• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

MSI Radeon RX 5600 XT Gaming X & Gaming Z

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
27,974 (3.71/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
MSI's Radeon RX 5600 XT Gaming Series comes in two flavors: the Gaming X and the Gaming Z, which has higher memory clocks. We compare both cards and their massive triple-slot thermal solution that achieves amazing temperatures and noise levels. Fan-stop is included, too.

Show full review
 
Joined
Jan 19, 2018
Messages
184 (0.07/day)
Processor AMD 5800X
Motherboard MSI X570 Tomahawk
Memory G.Skill 32GB
Software Windows 10
And just like the ASUS card, why would anyone buy this over the Pulse? It'll be interesting to see how the PowerColor cards perform since they're currently priced at $289.99 for the Red Devil and $309.99 for the Red Dragon. Looks like they have a basic model for $279.99 as well. Gigabyte is coming in at $299.99. All prices according to amazon right now. The Pulse set the bar and so far MSI and ASUS have failed to clear it.
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2014
Messages
1,793 (0.45/day)
Uhm, so are you going to keep both 12Gbps and 14Gbps versions of rx5600xts on future charts or only one?
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2011
Messages
540 (0.11/day)
Some of these board partners went full retard on the pricing. The new bios gives little o/c headroom so this is just a waste of money over the cards closer to msrp.
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2014
Messages
1,793 (0.45/day)
What the actual F is MSI doing with these prices?

They just have too damn many skus from the same gpu. I would guess it goes like this: Evoke $279, Evoke OC $289, Mech $299, Mech OC $309, Gaming $319, Gaming X $329, Gaming Z $339.
 
Joined
Apr 1, 2014
Messages
503 (0.13/day)
System Name Personal Rig
Processor Intel i5 3570K
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V
Cooling Noctua NH-U12P Push/Pull
Memory 8GB 1600Mhz Vengeance
Video Card(s) Intel HD4000
Storage Seagate 1TB & 180GB Intel 330
Display(s) AOC I2360P
Case Enermax Vostok
Audio Device(s) Onboard realtek
Power Supply Corsair TX650
Mouse Microsoft OEM 2.0
Keyboard Logitech Internet Pro White
Software Legal ;)
Benchmark Scores Very big
Shit, for that kind of money, a smart man would buy 5700 and flash 5700xt bios on it.
card like this only makes sense at msrp.
 
Joined
Apr 21, 2010
Messages
578 (0.11/day)
System Name Home PC
Processor Ryzen 5900X
Motherboard Asus Prime X370 Pro
Cooling Thermaltake Contac Silent 12
Memory 2x8gb F4-3200C16-8GVKB - 2x16gb F4-3200C16-16GVK
Video Card(s) XFX RX480 GTR
Storage Samsung SSD Evo 120GB -WD SN580 1TB - Toshiba 2TB HDWT720 - 1TB GIGABYTE GP-GSTFS31100TNTD
Display(s) Cooler Master GA271 and AoC 931wx (19in, 1680x1050)
Case Green Magnum Evo
Power Supply Green 650UK Plus
Mouse Green GM602-RGB ( copy of Aula F810 )
Keyboard Old 12 years FOCUS FK-8100
hmm , among all cards , this card is best in term of cooling unless someone cares about 5700, this will be sold out.
 
Joined
Oct 4, 2017
Messages
706 (0.27/day)
Location
France
Processor RYZEN 7 5800X3D
Motherboard Aorus B-550I Pro AX
Cooling HEATKILLER IV PRO , EKWB Vector FTW3 3080/3090 , Barrow res + Xylem DDC 4.2, SE 240 + Dabel 20b 240
Memory Viper Steel 4000 PVS416G400C6K
Video Card(s) EVGA 3080Ti FTW3
Storage XPG SX8200 Pro 512 GB NVMe + Samsung 980 1TB
Display(s) Dell S2721DGF
Case NR 200
Power Supply CORSAIR SF750
Mouse Logitech G PRO
Keyboard Meletrix Zoom 75 GT Silver
Software Windows 11 22H2
And just like the ASUS card, why would anyone buy this over the Pulse?

