• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Z890 Chipset Motherboards to Launch with Default Power Profile Out of the Box?

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,129 (7.58/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
Intel is expected to launch its next-generation Core Ultra 200 "Arrow Lake-S" desktop processors on October 24, 2024, and since these chips introduce the new Socket LGA1851, they launch alongside new motherboards. The first wave of Core Ultra 200 series processors will be "K" or "KF" SKUs targeting gamers and enthusiasts, and the first compatible motherboards will be based on the premium Intel Z890 chipset. Intel is reportedly being extra careful not to repeat the "Raptor Lake" fiasco that saw motherboards power its 13th- and 14th Gen Core "Raptor Lake" processors with elevated voltages, causing their irreversible physical degradation over time. To this effect, Intel is reportedly getting its motherboard partners to ship their Intel Z890 chipset motherboards with Intel Default Power Profile out of the box.

A motherboard-level Power Profile dictates the processor base power (PL1), maximum turbo power (PL2), and IccMax values. We don't know these values for "Arrow Lake-S," particularly its top Core Ultra 9 285K part; but to illustrate what Default Power Profile out of the box means, we have to look at "Raptor Lake-S." For a Core i9-14900K, the Performance Power Profile—which is what Intel Z690 and Z790 motherboards enable out of the box—provide a PL1 of 125 W, PL2 of 253 W, and IccMax of 307 W, which is what Intel considers stock for this processor model.



The Extreme Power Profile, which can be enabled in the UEFI setup program, holds PL1 and PL2 at 250 W, and unlocks 400 W IccMax (something that requires two 8-pin EPS power connectors to be plugged in, each capable of 225 W). The Insane Power Profile, available on select motherboard models, completely unlocks PL1 and PL2 to "4096 W" (i.e. anything that the motherboard VRM is capable of providing), and IccMax to 511 W (the socket's design limit). The Intel Baseline Power Profile (aka Default Power Profile) runs contrary to these three.

On the Core i9-14900K, the Default Power Profile gives the processor a PL1 of 125 W (which is also the chip's base power value), but the PL2 maximum turbo power is limited to 188 W, and the IccMax is capped at 249 W. These severely reduce the processor's boost frequency residency even at stock settings.

If the rumors of Intel getting motherboard vendors to ship Z890 chipset motherboards with Default Power Profile out of the box are true, then out of the box, these processors will likely not perform as Intel intended, and the company's guidelines to reviewers and end-users would be to manually enable at least Performance Power Profile in the UEFI setup, to at least get stock performance out of these processors.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site | Source
 
Joined
Nov 11, 2016
Messages
3,385 (1.17/day)
System Name The de-ploughminator Mk-II
Processor i7 13700KF
Motherboard MSI Z790 Carbon
Cooling ID-Cooling SE-226-XT + Phanteks T30
Memory 2x16GB G.Skill DDR5 7200Cas34
Video Card(s) Asus RTX4090 TUF
Storage Kingston KC3000 2TB NVME
Display(s) 48" LG OLED C4
Case Corsair 5000D Air
Audio Device(s) KEF LSX II LT speakers + KEF KC62 Subwoofer
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Mouse Razor Death Adder v3
Keyboard Razor Huntsman V3 Pro TKL
Software win11
Yeah sure but I'm just gonna put in even lower TDP and current limits, if I happen to buy Arrow Lake CPU :D
 

Outback Bronze

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Aug 3, 2011
Messages
2,008 (0.42/day)
Location
Walkabout Creek
System Name Raptor Baked
Processor 14900k w.c.
Motherboard Z790 Hero
Cooling w.c.
Memory 32GB Hynix
Video Card(s) Zotac 4080 w.c.
Storage 2TB Kingston kc3k
Display(s) Gigabyte 34" Curved
Case Corsair 460X
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply PCIe5 850w
Mouse Asus
Keyboard Corsair
Software Win 11
Benchmark Scores Cool n Quiet.
What's wrong with the Insane Profile out the box? Did something happen?? :)
 
