• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Statement on 13th and 14th Gen Core Instability: Faulty Microcode Causes Excessive Voltages, Fix Out Soon

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,718 (3.97/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
Joined
May 22, 2024
Messages
408 (2.43/day)
System Name Kuro
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D@65W
Motherboard MSI MAG B650 Tomahawk WiFi
Cooling Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 EVO
Memory Corsair DDR5 6000C30 2x48GB (Hynix M)@6000 30-36-36-76 1.36V
Video Card(s) PNY XLR8 RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 16G@200W
Storage Crucial T500 2TB + WD Blue 8TB
Case Lian Li LANCOOL 216
Power Supply MSI MPG A850G
Software Ubuntu 24.04 LTS + Windows 10 Home Build 19045
Benchmark Scores 17761 C23 Multi@65W
Nvidia Bumpgate ~2008. Permanently ruined their relationship with Apple. Nvidia blamed TSMC for it.
Was that the faulty GeForce 8-series GPU? I thought that one was faulty packaging. But yes, it's close.
 

j_N_k

New Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2024
Messages
1 (0.01/day)
So amd overvolted their 3d chips in order to compete turning them into handgrenades and then Intel overvolted theirs resulting in crashes. Lovely market, competition is great

It was not amd who overvolted the cpus but the motherboard manufacturers with their bioses.

X3D cpus are voltage limited so overvolting them serve no purpose, especially if they are already winning.
 
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
1,888 (0.46/day)
Was that the faulty GeForce 8-series GPU? I thought that one was faulty packaging. But yes, it's close.
The Nvidia Bumpgate controversy refers to a significant issue that emerged around 2008 involving defective Nvidia graphics processing units (GPUs). These defects were primarily associated with the materials and manufacturing processes used in the GPUs, leading to widespread failures in laptops and other devices. Here are the key aspects of the controversy:

### 1. **Defective GPUs**
The problem was linked to a specific packaging material used in the GPUs. The solder bumps, which connect the GPU die to the package substrate, were prone to cracking under heat and stress. This was exacerbated by thermal cycling (repeated heating and cooling) which is common in laptop usage.

### 2. **Affected Devices**
The defective GPUs were used in a range of laptops from major manufacturers, including Dell, HP, Apple, and others. Users began reporting issues such as graphical artifacts, system crashes, and complete device failures.

### 3. **Nvidia’s Response**
Initially, Nvidia was slow to acknowledge the extent of the problem. However, as the issue became more widespread, Nvidia took some responsibility and set aside a substantial sum of money (around $200 million) to cover warranty claims and repairs.

### 4. **Legal and Financial Repercussions**
The controversy led to several class-action lawsuits against Nvidia and the affected laptop manufacturers. These lawsuits alleged that both Nvidia and the manufacturers knew about the defects but continued to sell the affected products without adequately informing consumers.

### 5. **Settlement and Compensation**
Eventually, Nvidia and the manufacturers reached settlements with affected consumers. These settlements typically involved extending warranties, offering free repairs, and in some cases, providing replacement devices.

### 6. **Impact on Reputation**
The Bumpgate controversy significantly impacted Nvidia's reputation. It highlighted the challenges of maintaining quality control in complex semiconductor manufacturing processes and underscored the importance of transparent communication with consumers when defects are discovered.

### 7. **Technical Specifics**
The issue was traced back to the high-lead solder bumps used in the GPUs, which were less reliable under the thermal stresses of laptop operation compared to more resilient materials like eutectic solder.

The Bumpgate controversy remains a notable example of the complexities and risks involved in high-tech manufacturing, as well as the potential consequences when these risks are not managed effectively.
 
