• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

MSI Oculux NXG251R 240 Hz G-Sync Gaming Monitor

Inle

Staff member
Joined
Apr 6, 2017
Messages
329 (0.12/day)
System Name Efrafa
Processor Intel Core i7-5960X @ 4,3 GHz
Motherboard Asus X99 STRIX Gaming
Cooling NZXT Kraken X52
Memory G.Skill Ripjaws 4 32 GB
Video Card(s) Asus ROG STRIX GeForce GTX 1080 OC Edition
Storage ADATA SX8000 NVMe 512 GB + 5x Kingston HyperX Savage 512 GB
Display(s) Acer Predator XB271HU
Case Corsair Crystal 460X
Audio Device(s) Audiolab M-DAC
Power Supply Seasonic X-850
Mouse Logitech G900 Chaos Spectrum
Keyboard Cherry MX Board 6.0
Software Battlefield 1
The MSI Oculux NXG251R is one of the least expensive 240 Hz G-Sync monitors on the market. It promises eSports-grade gaming performance and a host of other goodies. Is it hindered by its 24.5-inch TN panel or does it truly deliver?

Show full review
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joined
Jun 15, 2016
Messages
1,042 (0.34/day)
Location
Pristina
System Name My PC
Processor 4670K@4.4GHz
Motherboard Gryphon Z87
Cooling CM 212
Memory 2x8GB+2x4GB @2400GHz
Video Card(s) XFX Radeon RX 580 GTS Black Edition 1425MHz OC+, 8GB
Storage Intel 530 SSD 480GB + Intel 510 SSD 120GB + 2x500GB hdd raid 1
Display(s) HP envy 32 1440p
Case CM Mastercase 5
Audio Device(s) Sbz ZXR
Power Supply Antec 620W
Mouse G502
Keyboard G910
Software Win 10 pro
Great review like always, but it seems that freesync version is better choice.
 
Joined
Dec 13, 2007
Messages
269 (0.04/day)
Location
Montreal, QC
System Name No Name
Processor i7 980 @ 4.2ghz
Motherboard GA-X99M-GAMING
Video Card(s) MSU Gaming X 1070
Audio Device(s) X7 Creative LE
Mouse Razer Naga
Keyboard K95 Corsair RGB Blue
The back looks like nvidia shield if you turn the light to green...
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
22,410 (6.03/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI MAG Mortar b650m wifi
Cooling Thermalright Peerless Assassin
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengeance 30CL6000
Video Card(s) ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming
Storage Lexar NM790 4TB + Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 980 1TB + Crucial BX100 250GB
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case Lian Li A3 mATX White
Audio Device(s) Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Steelseries Aerox 5
Keyboard Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II
Software W11 IoT Enterprise LTSC
Benchmark Scores Over 9000
Bit of an odd statement to say that ULMB, even though it is implemented well, is better than 240hz native. I guess that you suggest using Gsync because of its other advantages? But at high refresh, that doesn't really fly, does it? Enlighten me... what is the thought process here, or is it just '240hz native is better because native and higher number'?

I mean let's compare. And this is considering you actually can hold 240 FPS steady in game. Which I deem a LOT less likely as being able to keep the FPS above 100...

Basically 240hz = scrolling text is vague/hard to read. ULMB = readable at half the FPS requirement. I must be crazy or something...? Or is it from the viewpoint of 'competitive gaming' purely? Because lower FPS and strobe do add some input lag, however minor it may be.

1555077019753.png


Is better than this??

1555077051658.png
 
Joined
Nov 13, 2007
Messages
10,734 (1.73/day)
Location
Austin Texas
System Name Stress Less
Processor 9800X3D @ 5.42GHZ
Motherboard MSI B650 PRO Wifi
Cooling Thermalright Phantom Spirit EVO
Memory 64GB DDR5 6000 CL28
Video Card(s) RTX 4090 FE
Storage 2TB WD SN850, 4TB WD SN850X
Display(s) Alienware 32" 4k 240hz OLED
Case Jonsbo Z20
Audio Device(s) Yes
Power Supply Corsair SF750
Mouse DeathadderV2 X Hyperspeed
Keyboard 65% HE Keyboard
Software Windows 11
Benchmark Scores They're pretty good, nothing crazy.
Bit of an odd statement to say that ULMB, even though it is implemented well, is better than 240hz native. I guess that you suggest using Gsync because of its other advantages? But at high refresh, that doesn't really fly, does it? Enlighten me... what is the thought process here, or is it just '240hz native is better because native and higher number'?

I mean let's compare. And this is considering you actually can hold 240 FPS steady in game. Which I deem a LOT less likely as being able to keep the FPS above 100...

Basically 240hz = scrolling text is vague/hard to read. ULMB = readable at half the FPS requirement. I must be crazy or something...? Or is it from the viewpoint of 'competitive gaming' purely? Because lower FPS and strobe do add some input lag, however minor it may be.

View attachment 120898

Is better than this??

View attachment 120899

Less brightness / color vibrancy, lower fluidity, and no frame pacing & more noticeable stutter (compounded by ULMB) = why most people leave ULMB off for gaming. No one is sitting around reading rapidly scrolling text, if that's what you're doing, then ULMB is excellent.

Keep in mind, 'motion blur' is an effect that is ADDED to games to increase fluidity - so full brightness/color vibrancy with tiny bit of blur at high speed & synced refresh looks & feels much better than ULMB.

