AMD Radeon PRO W7600 GPU Spotted in Geekbench Database

[T0@st]

An interesting system popped up on Geekbench Browser early this morning—on initial inspection the evaluated high-end PC was sporting hardware of 2021-vintage, but its graphics card was observed as an outlier. The Intel Core i9-12900K (Alder Lake-S) CPU was sitting on an MSI MPG Z690 Carbon WiFi mainboard, with 64 GB of DDR5 SDRAM (3990 MT/s). The benchmarked computer was running Microsoft Windows 11 Pro (64-bit) on a power saver (economizador) plan. According to the entry's OpenCL information section we are looking at an attached GPU device called "GFX1102 ID," the board name is revealed to be "AMD Radeon PRO W7600" with 8 GB of VRAM. This lower-end alternative to existing (RDNA 3) Radeon Pro models—W7900 (48 GB) and W7800 (32 GB)—could be nearing a public launch.

This information aligns the workstation-oriented card with AMD's Navi 33 GPU—the same GFX1102 designation appears within TPU's database entry (look at the Shader ISA (GFX11.0) graphics feature). VideoCardz reckons that the leaked Radeon PRO W7600 is closely related to AMD's mobile Radeon RX 7700/7600 series—based on Navi 33, due to their matching IDs. Their report proposed: "Based on this data, the GPU is expected to have a clock speed of 1940 MHz. Comparatively, this is 310 MHz lower than the Radeon RX 7600 gaming model, which refers to its Game Clock of 2250 MHz. The Compute Unit field refers to "Workgroup Processor/WGP" cluster, so the card features 32 Compute Units or 2048 Stream Processors, the same configuration as the RX 7600. The card is listed with 8 GB of memory, but it remains uncertain whether this model will support ECC (error correction), a feature found in the W7900/W7800 models. It's important to note that the W6600 did not utilize this type of memory."



View at TechPowerUp Main Site | Source

 

[Minus Infinity]

Pro grade garbage. That would be some p!ss poor workstation you are using if this is your pro GPU.

 

[LabRat 891]

Pro grade garbage. That would be some p!ss poor workstation you are using if this is your pro GPU.

Oddly, there seem to be applications where a much weaker Quadro/Radeon PRO are applicable.

Both lineups have offered basically 'display-only' cards as well as mid-tier options, in addition to 3D powerhouse cards (for 3D CAD, etc.)

I can only assume those applications would be video and still image editing. A many-core CPU and a mid-tier GPU would be more than enough for such uses (assuming no need for GPGPU acceleration).

 

[Minus Infinity]

Oddly, there seem to be applications where a much weaker Quadro/Radeon PRO are applicable.

Both lineups have offered basically 'display-only' cards as well as mid-tier options, in addition to 3D powerhouse cards (for 3D CAD, etc.)

I can only assume those applications would be video and still image editing. A many-core CPU and a mid-tier GPU would be more than enough for such uses (assuming no need for GPGPU acceleration).

I had a Dell workstation at uni with the entry level AMD Pro card from about 2 generations ago and it was not good for the intended use which involved high end image processing. I would have much preferred a tier higher or a quadro.