• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Radeon RX 8000 "RDNA 4" GPU Spotted on Geekbench

Joined
Apr 14, 2022
Messages
745 (0.78/day)
Location
London, UK
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Motherboard ASUS B550M-Plus WiFi II
Cooling Noctua U12A chromax.black
Memory Corsair Vengeance 32GB 3600Mhz
Video Card(s) Palit RTX 4080 GameRock OC
Storage Samsung 970 Evo Plus 1TB + 980 Pro 2TB
Display(s) Acer Nitro XV271UM3B IPS 180Hz
Case Asus Prime AP201
Audio Device(s) Creative Gigaworks - Razer Blackshark V2 Pro
Power Supply Corsair SF750
Mouse Razer Viper
Keyboard Asus ROG Falchion
Software Windows 11 64bit
  • TSMC 4N process (5 nm custom designed for Nvidia)[1] – not to be confused with N4
 

ARF

Joined
Jan 28, 2020
Messages
4,670 (2.65/day)
Location
Ex-usa | slava the trolls
TPU database is wrong
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ada_Lovelace_(microarchitecture) . Wikipedia correctly lists it as 4N so a custom 4nm variant.

Let's see:

TPU:

1724695407993.png


Wiki:

1724695432820.png


Both share the same information. :kookoo:

Still N4P would offer advantages even over this because 4N is years old at this point.

Wrong. The "P" is a very minor process modification and won't result in any advantages.

  • TSMC 4N process (5 nm custom designed for Nvidia)[1] – not to be confused with N4

Virtually one and the same thing. A "plus" is replaced by a new digit. Meaningless.

N5 density:
1724695523749.png

N4 density:
1724695562258.png

 
Joined
Apr 18, 2019
Messages
2,344 (1.15/day)
Location
Olympia, WA
System Name Sleepy Painter
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Motherboard Asus TuF Gaming X570-PLUS/WIFI
Cooling FSP Windale 6 - Passive
Memory 2x16GB F4-3600C16-16GVKC @ 16-19-21-36-58-1T
Video Card(s) MSI RX580 8GB
Storage 2x Samsung PM963 960GB nVME RAID0, Crucial BX500 1TB SATA, WD Blue 3D 2TB SATA
Display(s) Microboard 32" Curved 1080P 144hz VA w/ Freesync
Case NZXT Gamma Classic Black
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar D1
Power Supply Rosewill 1KW on 240V@60hz
Mouse Logitech MX518 Legend
Keyboard Red Dragon K552
Software Windows 10 Enterprise 2019 LTSC 1809 17763.1757
16GB 256-bit for the larger core? that's it?
I've got that with a golden rabbit...

Unless RT performance is *greatly* improved, I 100% expect the 7900XT and XTX to continue to be sold and/or get a re-brand (ala Radeon VII sold alongside 5700XT, or R9 290->390x)
 
Joined
Feb 21, 2006
Messages
2,221 (0.32/day)
Location
Toronto, Ontario
System Name The Expanse
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Motherboard Asus Prime X570-Pro BIOS 5013 AM4 AGESA V2 PI 1.2.0.Cc.
Cooling Corsair H150i Pro
Memory 32GB GSkill Trident RGB DDR4-3200 14-14-14-34-1T (B-Die)
Video Card(s) XFX Radeon RX 7900 XTX Magnetic Air (24.10.1)
Storage WD SN850X 2TB / Corsair MP600 1TB / Samsung 860Evo 1TB x2 Raid 0 / Asus NAS AS1004T V2 20TB
Display(s) LG 34GP83A-B 34 Inch 21: 9 UltraGear Curved QHD (3440 x 1440) 1ms Nano IPS 160Hz
Case Fractal Design Meshify S2
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi + Logitech Z-5500 + HS80 Wireless
Power Supply Corsair AX850 Titanium
Mouse Corsair Dark Core RGB SE
Keyboard Corsair K100
Software Windows 10 Pro x64 22H2
Benchmark Scores 3800X https://valid.x86.fr/1zr4a5 5800X https://valid.x86.fr/2dey9c 5800X3D https://valid.x86.fr/b7d
This is rough napkin math. If RDNA4 is 15% faster than RDNA3 per compute unit, at 56 compute units RDNA4 would be close to 4070 super in speed. The 4070ti performance may be out of reach, unless RDNA4 is a lot more significant of an improvement.
If they can get it to 3Ghz+ clock speeds should be decent.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2020
Messages
985 (0.59/day)
System Name S.L.I + RTX research rig
Processor Ryzen 7 5800X 3D.
Motherboard MSI MEG ACE X570
Cooling Corsair H150i Cappellx
Memory Corsair Vengeance pro RGB 3200mhz 32Gbs
Video Card(s) 2x Dell RTX 2080 Ti in S.L.I
Storage Western digital Sata 6.0 SDD 500gb + fanxiang S660 4TB PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2
Display(s) HP X24i
Case Corsair 7000D Airflow
Power Supply EVGA G+1600watts
Mouse Corsair Scimitar
Keyboard Cosair K55 Pro RGB
16GB 256-bit for the larger core? that's it?
I've got that with a golden rabbit...

