KOORUI to Launch the World's First Monitor With a 750Hz Refresh Rate at CES 2025

[Nomad76]

As one of the global leaders in the display industry, KOORUI is set to unveil a range of cutting-edge products at CES 2025, showcasing advancements in both technology and user experience. These launches mark another milestone in delivering innovative display solutions to consumers. We warmly invite you to visit KOORUI at Booth #35609 in South Hall 2 of the Las Vegas Convention Center to explore these products firsthand.

The highlight of the new product lineup is the world's first consumer-grade monitor featuring an unprecedented 750 Hz refresh rate. To compensate for the color defects of the TN panels, the screen uses the latest QD film with a wide color gamut solution, enabling a color gamut of up to DCI-P3 95%.



In today's esports landscape, where every frame can be a game-changer in fast-paced FPS and MOBA games, there is a growing demand on ever-smoother performance for esports players. Traditional monitors with refresh rates of 144 Hz, 240 Hz, or even 480 Hz are no longer sufficient to meet the expectations of top-tier gamers. KOORUI's new gaming monitor shatters these boundaries, delivering an exceptional 750 Hz refresh rate that brings next-level visual fluidity. KOORUI has scheduled the mass production of this model in 2025, with a global launch planned.

Product Specifications:

• MOD: KOORUI G7
• Display Type: TN
• Screen Size: 24.5-inch
• Resolution: FHD
• Color Gamut: DCI-P3 95%
• Refresh Rate (Max.): 750 Hz
• Response Time: 0.5 ms
• HDR: HDR 400

In addition to unveiling new products, KOORUI will also showcase its popular featured lineup at CES 2025, including OLED gaming monitors such as the OG32UK (a 480 Hz UHD gaming monitor) and the GS49UK (a 49-inch DQHD ultra-wide gaming monitor with a high fresh rate).

Leveraging its parent company - HKC's robust supply chain and proprietary glass manufacturing facilities, KOORUI will also exhibit a range of cost-effective monitors tailored for bulk procurement needs.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site | Source

 

[ThomasK]

We had 500 Hz monitors already. I really doubt competitive gaming needs this much refresh rate anyways.

But the bigger number certainly is to make the marketing and PR material look good.

 

[Smaeili]

I remember the days when 60Hz was all you need.
Now if you excuse me I need to go clean my dentures.

 

[BlaezaLite]

We had 500 Hz monitors already. I really doubt competitive gaming needs this much refresh rate anyways.

But the bigger number certainly is to make the marketing and PR material look good.

If Shroud heard you say that, he'd cry...

If it isn't stupid expensive, I'd love to have one. So I won't, damn.

 

[ThomasK]

If Shroud heard you say that, he'd cry...

Glad I don't know who that is.

 

[TumbleGeorge]

750Hz max... What is typical refresh rate of this monitor?

 

[ZoneDymo]

8k at 1000hz and we are basically done on those to factors, then its all about colours and brightness and power consumption

 

[Prima.Vera]

I remember the days when 60Hz was all you need.
Now if you excuse me I need to go clean my dentures.

Nah, on my old CRT the 60Hz was a flickering mess. After changing to 75Hz or even 85Hz ( later 19" monitor), that flicker went away, together with a little more desktop smoothness.
Back then it was really making sense having a refresh rate bigger than 60Hz.
Nowadays, anything more than 90Hz is just marketing material. I've tried really hard to see any difference on day to day use, also gaming, between a 90Hz monitor and a 120, 144, 240Hz refresh rate, but for the love of God I absolutely couldn't tell which one is which.
And then you have this, yet another Chinese company, blowing things out of proportions, telling us that 750Hz is actually a thing, when in fact brings ZERO value, except for a huge increase in power consumption.

 

[Cheeseball]

No BFI? 375Hz (750Hz + black frames) would be nearly blur-free and would make tracking targets a dream.

 

[Waldorf]

@Prima.Vera
depends on what the high refresh is for.
while you might not see it/some hw doesnt need it, more than 75/90 is still relevant if you play pvp online, where any "lag" will impact game play.
when you have 2 (of 5) die regularly (making team win unlikely) just because they have "more" lag than others on the opposing team, you start to notice.

ignoring the specs dont say at what res, so if its 750@720, thus maybe half for 2k, and half of that for 4K, it wouldnt be much different from other screens.

and no power consumption is stated, so no proof that it uses (much) more, ignoring that there is no direct connection to refresh,
e.g. i can easily have double the refresh on lcd (same size screen), while using almost half of what an oled screen uses.

