• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

ADATA SU900 512 GB SSD

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
27,972 (3.71/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
The ADATA SU900 sticks to proven MLC flash chips in a market where most of the budget drives are TLC, with low sustained write performance and low endurance. In our review, we see good performance results that are on par with competing drives from Samsung and Crucial.

Show full review
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 24, 2010
Messages
5,047 (0.94/day)
Location
Iberian Peninsula
Thanks master.
MySQL graph confuses me. Vertical axis is query volume, and horizontal user volume, and Samsung 950 Pro is at the bottom. So is this a "higher is better" or "lower is better" graph. Maybe my fault, I need another cup of coffee... : )
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,844 (3.95/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
Quite pricey, for like $30 more you can get 1TB drives these days.

About the review format itself, you're using IOPS to measure random access perfotmance and MB/s to measure sequential performance. Since they're both on the same page, perhaps using a single unit of measure would make more sense?
 

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
27,972 (3.71/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
Thanks master.
MySQL graph confuses me. Vertical axis is query volume, and horizontal user volume, and Samsung 950 Pro is at the bottom. So is this a "higher is better" or "lower is better" graph. Maybe my fault, I need another cup of coffee... : )
Higher is better. At the bottom is 850 Pro. 950 Pro is somewhere in the middle.
 
Joined
Mar 24, 2010
Messages
5,047 (0.94/day)
Location
Iberian Peninsula
Perfecto! :)

BTW, I can't thank you enough for using that format for the graph's "waves" (using different crosses and forms) don't know its proper name), I am a little colorblind and graphs with only subtle colors to distinguish each line are a no go for me. ;)
 

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
27,972 (3.71/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
Perfecto! :)

BTW, I can't thank you enough for using that format for the graph's "waves" (using different crosses and forms) don't know its proper name), I am a little colorblind and graphs with only subtle colors to distinguish each line are a no go for me. ;)
Excel does that by default. I think. Trying my best :)
 
Joined
Jan 31, 2012
Messages
2,671 (0.57/day)
Location
East Europe
System Name PLAHI
Processor I5-10400
Motherboard MSI MPG Z490 GAMING PLUS
Cooling 120 AIO IWONGOU
Memory 32GB Corsair LPX 2400 Mhz DDR4 CL14
Video Card(s) PNY QUADRO RTX A2000
Storage Intel 670P 512GB
Display(s) Philips 288E2A 28" 4K + 22" LG 1080p
Case Silverstone Raven 03 (RV03)
Audio Device(s) Creative Soundblaster Z
Power Supply Fractal Design IntegraM 650W
Mouse Logitech Triathlon
Keyboard REDRAGON MITRA
Software Windows 11 Home x 64
Quite pricey, for like $30 more you can get 1TB drives these days.

Perhaps at your location, because most definitely I cannot get 1TB SSD for $245 here, Black Friday or not...
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,844 (3.95/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
Perhaps at your location, because most definitely I cannot get 1TB SSD for $245 here, Black Friday or not...
Not sure where you got that $245, because you can't get the SU900 512GB for $215 at your location either ;)
 
Joined
Jan 7, 2013
Messages
20 (0.00/day)
The MS Office installation is the one that surprises me. Any idea why the RD400 and Samsung 950 performed so poorly?
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
28,318 (6.75/day)
@W1zzard
I also have to say Thanks for this review! Been looking for a new drive to replace a failing TLC-based drive in one of the laptops we've got, and with this one being MLC based it fits that need perfectly. Based on a search on Amazon, they also have several other sizes ranging from 128GB to 1TB. Prices are good too.
Quite pricey, for like $30 more you can get 1TB drives these days.
You're not getting 1TB MLC-based drives for $245. TLC, maybe. MLC 1TB drive's start at $270 on Amazon or Newegg.
 
Last edited:

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,844 (3.95/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
You're not getting 1TB MLC-based drives for $245. TLC, maybe. MLC 1TB drive's start at $270 on Amazon or Newegg.

