• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Apple Trained its Apple Intelligence Models on Google TPUs, Not NVIDIA GPUs

AleksandarK

News Editor
Staff member
Joined
Aug 19, 2017
Messages
2,651 (0.99/day)
Apple has disclosed that its newly announced Apple Intelligence features were developed using Google's Tensor Processing Units (TPUs) rather than NVIDIA's widely adopted hardware accelerators like H100. This unexpected choice was detailed in an official Apple research paper, shedding light on the company's approach to AI development. The paper outlines how systems equipped with Google's TPUv4 and TPUv5 chips played a crucial role in creating Apple Foundation Models (AFMs). These models, including AFM-server and AFM-on-device, are designed to power both online and offline Apple Intelligence features introduced at WWDC 2024. For the training of the 6.4 billion parameter AFM-server, Apple's largest language model, the company utilized an impressive array of 8,192 TPUv4 chips, provisioned as 8×1024 chip slices. The training process involved a three-stage approach, processing a total of 7.4 trillion tokens. Meanwhile, the more compact 3 billion parameter AFM-on-device model, optimized for on-device processing, was trained using 2,048 TPUv5p chips.

Apple's training data came from various sources, including the Applebot web crawler and licensed high-quality datasets. The company also incorporated carefully selected code, math, and public datasets to enhance the models' capabilities. Benchmark results shared in the paper suggest that both AFM-server and AFM-on-device excel in areas such as Instruction Following, Tool Use, and Writing, positioning Apple as a strong contender in the AI race despite its relatively late entry. However, Apple's penetration tactic into the AI market is much more complex than any other AI competitor. Given Apple's massive user base and millions of devices compatible with Apple Intelligence, the AFM has the potential to change user interaction with devices for good, especially for everyday tasks. Hence, refining AI models for these tasks is critical before massive deployment. Another unexpected feature is transparency from Apple, a company typically known for its secrecy. The AI boom is changing some of Apple's ways, and revealing these inner workings is always interesting.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site | Source
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
9,504 (3.27/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R9 7900 - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Edge
Motherboard ASRock B650 Pro RS
Cooling 2x 360mm NexXxoS ST30 X-Flow, 1x 360mm NexXxoS ST30, 1x 240mm NexXxoS ST30
Memory 32GB - FURY Beast RGB 5600 Mhz
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 7900 XT - Alphacool Eisblock Aurora
Storage 1x Kingston KC3000 1TB 1x Kingston A2000 1TB, 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) LG UltraGear 32GN650-B + 4K Samsung TV
Case Phanteks NV7
Power Supply GPS-750C
Apple and Nvidia are not exactly on friendly terms, no surprise there.
 
Joined
Apr 13, 2023
Messages
314 (0.51/day)
System Name Can it run Warhammer 3?
Processor 7800X3D @ 5Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte B650 Aorus Elite AX
Cooling Enermax Liqmax III 360mm
Memory Teamgroup DDR5 CL30 6000Mhz 32GB
Video Card(s) Gigabyte 4090
Storage Silicon Power XS70, Corsair T700
Display(s) BenQ EX2710Q, BenQEX270M
Case NZXT H7 Flow
Audio Device(s) AudioTechnica M50xBT
Power Supply SuperFlower Leadex III 850W
Is that why it's not very good?
 
Joined
Nov 26, 2021
Messages
1,705 (1.52/day)
Location
Mississauga, Canada
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Motherboard ASUS TUF Gaming X570-PRO (WiFi 6)
Cooling Noctua NH-C14S (two fans)
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3200
Video Card(s) Reference Vega 64
Storage Intel 665p 1TB, WD Black SN850X 2TB, Crucial MX300 1TB SATA, Samsung 830 256 GB SATA
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG27, and Samsung S23A700
Case Fractal Design R5
Power Supply Seasonic PRIME TITANIUM 850W
Mouse Logitech
VR HMD Oculus Rift
Software Windows 11 Pro, and Ubuntu 20.04
Is that why it's not very good?
Google has pedigree in this field; they introduced dedicated AI silicon well before Nvidia, but I think adoption is hampered by the relative inaccessibility of their TPUs. Nvidia's adoption is helped greatly by the wide availability of their hardware and excellent developer support and education.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
7,563 (1.77/day)
Is that why it's not very good?
Nvidia for all their $3 trillion worth of market cap, plus some change, isn't a patch on Google's experience in "AI" plus (TPU)hardware. Maybe if they can show something other than "fake frames" or fooling the rest of the startup ecosystem having to go with their overpriced GPU's then we'll talk :rolleyes:
 