Joined
Mar 1, 2021
Messages
482 (0.36/day)
Location
Germany
System Name Homebase
Processor Ryzen 5 5600
Motherboard Gigabyte Aorus X570S UD
Cooling Scythe Mugen 5 RGB
Memory 2*16 Kingston Fury DDR4-3600 double ranked
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 6800 16 GB
Storage 1*512 WD Red SN700, 1*2TB Curcial P5, 1*2TB Sandisk Plus (TLC), 1*14TB Toshiba MG
Display(s) Philips E-line 275E1S
Case Fractal Design Torrent Compact
Power Supply Corsair RM850 2019
Mouse Sharkoon Sharkforce Pro
Keyboard Fujitsu KB955
Joined
May 22, 2024
Messages
408 (2.43/day)
System Name Kuro
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D@65W
Motherboard MSI MAG B650 Tomahawk WiFi
Cooling Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 EVO
Memory Corsair DDR5 6000C30 2x48GB (Hynix M)@6000 30-36-36-76 1.36V
Video Card(s) PNY XLR8 RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 16G@200W
Storage Crucial T500 2TB + WD Blue 8TB
Case Lian Li LANCOOL 216
Power Supply MSI MPG A850G
Software Ubuntu 24.04 LTS + Windows 10 Home Build 19045
Benchmark Scores 17761 C23 Multi@65W
So it was sufficiently well-known that ChatGPT could give a canny summary. Great.

Interesting how history repeats itself.
 
Joined
May 25, 2014
Messages
292 (0.08/day)
So many questions, how long did intel know about this? Is this really the only factor? What other CPU's might be or are impacted by this? Even if totally true, its going to be hard to convince the public otherwise. The performance/watt of Arrow Lake would have to be 2X that of Zen5 X3D, and Zen5 would have to be a hot unstable mess before considering it, and the likelihood of that happening is near zero. GG intel, are you sure you aren't in their rear view mirror now?
 
Joined
Dec 25, 2020
Messages
6,570 (4.66/day)
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
System Name "Icy Resurrection"
Processor 13th Gen Intel Core i9-13900KS Special Edition
Motherboard ASUS ROG MAXIMUS Z790 APEX ENCORE
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S upgraded with 2x NF-F12 iPPC-3000 fans and Honeywell PTM7950 TIM
Memory 32 GB G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB F5-6800J3445G16GX2-TZ5RK @ 7600 MT/s 36-44-44-52-96 1.4V
Video Card(s) ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX™ 4080 16GB GDDR6X White OC Edition
Storage 500 GB WD Black SN750 SE NVMe SSD + 4 TB WD Red Plus WD40EFPX HDD
Display(s) 55-inch LG G3 OLED
Case Pichau Mancer CV500 White Edition
Power Supply EVGA 1300 G2 1.3kW 80+ Gold
Mouse Microsoft Classic Intellimouse
Keyboard Generic PS/2
Software Windows 11 IoT Enterprise LTSC 24H2
Benchmark Scores I pulled a Qiqi~
Nvidia Bumpgate ~2008. Permanently ruined their relationship with Apple. Nvidia blamed TSMC for it.

That was actually around ~2006, though? Bumpgate affected G80 and its smaller subvariants, particularly in mobile where temperatures were higher and thermal expansion/contraction cycles punished the interposer more. By 2008 Nvidia was already moving to TSMC 55 nm process with GT200B (GTX 260 216, 275, 285, 295), from the original 65 nm GT200 (260 with 192 cores, 280). I believe G92 was not affected (9800 GTX, GTS 250)

Was that the faulty GeForce 8-series GPU? I thought that one was faulty packaging. But yes, it's close.

Yes.
 
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
4,930 (0.75/day)
Location
Hong Kong
Processor Core i7-12700k
Motherboard Z690 Aero G D4
Cooling Custom loop water, 3x 420 Rad
Video Card(s) RX 7900 XTX Phantom Gaming
Storage Plextor M10P 2TB
Display(s) InnoCN 27M2V
Case Thermaltake Level 20 XT
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster AE-5 Plus
Power Supply FSP Aurum PT 1200W
Software Windows 11 Pro 64-bit
So amd overvolted their 3d chips in order to compete turning them into handgrenades and then Intel overvolted theirs resulting in crashes. Lovely market, competition is great
What did AMD overvolt to compete with?
The culprit was mostly just board makers trying to out do each other, AMD responsible for not gate keeping enough.
FYI the issue with VSOC has nothing to do with Vcore or much to do with performance at all.
The memory settings AMD used in their benchmarks nor just about every review (DDR5 6000) did not require high Vsoc.
Some boards wanted to claim DDR5 6600 support and cranked up the Vsoc hoping for the best. You put the same ram and same CPUs in different boards can result in vastly different Vsoc.