Never said you were getting MLC, just twice the storage. And even if for some reason you must have MLC, what do you choose between $215 for 500GB and $270 for 1TB?
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
28,318 (6.75/day)
Never said you were getting MLC, just twice the storage. And even if for some reason you must have MLC, what do you choose between $215 for 500GB and $270 for 1TB?
TLC is less durable than MLC. The TLC drive that is failing is losing a lot of sectors due to wearing out. MLC has much more durability by an average of 10 to 11 times. So yeah, I'm willing to pay the premium. The 512GB $215 is likely the MSRP. Amazon has it for less that $200. But the system it would be intended for doesn't need 1TB, a 256GB or 512GB would do fine.
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,844 (3.95/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
TLC is less durable than MLC. The TLC drive that is failing is losing a lot of sectors due to wearing out. MLC has much more durability by an average of 10 to 11 times. So yeah, I'm willing to pay the premium. The 512GB $215 is likely the MSRP. Amazon has it for less that $200. But the system it would be intended for doesn't need 1TB, a 256GB or 512GB would do fine.
That was an issue for planar MLC vs planar TLC. 3D TLC has about the same endurance as planar MLC, so that is not an issue anymore. Of course, 3D MLC gets even better endurance, so if you need that, it's certainly an option.
For reference, I have two 5 years old OCZ Vertex 4 drives and CrystalDiskMark reports ~6,800 power on hours while both report 100% health. They're planar MLC, so similar to what a 3D TLC drive will look 5 years from now.
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
28,318 (6.75/day)
That was an issue for planar MLC vs planar TLC. 3D TLC has about the same endurance as planar MLC, so that is not an issue anymore.
That has been stated but has not, as of yet, been proven. Though 3D-TLC has been shown to be more durable.
Of course, 3D MLC gets even better endurance, so if you need that, it's certainly an option.
Been looking at those kinds of drives. They're a bit pricey compared to standard MLC. Still doing research. Longevity is a concern. I intend to do drive upgrades in most of my systems over the next 6 to 9 months as the market seems to be in a sweet-spot ATM where the balance between price/capacity/durability is concerned.
For reference, I have two 5 years old OCZ Vertex 4 drives and CrystalDiskMark reports ~6,800 power on hours while both report 100% health. They're planar MLC, so similar to what a 3D TLC drive will look 5 years from now.
It'll be interesting to see those results as they progress.
 
Last edited:

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,844 (3.95/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
Joined
Sep 9, 2013
Messages
535 (0.13/day)
System Name Can I run it
Processor delidded i9-10900KF @ 5.1Ghz SVID best case scenario +LLC5+Supercool direct die waterblock
Motherboard ASUS Maximus XII Apex 2801 BIOS
Cooling Main = GTS 360 GTX 240, EK PE 360,XSPC EX 360,2x EK-XRES 100 Revo D5 PWM, 12x T30, AC High Flow Next
Memory 2x16GB TridentZ 3600@4600 16-16-16-36@1.61V+EK Monarch, Separate loop with GTS 120&Freezemod DDC
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 3080 Ti Gaming OC @ 0.762V 1785Mhz core 20.8Gbps mem + Barrow full cover waterblock
Storage Transcend PCIE 220S 1TB (main), WD Blue 3D NAND 250GB for OC testing, Seagate Barracuda 4TB
Display(s) Samsung Odyssey OLED G9 49" 5120x1440 240Hz calibrated by X-Rite i1 Display Pro Plus
Case Thermaltake View 71
Audio Device(s) Q Acoustics M20 HD speakers with Q Acoustics QB12 subwoofer
Power Supply Thermaltake PF3 1200W 80+ Platinum
Mouse Logitech G Pro Wireless
Keyboard Logitech G913 (GL Linear)
Software Windows 11
Can someone clarify why the fastest SSD don't have impact on gaming load time ?

I and my wife play Sims 3 with all expansions pack (33.5GB) plus tons of custom contents (56.6GB) So that is already close to 100GB. Will NVME SSD really improve experience from normal SATA SSD in these kind of game ? because my SSD in the sig still take around 3 minute to load very large house (HDD can take 5-7 minute).

I have been test with i7-3770K @ 5.3Ghz 4 years ago and try to measure scaling from 2.5Ghz , 3Ghz , 3.5Ghz , 4Ghz , 4.5Ghz , 5Ghz , 5.3Ghz and found good scaling (higher Ghz = Shorter loading time). Not sure if this proof that CPU is a bottleneck rather than storage.
 
Last edited:

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
27,972 (3.71/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
Can someone clarify why the fastest SSD don't have impact on gaming load time ?

I and my wife play Sims 3 with all expansions pack (33.5GB) plus tons of custom contents (56.6GB) So that is already close to 100GB. Will NVME SSD really improve experience from normal SATA SSD in these kind of game ? because my SSD in the sig still take around 3 minute to load very large house (HDD can take 5-7 minute).

