I don't think so.
Lack of DisplayPort 2.1.
Low RT performance.
Extremely high power consumption.
Extremely large, that sag, and melt their power connectors.
Plenty of reasons for improvements..
No no.... There
are plenty of reasons for improvement - but NVIDIA GPUs are selling well enough anyway for them.
The reasons I was referring to are not technical reasons
for us - they were sales related ones for
them. I appreciate the naivety, though.
The model of coasting on an architecture for 2 years is being slowly replaced by one of doing so for 3 years, seemingly.
To touch some of the echo-chamber points brought up from a retail and user experience perspective, though.
- DSC and the effective widespread lack of DP 2.1 availability in monitors might not push this to exist next-gen. I own an FO32U2P, feel free to doubt this. User experience is not going to change much without DSC.
- Low RT is a matter of perspective. Who is going to beat them at it? If the answer on this flow-chart is nobody, its not going to improve much
- Power consumption is high, but new PSU standards and massive coolers are making this a somewhat of a none-issue consumer-wise
- newer cases can accommodate those larger cards, new revisions of 12VHPWR and 12V2x6 contain relatively high surface area contact with the connectors. I know from quite a large personal connection to retail numbers that this is effectively such a low percent issue its not being counted on any feasible RMA statistic anymore. AMD is also expected to adopt this new connector in their upcoming generation.