Well the Strix runs almost 20 degrees cooler ( hotspot ) at the same noise level , which means you can run it almost silently which matters to some :rolleyes:
 

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
27,974 (3.71/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
Uhm, so are you going to keep both 12Gbps and 14Gbps versions of rx5600xts on future charts or only one?
I'm not sure yet. It's not only 12 Gbps vs 14 Gbps memory, but also GPU clock. Cheapest cards will be at least 10% slower than the top ones
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2011
Messages
540 (0.11/day)
Apples to apples comparison of the Gaming Z cards:


The 2060 Gaming Z gets the same overclock over a Reference card as the 5600xt Gaming Z does over the gimped bios.

All 5600xt gpus are limited to just under 15 ghz vram while the 2060 vram is free to run 16 ghz or more.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2005
Messages
5,847 (0.81/day)
Location
Ikenai borderline!
System Name Firelance.
Processor Threadripper 3960X
Motherboard ROG Strix TRX40-E Gaming
Cooling IceGem 360 + 6x Arctic Cooling P12
Memory 8x 16GB Patriot Viper DDR4-3200 CL16
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Ventus 2X OC
Storage 2TB WD SN850X (boot), 4TB Crucial P3 (data)
Display(s) 3x AOC Q32E2N (32" 2560x1440 75Hz)
Case Enthoo Pro II Server Edition (Closed Panel) + 6 fans
Power Supply Fractal Design Ion+ 2 Platinum 760W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Razer Pro Type Ultra
Software Windows 10 Professional x64
What the actual F is MSI doing with these prices?

MSI anticipated that RX 5600 XT would launch into a slot in the GPU market where there was no other competition, so it would be a good seller, especially at under the psychological $300 mark. Based on that they budgeted a certain amount of money to design a number of 5600 XT SKUs, covering the performance range from stock to just below 5700.

Then NVIDIA cut RTX 2060 prices by $30 and suddenly the 5600 XT was no longer competitive. AMD had two options, either cut RX 5600 XT prices in return, or increase the card's performance. Since 5600 margins are apparently quite slim as is, AMD chose to release a new higher-performance BIOS.

That means AMD and its AIBs aren't losing money on every RX 5600 XT sold, but it does mean that AIBs with more 5600 XT SKUs - e.g. MSI - are screwed. Because instead of being able to market cards at various points along the clockspeed (performance) range from 1375MHz/12Gbps to slightly over 1615MHz/14Gbps, they now have to start at the higher value. Which means their new "stock speed" card isn't 10%+ behind their fastest card, it's maybe 3%. Which suddenly means that half the 5600 XT SKUs designed by MSI have cannibalised the other half. Which means the design and testing and marketing time spent by MSI on those now-dead SKUs... is a loss for MSI.

There's no way MSI is going to sit back and just accept that. Over its lifetime, maybe the 5600 XT will sell well enough as a whole to recoup those costs. But... maybe it won't. And MSI is a business, it doesn't exist to break even, it exists to make a profit. So MSI is going to pad its 5600 XT prices to ensure it still makes a profit on these cards, which is probably going to make MSI 5600 XTs sell poorly, which is probably going to make MSI think twice about committing so heavily to buy so many AMD GPUs next time around.

On the flipside, you can bet that MSI and every other AIB is reaching out to NVIDIA in a frantic attempt to acquire defective TU104 chips so that they too can make an "RTX 2060 KO". That card is going to make EVGA filthy stinking rich.

(AIBs like Sapphire can afford to leave their 5600 XT cards at original pricing because they didn't design half-a-dozen SKUs, so they have fewer to write off.)

Honestly, the 2060 price drop was a masterpiece. It's an older card, so AIBs have long ago made back the money they spent to create their 2060 SKUs, so they won't mind too much that it's being price-dropped. It won't cannibalise existing SKUs because they're all old stock that's already been cannibalised by the 2060 SUPER. And of course, it gives NVIDIA-favouring AIBs a SKU that can compete with the RX 5600 XT, so they can make more sales.

Honestly it's a massive win-win for NVIDIA and its partners, and a lose-lose for AMD and its partners.

W1zzard said:
I hear from various partners that some Navi 10 chips on the RX 5600 XT are having issues running at 1750 MHz memory — even when paired with 1750 MHz memory chips. It seems the memory controller in some of those GPUs can't handle the higher frequency.

