• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Core Ultra "Arrow Lake" Desktop Processor De-lidded

Joined
Dec 31, 2020
Messages
981 (0.69/day)
Processor E5-4627 v4
Motherboard VEINEDA X99
Memory 32 GB
Video Card(s) 2080 Ti
Storage NE-512
Display(s) G27Q
Case DAOTECH X9
Power Supply SF450
Motherboard future uncerain, 20A cancelled and the all nodes covered by frankenstein here. Fingers crossed 6+4 could still be monolithic.
That looks easy, AMD's 9000 series looks hard
And yet it broke one of the capacitors of junior here. (JNR is the gold letters insctription on the substrate)
I just still don't like the e-core/p-core thing. I wish 1. Intel will release Bartlett Lake, and/or 2. AMD will implement a similar tile-based design on Zen 6.
P or E wouldn't matter to me. Actually 1 p-core VS low power island of 4 e-cores, 990 pts VS 2660 CPUz, same die area 2.5 X performance.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Messages
12,337 (5.76/day)
Location
Midlands, UK
System Name Nebulon B
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard MSi PRO B650M-A WiFi
Cooling be quiet! Dark Rock 4
Memory 2x 24 GB Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT 12 GB
Storage 2 TB Corsair MP600 GS, 2 TB Corsair MP600 R2
Display(s) Dell S3422DWG, 7" Waveshare touchscreen
Case Kolink Citadel Mesh black
Audio Device(s) Logitech Z333 2.1 speakers, AKG Y50 headphones
Power Supply Seasonic Prime GX-750
Mouse Logitech MX Master 2S
Keyboard Logitech G413 SE
Software Bazzite (Fedora Linux) KDE
P or E wouldn't matter to me. Actually 1 p-core VS low power island of 4 e-cores, 990 pts VS 2660 CPUz, same die area 2.5 X performance.
If you think about it, e-cores are very space-efficient, but not very power-efficient, at least in current (14th) generation. This wouldn't bother me much if 1. we weren't talking about magnitudes greater power consumption and heat production than on any AMD chip, and 2. it didn't require Windows 11, Thread Director, and other software shenanigans to work properly. AMD's mixed-CCD chips (7900X3D and 7950X3D) are a no-go for me for the same reason. KISS (keep it simple, stupid) is the way to go on a desktop PC, imo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: N/A

SL2

Joined
Jan 27, 2006
Messages
2,445 (0.36/day)
At least heat is concentrated around the middle of the package, which leaves you with more surface area to dissipate it.
Apparently not middle enough
1729460802141.png
 
Top