My monitor does ULMB @ 120hz and it's crap in virtually all scenarios compared to standard Gsync @ 120hz.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
22,410 (6.03/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI MAG Mortar b650m wifi
Cooling Thermalright Peerless Assassin
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengeance 30CL6000
Video Card(s) ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming
Storage Lexar NM790 4TB + Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 980 1TB + Crucial BX100 250GB
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case Lian Li A3 mATX White
Audio Device(s) Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Steelseries Aerox 5
Keyboard Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II
Software W11 IoT Enterprise LTSC
Benchmark Scores Over 9000
Less brightness / color vibrancy, lower fluidity, and no frame pacing & more noticeable stutter (compounded by ULMB) = why most people leave ULMB off for gaming. No one is sitting around reading rapidly scrolling text, if that's what you're doing, then ULMB is excellent.

Keep in mind, 'motion blur' is an effect that is ADDED to games to increase fluidity - so full brightness/color vibrancy with tiny bit of blur at high speed & synced refresh looks & feels much better than ULMB.

My monitor does ULMB @ 120hz and it's crap in virtually all scenarios compared to standard Gsync @ 120hz.

I see. Then I suppose its truly different from the strobe I've got (which is not ULMB). Can't say I see any of these problems, ever. Except variable frame pacing.
 
Joined
Nov 13, 2007
Messages
10,734 (1.73/day)
Location
Austin Texas
System Name Stress Less
Processor 9800X3D @ 5.42GHZ
Motherboard MSI B650 PRO Wifi
Cooling Thermalright Phantom Spirit EVO
Memory 64GB DDR5 6000 CL28
Video Card(s) RTX 4090 FE
Storage 2TB WD SN850, 4TB WD SN850X
Display(s) Alienware 32" 4k 240hz OLED
Case Jonsbo Z20
Audio Device(s) Yes
Power Supply Corsair SF750
Mouse DeathadderV2 X Hyperspeed
Keyboard 65% HE Keyboard
Software Windows 11
Benchmark Scores They're pretty good, nothing crazy.
I see. Then I suppose its truly different from the strobe I've got (which is not ULMB). Can't say I see any of these problems, ever. Except variable frame pacing.

Might be because you have a VA panel with a better strobe implementation. Both mine and this monitor are TN panels where the colors are extremely 'meh' to begin with, add a black ULMB strobe to that where the brightness and colors wash out by another 30% and you basically don't even want to look at the thing anymore.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 20, 2012
Messages
422 (0.10/day)
Location
Hungary
System Name masina
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Motherboard ASUS TUF B550M
Cooling Scythe Kabuto 3 + Arctic BioniX P120 fan
Memory 16GB (2x8) DDR4-3200 CL16 Crucial Ballistix
Video Card(s) Radeon Pro WX 2100 2GB
Storage 500GB Crucial MX500, 640GB WD Black
Display(s) AOC C24G1
Case SilentiumPC AT6V
Power Supply Seasonic Focus GX 650W
Mouse Logitech G203
Keyboard Cooler Master MasterKeys L PBT
Software Win 10 Pro
Say NO to TN.

No Hz is worth TN, just isnt.

Depends on use case really. But having a new TN panel with decent colors is not that aweful to be honest.

But having had a relatively good IPS panel for a few years, I definitely won't go back to TN.

I'm moving onto VA for a bit now as I ordered an AOC C24G1 which is a relatively inexpensive 144Hz 8-bit VA panel with FreeSync.
Sadly I'm still waiting for it to arrive as it's been on back order for almost 3 weeks now. :(
 
Joined
Jul 24, 2009
Messages
1,002 (0.18/day)
Depends on use case really. But having a new TN panel with decent colors is not that aweful to be honest.

But having had a relatively good IPS panel for a few years, I definitely won't go back to TN.

I'm moving onto VA for a bit now as I ordered an AOC C24G1 which is a relatively inexpensive 144Hz 8-bit VA panel with FreeSync.
Sadly I'm still waiting for it to arrive as it's been on back order for almost 3 weeks now. :(

I have EIZO, so.. yea cant go to TN. Or even cheaper normals. But Im not target audience for such panels anyway. Im target audience for currently nearly non-existent mixes of photo+gaming monitors (I think there are only two that fit this :D).
 
Joined
Nov 20, 2012
Messages
422 (0.10/day)
Location
Hungary
System Name masina
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Motherboard ASUS TUF B550M
Cooling Scythe Kabuto 3 + Arctic BioniX P120 fan
Memory 16GB (2x8) DDR4-3200 CL16 Crucial Ballistix
Video Card(s) Radeon Pro WX 2100 2GB
Storage 500GB Crucial MX500, 640GB WD Black
Display(s) AOC C24G1
Case SilentiumPC AT6V
Power Supply Seasonic Focus GX 650W
Mouse Logitech G203
Keyboard Cooler Master MasterKeys L PBT
Software Win 10 Pro
I have EIZO, so.. yea cant go to TN. Or even cheaper normals. But Im not target audience for such panels anyway. Im target audience for currently nearly non-existent mixes of photo+gaming monitors (I think there are only two that fit this :D).

Yeah, one needs deep pockets for high refresh rate and good if not great color accuracy sadly. Friend was looking for this mesh and finally bit the bullet and went for the Acer XV273K and got it calibrated on top as he does graphical work. Not really on the cheap side tho.
 
Joined
Jul 24, 2009
Messages
1,002 (0.18/day)
Yeah, one needs deep pockets for high refresh rate and good if not great color accuracy sadly. Friend was looking for this mesh and finally bit the bullet and went for the Acer XV273K and got it calibrated on top as he does graphical work. Not really on the cheap side tho.

Another option is Dell (Alienware) which does one reasonably accurate and possible to calibrate. And ofc Eizo itself. Foris is damn expensive for what it does tho..
 
Top