The stock Vsoc of Raphael is only around 1V. The 1.4V+ that Asus fed into the IOD resulted in well over double the SOC power.
The new limit of 1.3V Vsoc still gives you around a 200% margin over stock, that seems pretty reasonable.
1721727564507.png


1721727425894.png


The stock V/F curve of 13/14th gen on the other hand is programe by Intel at the factory, and this is killing chips running at stock without any OC.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 16, 2021
Messages
321 (0.30/day)
Location
Denmark
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Motherboard ASUS Prime X470-Pro
Cooling bequiet! Dark Rock Slim
Memory 64 GB ECC DDR4 2666 MHz (Samsung M391A2K43BB1-CTD)
Video Card(s) eVGA GTX 1080 SC Gaming, 8 GB
Storage 1 TB Samsung 970 EVO Plus, 1 TB Samsung 850 EVO, 4 TB Lexar NM790, 12 TB WD HDDs
Display(s) Acer Predator XB271HU
Case Corsair Obsidian 550D
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Fatal1ty
Power Supply Seasonic X-Series 560W
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Glorious GMMK
It was not amd who overvolted the cpus but the motherboard manufacturers with their bioses.

X3D cpus are voltage limited so overvolting them serve no purpose, especially if they are already winning.

What did AMD overvolt to compete with?
FYI the issue with VSOC has nothing to do with Vcore or much to do with performance at all.
The memory settings AMD used in their benchmarks nor just about every review (DDR5 6000) did not require high Vsoc.
Some boards wanted to claim DDR5 6600 support and cranked up the Vsoc hoping for the best. You put the same ram and same CPUs in different boards can result in vastly different Vsoc.

The stock Vsoc of Raphael is only around 1V. The 1.4V+ that Asus fed into the IOD resulted in well over double the SOC power.
The new limit of 1.3V Vsoc still gives you around a 200% margin over stock, that is pretty reasonable.

The V/F curve of 13/14th gen on the other hand is programe by Intel at the factory, and this is killing chips running at stock without any OC.
So it seems I didn't remember incorrectly. From what I do remember it was a board issue (well, manufacturers running things out of specs for that teeeny little bit of bragging power). AMD did take the blame on themselves, though, and replaced the CPUs.

As for that voltage issue Intel now seems to blame, from what I can tell, they don't as much talk about the voltage going into the chip, but how said power is distributed internally. Which apparently is in a way resulting in these defects.
 
Joined
Aug 13, 2010
Messages
5,469 (1.05/day)
I have always deemed Intel's YOLO behavior with boosts since 12th gen a questionable one. I'm no silicon engineer, but when ones literally behind the tech mention that tolerances are being tested, who am i to doubt anything.
When I run intel for personal use, its being done with conservative V/F values. I'm not going to gain any significant performance by torture testing these chips anyway.
The sad part of this whole story to me is the fact most users will never know about this issue, and also aren't tech savvy enough to get into voltage tuning to prevent any longer term damages.

This, despite a possible microcode update, stands quite exposed to a regulatory problem Intel will have to face in court.
 
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
4,930 (0.75/day)
Location
Hong Kong
Processor Core i7-12700k
Motherboard Z690 Aero G D4
Cooling Custom loop water, 3x 420 Rad
Video Card(s) RX 7900 XTX Phantom Gaming
Storage Plextor M10P 2TB
Display(s) InnoCN 27M2V
Case Thermaltake Level 20 XT
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster AE-5 Plus
Power Supply FSP Aurum PT 1200W
Software Windows 11 Pro 64-bit
So it seems I didn't remember incorrectly. From what I do remember it was a board issue (well, manufacturers running things out of specs for that teeeny little bit of bragging power). AMD did take the blame on themselves, though, and replaced the CPUs.

