Post your Final Fantasy XV Benchmark Results

[T4C Fantasy]

I dont use the threads. CPU was a replacement for a CPU that went pop in a review. so it moved to my daily driver while my 24/7 CPU, the 7900X (which i also cant use all the cores often, lol) was thrust into review duty after the original met an untimely death.

Wow thats nuts! When you have to disable threads lol

 

[yesyesloud]

Yeah... it's clear the number of cores/threads plays a role in the scores in this bench.

As i said earlier, the bench will use all cores it has... at least 16. My 7960X has HT off and it pegged 2 cores at 100% and the others were all around equal use at 50%...first time i saw that in a game.

Try it if you have two monitors.

Watch Dogs 2 uses all of my cores/threads at about 100% all the time (except on map/menus obviously). It also had my old fx-9590 (8 physical cores) go full load. Pretty impressed with it assuming it's not bad coding. I read that ani7 2600K does better in that game than an i5 6600 at nearly same clocks (~0.1GHz difference)... Stock fx-8350 is also topping stock i5 skylake in that scenario. Crazy but we had it coming.

I truly hope it's a major trend since consoles turned into high core count APU PCs with custom OS's. PS4/xbone ports are better than last gen ones overall.

 

[Tomgang]

Today the old X58 really behaved well and after alot of ajustment, fine tuning and some sweet talk to the old lady. She responded back with a score of 13112. Who said sweet talking to an old girl would not work. It may not be enough for a fourth place still, but remember X58 is released nearly 10 years a go, so I am really impress by that this old setup manage to get above 13000 with and old cpu like this + this bench is very CPU demanding.

Edit: bummer cpu-z dosent show cpu max clock, but CPU is running at 4.72 GHz.

And here is the proof.

 

[DRDNA]

all updated..

 

[T4C Fantasy]

here's mine with a 1700x @3.8Ghz and a 1060 @2063 Mhz
View attachment 98257

However there might be something wrong with my computer when I look at the high quality result I had a few months ago :
This was a run with stock clock on everything :
View attachment 98258
Tonight run with overclock:
View attachment 98259
I've done several run, I even got one at 3791 I wasn't throttling so I don't understand why it's lower
(according to the official charts, it's not bad for a 1060 3gb, but I can't help but wonder why ?)

Make sure you label all 1060 submissions with its memory 3gb and 6gb are 2 different skus he has GTX 1060 3GB
@DRDNA

 

[agent_x007]

@Tomgang Next time use "Maximum performance" profile from Windows power profiles
@DRDNA I think with list growing this fast, a quick link to our post with results can be helpful (especially, when someone wants to confirm/verify what was OC'ed and what wasn't).
Example : agent_x007 - Xeon X3370 - R9 390X - Score = 5946 (LINK)

 

[Tomgang]

@Tomgang Next time use "Maximum performance" profile from Windows power profiles
@DRDNA I think with list growing this fast, a quick link to our post with results can be helpful (especially, when someone wants to confirm/verify what was OC'ed and what wasn't).
Example : agent_x007 - Xeon X3370 - R9 390X - Score = 5946 (LINK)

You mean with that cpu wont clock down right?

But yeah i cut do that

 

[agent_x007]

Yes

 

[T4C Fantasy]

@Tomgang Next time use "Maximum performance" profile from Windows power profiles
@DRDNA I think with list growing this fast, a quick link to our post with results can be helpful (especially, when someone wants to confirm/verify what was OC'ed and what wasn't).
Example : agent_x007 - Xeon X3370 - R9 390X - Score = 5946 (LINK)

I like the linking and with the small font it will fit

 

[EarthDog]

Or instead of making additional characters ("link" at the end) you can make the score the link to the post.

 

[T4C Fantasy]

Or instead of making additional characters ("link" at the end) you can make the score the link to the post.

True will colors stay same?

 

[EarthDog]

It should. Just underlined as a hyperlink.

Im mobile or id try.

 

[DRDNA]

Make sure you label all 1060 submissions with its memory 3gb and 6gb are 2 different skus he has GTX 1060 3GB
@DRDNA

Done, by the way what is the 1050 in your laptop. 2GB or 4GB?

View attachment 98264

Lenovo Y700 with the GTX960m

Melvis iS THAT 960 A 2GB or 4GB?

 

[T4C Fantasy]

Done, by the way what is the 1050 in your laptop. 2GB or 4GB?


Melvis iS THAT 960 A 2GB or 4GB?

its 4GB but no other sku has a different core count on memory amount change like 1060 does thats the only reason why i said 1060s

T4C Fantasy - i7 6700K - GTX 1080 Ti - Score = 13732

 

[DRDNA]

its 4GB but no other sku has a different core count on memory amount change like 1060 does thats the only reason why i said 1060s

T4C Fantasy - i7 6700K - GTX 1080 Ti - Score = 13732

I'm almost certain the 1050 in laptops comes in both 2 GB and 4 GB versions. but thnx.
And i'm positive the 960M do.

 

[T4C Fantasy]

I'm almost certain the 1050 in laptops comes in both 2 GB and 4 GB versions. but thnx.
And i'm positive the 960M do.

you can update my link, ill help with everybodys overtime

 

[DRDNA]

you can update my link, ill help with everybodys overtime

completed as requested.

 

[yesyesloud]

Ok since this game seems a bit cpu-bound I figured the i7 skylake ES @ 4GHz might be holding my GPU OC back and decided to have another go at it.

This is what I get with i7 6700K ES @ 4.4GHz + Gtx 1080 Ti @ 2.08GHz.

 

[T4C Fantasy]

Ok since this game seems a bit cpu-bound I figured the i7 skylake ES @ 4GHz might be holding my GPU OC back and decided to have another go at it.

This is what I get with i7 6700K ES @ 4.4GHz + Gtx 1080 Ti @ 2.08GHz.

View attachment 98302

my 1080ti wont leave 2025 it can scratch by 2037 for like 4 minutes but not enough on a benchmark, anyway my new score

 

[Ferrum Master]

I dont use the threads. CPU was a replacement for a CPU that went pop in a review. so it moved to my daily driver while my 24/7 CPU, the 7900X (which i also cant use all the cores often, lol) was thrust into review duty after the original met an untimely death.

How did you kill it?

PS. I did a shunt mod for my card(+50W ie not a complete short), so running 2100MHz does not trigger power limit, not only the temp limit. Also disable any kind of overlay. Steam, afterburner, razer shit etc...

 

[DRDNA]

Updated scores and they are clickable, just the new updates so far.

 

[EarthDog]

How did you kill it?

Not sure... it just died at stock settings when I was resetting the BIOS (XMP was enabled for review testing a mobo. That was it, no overclocks). It was replaced with a 7960X as the board partner who's board it was didn't have a 7900X to send.

 

[T4C Fantasy]

Not sure... it just died at stock settings when I was resetting the BIOS (XMP was enabled for review testing a mobo. That was it, no overclocks). It was replaced with a 7960X as the board partner who's board it was didn't have a 7900X to send.

How much does it cost to make a single 7900 series chip? Im sure 7980X cost same as 7900X to manufacture lol

 

[EarthDog]

No clue... I'd imagine yields are higher with fewer cores, though that is just a hunch. The board partner requested the board back for a root cause analysis as we have no idea what could have done it.

 

[Tomgang]

Tried out some more and ended up at 13180. This is as high it can be. X58 and GPU has nothing more to give now, at least not with my current cooling.