I have been test with i7-3770K @ 5.3Ghz 4 years ago and try to measure scaling from 2.5Ghz , 3Ghz , 3.5Ghz , 4Ghz , 4.5Ghz , 5Ghz , 5.3Ghz and found good scaling (higher Ghz = Shorter loading time). Not sure if this proof that CPU is a bottleneck rather than storage.
I think you are on the right track. The data needs to go from storage through CPU, where it might be processed in some way, to the graphics card over PCIe bus and to the system RAM. Various bottlenecks on the way. The difference between HDD and SSD is huge because disk seeks become free, going from SSD to NVMe seems to make little difference. On some systems it even makes game loading slower because NVMe sits on PCIe and eats up the bandwidth for the graphics card (during level load).

Every game is different though, so the sims might see good improvements.
 
Joined
Nov 18, 2010
Messages
7,602 (1.48/day)
Location
Rīga, Latvia
System Name HELLSTAR
Processor AMD RYZEN 9 5950X
Motherboard ASUS Strix X570-E
Cooling 2x 360 + 280 rads. 3x Gentle Typhoons, 3x Phanteks T30, 2x TT T140 . EK-Quantum Momentum Monoblock.
Memory 4x8GB G.SKILL Trident Z RGB F4-4133C19D-16GTZR 14-16-12-30-44
Video Card(s) Sapphire Pulse RX 7900XTX. Water block. Crossflashed.
Storage Optane 900P[Fedora] + WD BLACK SN850X 4TB + 750 EVO 500GB + 1TB 980PRO+SN560 1TB(W11)
Display(s) Philips PHL BDM3270 + Acer XV242Y
Case Lian Li O11 Dynamic EVO
Audio Device(s) SMSL RAW-MDA1 DAC
Power Supply Fractal Design Newton R3 1000W
Mouse Razer Basilisk
Keyboard Razer BlackWidow V3 - Yellow Switch
Software FEDORA 41
On some systems it even makes game loading slower because NVMe sits on PCIe and eats up the bandwidth for the graphics card (during level load).

I want more info on that. Direct CPU lines or via PCH? Examples to test it out. I've currently did a bonkers thing a put plain windows on 32GB Optane, it actually fits nice, and dedicated 950Pro to fight Sauron... I've kept in 750EVO before... (I hate that TLC drive with my guts, it gets more full and starts to crawl)
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,844 (3.95/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
Can someone clarify why the fastest SSD don't have impact on gaming load time ?

I and my wife play Sims 3 with all expansions pack (33.5GB) plus tons of custom contents (56.6GB) So that is already close to 100GB. Will NVME SSD really improve experience from normal SATA SSD in these kind of game ? because my SSD in the sig still take around 3 minute to load very large house (HDD can take 5-7 minute).

I have been test with i7-3770K @ 5.3Ghz 4 years ago and try to measure scaling from 2.5Ghz , 3Ghz , 3.5Ghz , 4Ghz , 4.5Ghz , 5Ghz , 5.3Ghz and found good scaling (higher Ghz = Shorter loading time). Not sure if this proof that CPU is a bottleneck rather than storage.
The fact that going from HDD to SSD (~10x faster) only cuts the load times in half should be indication enough that storage is not your only bottleneck.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2005
Messages
5,847 (0.81/day)
Location
Ikenai borderline!
System Name Firelance.
Processor Threadripper 3960X
Motherboard ROG Strix TRX40-E Gaming
Cooling IceGem 360 + 6x Arctic Cooling P12
Memory 8x 16GB Patriot Viper DDR4-3200 CL16
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Ventus 2X OC
Storage 2TB WD SN850X (boot), 4TB Crucial P3 (data)
Display(s) 3x AOC Q32E2N (32" 2560x1440 75Hz)
Case Enthoo Pro II Server Edition (Closed Panel) + 6 fans
Power Supply Fractal Design Ion+ 2 Platinum 760W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Razer Pro Type Ultra
Software Windows 10 Professional x64
Can someone clarify why the fastest SSD don't have impact on gaming load time ?

I and my wife play Sims 3 with all expansions pack (33.5GB) plus tons of custom contents (56.6GB) So that is already close to 100GB. Will NVME SSD really improve experience from normal SATA SSD in these kind of game ? because my SSD in the sig still take around 3 minute to load very large house (HDD can take 5-7 minute).

I have been test with i7-3770K @ 5.3Ghz 4 years ago and try to measure scaling from 2.5Ghz , 3Ghz , 3.5Ghz , 4Ghz , 4.5Ghz , 5Ghz , 5.3Ghz and found good scaling (higher Ghz = Shorter loading time). Not sure if this proof that CPU is a bottleneck rather than storage.