... another win for NVIDIA, and loss for AMD.
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
8,347 (3.90/day)
System Name Bragging Rights
Processor Atom Z3735F 1.33GHz
Motherboard It has no markings but it's green
Cooling No, it's a 2.2W processor
Memory 2GB DDR3L-1333
Video Card(s) Gen7 Intel HD (4EU @ 311MHz)
Storage 32GB eMMC and 128GB Sandisk Extreme U3
Display(s) 10" IPS 1280x800 60Hz
Case Veddha T2
Audio Device(s) Apparently, yes
Power Supply Samsung 18W 5V fast-charger
Mouse MX Anywhere 2
Keyboard Logitech MX Keys (not Cherry MX at all)
VR HMD Samsung Oddyssey, not that I'd plug it into this though....
Software W10 21H1, barely
Benchmark Scores I once clocked a Celeron-300A to 564MHz on an Abit BE6 and it scored over 9000.
hmm , among all cards , this card is best in term of cooling unless someone cares about 5700, this will be sold out.
Doesn't matter; It's getting perilously close to 5700XT pricing, and even the much cheaper 5700 smokes it.
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2018
Messages
7,006 (3.04/day)
Location
California
System Name His & Hers
Processor R7 5800X/ R7 7950X3D Stock
Motherboard X670E Aorus Pro X/ROG Crosshair VIII Hero
Cooling Corsair h150 elite/ Corsair h115i Platinum
Memory Trident Z5 Neo 6000/ 32 GB 3200 CL14 @3800 CL16 Team T Force Nighthawk
Video Card(s) Evga FTW 3 Ultra 3080ti/ Gigabyte Gaming OC 4090
Storage lots of SSD.
Display(s) A whole bunch OLED, VA, IPS.....
Case 011 Dynamic XL/ Phanteks Evolv X
Audio Device(s) Arctis Pro + gaming Dac/ Corsair sp 2500/ Logitech G560/Samsung Q990B
Power Supply Seasonic Ultra Prime Titanium 1000w/850w
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed/ Logitech G Pro Hero.
Keyboard Logitech - G915 LIGHTSPEED / Logitech G Pro
I'm a little confused by the Vega 56 Gears 5 results...... Beating a 1080 ti and destroying vega 64 @W1zzard

gears-5-2560-1440.png
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Messages
3,595 (1.16/day)
Shit, for that kind of money, a smart man would buy 5700 and flash 5700xt bios on it.
card like this only makes sense at msrp.
"Smart man" and flashing GPU BIOS doesn't look well in the same sentence.
The 2060 Gaming Z gets the same overclock over a Reference card as the 5600xt Gaming Z does over the gimped bios.
I said this will happen in another thread.
AIBs made whole lineups based on original specification.
The OC BIOS provided by AMD made lower-end models pointless and higher-end looking silly.

It's an awful move by AMD. AIBs won't forget this.
And just like the ASUS card, why would anyone buy this over the Pulse?
Simply because ASUS and MSI are known and popular brands, while STRIX and Gaming have very good opinions. Whenever a new GPU comes out, MSI Gaming is the first model I check and usually the one I end up buying.

Also, ASUS and MSI are huge, global sellers. So maybe where you live Sapphire is available and you'll get one of those 20 samples they'll make.
But for many there won't be a choice. They'll go to a store and it'll be filled with MSI/ASUS available instantly. Simple as that.
 
Joined
Sep 9, 2015
Messages
289 (0.09/day)
MSI anticipated that RX 5600 XT would launch into a slot in the GPU market where there was no other competition, so it would be a good seller, especially at under the psychological $300 mark. Based on that they budgeted a certain amount of money to design a number of 5600 XT SKUs, covering the performance range from stock to just below 5700.

Then NVIDIA cut RTX 2060 prices by $30 and suddenly the 5600 XT was no longer competitive. AMD had two options, either cut RX 5600 XT prices in return, or increase the card's performance. Since 5600 margins are apparently quite slim as is, AMD chose to release a new higher-performance BIOS.

That means AMD and its AIBs aren't losing money on every RX 5600 XT sold, but it does mean that AIBs with more 5600 XT SKUs - e.g. MSI - are screwed. Because instead of being able to market cards at various points along the clockspeed (performance) range from 1375MHz/12Gbps to slightly over 1615MHz/14Gbps, they now have to start at the higher value. Which means their new "stock speed" card isn't 10%+ behind their fastest card, it's maybe 3%. Which suddenly means that half the 5600 XT SKUs designed by MSI have cannibalised the other half. Which means the design and testing and marketing time spent by MSI on those now-dead SKUs... is a loss for MSI.

