DarkMatter
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2007
- Messages
- 1,714 (0.27/day)
Processor | Intel C2Q Q6600 @ Stock (for now) |
---|---|
Motherboard | Asus P5Q-E |
Cooling | Proc: Scythe Mine, Graphics: Zalman VF900 Cu |
Memory | 4 GB (2x2GB) DDR2 Corsair Dominator 1066Mhz 5-5-5-15 |
Video Card(s) | GigaByte 8800GT Stock Clocks: 700Mhz Core, 1700 Shader, 1940 Memory |
Storage | 74 GB WD Raptor 10000rpm, 2x250 GB Seagate Raid 0 |
Display(s) | HP p1130, 21" Trinitron |
Case | Antec p180 |
Audio Device(s) | Creative X-Fi PLatinum |
Power Supply | 700W FSP Group 85% Efficiency |
Software | Windows XP |
Tom's Hardware already tested it. This is how PCIe bandwidth scales the performance:
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/pci-express-2-0,1915-12.html
I wouldn't say we can talk about bottlenecking, even 4x (8x on PCIe 1.1) offers very good results overall. Meaning that you probably won't NEED PCIe 3.0, just as you don't need PCIe 2.0 right know. That doesn't mean is not necesary, because it does help a bit, the more the better, and as long as it is totally backwards compatible, and seems it will be, what's the problem?
On another note, this interface's 300w are probably for Intel Larrabee, so that POS can run on a computer without requiring a nuclear plant by the side of your PC.
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/pci-express-2-0,1915-12.html
I wouldn't say we can talk about bottlenecking, even 4x (8x on PCIe 1.1) offers very good results overall. Meaning that you probably won't NEED PCIe 3.0, just as you don't need PCIe 2.0 right know. That doesn't mean is not necesary, because it does help a bit, the more the better, and as long as it is totally backwards compatible, and seems it will be, what's the problem?
On another note, this interface's 300w are probably for Intel Larrabee, so that POS can run on a computer without requiring a nuclear plant by the side of your PC.