• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

LG Display Targets Gaming Market with OLED Monitor Panel featuring World's Best Picture Quality

Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
6,960 (1.41/day)
Processor Intel® Core™ i7-13700K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Elite AX
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory 32GB(2x16) DDR5@6600MHz G-Skill Trident Z5
Video Card(s) ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3080 AMP Holo
Storage 2TB SK Platinum P41 SSD + 4TB SanDisk Ultra SSD + 500GB Samsung 840 EVO SSD
Display(s) Acer Predator X34 3440x1440@100Hz G-Sync
Case NZXT PHANTOM410-BK
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium PCIe
Power Supply Corsair 850W
Mouse Logitech Hero G502 SE
Software Windows 11 Pro - 64bit
Benchmark Scores 30FPS in NFS:Rivals
Where are the 34" 3440x1400 high refresh panels?
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
8,996 (4.04/day)
System Name Bragging Rights
Processor Atom Z3735F 1.33GHz
Motherboard It has no markings but it's green
Cooling No, it's a 2.2W processor
Memory 2GB DDR3L-1333
Video Card(s) Gen7 Intel HD (4EU @ 311MHz)
Storage 32GB eMMC and 128GB Sandisk Extreme U3
Display(s) 10" IPS 1280x800 60Hz
Case Veddha T2
Audio Device(s) Apparently, yes
Power Supply Samsung 18W 5V fast-charger
Mouse MX Anywhere 2
Keyboard Logitech MX Keys (not Cherry MX at all)
VR HMD Samsung Oddyssey, not that I'd plug it into this though....
Software W10 21H1, barely
Benchmark Scores I once clocked a Celeron-300A to 564MHz on an Abit BE6 and it scored over 9000.
"improved RGWB" still looks like ass. The F, N, R, and L are just as terrible as before, if I take a few steps back from the image you posted and sqint to remove the screen door effect of the zoomed closeup, I'm not even sure it's better than the old, godawful RWBG.

It might even be worse? That doesn't seem possible but I'm trying my best to be objective.

Where are the 34" 3440x1400 high refresh panels?
LG thinks the "best pictured quality" is a panel that's so high-resolution you have to use blurry upscaling or run at low framerates or low graphics quality settings.

In 2029 when we finally have the hardware to run today's path-traced games at 5120x2160 at 165Hz, This model will be obsolete.
 
Joined
Feb 23, 2019
Messages
6,356 (2.86/day)
Location
Poland
Processor Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Elite
Cooling Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 SE
Memory 2x16 GB Crucial Ballistix 3600 CL16 Rev E @ 3600 CL14
Video Card(s) RTX3080 Ti FE
Storage SX8200 Pro 1 TB, Plextor M6Pro 256 GB, WD Blue 2TB
Display(s) LG 34GN850P-B
Case SilverStone Primera PM01 RGB
Audio Device(s) SoundBlaster G6 | Fidelio X2 | Sennheiser 6XX
Power Supply SeaSonic Focus Plus Gold 750W
Mouse Endgame Gear XM1R
Keyboard Wooting Two HE
"improved RGWB" still looks like ass. The F, N, R, and L are just as terrible as before, if I take a few steps back from the image you posted and sqint to remove the screen door effect of the zoomed closeup, I'm not even sure it's better than the old, godawful RWBG.
Compare 32" RGWB compared with IPS RGB:
1739960055296.png
1739960064158.png

1739960084423.png
1739960096903.png

1739960128101.png
1739960140444.png

I would say it's close. Standard RGB is yet to come (we haven't heard anything since last year updates).
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
8,996 (4.04/day)
System Name Bragging Rights
Processor Atom Z3735F 1.33GHz
Motherboard It has no markings but it's green
Cooling No, it's a 2.2W processor
Memory 2GB DDR3L-1333
Video Card(s) Gen7 Intel HD (4EU @ 311MHz)
Storage 32GB eMMC and 128GB Sandisk Extreme U3
Display(s) 10" IPS 1280x800 60Hz
Case Veddha T2
Audio Device(s) Apparently, yes
Power Supply Samsung 18W 5V fast-charger
Mouse MX Anywhere 2
Keyboard Logitech MX Keys (not Cherry MX at all)
VR HMD Samsung Oddyssey, not that I'd plug it into this though....
Software W10 21H1, barely
Benchmark Scores I once clocked a Celeron-300A to 564MHz on an Abit BE6 and it scored over 9000.
Here, I applied a gaussian blur with a radius to match one full pixel to the closeup images. This is what your eye sees, since it can't resolve fractions of a subpixel at normal viewing distance like a macro high-resolution photo shows:

1739961684540.png


RGWB is sharper than RWGB, but also even further from the RGB truth that we're aiming for.
 
Top