There's no way MSI is going to sit back and just accept that. Over its lifetime, maybe the 5600 XT will sell well enough as a whole to recoup those costs. But... maybe it won't. And MSI is a business, it doesn't exist to break even, it exists to make a profit. So MSI is going to pad its 5600 XT prices to ensure it still makes a profit on these cards, which is probably going to make MSI 5600 XTs sell poorly, which is probably going to make MSI think twice about committing so heavily to buy so many AMD GPUs next time around.

On the flipside, you can bet that MSI and every other AIB is reaching out to NVIDIA in a frantic attempt to acquire defective TU104 chips so that they too can make an "RTX 2060 KO". That card is going to make EVGA filthy stinking rich.

(AIBs like Sapphire can afford to leave their 5600 XT cards at original pricing because they didn't design half-a-dozen SKUs, so they have fewer to write off.)

Honestly, the 2060 price drop was a masterpiece. It's an older card, so AIBs have long ago made back the money they spent to create their 2060 SKUs, so they won't mind too much that it's being price-dropped. It won't cannibalise existing SKUs because they're all old stock that's already been cannibalised by the 2060 SUPER. And of course, it gives NVIDIA-favouring AIBs a SKU that can compete with the RX 5600 XT, so they can make more sales.

Honestly it's a massive win-win for NVIDIA and its partners, and a lose-lose for AMD and its partners.



... another win for NVIDIA, and loss for AMD.
Thanks for that essay. Nice theory but not correct.
 
Joined
Nov 18, 2010
Messages
7,604 (1.48/day)
Location
Rīga, Latvia
System Name HELLSTAR
Processor AMD RYZEN 9 5950X
Motherboard ASUS Strix X570-E
Cooling 2x 360 + 280 rads. 3x Gentle Typhoons, 3x Phanteks T30, 2x TT T140 . EK-Quantum Momentum Monoblock.
Memory 4x8GB G.SKILL Trident Z RGB F4-4133C19D-16GTZR 14-16-12-30-44
Video Card(s) Sapphire Pulse RX 7900XTX. Water block. Crossflashed.
Storage Optane 900P[Fedora] + WD BLACK SN850X 4TB + 750 EVO 500GB + 1TB 980PRO+SN560 1TB(W11)
Display(s) Philips PHL BDM3270 + Acer XV242Y
Case Lian Li O11 Dynamic EVO
Audio Device(s) SMSL RAW-MDA1 DAC
Power Supply Fractal Design Newton R3 1000W
Mouse Razer Basilisk
Keyboard Razer BlackWidow V3 - Yellow Switch
Software FEDORA 41
@W1zzard

Have you ever considered extreme review, like with modding the VRM, removing upping the current limit and feedback voltage sense pin on the VRM, only for a bit, like 20-30%, and see what it shows?

Or you aren't allow to do that? I am curious just how 7nm really does and how steep the current/frequency@voltage curve looks like. When the leakage starts etc... it would be good insight in future products.
 

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
27,974 (3.71/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
@W1zzard

Have you ever considered extreme review, like with modding the VRM, removing upping the current limit and feedback voltage sense pin on the VRM, only for a bit, like 20-30%, and see what it shows?

Or you aren't allow to do that? I am curious just how 7nm really does and how steep the current/frequency@voltage curve looks like. When the leakage starts etc... it would be good insight in future products.
I'm free to do what I want during review. 5600 XT isn't power limited. Clock limits are still in place. The biggest problem is time though
 