Joined
Apr 19, 2018
Messages
1,227 (0.50/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Motherboard Asus ROG Crosshair VIII Hero WiFi
Cooling Arctic Liquid Freezer II 420
Memory 32Gb G-Skill Trident Z Neo @3806MHz C14
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX2070
Storage Seagate FireCuda 530 1TB
Display(s) Samsung G9 49" Curved Ultrawide
Case Cooler Master Cosmos
Audio Device(s) O2 USB Headphone AMP
Power Supply Corsair HX850i
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Cherry MX
Software Windows 11
Not many people or corporations are on good terms with nGreedia... Karma will eventually catch up with the tech poseur.

But regarding the Apple models, I'm shocked that the server version is only twice the size of the on-device version.
 
Joined
Dec 25, 2020
Messages
7,013 (4.81/day)
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
System Name "Icy Resurrection"
Processor 13th Gen Intel Core i9-13900KS Special Edition
Motherboard ASUS ROG Maximus Z790 Apex Encore
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S upgraded with 2x NF-F12 iPPC-3000 fans and Honeywell PTM7950 TIM
Memory 32 GB G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB F5-6800J3445G16GX2-TZ5RK @ 7600 MT/s 36-44-44-52-96 1.4V
Video Card(s) ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX™ 4080 16GB GDDR6X White OC Edition
Storage 500 GB WD Black SN750 SE NVMe SSD + 4 TB WD Red Plus WD40EFPX HDD
Display(s) 55-inch LG G3 OLED
Case Pichau Mancer CV500 White Edition
Audio Device(s) Apple USB-C + Sony MDR-V7 headphones
Power Supply EVGA 1300 G2 1.3kW 80+ Gold
Mouse Microsoft Classic Intellimouse
Keyboard IBM Model M type 1391405 (distribución española)
Software Windows 11 IoT Enterprise LTSC 24H2
Benchmark Scores I pulled a Qiqi~
Not many people or corporations are on good terms with nGreedia

That's must be why they're the world's most valuable company :`)

When will you people realize that business is business, and grudges are something only forum dwellers hold... there's an obvious logic behind this choice - if anything, Google's far more antagonistic to Apple than Nvidia will ever be - the hardware likely operates the same way their in-SoC model does, just on a much larger scale.
 
Joined
Nov 26, 2021
Messages
1,705 (1.52/day)
Location
Mississauga, Canada
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Motherboard ASUS TUF Gaming X570-PRO (WiFi 6)
Cooling Noctua NH-C14S (two fans)
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3200
Video Card(s) Reference Vega 64
Storage Intel 665p 1TB, WD Black SN850X 2TB, Crucial MX300 1TB SATA, Samsung 830 256 GB SATA
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG27, and Samsung S23A700
Case Fractal Design R5
Power Supply Seasonic PRIME TITANIUM 850W
Mouse Logitech
VR HMD Oculus Rift
Software Windows 11 Pro, and Ubuntu 20.04
That's must be why they're the world's most valuable company :`)

When will you people realize that business is business, and grudges are something only forum dwellers hold... there's an obvious logic behind this choice - if anything, Google's far more antagonistic to Apple than Nvidia will ever be - the hardware likely operates the same way their in-SoC model does, just on a much larger scale.
That is how it should work. However, both Nvidia and Apple have been unforgiving in the past: Nvidia parted ways with XFX when they jumped on the AMD bandwagon with the RV770. Apple never forgave Nvidia for Bumpgate. Of course, by now it's a moot point as Apple devices only have Apple silicon for compute.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
7,563 (1.77/day)
The other major point which may have been lost in the flame wars is that Apple gets $20 billion or so from Google for their (iOS?) search deal so it's not like they wouldn't try to leverage that.

