• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Arctic Cooling Releases Freezer 64 LP

D_o_S

Moderator
Joined
Aug 27, 2005
Messages
954 (0.14/day)
Processor AMD Opteron 144
Motherboard DFI Lanparty nF4 SLI-DR Expert
Cooling Watercooled - Alphacool Nexxxos XP, BIX2, Eheim HPPS
Memory 2x 512MB OCZ PC 3200EL Platinum Rev.2 (TCCD)
Video Card(s) 2x Gainward GeForce 6800 Ultra (430/1200)
Storage 4x WD Raptor 740GD in RAID 0
Display(s) Eizo FlexScan L768
Case CM Stacker
Audio Device(s) Audigy 2
Power Supply Silverstone Zeus ST65ZF
Arctic cooling, well known for its CPU and GPU heatsinks, has officially launched the Freezer 64 LP (Low Profile).

Arctic cooling states that it is a "Ultra high performance dual fan AMD CPU cooler for low profile PC".



The design of Freezer 64 LP ultra high performance dual fan achieves the ultimate cooling effect that dramatically cools the AMD CPU even inside a tiny chassis. Freezer 64 LP's 2 vertical cooling fans draw a large amount of cold air from both sides that cool the CPU fast and effectively. 3 copper heat pipes directly connected from the CPU core transfer heat out of the core rapidly.

Features:
  • Dual Fan Cooling
  • 3 Heat Pipes
  • Extremely Quiet
  • Special Design for Low Profile PC Case
  • Advanced 4 Directions Ventilation for Chipset and Voltage Regulators
  • Patented Fan Design
  • 6 Years Warranty

Additionally the design of the Freezer 64 LP cools the surrounding chipset and voltage regulators and operates at just 1/3 of the noise level as the stock cooler and this even under heavy loading. Freezer 64 LP definitely gives the ideal cooling solution for high performance low profile HTPC applications.

The recommended retail price (excl. VAT) is 24 USD / 20 EUR. The heatsink is compatible with all AMD Sempron, Athlon 64, Athlon 64 X2 Athlon 64 FX and AMD Opteron (Socket 939 and AM2) CPUs.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Last edited by a moderator:

WarEagleAU

Bird of Prey
Joined
Jul 9, 2006
Messages
10,812 (1.64/day)
Location
Gurley, AL
System Name Pandemic 2020
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 "Gen 2" 2600X
Motherboard AsRock X470 Killer Promontory
Cooling CoolerMaster 240 RGB Master Cooler (Newegg Eggxpert)
Memory 32 GB Geil EVO Portenza DDR4 3200 MHz
Video Card(s) ASUS Radeon RX 580 DirectX 12 DUAL-RX580-O8G 8GB 256-Bit GDDR5 HDCP Ready CrossFireX Support Video C
Storage WD 250 M.2, Corsair P500 M.2, OCZ Trion 500, WD Black 1TB, Assorted others.
Display(s) ASUS MG24UQ Gaming Monitor - 23.6" 4K UHD (3840x2160) , IPS, Adaptive Sync, DisplayWidget
Case Fractal Define R6 C
Audio Device(s) Realtek 5.1 Onboard
Power Supply Corsair RMX 850 Platinum PSU (Newegg Eggxpert)
Mouse Razer Death Adder
Keyboard Corsair K95 Mechanical & Corsair K65 Wired, Wireless, Bluetooth)
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Nice...this may be the cooler I use in my HTPC Im building in the next few months.
 

Completely Bonkers

New Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
2,576 (0.40/day)
Processor Mysterious Engineering Prototype
Motherboard Intel 865
Cooling Custom block made in workshop
Memory Corsair XMS 2GB
Video Card(s) FireGL X3-256
Display(s) 1600x1200 SyncMaster x 2 = 3200x1200
Software Windows 2003
Lets hope how the fans are set as one PUSH and other SUCK... but I have my doubts. Probably both PUSHING.
 
Last edited:

Scavar

New Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2006
Messages
573 (0.09/day)
Location
Ft Lauderdale, FL
System Name ScarredWolf(Desktop), MBlackWolf(Laptop)
Processor E6600(Desktop), T7300(Laptop)
Motherboard EVGA 680i(Desktop), IFL90(Laptop)
Cooling Akasa EVO 120(Desktop), No idea(Laptop)
Memory G Skill PI 8GB 4x2gb(Desktop), G Skill 3GB 1GB/2GB(Laptop)
Video Card(s) 8800GTS 640mb(Desktop), 8600m GT(Laptop)
Storage 3x250GB 1x500GB(Desktop), 1x320GB(Laptop)
Display(s) Acer AL2216W 22"(Desktop), 15.4"(Laptop)
Case Cosmos 1000(Desktop), PowerPro J 10:15(Laptop)
Audio Device(s) CreativeX-Fi/Z-5500(Desktop), Realtek/No idea(Laptop)
Power Supply PC Power and Cooling Silencer 610w(Desptop), *shrug*(Laptop)
Software Windows Vista Ultimatex64 with tweaks(Both)
Benchmark Scores I'm too lazy to benchmark anything.
One fan should be set to pull and one to push shouldn't it? At leasts what I would think.
 

AshenSugar

New Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2006
Messages
1,998 (0.31/day)
Location
ashentech.com
Processor Athlon64 3500+(2.2gz)@2.94gz(3.03gz)
Motherboard Biostar Tforce550 (RMA) (m2n-sli delux)
Cooling PIB cooler
Memory 2gb ocz 533 +1gb samsung 533 4-4-4-12
Video Card(s) x1900xtx 512mb+zalman vf900 cooler(kicks stock coolers arse)
Storage 80gb,200gb,250gb,160gb
Display(s) 20.1 in dell 2001fp + KDS visual sensations 19"
Case Codegen briza seirse
Audio Device(s) ADI SoundMax HD audio onboard,using Ket's driver pack
Power Supply FSP 400watt SAGA seirse w/noise killer
Software Windows 2003 ent server as workstation(kills xp in perf and stab)
depends on the design, i have had areocool coolers where push/push was better then push/pull, it all depends on the design of the cooler, if designed properly push/push could be better then push/pull.


nice design tho, cant wait to see it reviewed :D
 

Completely Bonkers

New Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
2,576 (0.40/day)
Processor Mysterious Engineering Prototype
Motherboard Intel 865
Cooling Custom block made in workshop
Memory Corsair XMS 2GB
Video Card(s) FireGL X3-256
Display(s) 1600x1200 SyncMaster x 2 = 3200x1200
Software Windows 2003
In a LP case you want to "tunnel" air from front to back, or back to front, or side to side.... but NOT stir it all up leaving the hot air in the case.

The cooler really SHOULD push/pull. The cooling is optimised with a wind baffle to case openings.

@ashen. I dont doubt your experience. In a large case without "managed" airflow... your experience could be correct.

But if PROPERLY DESIGNED... the cooler is integral to the case and air flow management. Push/Pull IS the optimal solution.

***

In practice you will find many suboptimal cooling arrangements due to limited availability of fans. This about the Artic cooling fans. They need to design a fan that spins in the opposite direction optimised for sucking not pushing. Then they need to make it. And low volumes. = very expensive.

So design and manufacturing contraints usually lead to non-optimised solutions
 
Top