Post your Cinebench R23 Score

[Vayra86]

That Strix board is better than my MSI X299 Gaming M-7 ACK. Someone lent me what I need to de-lid this CPU but I'm not sure about doing it.
I screwed up one of my i7-7700Ks de-lidding it. So I'm pretty gunshy about it.
I'm going to have to either do it or not, pretty soon. I've had his de-lid tool too long.

Well... there does seem to be a 10 C gap in between your two Cinebench runs. Was this closed case? If so, you have an obvious airflow issue, the 1070's are more efficient, but the 980ti's dump too much heat in that case that can't leave it proper. Want to verify that (and exclude the different RAM as well), then dial back to 1 1070 and run again. I'll take a small guess and say your scores will be similar but your temps much lower. In that case, improve case airflow before you risk the delid.

As for the low scores, definitely temp related, you're hitting 100C

 

[RichKnecht]

Well... there does seem to be a 10 C gap in between your two Cinebench runs. Was this closed case? If so, you have an obvious airflow issue, the 1070's are more efficient, but the 980ti's dump too much heat in that case that can't leave it proper. Want to verify that (and exclude the different RAM as well), then dial back to 1 1070 and run again. I'll take a small guess and say your scores will be similar but your temps much lower. In that case, improve case airflow before you risk the delid.

As for the low scores, definitely temp related, you're hitting 100C

I saw that. He definitely needs better cooling. That Corsair AIO is simply inadequate.

 

[RealNeil]

OK, I'll be tearing apart the i9 box later today and going for the de-lid.
If you will, both of you PM me with an addy and what CPU you plan to work on. This is so I don't mix up the two tools that I have here with the one you need. Mine does 6600K, 7700K, and 8700K. CPUs, and phanbuey's does the X-CPUs.
I have 4 tubes of Conductonaught but only one of the black high heat RTV. Each box will include the Conductonaught but jboydgolfer gets the RTV.

I'll post my results when I know how I did.
I'll mail boxes on Monday.

 

[jboydgolfer]

If you will, both of you PM me with an addy and what CPU you plan to work on.

done

thanks a TON, Really awesome of you.

 

[RealNeil]

Well... there does seem to be a 10 C gap in between your two Cinebench runs. Was this closed case? If so, you have an obvious airflow issue, the 1070's are more efficient, but the 980ti's dump too much heat in that case that can't leave it proper. Want to verify that (and exclude the different RAM as well), then dial back to 1 1070 and run again. I'll take a small guess and say your scores will be similar but your temps much lower. In that case, improve case airflow before you risk the delid.

As for the low scores, definitely temp related, you're hitting 100C

The case is a Corsair Carbide Air 540 with seven 140mm Cougar Vortex High flow fans in it. What's weird is that when I do any benchmark runs, the temps spike to maximum immediately. In no time at all,......zip.

That makes me wonder about the temp sensors on the mainboard.

done

thanks a TON, Really awesome of you.

I'm only doing what was done for me already by phanbuey.
I like being able to help out.

 

[RichKnecht]

The case is a Corsair Carbide Air 540 with seven 140mm Cougar Vortex High flow fans in it. What's weird is that when I do any benchmark runs, the temps spike to maximum immediately. In no time at all,......zip.

That makes me wonder about the temp sensors on the mainboard.

Have you verified that the pump is working? I would seriously consider a custom loop to cool that chip. I have 2 EK PE 240mm radiators with EK Vardar fans on both of them pushing air through, an EVO full nickle block, and D5 RGB pump. This combo keeps my temps at 75C max load at 65% pump flow. My case is a MasterCase Maker 5 with glass side panel.

EDIT: My chip is not delidded.

 

[Vayra86]

The case is a Corsair Carbide Air 540 with seven 140mm Cougar Vortex High flow fans in it. What's weird is that when I do any benchmark runs, the temps spike to maximum immediately. In no time at all,......zip.

That makes me wonder about the temp sensors on the mainboard.

That would point me towards the AIO like @RichKnecht suspected

 

[DR4G00N]

Old hexa core power!

Need to try again with my Samsung HCH9 mems instead of these Micron D9GTR's.

 

[Hockster]

New hexa power.

