storage WD Black SN850X 4TB m.2, Seagate 2TB SSD + SN850 4TB x2 in an external enclosure
Display(s) 2x Samsung 43" & 2x 32"
Case Practically identical to a mac mini, just purrtier in slate blue, & with 3x usb ports on the front !
Audio Device(s) Yamaha ATS-1060 Bluetooth Soundbar & Subwoofer
Power Supply 65w brick
Mouse Logitech MX Master 2
Keyboard Logitech G613 mechanical wireless
Software Windows 10 pro 64 bit, with all the unnecessary background shitzu turned OFF !
Benchmark Scores PDQ
If Mimir wins, they could get up to USD 480 million in damages
But what happens if they LOSE ?

I know.... the lawyers clean up (will happen either way) and we get jacked up prices, to cover all the legal expenses :(

#patentrollsmustdie#
 
Joined
Jan 11, 2022
Messages
600 (0.66/day)
IP law needs to change, a patents something, b uses it or something similar without issues c buys paper from a and suddenly b is in trouble.
 
Joined
Jun 6, 2020
Messages
67 (0.04/day)
The lawsuit, filed on June 3, also targets Tesla, Dell, HP, and Lenovo for using Micron's products.

How can a lawsuit target end users of products, that "might" infringe their patents? Going after Micron, sure, but the users of those products seems like a wild goose chase. This one thing makes the whole issue seem like a money grab and not actually about the issue of patent infringement.
 

Nomad76

News Editor
Staff member
Joined
May 21, 2024
Messages
199 (3.75/day)
How can a lawsuit target end users of products, that "might" infringe their patents? Going after Micron, sure, but the users of those products seems like a wild goose chase. This one thing makes the whole issue seem like a money grab and not actually about the issue of patent infringement.
There are many reasons they are called "patent trolls", you found one
 
Joined
Jun 18, 2021
Messages
2,414 (2.16/day)
How can a lawsuit target end users of products, that "might" infringe their patents? Going after Micron, sure, but the users of those products seems like a wild goose chase. This one thing makes the whole issue seem like a money grab and not actually about the issue of patent infringement.

They're probably after a settlement, it might be cheaper for these companies to pay them a few bucks than to pay the lawyers to defend this in court. It's a sad reality
 
Top