There are two variables in data transfer: throughput, and latency. Throughput is how fast a storage device (memory, SDD, HDD) can transfer data, the higher the better; latency is how quickly a device can respond to requests to transfer data (in other words, how long other parts of the system have to wait before the device begins sending the requested data) - the lower the better.

Hard drives have poor throughput and terrible latency. Comparably, SSDs have many more times throughput, but orders of magnitude lower latency. This is why going from an HDD to an SSD is such a noticeable change. On the other hand, an NVMe SSD's throughput is again many times that of its SATA brethren, but its latency is almost the same.

Why does this matter? Because the majority of data transfer workloads that occur on consumer PCs involve large numbers of small files. That means latency, not throughput, is the limiting factor, and is why going from a SATA to NVMe SSD is not going to make much of a difference to the average consumer.

The reason that you saw better loading times with higher CPU clocks is due to the fact that a program never just "loads" data - it loads and processes it into the format it needs. When you were using a HDD, the loading took far longer because the HDD's high latency was the bottleneck; the CPU probably spent as much time waiting for the HDD to serve up the data, as it did processing that data. With an SSD's lower latency, the CPU was now able to get the data it needed far more quickly, which means it can spend all its time processing instead of some of its time waiting - and thanks to the SSD, that processing time is now the bottleneck.
 
Joined
Jul 22, 2009
Messages
183 (0.03/day)
Location
Bucharest
Can someone clarify why the fastest SSD don't have impact on gaming load time ?

I and my wife play Sims 3 with all expansions pack (33.5GB) plus tons of custom contents (56.6GB) So that is already close to 100GB. Will NVME SSD really improve experience from normal SATA SSD in these kind of game ? because my SSD in the sig still take around 3 minute to load very large house (HDD can take 5-7 minute).

I have been test with i7-3770K @ 5.3Ghz 4 years ago and try to measure scaling from 2.5Ghz , 3Ghz , 3.5Ghz , 4Ghz , 4.5Ghz , 5Ghz , 5.3Ghz and found good scaling (higher Ghz = Shorter loading time). Not sure if this proof that CPU is a bottleneck rather than storage.

You may want to be running Windows 7 or 10 on 64bits on that system with at least 16Gb of DDR3 memory, preferably 32. From name of the CPU I can tell it's quite an old Core i7 from the 3rd generation, making it capable of supporting at most 32Gb of RAM.

Also, with all that data on a SSD doing lots of loading, reading and some writing, you will want to do some trimming on it at least monthly. Writing, deleting, writing over deleted info on SSD will lead to severe slowdowns in time. Especially if the SSD is more than half full.
 
Joined
Sep 9, 2013
Messages
535 (0.13/day)
System Name Can I run it
Processor delidded i9-10900KF @ 5.1Ghz SVID best case scenario +LLC5+Supercool direct die waterblock
Motherboard ASUS Maximus XII Apex 2801 BIOS
Cooling Main = GTS 360 GTX 240, EK PE 360,XSPC EX 360,2x EK-XRES 100 Revo D5 PWM, 12x T30, AC High Flow Next
Memory 2x16GB TridentZ 3600@4600 16-16-16-36@1.61V+EK Monarch, Separate loop with GTS 120&Freezemod DDC
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 3080 Ti Gaming OC @ 0.762V 1785Mhz core 20.8Gbps mem + Barrow full cover waterblock
Storage Transcend PCIE 220S 1TB (main), WD Blue 3D NAND 250GB for OC testing, Seagate Barracuda 4TB
Display(s) Samsung Odyssey OLED G9 49" 5120x1440 240Hz calibrated by X-Rite i1 Display Pro Plus
Case Thermaltake View 71
Audio Device(s) Q Acoustics M20 HD speakers with Q Acoustics QB12 subwoofer
Power Supply Thermaltake PF3 1200W 80+ Platinum
Mouse Logitech G Pro Wireless
Keyboard Logitech G913 (GL Linear)
Software Windows 11
You may want to be running Windows 7 or 10 on 64bits on that system with at least 16Gb of DDR3 memory, preferably 32. From name of the CPU I can tell it's quite an old Core i7 from the 3rd generation, making it capable of supporting at most 32Gb of RAM.

Also, with all that data on a SSD doing lots of loading, reading and some writing, you will want to do some trimming on it at least monthly. Writing, deleting, writing over deleted info on SSD will lead to severe slowdowns in time. Especially if the SSD is more than half full.

Sold that cpu long time ago. And Sims 3 is 32 bit game so it can't take advantage from huge memory.
 
Top