 
Joined
Dec 25, 2020
Messages
7,013 (4.81/day)
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
System Name "Icy Resurrection"
Processor 13th Gen Intel Core i9-13900KS Special Edition
Motherboard ASUS ROG Maximus Z790 Apex Encore
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S upgraded with 2x NF-F12 iPPC-3000 fans and Honeywell PTM7950 TIM
Memory 32 GB G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB F5-6800J3445G16GX2-TZ5RK @ 7600 MT/s 36-44-44-52-96 1.4V
Video Card(s) ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX™ 4080 16GB GDDR6X White OC Edition
Storage 500 GB WD Black SN750 SE NVMe SSD + 4 TB WD Red Plus WD40EFPX HDD
Display(s) 55-inch LG G3 OLED
Case Pichau Mancer CV500 White Edition
Audio Device(s) Apple USB-C + Sony MDR-V7 headphones
Power Supply EVGA 1300 G2 1.3kW 80+ Gold
Mouse Microsoft Classic Intellimouse
Keyboard IBM Model M type 1391405 (distribución española)
Software Windows 11 IoT Enterprise LTSC 24H2
Benchmark Scores I pulled a Qiqi~
That is how it should work. However, both Nvidia and Apple have been unforgiving in the past: Nvidia parted ways with XFX when they jumped on the AMD bandwagon with the RV770. Apple never forgave Nvidia for Bumpgate. Of course, by now it's a moot point as Apple devices only have Apple silicon for compute.

It's how business works. No matter how "great" the business partner is, there's always an imbalance of power when doing business with a much larger entity. XFX and EVGA were both inconsequential ants to Nvidia. Techies may even seem impressed, but XFX... just wasn't worth the squeeze. And neither was EVGA, really. That doesn't hurt Nvidia's reputation or bottom line in the slightest, quite the contrary, it's XFX that had to make do and thrive in adverse conditions as Radeons consistently failed to capture the lion's share of the market.

They also got Apple's business for at least 6-7 years after Bumpgate - if there was truly any bad blood here you'd never see nForce Macs in the early 2010s. They'd been cut off around 2008. AMD's deal with Apple was likely a combination of favorable pricing and software licensing provisions, considered that Apple likely were already considering transitioning to in-house silicon for at least a few years before the 2020 debut of M1.

You don't need to be on "good terms" for that, same reason why Aramco is also such a massive name!

Similar situation, the Saudi Royal Family is vastly wealthier and more powerful than any who would have legitimate beef with them. Aramco, as any state oil company (you could say the same about Petrobras here in Brazil), is a national treasury in the strictest sense of it - oil, energy = money.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
7,563 (1.77/day)
Well, I have an even more grim view of Aramco personally but let's just say they're inevitable in this day & age!
 
Joined
Nov 26, 2021
Messages
1,705 (1.52/day)
Location
Mississauga, Canada
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Motherboard ASUS TUF Gaming X570-PRO (WiFi 6)
Cooling Noctua NH-C14S (two fans)
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3200
Video Card(s) Reference Vega 64
Storage Intel 665p 1TB, WD Black SN850X 2TB, Crucial MX300 1TB SATA, Samsung 830 256 GB SATA
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG27, and Samsung S23A700
Case Fractal Design R5
Power Supply Seasonic PRIME TITANIUM 850W
Mouse Logitech
VR HMD Oculus Rift
Software Windows 11 Pro, and Ubuntu 20.04
It's how business works. No matter how "great" the business partner is, there's always an imbalance of power when doing business with a much larger entity. XFX and EVGA were both inconsequential ants to Nvidia. Techies may even seem impressed, but XFX... just wasn't worth the squeeze. And neither was EVGA, really. That doesn't hurt Nvidia's reputation or bottom line in the slightest, quite the contrary, it's XFX that had to make do and thrive in adverse conditions as Radeons consistently failed to capture the lion's share of the market.

