Insider Refutes Reports of Samsung "Galaxy S26 Series" Featuring 6000+ mAh Capacity Batteries

[T0@st]

Yesterday's news cycle pointed to Samsung's alleged development of 7000 mAh capacity batteries for the next-gen "Galaxy S26" smartphone series. Additionally, reports suggest that the South Korean megacorporation's Electronics division is experimenting with silicon-carbon battery technology. Industry watchdogs reckon that Chinese manufacturers are market leaders in terms of silicon-carbon battery tech breakthrough, with Apple and Samsung trailing far behind. PandaFlashPro took issue with the latest reports, and dismissed the notion of a so-called "Galaxy S26 Ultra" model featuring a 7000 mAh capacity battery. According to their network of insider sources, Samsung engineers are struggling with their planned improvements.

Typically, flagship Galaxy S phones have utilized 5000 mAh lithium-polymer batteries. PandaFlashPro envisions an underwhelming next-gen upgrade in this department: "I'll delete my X/Twitter account if Samsung gives the 'Galaxy S26 Ultra' a 7000 mAh or even a 6000 mAh battery I bet...based on my five sources, the internal Samsung Test Lab only seem to have a maximum capacity of 5500mAh; not more." The self-proclaimed science and tech enthusiast did not clarify whether the new generation of Galaxy S models will utilize silicon-carbon tech. Industry whispers allege that Samsung is perfecting its "battery formula," thus ensuring that it meets internal standards and expectations.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site | Source

 

[sudothelinuxwizard]

This may be a unpopular opinion, but if SiC anodes really have the kind of reliability issues that have been described, I support waiting for it to mature and also think the Chinese companies shipping these unproven technologies in consumer devices is pretty disingenious.

 

[FierceRed]

The most disturbing part of this news item is "I'll delete my Twitter account if..." is a measure considered 'great value' that's worthy of being bargained.

 

[tommo1982]

Why wouldn't Samsung develop silicon-carbon batteries. It is not even a question of "if", but what the progress is.
Instead of higher capacity batteries, I'd prefer something that can generate power, equivalent to 5000 mAh battery or higher.

 

[AusWolf]

This is hardly news. You can get much cheaper phones with 10,000+ mAh batteries.

 

[ExplodingCaps]

This is hardly news. You can get much cheaper phones with 10,000+ mAh batteries.

With rugged body and build like a tank? Yeah, no. That's the point of SiC battery.

 

[AusWolf]

With rugged body and build like a tank?

Yes. There's nothing wrong with a phone having a proper grip, and not shattering if you drop it every now and then. Win-win in my opinion.

 

[tommo1982]

With rugged body and build like a tank? Yeah, no. That's the point of SiC battery.

That is their purpose. One doesn't buy a smarphone like that to flaunt the logo on the back to bystanders. It's to work and get the job done.

 

[AusWolf]

That is their purpose. One doesn't buy a smarphone like that to flaunt the logo on the back to bystanders. It's to work and get the job done.

Shouldn't that be the purpose of every phone? I don't understand how phones became status symbols for the peasantry.

Edit: Besides, my rugged Blackview turns a lot more heads than the regular Samsung soap bar.