• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel's Core Ultra 9 285K Performance Claims Leaked, Doesn't Beat i9-14900K at Gaming

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,304 (7.52/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
The Chinese tech press is abuzz with slides allegedly from Intel's pre-launch press-deck for the Core Ultra 2-series "Arrow Lake-S." The most sensational of these are Intel's first-party performance claims for the top Core Ultra 9 285K model. There's good news and bad news. Good news first—Intel claims to have made a big leap in energy efficiency with "Arrow Lake," and the 285K should offer gaming performance comparable to the current Core i9-14900K at around 80 W lower power draw for the processor. But then there in lies the bad news—despite claimed IPC gains for the "Lion Cove" P-core, and rumored clock speeds being on par with the "Raptor Cove" P-cores on the i9-14900K, the 285K is barely any faster than its predecessor in absolute terms.

In its first party testing, when averaged across 12 game tests, which we used Google optical translation to make out the titles of, Intel used performance numbers of the i9-14900K as the mean. The 285K beats the i9-14900K in only four games—Warhammer 40K: Space Marine 2, Age of Mythology Retold, Civilization VI: Gathering Storm, and F1 23. It's on-par with the i9-14900K in Red Dead Redemption 2, Total War: Pharaoh, Metro Exodus, Cyberpunk 2077, Black Myth: Wukong, Rainbow Six Siege. It's slower than the i9-14900K in Far Cry 6, FF XIV, F1 24, Red Dead Redemption 2. Averaged across this bench, the Core Ultra 9 285K ends up roughly on par with the Core i9-14900K in gaming. Intel also compared the 285K to AMD's Ryzen 9 9950X, and interestingly, even the Ryzen 9 7950X3D.



The Ryzen 9 7950X3D isn't AMD's fastest gaming processor (which is the 7800X3D), but Intel chose this so it could compare the 285K across both gaming and productivity workloads. The 285K is shown being significantly slower than the 7950X3D in Far Cry 6 and Cyberpunk 2077. It's on par in Assassin's Creed Shadows and CIV 6 Gathering Storm. It only gets ahead in Rainbow Six Siege. Then there's the all important comparison with the current AMD flagship, the Ryzen 9 9950X "Zen 5." The 9950X is shown being on-par or beating the 285K in 8 out of 12 game tests. And the 9950X is the regular version of "Zen 5," without the 3D V-cache.

All is not doom and gloom for the Core Ultra 9 285K, the significant IPC gains Intel made for the "Skymont" E-cores means that the 285K gets significantly ahead of the 7950X3D in multithreaded productivity workloads, as shown with Geekbench 4.3, Cinebench 2024, and POV-Ray.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site | Source
 
Joined
Dec 1, 2020
Messages
491 (0.33/day)
Processor Ryzen 5 7600X
Motherboard ASRock B650M PG Riptide
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory DDR5 6000Mhz CL28 32GB
Video Card(s) Nvidia Geforce RTX 3070 Palit GamingPro OC
Storage Corsair MP600 Force Series Gen.4 1TB
This is before or after the castration of the 14900k with baseline and patches? Imagine if they didn't remove the HT, Arrow Lake would have been on par with Alder Lake from 2021

On the next Q-report Pat will be like:

As I walk through the valley of the silicon and tech
I take a look at my company and realize there's nothin' alright
'Cause I've been crying and begging' for so long that
Even my momma thinks that my career is gone
 
Joined
Dec 12, 2016
Messages
1,958 (0.67/day)
There are also some IPC leaks:

Intel Core Ultra 200 "Arrow Lake-S" to offer 9% IPC gain on P-Cores and 32% on E-Cores - VideoCardz.com

It looks like much higher IPC E-cores is 1:1 replacing HT and slightly higher IPC P-cores is allowing Intel to drop the clocks to help with power consumption and runaway voltage issues. In the end, it looks like Zen 4, Zen 5, Raptor Lake Refresh and Arrow Lake-S are going to be within 10% of each other performance-wise on average across the board. Desktop gains are slowing down generation to generation as the industry focuses on data centers and AI.
 