 

[er557]

To thee thy tweaketh, go the spolis...
currently my dual xeons are running a newer efi hack containing -90mv undervolt of vcore, -60mv offset of cache, and -50mv offset of system agent, yielding two more turbo bins for all 36 cores simultaneously, placing it at x31, 3.1ghz all cores or 3.5ghz up to 20 cores. starting off with a cinebench score of 4400, having tweaked the bcd options of hpet and adding the now being installed windows rs4 with ultimate performance power scheme, I expect no less of 5000 cinebench, all while not being overclocked one bit, as the board does not support it, only turbo unlock. Also the driver breaks TDP lock, allowing the cpus to push 300 watt each easily without throttling, plus setting constant vccin of 1.8v for stability and finishing off with microcode setup of 0x39 , also for stability. As the cpu initializes in a modded bios without microcode. All of that in a pair of 400$ each xeons, netting the performance of multi 1k$$$'s of equivalent procs. While destroying in performance any current retail cpu, including the not yet released parts. To be continued soon...

 

[NicklasAPJ]

Nice score! is that 2x 18 cores? my 7980 XE does 47xx

 

[er557]

yes, 2x 18c, at a very low vcore, not overclocked, very low temps, plus they both together have 80 pcie lanes, and of course ECC ram support, featuring NUMA for low latency octal channel ddr4 access for any ram section from either cpu.

 

[HammerON]

 

[CAPSLOCKSTUCK]

Old hexa core power!

Need to try again with my Samsung HCH9 mems instead of these Micron D9GTR's.
View attachment 98818

my hair stood on end when i saw those volts.....ace score dude.

 

[DR4G00N]

my hair stood on end when i saw those volts.....ace score dude.

Eh, it's not too bad, this was with my water chiller so temps were low single digits under load.
I was also only using my cheap waterblock on the thing so it was getting too hot under load past 1.7V to run stable.

Need to bring out the chiller pot to keep it under control. Maybe see 5.1GHz+.

I was taking it easy on the uncore too, it'll do around 4.25GHz @ 1.475V VTT when I need it to.

 

[Tomgang]

Eh, it's not too bad, this was with my water chiller so temps were low single digits under load.
I was also only using my cheap waterblock on the thing so it was getting too hot under load past 1.7V to run stable.

Need to bring out the chiller pot to keep it under control. Maybe see 5.1GHz+.

Be careful about voltage above 1.6 volts on X58. Voltage above that is in the danger zone of frying the cpu with high voltage.

But with that said. Nice score and if you can get the north bridge up to 3800 mhz or 4000 MHz that shut give you a few ekstra points as well.

Here is my own I7 980X running NB af 3990 MHz so it is possible to do so and 4.75 GHz resulting in a 1103 score on air cooling.

 

[phill]

The fun I remember having with X58 and phase cooling.... Sadly no Cinebench results then tho Although we did manage a 5.13Ghz @ 1.435vcore... Which I thought was pretty darn decent!! How stable it was... No idea lol

Here's one of my stock pair of X5650's in my SR-2

Ahhh... Happy days

 

[T4C Fantasy]

