FFS 3080Ti without the maximum power limit (160-175w) is just a pointless exercise in marketing. Saying that even at the maximum power limit it is still power limited given the relative performance uplift from the 150-165w 3080.
The full power 3080 in the otherwise stupid Origin laptop shows this perfectly.
I must admit when the Ti was announced it caught my attention. Significant core increase (albeit at lower "turbo" clocks) and faster memory vs 3080 sounded quite interesting. Then I say the power limit increase of ~10w and then the reviews dropped... Oh dear.
My Legion 7 with its full power 3080 - that does hold around 160w even when the CPU loads up to ~40w, is a noticeable step up from the full power 3070 equipped laptop I had before (same CPU)* - part of this I think is down to the Legion having a stronger power delivery thanks to its 300w PSU (vs 230w on the 3070). All this with the GPU only hitting low 70's.
The Ti on the other hand is only a marginal step up and in models released in the UK so far a significant step up in price.
*Circa 25-30% faster in Cyberpunk 2077 with RT enabled @ 3440x1440 - 3070 undervolted @140w (~1700/15000) vs 3080 @ stock 160w (1755/14000). Similar up uplift in synthetics and I haven't started messing with the 3080 yet.
On that note undervolting would have yielded much better results than just bumping the clocks up. The GPU is already power limited thus just pushing the clocks up won't do a a lot - as noted in the review. This was certainly the case on the 3070 laptop I had. Overclocking would yield higher peaks but lower sustained clocks over the course of a benchmark, thus slower overall.