Joined
Sep 14, 2020
Messages
585 (0.37/day)
Location
Greece
System Name Office / HP Prodesk 490 G3 MT (ex-office)
Processor Intel 13700 (90° limit) / Intel i7-6700
Motherboard Asus TUF Gaming H770 Pro / HP 805F H170
Cooling Noctua NH-U14S / Stock
Memory G. Skill Trident XMP 2x16gb DDR5 6400MHz cl32 / Samsung 2x8gb 2133MHz DDR4
Video Card(s) Asus RTX 3060 Ti Dual OC GDDR6X / Zotac GTX 1650 GDDR6 OC
Storage Samsung 2tb 980 PRO MZ / Samsung SSD 1TB 860 EVO + WD blue HDD 1TB (WD10EZEX)
Display(s) Eizo FlexScan EV2455 - 1920x1200 / Panasonic TX-32LS490E 32'' LED 1920x1080
Case Nanoxia Deep Silence 8 Pro / HP microtower
Audio Device(s) On board
Power Supply Seasonic Prime PX750 / OEM 300W bronze
Mouse MS cheap wired / Logitech cheap wired m90
Keyboard MS cheap wired / HP cheap wired
Software W11 / W7 Pro ->10 Pro
Joined
Nov 13, 2007
Messages
10,853 (1.74/day)
Location
Austin Texas
System Name stress-less
Processor 9800X3D @ 5.42GHZ
Motherboard MSI PRO B650M-A Wifi
Cooling Thermalright Phantom Spirit EVO
Memory 64GB DDR5 6400 1:1 CL30-36-36-76 FCLK 2200
Video Card(s) RTX 4090 FE
Storage 2TB WD SN850, 4TB WD SN850X
Display(s) Alienware 32" 4k 240hz OLED
Case Jonsbo Z20
Audio Device(s) Yes
Power Supply Corsair SF750
Mouse DeathadderV2 X Hyperspeed
Keyboard 65% HE Keyboard
Software Windows 11
Benchmark Scores They're pretty good, nothing crazy.
Oooof. Man that is unfortunate. Oh well looks like 9800X3D in my future.
 
Joined
Jul 31, 2024
Messages
457 (3.13/day)
Not all software is executable on E-Cores. Comparing E-cores with decent processors with only P-cores is nonsense in the first place.

If you do, I assume that your software is badly optimised and only uses the capabilities of the bad E-Cores, not the good P-Cores. Which contradicts the purpose of a newer processor with newer instruction sets and capabilities.
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
3,823 (1.33/day)
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard ROG STRIX B650E-F GAMING WIFI
Memory 2x16GB G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 CL36 (F5-6000J3636F16GX2-FX5)
Video Card(s) INNO3D GeForce RTX™ 4070 Ti SUPER TWIN X2
Storage 2TB Samsung 980 PRO, 4TB WD Black SN850X
Display(s) 42" LG C2 OLED, 27" ASUS PG279Q
Case Thermaltake Core P5
Power Supply Fractal Design Ion+ Platinum 760W
Mouse Corsair Dark Core RGB Pro SE
Keyboard Corsair K100 RGB
VR HMD HTC Vive Cosmos
They seem to be going for the same efficiency push as AMD did with Ryzen 9000 series. Same-ish performance at a noticeably lower power point. -80W in gaming test is significant.
Probably hoping that against Ryzen 9000 it looks better than would otherwise be expected.
 