 

[Onasi]

Okay. So how much of the transitions are actually in the refresh window? Because even TN can be pushed only so much. Or is it going to run with awful overdrive artifacts?
Anyway, it’s a TN so nobody, literally nobody except for Tier 1 CS pros should even attempt to care. And the statement that a 240 or, fuck me sideways, even a 480 Hz OLED would be “insufficient” for top tier gamers is… ridiculous.

No BFI? 375Hz (750Hz + black frames) would be nearly blur-free and would make tracking targets a dream.

I assume whatever technological rape is done here to make that poor panel run at 750 is also responsible for lack of BFI - might be that the loss of brightness would be crippling, might be controller issues, who even knows. Not like we’re dealing with a major panel provider here.

 

[Battler624]

Including a 480hz UHD monitor?

Dual mode or actual 480hz 4K monitor?

 

[AnarchoPrimitiv]

I've been saying for years that a tech reviewer REALLY needs to do a controlled experiment where they conclusively determine whether or not the AVERAGE human being can actually differentiate between 240hz and 360hz, I know LTT looked into this a few years back, but I think a larger data set needs to be used and average humans, not pro gamers....they should also determine the point at which an average human csn correctly identify and differentiate the difference between FPS....i.e. is it at a delta of 10fps? 15fps? Or even 30fps that a human can accurately identify FPS differences....I think it would be extremely valuable to the entire community if we knew definitively whether or not a 3% or 5% performance difference between GPUs or CPUs can essentially be ignored.

 

[FoulOnWhite]

I've been saying for years that a tech reviewer REALLY needs to do a controlled experiment where they conclusively determine whether or not the AVERAGE human being can actually differentiate between 240hz and 360hz, I know LTT looked into this a few years back, but I think a larger data set needs to be used and average humans, not pro gamers....they should also determine the point at which an average human csn correctly identify and differentiate the difference between FPS....i.e. is it at a delta of 10fps? 15fps? Or even 30fps that a human can accurately identify FPS differences....I think it would be extremely valuable to the entire community if we knew definitively whether or not a 3% or 5% performance difference between GPUs or CPUs can essentially be ignored.

With no fps counter onscreen, and no other indicators, i am pretty sure most average gamers would not even tell the difference between 90 and 120, but i bet every one says they can, but let them explain how, rather than, i just can.

 

[LabRat 891]

LCD must be on its way out. The tech is being pushed way beyond its capabilities to try and maintain competitiveness with 240-480hz OLED/QD-OLED, etc.

 

[Courier 6]

I wonder how much it would cost

 

[Veseleil]

A lot of experts in the comment section. Like always when there's a niche product involved.
If you don't find the use for this product, there's someone out there that certainly will. Otherwise it wouldn't exist, it wouldn't be commercially sustainable. It's for professional FPS and MOBA players, it's written in the article.
The technology goes forward, whether you like it or not. TN is the fastest responding LCD panel type, period.
"It's BS marketing and it's probably bad, because it's a Chinese company" - oh please, grow up and stop watching TV news, be smarter.
The next gen OLED TV's (as well as monitors already available) will have the 240Hz native refresh rate.
If you can't notice the difference between 60 and 90, 90 and 120, 120 and 144, 144 and 165, 165 and 240, it's on you my friend. It's not our fault.

 

[eidairaman1]

Nah, on my old CRT the 60Hz was a flickering mess. After changing to 75Hz or even 85Hz ( later 19" monitor), that flicker went away, together with a little more desktop smoothness.
Back then it was really making sense having a refresh rate bigger than 60Hz.
Nowadays, anything more than 90Hz is just marketing material. I've tried really hard to see any difference on day to day use, also gaming, between a 90Hz monitor and a 120, 144, 240Hz refresh rate, but for the love of God I absolutely couldn't tell which one is which.
And then you have this, yet another Chinese company, blowing things out of proportions, telling us that 750Hz is actually a thing, when in fact brings ZERO value, except for a huge increase in power consumption.

My lcd performs better at 75 and its not officially supported by nec.

I will just mention this for everything thats been going on for several coming on these forums, stutter(micro)

 

[MarquiseAke]

What is the point? This is far from being practical.

 

[Prima.Vera]

A lot of experts in the comment section. Like always when there's a niche product involved.
If you don't find the use for this product, there's someone out there that certainly will. Otherwise it wouldn't exist, it wouldn't be commercially sustainable. It's for professional FPS and MOBA players, it's written in the article.
The technology goes forward, whether you like it or not. TN is the fastest responding LCD panel type, period.
"It's BS marketing and it's probably bad, because it's a Chinese company" - oh please, grow up and stop watching TV news, be smarter.
The next gen OLED TV's (as well as monitors already available) will have the 240Hz native refresh rate.
If you can't notice the difference between 60 and 90, 90 and 120, 120 and 144, 144 and 165, 165 and 240, it's on you my friend. It's not our fault.

