• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NVIDIA Beats AMD to Market On HBM2 - Announces Tesla P100

Raevenlord

News Editor
Joined
Aug 12, 2016
Messages
3,755 (1.18/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name The Ryzening
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
Motherboard MSI X570 MAG TOMAHAWK
Cooling Lian Li Galahad 360mm AIO
Memory 32 GB G.Skill Trident Z F4-3733 (4x 8 GB)
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 3070 Ti
Storage Boot: Transcend MTE220S 2TB, Kintson A2000 1TB, Seagate Firewolf Pro 14 TB
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG270UP (1440p 144 Hz IPS)
Case Lian Li O11DX Dynamic White
Audio Device(s) iFi Audio Zen DAC
Power Supply Seasonic Focus+ 750 W
Mouse Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Keyboard Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Software Windows 10 x64
NVIDIA has announced availability of their latest data center accelerator, the Tesla P100, which is the world's first HBM2-powered add-in-card. this means that NVIDIA effectively beat AMD in time to market with HBM2 technology, which AMD pioneered (in its HBM form) with the Fury line of graphics cards.





NVIDIA naturally touts this as the world's most advanced data center accelerator, for workloads such as "Artificial intelligence for self-driving cars. Predicting our climate's future. A new drug to treat cancer." NVIDIA's green graphics show an almost 50x increase in computing power from 8x Tesla P100 accelerators when compared to a dual CPU server based on Intel's Xeon E5-2698 V3 (which isn't really all that surprising.) NVIDIA further brings in the PR talk with examples on how a single GPU-accelerated node powered by four Tesla P100s - interconnected with PCIe - can replace up to 32 commodity CPU nodes for a variety of applications - saving up to 70% in overall data center costs.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
But... Can it play Crysis 3? (sorry I had to XD)
 
Business segment maybe, but not for consumers. Where AMD still holds the first for HBM and also for HBM2. Because RX Vega cards already exist, you still can't actually buy them yes, but they exist far more than anything NVIDIA might have. We've acually seen real, operating Vega cards.
 
Business segment maybe, but not for consumers. Where AMD still holds the first for HBM and also for HBM2. Because RX Vega cards already exist, you still can't actually buy them yes, but they exist far more than anything NVIDIA might have. We've acually seen real, operating Vega cards.
Which doesn't mean Nvidia doesn't have them. AMD just always chooses to show off what they have before they can actually deliver it in any reasonable form or quantity.
 
But they've shown a real functioning card.
 
Where is HBM2 equipped Titan then...
 
But can it be used for Crunching or Folding?
 
Business segment maybe, but not for consumers. Where AMD still holds the first for HBM and also for HBM2. Because RX Vega cards already exist, you still can't actually buy them yes, but they exist far more than anything NVIDIA might have. We've acually seen real, operating Vega cards.

The bias is strong in this one.
 
Where is HBM2 equipped Titan then...
This is a cut-down GP100. It would perform on par with the first Pascal Titan, the key difference would be significantly increased FP64-performance.
 
The bias is strong in this one.

Is it? Are you going to accuse me of being an AMD fanboy now? I suggest you clickidy click to my specs...
 
Is it? Are you going to accuse me of being an AMD fanboy now? I suggest you clickidy click to my specs...

Not accusing you and owning hardware from a different camp isn't exactly cover. Just an observation that you often have a strong biased opinion regarding most topics you post on (posts regarding Nvidia, for example). It shows. Does it not grow tiresome?
 
But can it be used for Crunching or Folding?
Is all about the drivers and if the Bios is optimised for those kind of tasks. In theory can be a monster.
 
Not accusing you and owning hardware from a different camp isn't exactly cover. Just an observation that you often have a strong biased opinion regarding most topics you post on (posts regarding Nvidia, for example). It shows. Does it not grow tiresome?

Just checked Newegg. No joy though. /s

Uhm what is this, year old news?

Looking closely for wood screws. :D
 
Not accusing you and owning hardware from a different camp isn't exactly cover. Just an observation that you often have a strong biased opinion regarding most topics you post on (posts regarding Nvidia, for example). It shows. Does it not grow tiresome?

Don't bother, being AMD biased has become the new cool thing in the last years. Eventually people will realize how stupid it is to support something or someone, just because they're the underdogs
 
Don't bother, being AMD biased has become the new cool thing in the last years. Eventually people will realize how stupid it is to support something or someone, just because they're the underdogs

People can support whatever they may like - each to their own and all that, but is it expecting too much to scroll past the article and read some level-headed discussion and debate about tech? Not jump straight into brand bias spew from regular members...

Sorry, for being off topic. Over and out.
 
Not accusing you and owning hardware from a different camp isn't exactly cover. Just an observation that you often have a strong biased opinion regarding most topics you post on (posts regarding Nvidia, for example). It shows. Does it not grow tiresome?

Bias? For stating facts? NVIDIA doesn't have even a working prototype shown to the public. AMD has. The end. If we'd play that game, we can also make up things like uh oh, but AMD has HBM3 already. They haven't told anyone about it or shown it, but they already have one.
 
Bias? For stating facts? NVIDIA doesn't have even a working prototype shown to the public. AMD has. The end. If we'd play that game, we can also make up things like uh oh, but AMD has HBM3 already. They haven't told anyone about it or shown it, but they already have one.

No need to take it so personally.
 
People can support whatever they may like - each to their own and all that, but is it expecting too much to scroll past the article and read some level-headed discussion and debate about tech? Not jump straight into brand bias spew from regular members...

Sorry, for being off topic. Over and out.

I'll suggest you go for a small tour on overclock.net, lol.

/OT
 
Wasnt VEGA(HBM2) server/pro workstation released/announced already ?
 
Business segment maybe, but not for consumers. Where AMD still holds the first for HBM and also for HBM2. Because RX Vega cards already exist, you still can't actually buy them yes, but they exist far more than anything NVIDIA might have. We've acually seen real, operating Vega cards.
Same could be said about NV showing the prototype last year, or argued backwards that it was a dud. What matters that P100 is in retail and MI25 is not.

Just checked Newegg. No joy though. /s
Newegg became a horrible place to look for enterprise stuff.
Here's one I found just a few days ago:
http://www.thinkmate.com/hardware/c...0Mzc7YToxOntpOjA7czoxMDoiVGVzbGEgUDEwMCI7fX0=

Supermicro also started to offer P40 and P100-based server solutions.
 
Same could be said about NV showing the prototype last year, or argued backwards that it was a dud. What matters that P100 is in retail and MI25 is not.


Newegg became a horrible place to look for enterprise stuff.
Here's one I found just a few days ago:
http://www.thinkmate.com/hardware/co-processors?a=YToxOntpOjE0Mzc7YToxOntpOjA7czoxMDoiVGVzbGEgUDEwMCI7fX0=

Supermicro also started to offer P40 and P100-based server solutions.
I wonder what the news is though? I'm pretty sure my work has P100s and have had for quite some time.
 
Back
Top