Joined
Jun 11, 2019
Messages
636 (0.31/day)
Location
Moscow, Russia
Processor Intel 12600K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z690 Gaming X
Cooling CPU: Noctua NH-D15S; Case: 2xNoctua NF-A14, 1xNF-S12A.
Memory Ballistix Sport LT DDR4 @3600CL16 2*16GB
Video Card(s) Palit RTX 4080
Storage Samsung 970 Pro 512GB + Crucial MX500 500gb + WD Red 6TB
Display(s) Dell S2721qs
Case Phanteks P300A Mesh
Audio Device(s) Behringer UMC204HD
Power Supply Fractal Design Ion+ 560W
Mouse Glorious Model D-
Look, efficiency and all is cool but realistically nobody except 3.5 enthusiasts and a few die-hard Intel fans with long overdue upgrades from something like 9th gen is going to spend around $800 on Z890mb+cpu combo to be slower than both past gen and AMD. This is a complete mess if true, there's no good spin here. Damn.
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 17, 2018
Messages
32 (0.01/day)
Look, efficiency and all is cool but realistically nobody except 3.5 enthusiasts and people with long overdue upgrades from something like 9th gen is going to spend around $800 on Z890mb+cpu combo to be slower than both past gen and AMD. This a complete mess if true, there's no good spin here. Damn.
You meant to say 1200$+
 

Outback Bronze

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Aug 3, 2011
Messages
2,044 (0.42/day)
Location
Walkabout Creek
System Name Raptor Baked
Processor 14900k w.c.
Motherboard Z790 Hero
Cooling w.c.
Memory 48GB G.Skill 7200
Video Card(s) Zotac 4080 w.c.
Storage 2TB Kingston kc3k
Display(s) Samsung 34" G8
Case Corsair 460X
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply PCIe5 850w
Mouse Asus
Keyboard Corsair
Software Win 11
Benchmark Scores Cool n Quiet.
The funny thing is, my 14900K & KS will end up having more warranty than them too : )

But let's wait for official benchmarks before we get carried away yeah.
 
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
2,200 (0.43/day)
They seem to be going for the same efficiency push as AMD did with Ryzen 9000 series. Same-ish performance at a noticeably lower power point. -80W in gaming test is significant.
Probably hoping that against Ryzen 9000 it looks better than would otherwise be expected.

Still, 400W on avg for "gaming" is kind of absurd.

X3D will need not even 1/3rd of that to even produce more or higher FPS.
 
Joined
Dec 12, 2016
Messages
1,958 (0.67/day)
The funny thing is, my 14900K & KS will end up having more warranty than them too : )

But let's wait for official benchmarks before we get carried away yeah.
Arrow Lake was never expected to beat Raptor Lake by anything approaching a significant margin. Intel is recorrecting right now as both Skylake and Raptor Lake were dead-ends.
 

SL2

Joined
Jan 27, 2006
Messages
2,460 (0.36/day)
I'd say no one in their right mind would expect Arrow lake beating Superposition Raptor lake in everything given the W differences. I'm not saying it's impossible, but it's highly unlikely.

No HT™ on top of that, although same amount of Economy-cores™. Better IPC so I guess they're Economy Plus?
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 13, 2007
Messages
10,853 (1.74/day)
Location
Austin Texas
System Name stress-less
Processor 9800X3D @ 5.42GHZ
Motherboard MSI PRO B650M-A Wifi
Cooling Thermalright Phantom Spirit EVO
Memory 64GB DDR5 6400 1:1 CL30-36-36-76 FCLK 2200
Video Card(s) RTX 4090 FE
Storage 2TB WD SN850, 4TB WD SN850X
Display(s) Alienware 32" 4k 240hz OLED
Case Jonsbo Z20
Audio Device(s) Yes
Power Supply Corsair SF750
Mouse DeathadderV2 X Hyperspeed
Keyboard 65% HE Keyboard
Software Windows 11
Benchmark Scores They're pretty good, nothing crazy.
Arrow Lake was never expected to beat Raptor Lake by anything approaching a significant margin. Intel is recorrecting right now as both Skylake and Raptor Lake were dead-ends.

I think you're right. In my own, way-off the mark thread here, this is what we generally thought:
1728384214325.png


The scary part is: Intel's "First-Party Benchmarks" are usually fantastically optimistic.... and a large chunk of people did think that there would be SOME improvement. So IMO this looks like it's going to generally miss expectations in the broader market.