Oh, I can definitely notice the difference between 60 and 90, just a little between 90 and 120, but definitely not from 120 and above. Whomever say it can is plain old delusional, or totally brainwashed by stupid youtube videos, where everything is just slowed down and zoomed in, so you can see the theoretical differences that do not matter at all in real life.
As for those monitors being produced for Professional gamers, this line is getting pretty tiresome already, since not only it is absolutely NOT TRUE, but it is also literally impossible.
No company in their right mind would develop a product only for 10 or 20 people. You can not compare a monitor, with a very expensive, limited edition hyper car, let's get real.

This monitor is just a flex, an unnecessary and useless gimmick, basically an e-pen competition, to see which producer can go higher and higher with those specs, for no particular practical use.

 

[GodisanAtheist]

A lot of experts in the comment section. Like always when there's a niche product involved.
If you don't find the use for this product, there's someone out there that certainly will. Otherwise it wouldn't exist, it wouldn't be commercially sustainable. It's for professional FPS and MOBA players, it's written in the article.
The technology goes forward, whether you like it or not. TN is the fastest responding LCD panel type, period.
"It's BS marketing and it's probably bad, because it's a Chinese company" - oh please, grow up and stop watching TV news, be smarter.
The next gen OLED TV's (as well as monitors already available) will have the 240Hz native refresh rate.
If you can't notice the difference between 60 and 90, 90 and 120, 120 and 144, 144 and 165, 165 and 240, it's on you my friend. It's not our fault.

- Sir this is the TechPowerUp forums, rational, well reasoned, and measured discussion is not permitted here.

We're going to have to ask you to either start hollering at the other members like a deranged howler monkey with an advanced degree in BS-ology or leave.

 

[Marcus L]

Screen Size: 24.5-inch

24" screen....

Imagine playing fortnite on performance settings with your shiny new 5090 just so you can hit 750fps@1080p

 

[Macro Device]

but definitely not from 120 and above

So if you can't then no one can? Is that it? And my experience with my 170 Hz display clearly being much prettier at 150 than it is at 120 and slightly more entertaining at 170 than it is at 150 is just me being a cuckoo? Hard pass on that. I'm truly not the sanest out here but not that gonzo.

750 Hz is not a problem in itself. If a display can go that fast without too much sacrifices then let it be so. There is no risk of getting your retina becoming mouthwash due to staring at more than X refresh rate. What is problematic, however, is it's probably a panel that's overdriven so far beyond its realistic capabilities it's doomed to go out of order pretty much yesterday if run at a full swing. At least whatever comes down to colour accuracy is totally a crapshow.

I don't think you can shave enough latency off by going, say, 300ish FPS to 750 FPS for your competitive edge to become measurably higher but y'know, the more the merrier. Rich humans buy all sorts of deranged stuff. And this display is one of the most innocent things on this chart.

 

[xorbe]

Wide gamut and TN, two things I don't want. I had 2 wide gamut monitors, and it's just a headache unless you actively need that capability, imho.

 

[Prima.Vera]

So if you can't then no one can? Is that it? And my experience with my 170 Hz display clearly being much prettier at 150 than it is at 120 and slightly more entertaining at 170 than it is at 150 is just me being a cuckoo? Hard pass on that. I'm truly not the sanest out here but not that gonzo.

750 Hz is not a problem in itself. If a display can go that fast without too much sacrifices then let it be so. There is no risk of getting your retina becoming mouthwash due to staring at more than X refresh rate. What is problematic, however, is it's probably a panel that's overdriven so far beyond its realistic capabilities it's doomed to go out of order pretty much yesterday if run at a full swing. At least whatever comes down to colour accuracy is totally a crapshow.

I don't think you can shave enough latency off by going, say, 300ish FPS to 750 FPS for your competitive edge to become measurably higher but y'know, the more the merrier. Rich humans buy all sorts of deranged stuff. And this display is one of the most innocent things on this chart.

Not coocoo, but just placebo. Is OK.
As for the 300Hz and above, that's very interesting, especially that ALL competitive games are capped at 300fps, so having a higher refresh rate doesn't do anything to help with the lag.
But yes, I would love to hear more on how more than 240Hz (OK, 300Hz) refresh rate makes a difference.