er557 - Xeon E5-2686 v3 (x2) - 36 Cores / 72 Threads @ 3100 MHz = 5005 cb
NicklasAPJ - i7 7980XE - 18 Cores / 36 Threads @ 4800 MHz = 4738 cb
liangxiaohan - i7 7960X - 16 Cores / 32 Threads @ 4998 MHz = 4475 cb
Vego - i7 7980XE - 18 Cores / 36 Threads @ 4603 MHz = 4408 cb
usmc362 - i7 7940X - 14 Cores / 28 Threads @ 4904 MHz = 3821 cb
xkm1948 - Threadripper 1950X - 16 Cores / 32 Threads @ 3998 MHz = 3348 cb
Solaris17 - i7 7980XE - 18 Cores / 36 Threads @ 2600 MHz = 3321 cb
HammerON - EPYC 7401P - 24 Cores / 48 Threads @ 2793 MHz = 3158 cb
James Dean - Xeon E5-2??? v3 (x2) - 28 Cores / 56 Threads @ ???? MHz = 2987 cb
kniaugaudiskis - Xeon E5-2686 v3 - 18 Cores / 36 Threads @ 3397 MHz = 2938 cb
RichKnecht - i7 7900X - 10 Cores / 20 Threads @ 4798 MHz = 2631 cb
Vego - i7 7900X - 10 Cores / 20 Threads @ 4700 MHz = 2523 cb
RealNeil - i7 7900X - 10 Cores / 20 Threads @ 4500 MHz = 2375 cb
EarthDog - i7 6950X - 10 Cores / 20 Threads @ 4489 MHz = 2323 cb
FlanK3r - R7 1700X - 8 Cores / 16 Threads @ 5095 MHz = 2271 cb
Vego - i7 6950X - 10 Cores / 20 Threads @ 4700 MHz = 2258 cb
xkm1948 - i7 6950X - 10 Cores / 20 Threads @ 4306 MHz = 2244 cb
iLiRRR - i7 7900X - 10 Cores / 20 Threads @ ???? MHz = 2163 cb
phanbuey - i7 7820X - 8 Cores / 16 Threads @ ???? MHz = 2078 cb
Dia01 - i7 7820X - 8 Cores / 16 Threads @ 4601 MHz = 2046 cb
Vego - i7 7820X - 8 Cores / 16 Threads @ 4700 MHz = 2027 cb
infrared - R7 1800X - 8 Cores / 16 Threads @ 4199 MHz = 1945 cb
Johan45 - R7 1700X - 8 Cores / 16 Threads @ 4226 MHz = 1941 cb
phill - i7 5960X - 8 Cores / 16 Threads @ 4755 MHz = 1928 cb
Vego - i7 5960X - 8 Cores / 16 Threads @ 4700 MHz = 1901 cb
cdawall - R7 1800X - 8 Cores / 16 Threads @ 4099 MHz = 1866 cb
phanbuey - R7 1800X - 8 Cores / 16 Threads @ 4020 MHz = 1849 cb
MetalRacer - i7 5960X - 8 Cores / 16 Threads @ 4604 MHz = 1817 cb
ArbitraryAffection - R7 1800X - 8 Cores / 16 Threads @ 4100 MHz = 1816 cb
chuck216 - R7 1700X - 8 Cores / 16 Threads @ 3900 MHz = 1763 cb
alucasa - Xeon E5-2683 v3 - 14 Cores / 28 Threads @ ???? MHz = 1719 cb
etha4n - R7 1700 - 8 Cores / 16 Threads @ 3600 MHz = 1710 cb
Jhelms - R7 1700 - 8 Cores / 16 Threads @ 3800 MHz = 1675 cb
Hockster - i7 8700K - 6 Cores / 12 Threads @ 5000 MHz = 1608 cb
natr0n - Xeon X5675 (x2) - 12 Cores / 24 Threads @ 3392 MHz = 1551 cb
Vego - i7 7800X - 6 Cores / 12 Threads @ 4700 MHz = 1510 cb
patriotaki - i7 5930K - 6 Cores / 12 Threads @ 4699 MHz = 1421 cb
cdawall - i7 6850K - 6 Cores / 12 Threads @ 4544 MHz = 1419 cb
Vellinious - R5 1600X - 6 Cores / 12 Threads @ 4181 MHz = 1406 cb
The Pack - i7 6850K - 6 Cores / 12 Threads @ 4400 MHz = 1405 cb
Brandon - R7 1700 - 6 Cores / 12 Threads @ 3000 MHz = 1371 cb
Vellinious - i7 5820K - 6 Cores / 12 Threads @ ???? MHz = 1365 cb
techtard - R5 1600 - 6 Cores / 12 Threads @ 3892 MHz = 1348 cb
RejZoR - i7 5820K - 6 Cores / 12 Threads @ 4499 MHz = 1341 cb
NdMk2o1o - R5 1600 - 6 Cores / 12 Threads @ 3990 MHz = 1339 cb
erixx - i7 5930K - 6 Cores / 12 Threads @ 4600 MHz = 1323 cb
blugbox - i7 5930K - 6 Cores / 12 Threads @ 4399 MHz = 1317 cb
Laki89 - Xeon X5660 (x2) - 12 Cores / 24 Threads @ 2800 MHz = 1307 cb
RealNeil - i7 6850K - 6 Cores / 12 Threads @ 4199 MHz = 1307 cb
xkm1948 - - i7 5820K - 6 Cores / 12 Threads @ ???? MHz = 1267 cb
johnspack - Xeon E5-1650 - 6 Cores / 12 Threads @ 3200 MHz = 1240 cb
phill - Xeon X5650 (x2) - 12 Cores / 24 Threads @ 2663 MHz = 1234 cb
jboydgolfer - i5 8600K - 6 Cores / 6 Threads @ 5000 MHz = 1226 cb
Knoxx29 - Xeon X5690 - 6 Cores / 12 Threads @ 5087 MHz = 1188 cb