They also got Apple's business for at least 6-7 years after Bumpgate - if there was truly any bad blood here you'd never see nForce Macs in the early 2010s. They'd been cut off around 2008. AMD's deal with Apple was likely a combination of favorable pricing and software licensing provisions, considered that Apple likely were already considering transitioning to in-house silicon for at least a few years before the 2020 debut of M1.



Similar situation, the Saudi Royal Family is vastly wealthier and more powerful than any who would have legitimate beef with them. Aramco, as any state oil company (you could say the same about Petrobras here in Brazil), is a national treasury in the strictest sense of it - oil, energy = money.
You are right about the imbalance of power between Nvidia and its partners; however, that doesn't apply to their relationship with Apple at that time. You're also right about the continued use of Nvidia's products by Apple, but they ditched them in 2016 for the inferior Polaris based GPUs in their Macbooks. That seems rather irrational when Pascal was stomping all over Radeon.
 
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
2,200 (0.43/day)
Google has pedigree in this field; they introduced dedicated AI silicon well before Nvidia, but I think adoption is hampered by the relative inaccessibility of their TPUs. Nvidia's adoption is helped greatly by the wide availability of their hardware and excellent developer support and education.

Their TPU's drive youtube video conversion and lots of other AI related stuff in Google's core business as well.

But many company's are generating their own TPU's - amazon, MS and such. It gets the work far more efficient then using a general purpose GPU.
 
Joined
Mar 20, 2024
Messages
33 (0.12/day)
Apple can work with whomever they please and Nvidia has demonstrated to be an unpleasant business partner.

Other companies might not have a real choice in the matter but Apple has the cash book to not suffer headache partners.

Just like when they cut ZFS from its integration (in progress) in macOS upon Oracle’s acquisition of Sun Microsystems.

We should all learn from Apple’s management and not work with business partners that are likely to or do cause us headaches.
 
Joined
Apr 19, 2018
Messages
1,227 (0.50/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Motherboard Asus ROG Crosshair VIII Hero WiFi
Cooling Arctic Liquid Freezer II 420
Memory 32Gb G-Skill Trident Z Neo @3806MHz C14
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX2070
Storage Seagate FireCuda 530 1TB
Display(s) Samsung G9 49" Curved Ultrawide
Case Cooler Master Cosmos
Audio Device(s) O2 USB Headphone AMP
Power Supply Corsair HX850i
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Cherry MX
Software Windows 11
That's must be why they're the world's most valuable company :`)

When will you people realize that business is business, and grudges are something only forum dwellers hold... there's an obvious logic behind this choice - if anything, Google's far more antagonistic to Apple than Nvidia will ever be - the hardware likely operates the same way their in-SoC model does, just on a much larger scale.
Are these people giving nGreedia money because they want to, or have to? I have heard again and again that companies do not like working with nGreedia. That hasn't changed and the list is getting longer.
 
Joined
Dec 25, 2020
Messages
7,013 (4.81/day)
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
System Name "Icy Resurrection"
Processor 13th Gen Intel Core i9-13900KS Special Edition
Motherboard ASUS ROG Maximus Z790 Apex Encore
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S upgraded with 2x NF-F12 iPPC-3000 fans and Honeywell PTM7950 TIM
Memory 32 GB G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB F5-6800J3445G16GX2-TZ5RK @ 7600 MT/s 36-44-44-52-96 1.4V
Video Card(s) ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX™ 4080 16GB GDDR6X White OC Edition
Storage 500 GB WD Black SN750 SE NVMe SSD + 4 TB WD Red Plus WD40EFPX HDD
Display(s) 55-inch LG G3 OLED
Case Pichau Mancer CV500 White Edition
Audio Device(s) Apple USB-C + Sony MDR-V7 headphones
Power Supply EVGA 1300 G2 1.3kW 80+ Gold
Mouse Microsoft Classic Intellimouse
Keyboard IBM Model M type 1391405 (distribución española)
Software Windows 11 IoT Enterprise LTSC 24H2
Benchmark Scores I pulled a Qiqi~
Are these people giving nGreedia money because they want to, or have to? I have heard again and again that companies do not like working with nGreedia. That hasn't changed and the list is getting longer.