Joined
Nov 11, 2016
Messages
3,385 (1.17/day)
System Name The de-ploughminator Mk-II
Processor i7 13700KF
Motherboard MSI Z790 Carbon
Cooling ID-Cooling SE-226-XT + Phanteks T30
Memory 2x16GB G.Skill DDR5 7200Cas34
Video Card(s) Asus RTX4090 TUF
Storage Kingston KC3000 2TB NVME
Display(s) 48" LG OLED C4
Case Corsair 5000D Air
Audio Device(s) KEF LSX II LT speakers + KEF KC62 Subwoofer
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Mouse Razor Death Adder v3
Keyboard Razor Huntsman V3 Pro TKL
Software win11

las

Joined
Nov 14, 2012
Messages
1,693 (0.39/day)
System Name Meh
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI X670E Tomahawk
Cooling Thermalright Phantom Spirit
Memory 32GB G.Skill @ 6000/CL30
Video Card(s) Gainward RTX 4090 Phantom / Undervolt + OC
Storage Samsung 990 Pro 2TB + WD SN850X 1TB + 64TB NAS/Server
Display(s) 27" 1440p IPS @ 360 Hz + 32" 4K/UHD QD-OLED @ 240 Hz + 77" 4K/UHD QD-OLED @ 144 Hz VRR
Case Fractal Design North XL
Audio Device(s) FiiO DAC
Power Supply Corsair RM1000x / Native 12VHPWR
Mouse Logitech G Pro Wireless Superlight + Razer Deathadder V3 Pro
Keyboard Corsair K60 Pro / MX Low Profile Speed
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Sounds like OC headroom to me.

Can't wait to see what Intel can do with TSMC 3N - AMD will probably be rushing out 9000X3D very fast afterwards... AMD going with 4N might bite them in the A
 
Joined
Aug 4, 2021
Messages
56 (0.05/day)
Location
Belgium
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard Asus ROG Crosshair X670E Hero
Cooling EKWB loop
Memory Corsair Dominator Titanium DDR5-8000C38
Video Card(s) nvidia RTX 4090 FE
Storage WD Black SN850X 1TB // WD Black SN850X 2TB // WD Black SN770 2TB
Display(s) Samsung Odyssey G8 OLED
Case Corsair 5000D Airflow
Power Supply Corsair HX1500i
Mouse Glorious Model D 2 Pro
Keyboard Lemokey P1 Pro
If the rumors of Intel getting motherboard vendors to ship Z890 chipset motherboards with Default Power Profile out of the box are true, then out of the box, these processors will likely not perform as Intel intended, and the company's guidelines to reviewers and end-users would be to manually enable at least Performance Power Profile in the UEFI setup, to at least get stock performance out of these processors..
I don't agree with this. Stock performance would be with the 'Default Power Profile' since those are the 'stock' settings. You get extra performance by enabling the 'Performance Power Profile' but that's not 'stock'. Soon this will be enabled again by default, to get the extra performance. And we all know how this went.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2024
Messages
184 (0.65/day)
Ship it in default mode but review it in performance mode. I guess that's kind of like the XMP/EXPO situation. Still not great.
 

las

Joined
Nov 14, 2012
Messages
1,693 (0.39/day)
System Name Meh
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI X670E Tomahawk
Cooling Thermalright Phantom Spirit
Memory 32GB G.Skill @ 6000/CL30
Video Card(s) Gainward RTX 4090 Phantom / Undervolt + OC
Storage Samsung 990 Pro 2TB + WD SN850X 1TB + 64TB NAS/Server
Display(s) 27" 1440p IPS @ 360 Hz + 32" 4K/UHD QD-OLED @ 240 Hz + 77" 4K/UHD QD-OLED @ 144 Hz VRR
Case Fractal Design North XL
Audio Device(s) FiiO DAC
Power Supply Corsair RM1000x / Native 12VHPWR
Mouse Logitech G Pro Wireless Superlight + Razer Deathadder V3 Pro
Keyboard Corsair K60 Pro / MX Low Profile Speed
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Ship it in default mode but review it in performance mode. I guess that's kind of like the XMP/EXPO situation. Still not great.
Any decent review will state this clearly
 
Joined
Sep 9, 2022
Messages
99 (0.13/day)
Reviews should definitely be conducted with the default profile only. Every decent CPU review usually has an OC section and that is where the testing of the 'Performance' and 'Extreme' profiles belongs.
 