Unless RT performance is *greatly* improved, I 100% expect the 7900XT and XTX to continue to be sold and/or get a re-brand (ala Radeon VII sold alongside 5700XT, or R9 290->390x)

from what rumors say it only double the Ray accelarator per shader unit, so don't expect too much maybe 33% increase RT?

I doubt it would eve get that it will be straved for instructiond anyways.
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2018
Messages
6,905 (3.05/day)
Location
California
System Name His & Hers
Processor R7 5800X/ R7 7950X3D Stock
Motherboard X670E Aorus Pro X/ROG Crosshair VIII Hero
Cooling Corsair h150 elite/ Corsair h115i Platinum
Memory Trident Z5 Neo 6000/ 32 GB 3200 CL14 @3800 CL16 Team T Force Nighthawk
Video Card(s) Evga FTW 3 Ultra 3080ti/ Gigabyte Gaming OC 4090
Storage lots of SSD.
Display(s) A whole bunch OLED, VA, IPS.....
Case 011 Dynamic XL/ Phanteks Evolv X
Audio Device(s) Arctis Pro + gaming Dac/ Corsair sp 2500/ Logitech G560/Samsung Q990B
Power Supply Seasonic Ultra Prime Titanium 1000w/850w
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed/ Logitech G Pro Hero.
Keyboard Logitech - G915 LIGHTSPEED / Logitech G Pro
from what rumors say it only double the Ray accelarator per shader unit, so don't expect too much maybe 33% increase RT?

I doubt it would eve get that it will be straved for instructiond anyways.

The latest rumors which should be taken with a huge grain of salt as amd ones tend to be straight out of dreamland is that it will be 4080 raster with 4070ti super RT performance for 500 bucks.

I'll believe it when I see it.

Although 500 is probably the most made up part they will price is 10-15% lower than it's closest performance rival from the 50 series so if the 5070 is 699 expect 599-649..... Assuming that's the card it's most similar to perfomance wise.

Once we see the PS5 pro which likely shares some of the DNA with RDNA4 we will see hopefully it has the dedicated hardware like the PS5 pro for upscaling and that isn't a Sony only thing.
 
Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Messages
3,875 (0.89/day)
System Name Skunkworks 3.0
Processor 5800x3d
Motherboard x570 unify
Cooling Noctua NH-U12A
Memory 32GB 3600 mhz
Video Card(s) asrock 6800xt challenger D
Storage Sabarent rocket 4.0 2TB, MX 500 2TB
Display(s) Asus 1440p144 27"
Case Old arse cooler master 932
Power Supply Corsair 1200w platinum
Mouse *squeak*
Keyboard Some old office thing
Software Manjaro
I'mma place my bet now: performance will be within 5% of the 7800xt in both raster and RT. There will be no 7900 series replacement. Nvidia marketshare will increase.
 
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
1,898 (0.46/day)
Let's see:

TPU:

View attachment 360753

Wiki:

View attachment 360754

Both share the same information. :kookoo:



Wrong. The "P" is a very minor process modification and won't result in any advantages.



Virtually one and the same thing. A "plus" is replaced by a new digit. Meaningless.

N5 density:
View attachment 360755
N4 density:
View attachment 360756
I posted a link where TPU says 5nm for 4090. You keep posting the same 4N FinFET image but not the link where this originates from.
As others have said it's really still 5nm and i would not call two years of process advancements as "minor modification".
Zen 5 already proved the efficiency advantage of N4P. Let's see if Nvidia uses the extra budget for efficiency or performance.

Blackwell already *IS* N4P. There's nothing to argue here. Gaming variants of this architecture will also be N4P. Anyone hoping otherwise is deluding themselves. Rubin will release next year with N3 and HBM4 and the next gaming architecture is likely 2026 on N3.