DR4G00N - Xeon X5670 - 6 Cores / 12 Threads @ 5003 MHz = 1154 cb
scevism - i7 4960X - 6 Cores / 12 Threads @ 4400 MHz = 1149 cb
agello24 - R5 1600 - 6 Cores / 12 Threads @ 3492 MHz = 1148 cb
FreedomEclipse - i7 3930K - 6 Cores / 12 Threads @ ???? MHz = 1141 cb
Schmuckley - Xeon E5-2670 - 8 Cores / 16 Threads @ 3248 MHz = 1127 cb
fullinfusion - i7 7700K - 4 Cores / 8 Threads @ 5000 MHz = 1116 cb
Tomgang - i7 980X - 6 Cores / 12 Threads @ 4750 MHz = 1103 cb
oinkypig - Xeon X5675 - 6 Cores / 12 Threads @ 4894 MHz = 1102 cb
Arctucas - i7 6700K - 4 Cores / 8 Threads @ 4875 MHz = 1097 cb
FilipM - Xeon X5660 - 6 Cores / 12 Threads @ 4678 MHz = 1090 cb
ahujet - i7 3930K - 6 Cores / 12 Threads @ 4250 MHz = 1089 cb
RichKnecht - Xeon X5675 - 6 Cores / 12 Threads @ 4600 MHz = 1064 cb
Schmuckley - Xeon X5670 - 6 Cores / 12 Threads @ 4460 MHz = 1037 cb
CAPSLOCKSTUCK - Xeon X5670 - 6 Cores / 12 Threads @ 4546 MHz = 1035 cb
RealNeil - i7 7700K - 4 Cores / 8 Threads @ 4800 MHz = 1033 cb
Morgoth - Xeon W5580 - 6 Cores / 12 Threads @ ???? MHz = 1032 cb
RealNeil - i7 6700K - 4 Cores / 8 Threads @ 4599 MHz = 992 cb
Hockster - i7 6700K - 4 Cores / 8 Threads @ ???? MHz = 989 cb
Neve29th - i7 6700K - 4 Cores / 8 Threads @ 4600 MHz = 979 cb
Zyll Goliath - Xeon E5645 - 6 Cores / 12 Threads @ 4119 MHz = 960 cb
RealNeil - i7 4790K - 4 Cores / 8 Threads @ ???? MHz = 952 cb
rippleddcman - Xeon E5-2660 - 8 Cores / 16 Threads @ ???? MHz = 935 cb
sn2x - i7 5775C - 4 Cores / 8 Threads @ 4299 MHz = 929 cb
Enterprise24 - i7 2600K - 4 Cores / 8 Threads @ 4999 MHz = 880 cb
Enterprise24 - i5 6500 - 4 Cores / 4 Threads @ 5101 MHz = 860 cb
ArbitraryAffection - R5 2400G - 4 Cores / 8 Threads @ 3900 MHz = 859 cb
Lt_JWS - R5 1400 - 4 Cores / 8 Threads @ 3892 MHz = 832 cb
Chloe Price - i5 7600K - 4 Cores / 4 Threads @ 5000 MHz = 800 cb
Thimblewad - FX-8350 - 8 Cores / 8 Threads @ 4830 MHz = 761 cb
cdawall - i7 6700T - 4 Cores / 8 Threads @ 2810 MHz = 755 cb
DR4G00N - FX-8150 - 8 Cores / 0 Threads @ 5016 MHz = 744 cb
flmatter - i7 7700HQ - 4 Cores / 8 Threads @ 2810 MHz = 728 cb
natr0n - Xeon E3-1290 - 4 Cores / 8 Threads @ 1682 MHz = 692 cb
jboydgolfer - i5 4690K - 4 Cores / 4 Threads @ 4697 MHz = 689 cb
laamanaator - i7 950 - 4 Cores / 8 Threads @ 1682 MHz = 687 cb
MrGenius - i5 3570K - 4 Cores / 4 Threads @ 4800 MHz = 671 cb
RealNeil - i5 6600K - 4 Cores / 4 Threads @ ???? MHz = 660 cb
Final_Fighter - i5 3570K - 4 Cores / 4 Threads @ ???? MHz = 649 cb
Jborg - i5 4690K - 4 Cores / 4 Threads @ 4200 MHz = 646 cb
DR4G00N - i3 7350K - 2 Cores / 4 Threads @ 5413 MHz = 618 cb
CAPSLOCKSTUCK - Xeon E5620 - 4 Cores / 8 Threads @ 4000 MHz = 616 cb
Recon-UK - Xeon E5640 - 4 Cores / 8 Threads @ 4000 MHz = 607 cb
ArbitraryAffection - R3 2200G - 4 Cores / 4 Threads @ 3800 MHz = 598 cb
biffzinker - R3 1200 - 4 Cores / 4 Threads @ 3825 MHz = 597 cb
trickson - R3 1300X - 4 Cores / 4 Threads @ 4020 MHz = 574 cb
ronak3010 - i7 860 - 4 Cores / 8 Threads @ 3612 MHz = 568 cb
adamiakadam00 - R3 2200G - 4 Cores / 4 Threads @ 3500 MHz = 553 cb
XiGMAKiD - Core 2 Quad Q9450 - 4 Cores / 4 Threads @ 3600 MHz = 398 cb
Enterprise24 - Celeron G3900 - 2 Cores / 2 Threads @ 4511 MHz = 370 cb
jboydgolfer - Pentium G3258 - 2 Cores / 2 Threads @ 4697 MHz = 332 cb
Tomgang - Atom x5 - 4 Cores / 4 Threads @ 480 MHz = 97 cb
Melvis - Turion Dual-Core ZM-80 - 2 Cores / 2 Threads @ 2100 MHz = 84 cb
jboydgolfer - Core 2 Duo T6500 - 2 Cores / 2 Threads @ 2100 MHz = 75 cb
DR4G00N - Pentium 4 531 - 1 Core / 1 Thread @ 4199 MHz = 48 cb