Joined
Nov 18, 2010
Messages
7,604 (1.48/day)
Location
Rīga, Latvia
System Name HELLSTAR
Processor AMD RYZEN 9 5950X
Motherboard ASUS Strix X570-E
Cooling 2x 360 + 280 rads. 3x Gentle Typhoons, 3x Phanteks T30, 2x TT T140 . EK-Quantum Momentum Monoblock.
Memory 4x8GB G.SKILL Trident Z RGB F4-4133C19D-16GTZR 14-16-12-30-44
Video Card(s) Sapphire Pulse RX 7900XTX. Water block. Crossflashed.
Storage Optane 900P[Fedora] + WD BLACK SN850X 4TB + 750 EVO 500GB + 1TB 980PRO+SN560 1TB(W11)
Display(s) Philips PHL BDM3270 + Acer XV242Y
Case Lian Li O11 Dynamic EVO
Audio Device(s) SMSL RAW-MDA1 DAC
Power Supply Fractal Design Newton R3 1000W
Mouse Razer Basilisk
Keyboard Razer BlackWidow V3 - Yellow Switch
Software FEDORA 41
I'm free to do what I want during review. 5600 XT isn't power limited. Clock limits are still in place. The biggest problem is time though

oh... hex edit is the only way then? At least we have two exact bioses to compare now... that's something. Indeed it would take a lot of time tough, thanks.
 

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
27,974 (3.71/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Messages
3,595 (1.16/day)
oh... hex edit is the only way then? At least we have two exact bioses to compare now... that's something. Indeed it would take a lot of time tough, thanks.
No offense, but what's the goal here?
What you're suggesting has as much in common with using a graphics card (as a product) as checking how much it expands in the oven. :)
 
Joined
Nov 18, 2010
Messages
7,604 (1.48/day)
Location
Rīga, Latvia
System Name HELLSTAR
Processor AMD RYZEN 9 5950X
Motherboard ASUS Strix X570-E
Cooling 2x 360 + 280 rads. 3x Gentle Typhoons, 3x Phanteks T30, 2x TT T140 . EK-Quantum Momentum Monoblock.
Memory 4x8GB G.SKILL Trident Z RGB F4-4133C19D-16GTZR 14-16-12-30-44
Video Card(s) Sapphire Pulse RX 7900XTX. Water block. Crossflashed.
Storage Optane 900P[Fedora] + WD BLACK SN850X 4TB + 750 EVO 500GB + 1TB 980PRO+SN560 1TB(W11)
Display(s) Philips PHL BDM3270 + Acer XV242Y
Case Lian Li O11 Dynamic EVO
Audio Device(s) SMSL RAW-MDA1 DAC
Power Supply Fractal Design Newton R3 1000W
Mouse Razer Basilisk
Keyboard Razer BlackWidow V3 - Yellow Switch
Software FEDORA 41
No offense, but what's the goal here?
What you're suggesting has as much in common with using a graphics card (as a product) as checking how much it expands in the oven. :)

If you don't treat it as sport and fun... you have ventured in the wrong forum, I started to follow this place seeking GPU overclocking info in the first place... stressing silicon gives many kinds of info also educational not only leisure.

this will break the digital signature in the bios and the driver will no longer load

Yeah I've heard, but sometimes some strange unlocked bioses emerge from somewhere even for signed cards, for example 1080ti(no limiter and voltage unlock). I wonder it was a hack or they had a buddy in the fab.
 

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
27,974 (3.71/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
Joined
Aug 14, 2019
Messages
19 (0.01/day)
GeForce RTX 2070 Founders Edition: max 203 Watt = one 8-pin power connector
MSI Radeon RX 5600 XT Gaming X: : max 197 Watt = zwo 8-pin power connectors
...something is wrong :cool:
 
Joined
Oct 12, 2019
Messages
128 (0.07/day)
No offense, but what's the goal here?
What you're suggesting has as much in common with using a graphics card (as a product) as checking how much it expands in the oven. :)

...including "smart men" remark...

Perhaps you've seen this?

https://www.techpowerup.com/vgabios/

It goes for a very long time... That's about how I got here, for the first time - looking for some of that stuff. People like to experiment, push the limits to the max, just to see how it works. People liked stuff like graphic-pen modding Athlon or whatever CPU was in question (paraphrasing), putting Quaddro BIOS on GeForce and so on, soft-enabling the locked cores... Some of those were giving decent results (OC-ing Celeron 300MHz to 450, for example), some are just proof of concept, some are just for fun (liquid nitrogen OC-records - it's apparent to everyone that there is exactly zero sense in cooling a cchip in a way impossible for regular work, to allow ungodly clocks by the price of enormous amount of power used).

But all of it has a significant "fun" moniker to certain people. Yes, modding mid-range product for several % gain if the same can be achieved by investing the same %g in more expensive solution? Not much sense - but perhaps plenty of fun... in trying, if nothing else...
 
Top