As for that voltage issue Intel now seems to blame, from what I can tell, they don't as much talk about the voltage going into the chip, but how said power is distributed internally. Which apparently is in a way resulting in these defects.
Yes as said, while AMD had the responibility of keeping an eye on what the boards were doing, overall it was initiated by the board partners.
Also FYI anandtech tested different AGESA and bios versions on Asrock boards, and it seems they kept out of the Vsoc (VDDCR SOC) insanity.
AGESA 1.0.0.5c to 1.0.0.7 Firmware Testing: Temps, Voltages, Currents, and Power - Voltage Lockdown: Investigating AMD's Recent AM5 AGESA Updates on ASRock's X670E Taichi (anandtech.com)

 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 18, 2005
Messages
5,766 (0.80/day)
Location
Ikenai borderline!
System Name Firelance.
Processor Threadripper 3960X
Motherboard ROG Strix TRX40-E Gaming
Cooling IceGem 360 + 6x Arctic Cooling P12
Memory 8x 16GB Patriot Viper DDR4-3200 CL16
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Ventus 2X OC
Storage 2TB WD SN850X (boot), 4TB Crucial P3 (data)
Display(s) 3x AOC Q32E2N (32" 2560x1440 75Hz)
Case Enthoo Pro II Server Edition (Closed Panel) + 6 fans
Power Supply Fractal Design Ion+ 2 Platinum 760W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Razer Pro Type Ultra
Software Windows 10 Professional x64
Please can we keep discussions about G80/G92 bumpgate, and AMD CPU voltage, as minimal as possible to prevent this thread from being derailed and thus locked by mods?

Thank you.
 
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
4,930 (0.75/day)
Location
Hong Kong
Processor Core i7-12700k
Motherboard Z690 Aero G D4
Cooling Custom loop water, 3x 420 Rad
Video Card(s) RX 7900 XTX Phantom Gaming
Storage Plextor M10P 2TB
Display(s) InnoCN 27M2V
Case Thermaltake Level 20 XT
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster AE-5 Plus
Power Supply FSP Aurum PT 1200W
Software Windows 11 Pro 64-bit
Please can we keep discussions about G80/G92 bumpgate, and AMD CPU voltage, as minimal as possible to prevent this thread from being derailed and thus locked by mods?

Thank you.
I suspect that is the goal of some of the comments with "whataboutism".
Get the discussion derailed and hopefully shield Intel from further discussion/critisim.
 
Joined
Jan 29, 2024
Messages
87 (0.31/day)
So amd overvolted their 3d chips in order to compete turning them into handgrenades and then Intel overvolted theirs resulting in crashes. Lovely market, competition is great
Please get this right, AMD did not release overvolted or faulty CPUS. Certain motherboard companies pumped a little to much SOC voltage to it which resulted in the CPUS not working. To put the blame on AMD is a bit desperate to divert blame away from Intel to say the least.

What is not at fault is that Intel have a major design problem and have stayed radio silent until called out on it while knowing there is a fault.

To put it as simply as these are crashing is also belittling the problem. These are crashing and degrading.

You want to see the extent of the problem look here.

1721728138360.png

1721728154215.png

1721728176412.png

1721728193468.png
 
Joined
May 22, 2024
Messages
408 (2.43/day)
System Name Kuro
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D@65W
Motherboard MSI MAG B650 Tomahawk WiFi
Cooling Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 EVO
Memory Corsair DDR5 6000C30 2x48GB (Hynix M)@6000 30-36-36-76 1.36V
Video Card(s) PNY XLR8 RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 16G@200W
Storage Crucial T500 2TB + WD Blue 8TB
Case Lian Li LANCOOL 216
Power Supply MSI MPG A850G
Software Ubuntu 24.04 LTS + Windows 10 Home Build 19045
Benchmark Scores 17761 C23 Multi@65W
I suspect that is the goal of some of the comments of whataboutism.
Get the discussion derailed and hopefully shield Intel from further discussion/critisim.
Seeing how that sprung from a semi-rhetorical question for previous, similar, occurrences, guess I should have known better. Sorry about how that turned out.

Still interesting how things are repeating themselves.
 
