Post your Cinebench R23 Score

[ArbitraryAffection]

just a humble 1400 passing through :3

core voltage is 1.35 if anyone is interested. don't know why CPUz is reporting it wrongly. I used 1.4 for the 3925Mhz run there too. So 860 is my top score but I don't run that every day as it not 100% stable.

 

[obg70]

Ryzen 2700X @ 4225Mhz with Corsair Dominator 3466Mhz Memory @ 3600.

 

[E-curbi]

Grabbed a Cinebench ST Single and Slightly Threaded score last night of 243.

5.5Ghz 8086K 1.45volts EVGA Z390 DARK mobo.

It was 1:30am and was getting tired and frustrated after not moving above 237 at 5.4Ghz (already had a 238 score with my 8700K at 5.4Ghz and an Apex 10 board)

So just went for it at 5.5Ghz.

It was my first and only 5.5Ghz run. No stability issues, I think the mobo and CPU have a bit more to offer. Will do a dozen more runs this weekend maybe I can reach 250. idk.

Hop on over to my Batman build thread for more info, I only got the board a few days ago and I'm pretty slow at building so this was first attempt.

I think it's a new TPU high score. yay

Oh yea, and for cooling I'm using a Noctua C14S.

 

[Deleted member 178884]

I think it's a new TPU high score. yay

Well since you came here I gave up on trying to get my 7740x up top for single thread lol though I wasn't far off:

Shame this £120~ 7740x didn't win the silicon lottery : P

 

[Lorec]

A humble 4ghz @1.3V (im not proud of that voltage though). Maybe I can squeeze 4.1-4.2?

 

[FCG]

E5-2696 v3 (x2) @ 3400 MHz on H20 (36C/72T)
64GB (8x8GB) DDR4 Reg ECC -> 128GB (8x16GB) this afternoon!
To be clear as possible, all cores sustain about 3.3~3.4GHz under full load in this configuration. Peak turbo is 4GHz. So let's call it 3400 MHz for comparison purposes.

OS is Windows 10 Pro for Workstations 1809/RS5. Cinebench reports incorrectly as unknown Windows 8 version.

Single thread score: 155 cb

I think I just took 2nd place, son.

 

[Hardi]

my 2700X

 

[DR4G00N]

Here's a couple I don't think I've shared yet.

Dual X5460's @ 3.8GHz air - 806 cb

X5687 @ 5.1GHz chilled water - 799 cb

 

[delshay]

Just to make user(s) aware there is a "unofficial" Cinebench R15 Extreme Edition. Please do not add this benchmark in this thread to cause confusion.

Download here https://www.guru3d.com/files-details/cinebench-r15-extreme-edition-download.html

 

[T4C Fantasy]

also if you want your separated single threaded scores added you need to show it in the thread with the multi threaded score, just update it and tell me.

if there is no edit button click report and say unlock please and in a few minutes to a few hours it will be unlocked.

and yes it absolutely must be in the same thread.

 

[storm-chaser]

The "mighty" quad core known as the FX4530 -- this run was 5.0Ghz
To put this in perspective, my Q9650 @ 4.5Ghz ran a 499 lol

 

[T4C Fantasy]

when i like a post its my way of knowing which ones ive added, if its unliked then i didnt add it yet.

or it didnt qualify

 

[cdawall]

The "mighty" quad core known as the FX4530 -- this run was 5.0Ghz
To put this in perspective, my Q9650 @ 4.5Ghz ran a 499 lol

View attachment 115884

You beat me for the fastest quad core fx based chip I need to fix that somehow.

Good run bud

 

[T4C Fantasy]

The "mighty" quad core known as the FX4530 -- this run was 5.0Ghz
To put this in perspective, my Q9650 @ 4.5Ghz ran a 499 lol

View attachment 115884

H2O? or AIO

 

[storm-chaser]

H2O? or AIO

Fractal Celsius S36 360mm liquid cooler

 

[T4C Fantasy]

Name|CPU|Core|Clock|Memory|Single|Multi|OpenGL|Cooling
cdawall | Threadripper 2990WX | 32C/64T | @ 4215 MHz | DDR4-2133 Quad | 176 cb | 6465 cb || H2O

just a thought
does this explain it all (Memory) or a different format that is better to show it?

 

[storm-chaser]

T4C, if directing that question to me I'd say that looks fine. If you want to get super granular you could also include NB speed and memory timings but that might be going a little too far.

Here is my Q9650 rig running at 4.29Ghz on air cooling (Ultra 120 extreme) this is the 24/7 config but I can go higher for benching

 

[Wavetrex]

Computer from signature - i7-6800K, 6/12 @ 4.2 Ghz, DDR4-3000 CL15 Quad

How Broadwell-E "HEDT" has fallen behind... cheaper systems today get close to 2000. Uh-oh.

 

[T4C Fantasy]

whats more important to show, channel or timings

 

[storm-chaser]

Listing memory channels wins out over timings in my book.

 

[Wavetrex]

For Cinebench probably total memory bandwidth (Freq x Channels) since it has all those threads to compete for memory access.

Only games are sensitive to timings.

 

[DR4G00N]

I wouldn't even bother keeping track of memory, R15 doesn't scale much if at all from memory speed & timings. At least on modern platforms.
Going from 4133 19-21-21 super loose XMP to very tight 4200 12-11-11 gains like 4-5 points on an 8700K.

 

[cdawall]

Name|CPU|Core|Clock|Memory|Single|Multi|OpenGL|Cooling
cdawall | Threadripper 2990WX | 32C/64T | @ 4215 MHz | DDR4-2133 Quad | 176 cb | 6465 cb || H2O

just a thought
does this explain it all (Memory) or a different format that is better to show it?

That's how I would do it.

 

[T4C Fantasy]

Hmm i can leave it up to what people post i guess

 

[Vya Domus]

I don't think I have posted one yet here :

1700X - 4 Ghz