• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

ASUS Republic of Gamers Unveils Three Premium 1440p Gaming Monitors

Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
1,804 (0.45/day)
Just buy the same monitor directly from LG (they make the displays) and avoid Asus tax. W + profit
Except thus far LG models have all been without heatsinks and significantly dimmer.
27" is so 2012. Even if the refresh rate is high.
What's the problem with 27"? It's in the sweet spot diagonal: 24-27-32-34. Below 24 is too small. Above 34 starts to get too big for desktop use.
It all depends on the resolution the display is paired with and the users own eyesight. Those with better eyesight wish 24" or 27" 4K while those with average or below eyesight are perfectly fine with 27" 1440p. I can run this at 100% with no need for scaling. 27" 4K i would need to enable scaling and even 32" 4K is still too small at 100%. Im glad they're pushing 27" 1440p refresh rates up. Now we need pure RGB pixel layout and DP 2.1 UHBR20 start being included. 1440p 480Hz barely fits inside DSC 3.0 compression limit.
Is anyone going to make a 360hz 4k panel at 27" ? I think 32" is way too big for gaming.
There will be 360Hz 32" 4K panels next year but i very much doubt there will be 27" 4K panels.
 
Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Messages
8,508 (3.23/day)
System Name Best AMD Computer
Processor AMD 7900X3D
Motherboard Asus X670E E Strix
Cooling In Win SR36
Memory GSKILL DDR5 32GB 5200 30
Video Card(s) Sapphire Pulse 7900XT (Watercooled)
Storage Corsair MP 700, Seagate 530 2Tb, Adata SX8200 2TBx2, Kingston 2 TBx2, Micron 8 TB, WD AN 1500
Display(s) GIGABYTE FV43U
Case Corsair 7000D Airflow
Audio Device(s) Corsair Void Pro, Logitch Z523 5.1
Power Supply Deepcool 1000M
Mouse Logitech g7 gaming mouse
Keyboard Logitech G510
Software Windows 11 Pro 64 Steam. GOG, Uplay, Origin
Benchmark Scores Firestrike: 46183 Time Spy: 25121
What's the problem with 27"? It's in the sweet spot diagonal: 24-27-32-34. Below 24 is too small. Above 34 starts to get too big for desktop use.
It all depends on the resolution the display is paired with and the users own eyesight. Those with better eyesight wish 24" or 27" 4K while those with average or below eyesight are perfectly fine with 27" 1440p. I can run this at 100% with no need for scaling. 27" 4K i would need to enable scaling and even 32" 4K is still too small at 100%. Im glad they're pushing 27" 1440p refresh rates up. Now we need pure RGB pixel layout and DP 2.1 UHBR20 start being included. 1440p 480Hz barely fits inside DSC 3.0 compression limit.

Monitors are subjective. I myself love my FV43U and it is fine for Desktop usage. Means I have more real estate and can enjoy Sports Streams when my TV is in use. I am glad that you are happy with your experience. I use 100% scaling with that and my pixel density is 138 according to AIDA.
 
Top