Post your Final Fantasy XV Benchmark Results

[Gan77]

I9-9900K @ 5100/4700 HT Off
2x16Gb 4200 16-16-36-2T
2080TI 2175-2160 / 15900
Score: 20311

 

[Deleted member 197986]

 

[Gan77]

Minor improvements
I9-9900K @ 5200/4700 HT Off
2x16Gb 4200 16-16-36-2T
2080TI 2175-2160 / 15900

 

[Fizban]

13k as the best AMD score is kind of sad. I actually think I might get close to that on a laptop I just ordered, will test once it's arrived, but I fully expect it to score 12000+, just not sure if it can actually match the Radeon VII's scores or not. (It has a 2070 Super.)

 

[Godsun]

Процессор: R7 2700X
GPU: RX 5700 XT
Счет: 13422

 

[harm9963]

455.41

 

[sepheronx]

W3680 @ Stock (3.3ghz boost)
12gb 1066 DDR3 memory
ASUS GTX 1070 Turbo

 

[Fizban]

Guessing the Xeon is holding back your score. I got 9241 on a laptop with a 1660 TI. Desktop 1070 should outperform my videocard.

 

[sepheronx]

Guessing the Xeon is holding back your score. I got 9241 on a laptop with a 1660 TI. Desktop 1070 should outperform my videocard.

Probably. I can run it again and see the CPU usage to make sure.

Otherwise, judging by overall performance scores what harm posted, the 1070 falls right in that area that I got.

Edit: Yeah, about same score. CPU usage went from anywhere between 40% to 99%. GPU was at full 99% throughout the benchmark. Either way, it ran very well imo. Now once I can get a proper cooling solution going with this CPU, I am gonna throttlestop this bad boy back to 4.1Ghz.

So I am not really all that dissapointed cause the other machine (3500X and 1660 Super) didnt score much higher.

 

[Fizban]

Shocked my laptop beat out the 1660 Super machine actually. I thought it'd beat the 1070 due to having a superior CPU, but I wouldn't really expect a Ryzen 3500X to be outperformed by my i7-9750H.

Might vary a lot game to game, but according to: https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce-gtx-1660-ti-mobile.c3369

A desktop 1660 super is usually about 9% faster than my 1660 TI. Desktop 1070 is usually 11% faster. Mine might be better cooled though than whatever techpowerup's results were obtained from.

 

[sepheronx]

Mix this with what harm posted: https://www.techpowerup.com/forums/...benchmark-results.242200/page-30#post-4293598

And it all makes sense. The performance numbers are all exactly what tests are showing.

Can you post your full benchmark then?

Because judging by what all the benchmarks are saying, your numbers are way too high compared to what the average is for same setups. Maybe your CPU is being taken good advantage of in this game? But your score matches those with Ryzen 2600X @ 4ghz. So who knows. And I know those Ryzens are much better than my W3680.

 

[Fizban]

I posted mine earlier in the thread:

Got a new laptop, score seems decent.

View attachment 140568

 

[sepheronx]

I posted mine earlier in the thread:

Definitely good score. Good processor and you mixture. I recall back when ff15 was released it worked generally better on Intel. That hasn't changed it seems. Heck, your cpu does better than a lot of the newer xeon setups from mine. And the 1660 to is essentially a 6gb vram 1070 in performance. The two trade blows

 

[Fizban]

I think my laptops cpu beats Xeons due to higher clock speed. The game probably doesn't scale super well with extra cores by comparison. 9750H can do 4.0 GHz on 12 threads, whereas your Xeon looks to cap at 3.6 GHz.

Listings of base-clock tend to make laptop cpus look a lot worse than they are. ie. That screenshot says my cpu is 2.6 GHz, but that's base, all-core turbo is 4.0 GHz, single-core turbo is 4.5 GHz.

 

[ultrafx]

Ryzen 5 1500X @3700 MHz
2x8GB @2800 MHz CL14-16-14-30-48 1T
GTX 1650 Super @~1935/14000 (Palit StormX) - https://st.overclockers.ru/legacy/blog/79837/181611_O.jpg

Score: 7585

So this card beat my previous overclocked MSI Gaming X GTX 1060. But It's hot today in my room, summer... This card can more, but need less temperatures

 

[P4-630]

for my specs see hwinfo or under system specs under my name, its up to date.

Don't see your specs under your name.

 

[ultrafx]

Ryzen 5 1500X @3700 MHz
2x8GB @2800 MHz CL14-16-14-30-48 1T
GTX 1650 Super @~1935/14000 (Palit StormX) - https://st.overclockers.ru/legacy/blog/79837/181611_O.jpg

Score: 7585

So this card beat my previous overclocked MSI Gaming X GTX 1060. But It's hot today in my room, summer... This card can more, but need less temperatures

@~1950/14200

Score: 7724

 

[ThrashZone]

Hi,
ThrashZone---10900k---1080ti ftw3---16716

 

[Moonshield84]

r7 3700x @ 4.2ghz (I think this is the auto overclock)
2 x 8 gb 3600mhz (enabled in bios)
evga xc ultra 2080ti

 

[Fizban]

Beat the Radeon VII's and GTX 1080's, on the lower end of the 1080 TI scores.

Not too shabby for a laptop that was under $2,000 including shipping, tax, etc.

 

[mrthanhnguyen]

 

[DRDNA]

INTEL CORE I9-9900K,
EVGA GEFORECE RTX 2080 SUPER XC HYBRID GAMING ,
ASUS PRIME Z390-P ATX MOBO
CRUCIAL BALLISTIX 32gb,
CORSAIR HYDRO H150I PRO RGB 360MM LIQUID CPU COOLING,6xfans push-pull
BLACK LIAN LI O11 DYNAMIC XL FULL-TOWER GAMING CASE,
1600W 80 PLUS GOLD MODULAR POWER SUPPLY,

 

[sounik]

gtx 1080 @ 2126 core / 6200 memory paired with r5 3600@4.55ghz and 3733/cl16 memory

 

[DRDNA]

lowered some voltages

INTEL CORE I9-9900K,
EVGA GEFORECE RTX 2080 SUPER XC HYBRID GAMING ,
ASUS PRIME Z390-P ATX MOBO
CRUCIAL BALLISTIX 32gb,
CORSAIR HYDRO H150I PRO RGB 360MM LIQUID CPU COOLING,6xfans push-pull
BLACK LIAN LI O11 DYNAMIC XL FULL-TOWER GAMING CASE,
1600W 80 PLUS GOLD MODULAR POWER SUPPLY,

 

[DRDNA]

17,000 boi's

lil OC bump in the 32gb system raM and whala. I guess you could say I'm "just cleaning some clocks" lol TOOK OUT a 2080 TI'S dang

INTEL CORE I9-9900K,
EVGA GEFORECE RTX 2080 SUPER XC HYBRID GAMING ,
ASUS PRIME Z390-P ATX MOBO
CRUCIAL BALLISTIX 32gb,
CORSAIR HYDRO H150I PRO RGB 360MM LIQUID CPU COOLING,6xfans push-pull
BLACK LIAN LI O11 DYNAMIC XL FULL-TOWER GAMING CASE,
1600W 80 PLUS GOLD MODULAR POWER SUPPLY,