I think we will be lucky if Nvidia finally decides to include DisplayPort 2.1 UHBR20 on gaming cards tho i dont expect any VRAM increases.
It will likely be the same meh generation as 20 series was.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: ARF
Joined
May 3, 2018
Messages
2,881 (1.20/day)
16GB 256-bit for the larger core? that's it?
I've got that with a golden rabbit...

Unless RT performance is *greatly* improved, I 100% expect the 7900XT and XTX to continue to be sold and/or get a re-brand (ala Radeon VII sold alongside 5700XT, or R9 290->390x)
Ok grain of salt, but MLiD is claiming his sources have said 8800XT will run at 2.9GHz+, be roughly equal to 7900XTX in raster and about 50% faster in RT and 16GB on 256bit bus.
 
Joined
Dec 6, 2022
Messages
381 (0.53/day)
Location
NYC
System Name GameStation
Processor AMD R5 5600X
Motherboard Gigabyte B550
Cooling Artic Freezer II 120
Memory 16 GB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Pulse 7900 XTX
Storage 2 TB SSD
Case Cooler Master Elite 120
Will be waiting to see how much power consumption is improved over predecessor.
Ahh, the time when power consumption matters (when it can be used against AMD) but doesnt matter otherwise, as told many times in here. See all the excuses of intel cpu owners and 3090 and 4090 gpus on Ngreedia side on the subject.

Amyways…wondering if they plan to follow through with the lower price as it has been rumored before, like the rumored 500 bucks unit with better performance than the current 7900xtx.

I've been thinking about what might be going on with all the next gen discrete GPU releases. We have been on a GPU release schedule of about two years for a while now. Here are the dates of the last releases:

A770 - Oct 2022
4090 - Oct 2022
7900XTX - Dec 2022

So there is still time for the next gen to come out this year. Rumors swirling around the tech media might be due to filling that 24/7 news cycle. The sites are probably getting bored and jumping at every bit of information. However, if the rumors are true and the next gens are delayed, all three families most likely are delayed for very different reasons:

Blackwell - Nvidia has all the resources in the world to release whatever they want whenever they want regardless of AI/Data center prioritization rumors. Therefore, the delay is most likely external. I think Nvidia needs TSMC 3 nm in order to produce Blackwell. I don't think 4 nm will yield the number of units and power consumption levels that will allow them to go above the 4090. Blackwell for the client might be delayed until 2025H2 since 3NP and 3NX are not ready until later this year or the middle of next depending on which node version is needed. With rumors suggesting that neither Intel or AMD will reach or exceed the 4090, there is just no rush for Nvidia to push out high end Blackwell.

Battlemage - Intel still has resources but they are dwindling fast. It is still possible that they may discontinue their entire GPU division for both data center and client. Rumors indicate that the GPU is still coming and Intel has a variety of choices when it comes to process node. But their financial situation is dire and there has been very little information regarding their next gen data center GPU which would get higher priority than the client.

RDNA4 - AMD has the least resources of all three companies so they probably do need to prioritize product releases based on the most important markets. As some have pointed out, AMD is focusing on the data center so any delays to RDNA4 would most likely be caused by data center GPU product schedules. The process node is not a problem as AMD might be leaving the top end GPU market for a while and they have yet to utilize 4 nm.
Sometimes we gamers ignore the fact that we are not the biggest money makers of these companies. I dont like it but understand why a company with still limited budget will dedicate more of that money to enterprise components, like zen 5.
Problem with RX 7000 is the power consumption in media playback scenarios.
Lord, this again. It’s tiresome. I’m pretty sure that you dont care about how much power your intel/ngreedia combo is using when gaming.
Adding the speculation of higher RT performance, this needs to be priced at $399 and a possible 192bit cheaper model with, for example, 44-48 CUs at $299 to really make some noise.
If AMD comes out with a 56 CUs model at $499 or more, it will mean that they are not ready yet to offer anything competitive to Nvidia and only wish to maintain a position in the discrete market to keep the Radeon brand alive.
I love the idea of prices coming down, but given that everything has simply become more expensive, we shouldn’t expect the return to those prices of old. Hell, TSMC alone has raised the price per wafer a couple of times just in the last couple of years.