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
1,652 (0.23/day)
Location
Maribor, Slovenia, EU
System Name Core i9 rig / Lenovo laptop
Processor Core i9 10900X / Core i5 8350U
Motherboard Asus Prime X299 Edition 30 / Lenovo motherboard
Cooling Corsair H115i PRO RGB / stock cooler
Memory Gskill 4x8GB 3600mhz / 16GB 2400mhz
Video Card(s) Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 Super / UHD 620
Storage Samsung SSD 970 PRO 1TB / Samsung OEM 256GB NVMe
Display(s) Dell UltraSharp UP3017 / Full HD IPS touch
Case Coolermaster mastercase H500M
Audio Device(s) Onboard sound
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 1700 watt / Lenovo 65watt power adapter
Mouse Logitech M500s
Keyboard Cherry
Software Windows 11 Pro / Windows 11 Pro
Intel fucked up big time.
 
Joined
Feb 28, 2015
Messages
93 (0.03/day)
hm... I know some guys running i9 12900k at 1,56V for years now no issue, in my humble opinion 13 gen architectures changes caused CPUs to no longer tolerate high voltages.
 
Joined
Dec 12, 2016
Messages
1,771 (0.61/day)
So amd overvolted their 3d chips in order to compete turning them into handgrenades and then Intel overvolted theirs resulting in crashes. Lovely market, competition is great
This is pure bothersiderism bull that no one should listen to. Intel boasted that their chips were extremely stable versus the competition because reasons and blamed everyone (motherboard manufacturers especially) but themselves when their products turned out to be anything but stable.

Add statements from the CEO such as ‘geostability’ when it come to manufacturing and Intel looks like a scam company. Theranos esque comes to mind.


Intel should be boycotted and denied government funding until they spin off their fabs and forced to concentrate on actually making stable high quality products.
 
Joined
Jan 11, 2022
Messages
838 (0.81/day)
hm... I know some guys running i9 12900k at 1,56V for years now no issue, in my humble opinion 13 gen architectures changes caused CPUs to no longer tolerate high voltages.
The vast ocean of AVX512 mostly idle silicon acting like some sort of capacitance buffer?
 
Joined
Jun 14, 2020
Messages
3,275 (2.04/day)
System Name Mean machine
Processor 12900k
Motherboard MSI Unify X
Cooling Noctua U12A
Memory 7600c34
Video Card(s) 4090 Gamerock oc
Storage 980 pro 2tb
Display(s) Samsung crg90
Case Fractal Torent
Audio Device(s) Hifiman Arya / a30 - d30 pro stack
Power Supply Be quiet dark power pro 1200
Mouse Viper ultimate
Keyboard Blackwidow 65%
hm... I know some guys running i9 12900k at 1,56V for years now no issue, in my humble opinion 13 gen architectures changes caused CPUs to no longer tolerate high voltages.
No he doesn't. He is lying to you. No way he is running 1.56 for more than 5 minutes.

This is pure bothersiderism bull that no one should listen to. Intel boasted that their chips were extremely stable versus the competition because reasons and blamed everyone (motherboard manufacturers especially) but themselves when their products turned out to be anything but stable.

Add statements from the CEO such as ‘geostability’ when it come to manufacturing and Intel looks like a scam company. Theranos esque comes to mind.


Intel should be boycotted and denied government funding until they spin off their fabs and forced to concentrate on actually making stable high quality products.
Can you stop talking about amds handgrenades and focus on the topic? Thanks.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2005
Messages
5,766 (0.80/day)
Location
Ikenai borderline!
System Name Firelance.
Processor Threadripper 3960X
Motherboard ROG Strix TRX40-E Gaming
Cooling IceGem 360 + 6x Arctic Cooling P12
Memory 8x 16GB Patriot Viper DDR4-3200 CL16
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Ventus 2X OC
Storage 2TB WD SN850X (boot), 4TB Crucial P3 (data)
Display(s) 3x AOC Q32E2N (32" 2560x1440 75Hz)
Case Enthoo Pro II Server Edition (Closed Panel) + 6 fans
Power Supply Fractal Design Ion+ 2 Platinum 760W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Razer Pro Type Ultra
Software Windows 10 Professional x64
Given this is a microcode fix, it will be delivered as a Windows update - no new BIOS version or end-user action needed. That's at least a relief for Intel and its board partners.
 
Top