I legitimately thought the APO team, faster ram etc. etc. would net some gains in games (since tuning ram and turning of HT on a 14900K can get you +10% over stock, reduce power draw, without any IPC increase or other improvements).
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 5, 2020
Messages
204 (0.14/day)
They seem to be going for the same efficiency push as AMD did with Ryzen 9000 series. Same-ish performance at a noticeably lower power point. -80W in gaming test is significant.
Probably hoping that against Ryzen 9000 it looks better than would otherwise be expected.
For the 9000 series that's just mostly from lower power limits. GN tested both arch on 45W and the 7000 series actually did better. At higher power draw >65w 9000 won so the lower power limits for 9000 series are actually more of a disadvantage.

Still, 400W on avg for "gaming" is kind of absurd.

X3D will need not even 1/3rd of that to even produce more or higher FPS.
C'mon, it's obviously total system power...
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 13, 2007
Messages
10,853 (1.74/day)
Location
Austin Texas
System Name stress-less
Processor 9800X3D @ 5.42GHZ
Motherboard MSI PRO B650M-A Wifi
Cooling Thermalright Phantom Spirit EVO
Memory 64GB DDR5 6400 1:1 CL30-36-36-76 FCLK 2200
Video Card(s) RTX 4090 FE
Storage 2TB WD SN850, 4TB WD SN850X
Display(s) Alienware 32" 4k 240hz OLED
Case Jonsbo Z20
Audio Device(s) Yes
Power Supply Corsair SF750
Mouse DeathadderV2 X Hyperspeed
Keyboard 65% HE Keyboard
Software Windows 11
Benchmark Scores They're pretty good, nothing crazy.
Or, maybe they saw what happened with AMD's 9000 launch and got a bit humble about it this time around.
It's possible but I'm not holding my breath on that one. For example, here's the 14th Gen (13th Gen) slide deck:
1728385364455.png

Steve Harvey Lol GIF by Digg
 

SL2

Joined
Jan 27, 2006
Messages
2,460 (0.36/day)
It's possible but I'm not holding my breath on that one.
I think all the "Up to" numbers should be ignored, while the rest should be taken with a grain of salt as usual.

It's a more interesting launch than the last time, that's for sure. Not because of performance, but because it's different, and less insane..

I'm curious if this is the final CPU for LGA 1851 tho.
Lots of people won't upgrade the CPU the following year, I know lol
 
Joined
Aug 10, 2020
Messages
336 (0.21/day)
One benchmark showing 4% faster while being down 165W?!? Here is to hoping Intel finally fixed their insane power consumption. At the very least new architecture is interesting.
 

Pavlinius

New Member
Joined
May 30, 2024
Messages
4 (0.02/day)
This is before or after the castration of the 14900k with baseline and patches? Imagine if they didn't remove the HT, Arrow Lake would have been on par with Alder Lake from 2021

On the next Q-report Pat will be like:

As I walk through the valley of the silicon and tech
I take a look at my company and realize there's nothin' alright
'Cause I've been crying and begging' for so long that
Even my momma thinks that my career is gone
I'm not sure where do you see castration. Yes setting a 253W power limit is a bit restrictive but it only matters for all core loads like Cinebench and not in gaming. Also my 14900K is a bit faster with the latest Intel microcode from a few days back. It's scoring 39.9K at Cinebench at 253W, so I'm happy.
 
Joined
May 17, 2018
Messages
32 (0.01/day)
I think all the "Up to" numbers should be ignored, while the rest should be taken with a grain of salt as usual.

It's a more interesting launch than the last time, that's for sure. Not because of performance, but because it's different, and less insane..

I'm curious if this is the final CPU for LGA 1851 tho.
Lots of people won't upgrade the CPU the following year, I know lol
Yes, Arrow Lake last proc. for 1851. Nova Lake will have 1900+ pins
 

SL2

Joined
Jan 27, 2006
Messages
2,460 (0.36/day)
Yes, Arrow Lake last proc. for 1851. Nova Lake will have 1900+ pins
Well it had a good run, I guess.

Funny thing is that the only game where it beats the 7950X3D is Rainbow Six Siege that's NINE years old, and it has an asterisk lol.
1728387040258.png
 
Last edited:

mikesg

New Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2024
Messages
26 (0.13/day)
Isn't there a latency advantage by removing HT?

That's important for gamers, and sound engineers.
 
Top