Again, dont get me wrong, i dont like the msrp of a 7900xtx anymore than the already overpriced 4090, but doubt we will see a negative adjustment in a meaningful way (lower prices)
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
3,328 (0.81/day)
Location
Athens, Greece
System Name 3 desktop systems: Gaming / Internet / HTPC
Processor Ryzen 5 5500 / Ryzen 5 4600G / FX 6300 (12 years latter got to see how bad Bulldozer is)
Motherboard MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (1) / MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (2) / Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3
Cooling Νoctua U12S / Segotep T4 / Snowman M-T6
Memory 32GB - 16GB G.Skill RIPJAWS 3600+16GB G.Skill Aegis 3200 / 16GB JUHOR / 16GB Kingston 2400MHz (DDR3)
Video Card(s) ASRock RX 6600 + GT 710 (PhysX)/ Vega 7 integrated / Radeon RX 580
Storage NVMes, ONLY NVMes/ NVMes, SATA Storage / NVMe boot(Clover), SATA storage
Display(s) Philips 43PUS8857/12 UHD TV (120Hz, HDR, FreeSync Premium) ---- 19'' HP monitor + BlitzWolf BW-V5
Case Sharkoon Rebel 12 / CoolerMaster Elite 361 / Xigmatek Midguard
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Chieftec 850W / Silver Power 400W / Sharkoon 650W
Mouse CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / CoolerMaster Devastator / Logitech
Keyboard CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / CoolerMaster Devastator / Logitech
Software Windows 10 / Windows 10&Windows 11 / Windows 10
I love the idea of prices coming down, but given that everything has simply become more expensive, we shouldn’t expect the return to those prices of old. Hell, TSMC alone has raised the price per wafer a couple of times just in the last couple of years.

Again, dont get me wrong, i dont like the msrp of a 7900xtx anymore than the already overpriced 4090, but doubt we will see a negative adjustment in a meaningful way (lower prices)
Those prices aren't an example of prices "coming down" but more of an example of "getting more from a new generation at current prices". What was the normal for over a decade and until a couple years ago. Are we already educated to expect higher performance from a new generation product, to also come at a higher price? Hope not.

$399 for the top model wouldn't be an example of prices going down considering RX 7700 sells even lower than that.
$299 for a 40+ CU model with 12GBs of VRAM wouldn't either, considering that RX 67x0 XT sells at that price range.

Anyway, as I said those prices I mentioned would be an indication that AMD wants to increase it's market share and it is ready to do a limited price war with Nvidia at the sub $500 market, while also maintaining a healthy advantage over the future Intel cards. If AMD doesn't have the wafer supply, or the will to try to increase it's market share, we can expect prices to be again relative to prices of Nvidia competing models.
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
3,328 (0.81/day)
Location
Athens, Greece
System Name 3 desktop systems: Gaming / Internet / HTPC
Processor Ryzen 5 5500 / Ryzen 5 4600G / FX 6300 (12 years latter got to see how bad Bulldozer is)
Motherboard MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (1) / MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (2) / Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3
Cooling Νoctua U12S / Segotep T4 / Snowman M-T6
Memory 32GB - 16GB G.Skill RIPJAWS 3600+16GB G.Skill Aegis 3200 / 16GB JUHOR / 16GB Kingston 2400MHz (DDR3)
Video Card(s) ASRock RX 6600 + GT 710 (PhysX)/ Vega 7 integrated / Radeon RX 580
Storage NVMes, ONLY NVMes/ NVMes, SATA Storage / NVMe boot(Clover), SATA storage
Display(s) Philips 43PUS8857/12 UHD TV (120Hz, HDR, FreeSync Premium) ---- 19'' HP monitor + BlitzWolf BW-V5
Case Sharkoon Rebel 12 / CoolerMaster Elite 361 / Xigmatek Midguard
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Chieftec 850W / Silver Power 400W / Sharkoon 650W
Mouse CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / CoolerMaster Devastator / Logitech
Keyboard CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / CoolerMaster Devastator / Logitech
Software Windows 10 / Windows 10&Windows 11 / Windows 10
Joined
Dec 6, 2022
Messages
381 (0.53/day)
Location
NYC
System Name GameStation
Processor AMD R5 5600X
Motherboard Gigabyte B550
Cooling Artic Freezer II 120
Memory 16 GB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Pulse 7900 XTX
Storage 2 TB SSD
Case Cooler Master Elite 120
Those prices aren't an example of prices "coming down" but more of an example of "getting more from a new generation at current prices". What was the normal for over a decade and until a couple years ago. Are we already educated to expect higher performance from a new generation product, to also come at a higher price? Hope not.

$399 for the top model wouldn't be an example of prices going down considering RX 7700 sells even lower than that.
$299 for a 40+ CU model with 12GBs of VRAM wouldn't either, considering that RX 67x0 XT sells at that price range.