total cores/threads, for (x2)
this is a new template ill be using to post everyones scores in 1 post if the OP wants me to, advice would be nice.. (scores are clickable) *number score*

i hope this helps xD
Page 3 Post 71 <-- bookmark to finish this

 

[phanbuey]

@T4C Fantasy you are the man

 

[T4C Fantasy]

@T4C Fantasy you are the man

phanbuey - R7 1800X - 8 Cores / 16 Threads @ 4020 MHz - Score = 1849 cb

just found

 

[dorsetknob]

Is This a Thread hijack attempt

This is a new template ill be using to post everyones scores in 1 post if the OP wants me to,

I thought threads only got taken over if thread was interesting and the OP either Left or was Banned So was unable or unwilling to maintain thread.

 

[T4C Fantasy]

Is This a Thread hijack attempt


I thought threads only got taken over if thread was interesting and the OP either Left or was Banned So was unable or unwilling to maintain thread.

I spoke to caps mainly to implement this template, he gave the ok i just need w1zzard to finish it

 

[CAPSLOCKSTUCK]

i will msg him now...ive had dramas this morning....whoever called it good friday was wrong.

 

[er557]

@T4C Fantasy : Great chart! a typo in number #9 from the top, @kniaugaudiskis , it's a 2696 v3, not 2686 v3. There's a difference, the 2696 is a much more expensive top of the line clone of 2699 v3, it's turbo max is 3.8ghz, unlike the 2686 which is more energy efficient, a cheaper oem part, and turbos to 3.5ghz. In real life they are about 15% apart.

 

[T4C Fantasy]

@T4C Fantasy : Great chart! a typo in number #9 from the top, @kniaugaudiskis , it's a 2696 v3, not 2686 v3. There's a difference, the 2696 is a much more expensive top of the line clone of 2699 v3, it's turbo max is 3.8ghz, unlike the 2686 which is more energy efficient, a cheaper oem part, and turbos to 3.5ghz. In real life they are about 15% apart.

Fixed