LG Adds Pair of 45-inch DQHD Displays with 200 Hz Refresh Rate to its Ultragear Lineup

[TheLostSwede]

LG Electronics USA announced today pricing and availability of two new models to its LG UltraGear gaming monitor lineup - the 45-inch LG UltraGear GR75DC and the 45-inch LG UltraGear GR65DC. The GR65DC is available to purchase for $799.99 now at LG.com and LG-authorized retailers. For a limited time, customers shopping on LG.com can preorder the LG UltraGear GR75DC for $899.99 and receive an UltraGear GP9 gaming speaker ($399 ARV) along with free expedited shipping.

The newest LG UltraGear models feature a 45-inch 32:9 Ultrawide Dual QHD screen - providing what is the equivalent of two 24-inch 16:9 QHD displays on one monitor at the same time. Engineered for multi-tasking, the built in PBP (picture by picture) and PIP (picture in picture) features allow users to play console games while simultaneously streaming content on an ultra-wide screen.




Their immersive QHD (5120 x 1440) 1500R curved screens support up to a 200 Hz refresh rate and a 1 ms (GtG) response time for the smooth, low-latency gaming LG's UltraGear monitors are known for. The UltraGear GR75DC supports USB Type-C, DP1.4 and HDMI 2.1 enabling compatibility for a variety of devices. The UltraGear GR65DC does not include a USB Type-C port.

Both models support up to 95% (Typ.) of the DCI-P3 color gamut with VESA DisplayHDR 600 delivering dynamic contrast and high-fidelity color. LG's UltraGear monitors are all about creating a premium gaming experience, which is why they're AMD FreeSync Premium Pro-certified and contain a 4-Pole Headphone out with DTS HP:X.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site | Source

 

[Kaleid]

1440p...

Can we get some more please?

 

[jonup]

Can we get some more please?

On what is the height of 24" monitor!? Do you have cyborg eyes?

 

[ZoneDymo]

Can we get some more please?

enjoy running that DLSS performance mode, with frame generation!

 

[Kaleid]

On what is the height of 24" monitor!? Do you have cyborg eyes?

Around 120 ppi. Text starts to look much nicer at around 160

enjoy running that DLSS performance mode, with frame generation!

7372800 pixels, which is lower than 4k at 8294400 pixels
It's not superheavy, unless you need to enable every ultra setting in every game

 

[phanbuey]

enjoy running that DLSS performance mode, with frame generation!

more like enjoy turning your entire head to look at hud elements or minimap.

 

[Darksaber]

Two separate 24" 1440P monitors cost what these days? Maybe around $200-300 each if you want 200+ Hz? - if anyone even wants that size instead of two 27" 1440P? Brands are looking to find better ways to make money on the sheets of panels. Instead of cutting two 24" out of this with double the electronics. feet, packaging etc, and selling it for a total of $400-500, they are offering these monstrosities with fewer components, less cutting and less packaging, but then charge you a couple of hundreds of bucks more for them. Again this is essentially two 24" displays for 800 and 900 USD.

 

[Chaitanya]

Two separate 24" 1440P monitors cost what these days? Maybe around $200-300 each if you want 200+ Hz? - if anyone even wants that size instead of two 27" 1440P? Brands are looking to find better ways to make money on the sheets of panels. Instead of cutting two 24" out of this with double the electronics. feet, packaging etc, and selling it for a total of $400-500, they are offering these monstrosities with fewer components, less cutting and less packaging, but then charge you a couple of hundreds of bucks more for them. Again this is essentially two 24" displays for 800 and 900 USD.

Also power consumption of 24" display is sub 30W max compared to 80W(Typical and 90W max) on this 45" is as much as 3x 24" displays.

 

[bearClaw5]

2 x 27" or 49" 32:9 is perfect. 24's are too small.

 

[gurusmi]

2 x 27" or 49" 32:9 is perfect. 24's are too small.

I use 2+ 32° QHD. 27" are too small for me.

 

[lexluthermiester]

Good grief this monstrosity! I get that some people like ultra wide, but damn. What would someone use this display for? Certainly not for games, very few games could effectively use such a resolution configuration. Video editing for power users? Ok I can see that.

 

[PLAfiller]

Good grief this monstrosity! I get that some people like ultra wide, but damn. What would someone use this display for? Certainly not for games, very few games could effectively use such a resolution configuration. Video editing for power users? Ok I can see that.

Friend of mine has Samsung Odyssey G9.....Microsoft flight simulator looks great with some HOTAS equipment

 

[lexluthermiester]

Friend of mine has Samsung Odyssey G9.....Microsoft flight simulator looks great with some HOTAS equipment

Ok, reasonable point. Still, is a screen as wide as this really needed? There is a point at which going wider has diminishing returns..

 

[unwind-protect]

Good grief this monstrosity! I get that some people like ultra wide, but damn. What would someone use this display for? Certainly not for games, very few games could effectively use such a resolution configuration. Video editing for power users? Ok I can see that.

Racing games are ideal on either 3x normal monitor or ultrawides like this. You need video only horizontally in racing games, unlike flight simulators where you also need the sky and the lower console instruments.

 

[Octavean]

I'm sure there are a number of double and tipple monitor users that would love to switch over to the right UltraWide or Super UltraWide monitor. All the resolution and screen real estate without the bezels getting in the way:

1080p Ultrawide monitors are reasonably cheap IMO but the low resolution is bothersome to many. 1440p Ultrawide monitors are a reasonable compromise, typically still affordable (34" could be under ~$300) and quite functional. However if your used to 4K resolutions then a 7680×2160 Ultrawide will likely cost you around ~$1500+ USD.

I wouldn't mind a 57" 7680×2160 Ultrawide,....not one bit.

 

[lexluthermiester]

I wouldn't mind a 57" 7680×2160 Ultrawide,....not one bit.

Good luck finding a GPU that can push that many pixels at more than a slide-show rate..

 

[Octavean]

Good luck finding a GPU that can push that many pixels at more than a slide-show rate..

I'm not worried about it.

99.999% of the time I'm using a computer in desktop mode. If I fire up a game that can't be driven acceptably at native resolution it could always be run at lower settings. Also note that 7680×2160 is a multiple of lower resolutions that are much more easily driven.

A video card is half an upgrade. So too is a monitor upgrade. If it takes time for the video card to catch up to the monitor then so be it.

 

[Firedrops]

1000R or lower plz

 

[trsttte]

Two separate 24" 1440P monitors cost what these days? Maybe around $200-300 each if you want 200+ Hz? - if anyone even wants that size instead of two 27" 1440P? Brands are looking to find better ways to make money on the sheets of panels. Instead of cutting two 24" out of this with double the electronics. feet, packaging etc, and selling it for a total of $400-500, they are offering these monstrosities with fewer components, less cutting and less packaging, but then charge you a couple of hundreds of bucks more for them. Again this is essentially two 24" displays for 800 and 900 USD.

And you can get decent enough IPS panels for that money, this is a crappy VA with a price from a different world. This is the kind of purchase designed to be regretted not too long after