Joined
Oct 23, 2020
Messages
55 (0.04/day)
For reference on profiles, from Intel themselves:
Thomas_Hannaford_0-1718725426624.png


According to this image, which is still referenced in the latest news about the Raptor Lake issue in the Intel forums, and as far as I know is exactly what still is in the datasheet, the baseline profile is not the default, and shouldn't be unless required. At least when talking about current CPUs Intel was also somewhat clear in saying "Intel is not recommending motherboard manufacturers to use ‘baseline’ power delivery settings on boards capable of higher values. Intel’s recommended ‘Intel Default Settings’ are a combination of thermal and power delivery features along with a selection of possible power delivery profiles based on motherboard capabilities."
My guess is that the default profile will simply be the Performance one, with the baseline and extreme profiles being there as alternatives, together with possible custom profiles by motherboard manufacturers. Which would be avoiding the situation of some motherboards defaulting to PL2=4096W and ICCMAX=500A like it was happening.
 
Joined
Jun 22, 2012
Messages
301 (0.07/day)
Processor Intel i7-12700K
Motherboard MSI PRO Z690-A WIFI
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S
Memory Corsair Vengeance 4x16 GB (64GB) DDR4-3600 C18
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 3090 GAMING X TRIO 24G
Storage Samsung 980 Pro 1TB, SK hynix Platinum P41 2TB
Case Fractal Define C
Power Supply Corsair RM850x
Mouse Logitech G203
Software openSUSE Tumbleweed
For reference on profiles, from Intel themselves:
View attachment 363060

PL1=PL2=253W cannot be sustained continuously below TjMax with air cooling unless you have some pretty serious air flow and a high-end cooler, so I can't see how it could be the default unless thermal throttling is the intended default operating state for these processors.
 
Joined
Oct 23, 2020
Messages
55 (0.04/day)
PL1=PL2=253W cannot be sustained continuously below TjMax with air cooling unless you have some pretty serious air flow and a high-end cooler, so I can't see how it could be the default unless thermal throttling is the intended default operating state for these processors.
I'm guessing the assumption is that if you're getting a 1X900KS you're going to be cooling it properly. For the other models 125W PL1 is considered the standard, but with the option for the manufacturers to set it to 253W. I mean depending on the motherboard, making the assumption the person will have enough cooling isn't that weird.
Even if in my opinion it should be lower, with the PL2 of the i7 range around 180W and the i9 around 200W, it doesn't really make sense in most cases to have the default be higher than that.
 
Joined
May 3, 2018
Messages
2,881 (1.22/day)
Intel and their voltages :kookoo::kookoo::kookoo::kookoo::kookoo::kookoo::kookoo:
cRaptor Lake was a rush job. Insiders have admitted they did the refresh in record time to beat AMD in benchmark and it clearly shows. It's the ring bus that is experiencing the high voltage spikes. If we can believe Intel, Arrow Lake's new design means it won't happen again.

I'm prepared to give them a go. I want to move beyond 8 cores and don't want to deal with AMD's dual ccd design even more so that non-X3D models get core parking nonsense now. Intel 265KF is looking like a nice update from my 5800X.
 

NoLoihi

New Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2024
Messages
8 (0.24/day)
It's the ring bus that is experiencing the high voltage spikes.
From what it seems like to me, it's a programming error. People have said these spikes happen right when coming out of C-states, so there's probably some control registers which aren't being set properly in time. Most importantly, I don't see how this would result in any appreciable performance gain.
I don't see why people constanly need to pull in all these allegations. Errors happen in products that haven't been rushed as well. Processor testing is (surely) highly automated, they might not have had a test case for that, maybe some engineer disabled it in a fat-fingering accident, who knows. They’ve had quite some time after release to find the issue, so even if you wish to imply the release was rushed beyond good conciousness, there were lengths of time after that to pick up any loose ends. Had they quietly released a microcode update with “fixes for voltage regulation in transitional operating states”, probably nobody whatsoever would have batted an eye.
It just doesn’t make sense to believe Intel sat on their knowledge for over a year, which is also why they themselves didn’t know what’s up for the first stretch of time.
 
Top