Anyway, as I said those prices I mentioned would be an indication that AMD wants to increase it's market share and it is ready to do a limited price war with Nvidia at the sub $500 market, while also maintaining a healthy advantage over the future Intel cards. If AMD doesn't have the wafer supply, or the will to try to increase it's market share, we can expect prices to be again relative to prices of Nvidia competing models.
To a point, you could say that AMD is already doing a mini-tiny price war since their offerings are indeed cheaper.

Again, dont get me wrong, I would love lower prices, i just dont know how realistic that could be with today’s money devaluation. Maybe a small reduction, but seriously doubt we will get even near to what it used to be.

And i do wish to be wrong on that, for the sake of our pockets. :)
 
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
1,898 (0.46/day)
What chip does "4090" include ? :slap:
:nutkick:

View attachment 360826
From your own link: Process Size 5 nm

You seem to be under the impression that Nvidia already uses pure 4nm and thus there's now way they could possibly improve anything by moving to N4P?

I would like to remind you that both Kepler and Maxwell were produced on the same 28nm node with roughly 1,5 years apart.
Despite the same node Nvidia managed to:

Improve performance by 28% (780 Ti to 980 Ti).
Double the L2.
Quadruple the L1.
Increase transistor count by a billion (chip size increased by only 40mm² or 7,1%).
Double the VRAM within the same 250W power.
Increase both base and boost clocks.
Lower the price by $50.

There's a lot that can be done even on the same node. Even more on a two year newer node.
Would i as tech enthusiast be happy if they used 3nm for gaming cards? Yes of course i would. But im also a realist and gamers are not their biggest customers. Same with AMD and Intel.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: ARF

ARF

Joined
Jan 28, 2020
Messages
4,670 (2.65/day)
Location
Ex-usa | slava the trolls
Would i as tech enthusiast be happy if they used 3nm for gaming cards?

Especially that 3nm is not TSMC's latest & greatest. That is the new 2nm node.




All delays by AMD, nvidia or intel, and keeping the products on the older 7nm(6) and 5nm(4) will lead to declining sales, and users finding other areas where to spend money.
 
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
1,898 (0.46/day)
Especially that 3nm is not TSMC's latest & greatest. That is the new 2nm node.




All delays by AMD, nvidia or intel, and keeping the products on the older 7nm(6) and 5nm(4) will lead to declining sales, and users finding other areas where to spend money.
Most people dont buy these products based on process nodes. Most people dont even know what a process node is.
People primarily buy on price and performance. If the product is the same or lower price and higher performance with same or better efficiency then it sells regardless if the process node is same or not. Declining sales have been because there has been mostly bad pricing for most products and the economic situation is also not good which makes people decide twice before pulling the trigger.

2nm is years away. When words like trial and apple are thrown around then you know it will be years before big several hundred mm² chips could be produced on it with acceptable yields.

I would much more prefer at least flagship gaming cards move to HBM. This is not something that's just starting or super expensive (contrary to what others say). Even using older mass produced HBM3 (current is HBM3e and HBM4 next year) would offer advantages in terms of area, power and performance.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: ARF
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
3,328 (0.81/day)
Location
Athens, Greece
System Name 3 desktop systems: Gaming / Internet / HTPC
Processor Ryzen 5 5500 / Ryzen 5 4600G / FX 6300 (12 years latter got to see how bad Bulldozer is)
Motherboard MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (1) / MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (2) / Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3
Cooling Νoctua U12S / Segotep T4 / Snowman M-T6
Memory 32GB - 16GB G.Skill RIPJAWS 3600+16GB G.Skill Aegis 3200 / 16GB JUHOR / 16GB Kingston 2400MHz (DDR3)
Video Card(s) ASRock RX 6600 + GT 710 (PhysX)/ Vega 7 integrated / Radeon RX 580
Storage NVMes, ONLY NVMes/ NVMes, SATA Storage / NVMe boot(Clover), SATA storage
Display(s) Philips 43PUS8857/12 UHD TV (120Hz, HDR, FreeSync Premium) ---- 19'' HP monitor + BlitzWolf BW-V5
Case Sharkoon Rebel 12 / CoolerMaster Elite 361 / Xigmatek Midguard
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Chieftec 850W / Silver Power 400W / Sharkoon 650W
Mouse CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / CoolerMaster Devastator / Logitech
Keyboard CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / CoolerMaster Devastator / Logitech
Software Windows 10 / Windows 10&Windows 11 / Windows 10
From your own link: Process Size 5 nm

Most people dont buy these products based on process nodes. Most people dont even know what a process node is.

Haven't you realized by now that it is pointless to expect a conversation with that account?
You are just losing your time, while he is probably just having fun.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: ARF
Top