- Joined
- Apr 29, 2014
- Messages
- 4,292 (1.11/day)
- Location
- Texas
System Name | SnowFire / The Reinforcer |
---|---|
Processor | i7 10700K 5.1ghz (24/7) / 2x Xeon E52650v2 |
Motherboard | Asus Strix Z490 / Dell Dual Socket (R720) |
Cooling | RX 360mm + 140mm Custom Loop / Dell Stock |
Memory | Corsair RGB 16gb DDR4 3000 CL 16 / DDR3 128gb 16 x 8gb |
Video Card(s) | GTX Titan XP (2025mhz) / Asus GTX 950 (No Power Connector) |
Storage | Samsung 970 1tb NVME and 2tb HDD x4 RAID 5 / 300gb x8 RAID 5 |
Display(s) | Acer XG270HU, Samsung G7 Odyssey (1440p 240hz) |
Case | Thermaltake Cube / Dell Poweredge R720 Rack Mount Case |
Audio Device(s) | Realtec ALC1150 (On board) |
Power Supply | Rosewill Lightning 1300Watt / Dell Stock 750 / Brick |
Mouse | Logitech G5 |
Keyboard | Logitech G19S |
Software | Windows 11 Pro / Windows Server 2016 |
Not sure I agree with all of that statement. I mean the FSR vs DLSS argument in terms of quality is subjective in most cases. In the side by side I have seen opinions all over the place. Personally I think they are pretty close to equal in terms of image quality with each having certain things be a weakness for them.He never said that. You're injecting your own argument.
He's right, AMD's RT is almost two generations behind nvidia now, and FSR is just awful. Full of blurry text ad almost hallucinogenic color mixing at times. DLSS balanced has better image quality then FSR ultra quality does. It's just fact.
How about this: if AMD wants to make an open source DLSS, make it good?
The RT argument is not one I am a fan of because its another one of those new tech arguments where Nvidia comes out with something and now everyone constantly references it like its the new standard. Personally I still see RT as unnecessary or overhyped especially with how much of a performance drop you get in most high end games enabling it. Neither side has it down where I would consider turning it on for most games just to watch my FPS halved in many cases. No doubt Nvidia is better, but of course they are they started the trend.
I mean, AMD has tried proprietary things in the past but they never invest enough in getting's games to support it. Normally they just open source it and hope. Problem with Nvidia's proprietary things is in the past alot have been just performance killers if you don't have Nvidia hardware like with Gameworks which I don't think helped anyone other than them.Nvidia was faster. The only reason Nvidia can keep creating proprietary features is because they simply pay off, and part of the reason they're paying off, is because AMD is always in wait and see mode.
I agree, RT is way overhyped and people talk about it like its the second coming. I have seen some of the best case scenarios on my friends 4090 PC and to be honest I was not that impressed (To be fair, it looked good on Cyberpunk at 4K settings maxed, but performance was pretty abysmal depending on the scene with DLSS off). I will say I like DLSS a lot more than I like RT. I think many people and places focus on RT way to much.Let me address these points separately:
AMD's lack of RT performance doesn't matter much when even Nvidia's RT performance is abysmal on anything less than a 4080. I'm not sad that I can't RT on my 6750 XT because I couldn't on a 3070 either. Whether or not RT is really such a significant and meaningful visual upgrade that makes it worth spending more is a separate debate, but I'm personally doubtful.
I don't care what anyone says, DLSS, FSR and XeSS are tools to get better performance out of ageing or lower end hardware when even low quality graphics options won't do anymore, nothing more. And that is a sign for me that the need for a GPU upgrade is imminent.
I'm sick and tired of responding to the mindless "oooh RT, aaah DLSS" comments everywhere, so let's leave it at that, shall we?