• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Samsung to Install High-NA EUV Machines Ahead of TSMC in Q4 2024 or Q1 2025

AleksandarK

News Editor
Staff member
Joined
Aug 19, 2017
Messages
2,753 (1.01/day)
Samsung Electronics is set to make a significant leap in semiconductor manufacturing technology with the introduction of its first High-NA 0.55 EUV lithography tool. The company plans to install the ASML Twinscan EXE:5000 system at its Hwaseong campus between Q4 2024 and Q1 2025, marking a crucial step in developing next-generation process technologies for logic and DRAM production. This move positions Samsung about a year behind Intel but ahead of rivals TSMC and SK Hynix in adopting High-NA EUV technology. The system is expected to be operational by mid-2025, primarily for research and development purposes. Samsung is not just focusing on the lithography equipment itself but is building a comprehensive ecosystem around High-NA EUV technology.

The company is collaborating with several key partners like Lasertec (developing inspection equipment for High-NA photomasks), JSR (working on advanced photoresists), Tokyo Electron (enhancing etching machines), and Synopsys (shifting to curvilinear patterns on photomasks for improved circuit precision). The High-NA EUV technology promises significant advancements in chip manufacturing. With an 8 nm resolution capability, it could make transistors about 1.7 times smaller and increase transistor density by nearly three times compared to current Low-NA EUV systems. However, the transition to High-NA EUV comes with challenges. The tools are more expensive, costing up to $380 million each, and have a smaller imaging field. Their larger size also requires chipmakers to reconsider fab layouts. Despite these hurdles, Samsung aims for commercial implementation of High-NA EUV by 2027.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site | Source
 

ARF

Joined
Jan 28, 2020
Messages
4,670 (2.55/day)
Location
Ex-usa | slava the trolls
AMD must go to Samsung already! :kookoo: :banghead:
 
Joined
Nov 18, 2010
Messages
7,607 (1.47/day)
Location
Rīga, Latvia
System Name HELLSTAR
Processor AMD RYZEN 9 5950X
Motherboard ASUS Strix X570-E
Cooling 2x 360 + 280 rads. 3x Gentle Typhoons, 3x Phanteks T30, 2x TT T140 . EK-Quantum Momentum Monoblock.
Memory 4x8GB G.SKILL Trident Z RGB F4-4133C19D-16GTZR 14-16-12-30-44
Video Card(s) Sapphire Pulse RX 7900XTX. Water block. Crossflashed.
Storage Optane 900P[Fedora] + WD BLACK SN850X 4TB + 750 EVO 500GB + 1TB 980PRO+SN560 1TB(W11)
Display(s) Philips PHL BDM3270 + Acer XV242Y
Case Lian Li O11 Dynamic EVO
Audio Device(s) SMSL RAW-MDA1 DAC
Power Supply Fractal Design Newton R3 1000W
Mouse Razer Basilisk
Keyboard Razer BlackWidow V3 - Yellow Switch
Software FEDORA 41
Joined
Feb 18, 2005
Messages
5,962 (0.82/day)
Location
Ikenai borderline!
System Name Firelance.
Processor Threadripper 3960X
Motherboard ROG Strix TRX40-E Gaming
Cooling IceGem 360 + 6x Arctic Cooling P12
Memory 8x 16GB Patriot Viper DDR4-3200 CL16
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Ventus 2X OC
Storage 2TB WD SN850X (boot), 4TB Crucial P3 (data)
Display(s) Dell S3221QS(A) (32" 38x21 60Hz) + 2x AOC Q32E2N (32" 25x14 75Hz)
Case Enthoo Pro II Server Edition (Closed Panel) + 6 fans
Power Supply Fractal Design Ion+ 2 Platinum 760W
Mouse Logitech G604
Keyboard Razer Pro Type Ultra
Software Windows 10 Professional x64
This move positions Samsung about a year behind Intel but ahead of rivals TSMC and SK Hynix in adopting High-NA EUV technology.
Because high-NA has done sooo much for Intel... oh wait...
 

ARF

Joined
Jan 28, 2020
Messages
4,670 (2.55/day)
Location
Ex-usa | slava the trolls
For the IO die? Sure.

Not only. For the Navi graphics line, too. Because it is a poor decision to offer a pathetic 6nm Navi 33 present in the low-end and abysmal Radeon RX 7600.

1723799312733.png
 
Joined
Jun 1, 2021
Messages
311 (0.23/day)
Joined
Jun 19, 2024
Messages
372 (1.63/day)
System Name XPS, Lenovo and HP Laptops, HP Xeon Mobile Workstation, HP Servers, Dell Desktops
Processor Everything from Turion to 13900kf
Motherboard MSI - they own the OEM market
Cooling Air on laptops, lots of air on servers, AIO on desktops
Memory I think one of the laptops is 2GB, to 64GB on gamer, to 128GB on ZFS Filer
Video Card(s) A pile up to my knee, with a RTX 4090 teetering on top
Storage Rust in the closet, solid state everywhere else
Display(s) Laptop crap, LG UltraGear of various vintages
Case OEM and a 42U rack
Audio Device(s) Headphones
Power Supply Whole home UPS w/Generac Standby Generator
Software ZFS, UniFi Network Application, Entra, AWS IoT Core, Splunk
Benchmark Scores 1.21 GigaBungholioMarks
Because high-NA has done sooo much for Intel... oh wait...

Which products are being produced using high-NA EUV lithography? Oh wait…
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2005
Messages
5,962 (0.82/day)
Location
Ikenai borderline!
System Name Firelance.
Processor Threadripper 3960X
Motherboard ROG Strix TRX40-E Gaming
Cooling IceGem 360 + 6x Arctic Cooling P12
Memory 8x 16GB Patriot Viper DDR4-3200 CL16
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Ventus 2X OC
Storage 2TB WD SN850X (boot), 4TB Crucial P3 (data)
Display(s) Dell S3221QS(A) (32" 38x21 60Hz) + 2x AOC Q32E2N (32" 25x14 75Hz)
Case Enthoo Pro II Server Edition (Closed Panel) + 6 fans
Power Supply Fractal Design Ion+ 2 Platinum 760W
Mouse Logitech G604
Keyboard Razer Pro Type Ultra
Software Windows 10 Professional x64

Count von Schwalbe

Nocturnus Moderatus
Staff member
Joined
Nov 15, 2021
Messages
3,279 (2.79/day)
Location
Knoxville, TN, USA
System Name Work Computer | Unfinished Computer
Processor Core i7-6700 | Ryzen 5 5600X
Motherboard Dell Q170 | Gigabyte Aorus Elite Wi-Fi
Cooling A fan? | Truly Custom Loop
Memory 4x4GB Crucial 2133 C17 | 4x8GB Corsair Vengeance RGB 3600 C26
Video Card(s) Dell Radeon R7 450 | RTX 2080 Ti FE
Storage Crucial BX500 2TB | TBD
Display(s) 3x LG QHD 32" GSM5B96 | TBD
Case Dell | Heavily Modified Phanteks P400
Power Supply Dell TFX Non-standard | EVGA BQ 650W
Mouse Monster No-Name $7 Gaming Mouse| TBD
TBF, Intel has had this for about 8 months, if the timeline in the article is to be taken at face value.

I doubt that is long enough to design a line of products for it - probably not even long enough to design the manufacturing node.
 
Top