Because they want to make money. News flash, false ethics don't speak anywhere near as loud as money.

Apple can work with whomever they please and Nvidia has demonstrated to be an unpleasant business partner.

Turns out as long as they're unpleasant business partners, they're making a killing. So who is really wrong here?
 
Joined
Apr 19, 2018
Messages
1,227 (0.50/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Motherboard Asus ROG Crosshair VIII Hero WiFi
Cooling Arctic Liquid Freezer II 420
Memory 32Gb G-Skill Trident Z Neo @3806MHz C14
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX2070
Storage Seagate FireCuda 530 1TB
Display(s) Samsung G9 49" Curved Ultrawide
Case Cooler Master Cosmos
Audio Device(s) O2 USB Headphone AMP
Power Supply Corsair HX850i
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Cherry MX
Software Windows 11
Because they want to make money. News flash, false ethics don't speak anywhere near as loud as money.
Yeah, ok dude. This is a billion nGreedia didn't get then. The high end A.I. people have all but abandoned nGreedia in favour of their own chips, or somebody else's.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
9,504 (3.27/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R9 7900 - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Edge
Motherboard ASRock B650 Pro RS
Cooling 2x 360mm NexXxoS ST30 X-Flow, 1x 360mm NexXxoS ST30, 1x 240mm NexXxoS ST30
Memory 32GB - FURY Beast RGB 5600 Mhz
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 7900 XT - Alphacool Eisblock Aurora
Storage 1x Kingston KC3000 1TB 1x Kingston A2000 1TB, 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) LG UltraGear 32GN650-B + 4K Samsung TV
Case Phanteks NV7
Power Supply GPS-750C
When will you people realize that business is business
Apple didn't switch to AMD for no reason before they made their own silicon, around that time Nvidia was going around suing companies over GPU related IP and they probably recognized this as a serious liability considering what they were planning for their own hardware, they avoided a lot of trouble by ditching them in retrospect. Apple was also simply never on the same page when it came to software, they were pushing for OpenCL and Nvidia wasn't, eventually they switched to their own API seeing as OpenCL wasn't going the way they hoped.
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,843 (3.95/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
Joined
Jun 18, 2021
Messages
2,569 (2.00/day)
Google has pedigree in this field; they introduced dedicated AI silicon well before Nvidia, but I think adoption is hampered by the relative inaccessibility of their TPUs. Nvidia's adoption is helped greatly by the wide availability of their hardware and excellent developer support and education.

They have more than just pedigree, the current "queen of the prom" chatgpt is based on technology google published on 2017. Bard/Gemini was pretty much sitting in a drawer because google didn't think it was interesting enough. They've been investing in designing their TPUs to solve the obvious scalability and efficiency problem for longer than that. The problem with google is they are pretty bad at monetizing their own inventions and always seem like an adhd kid who easily gets distracted before finishing anything.

Are these people giving nGreedia money because they want to, or have to?

Definitely because they have to, it's the fastest way to bring something to market because of both hw availability and software support. But that will not last.

BTW this is kind of misleading, it's getting reposted everywhere but if you go read the original articles on reuters/cnbc or the paper Apple published it's not that they used Google TPUs, they used Google Cloud which offers both Google TPU and Nvidia gpus. The idea making the rounds that it's all Google silicon is just clickbait
 
Top