Really disappointing to see the Hifiman sticking to the same, flawed headstrap design. That's why I left them and went to Audeze.
The pleather suspension band, bends 90 degrees into the plastic housing on either side, where it is held in place with a frail metal clamp and glue. I got less than 2 years out of my HE400i headstraps, two from Hifi and one off Amazon. I was using them relentless as my daily driver, on/off frequently, and subject to desk abuse.
I still enjoy that sound signature, so I've kept them.... does anyone know of a third party company that supplies alternative headstrap designs?
You're not wrong about the cheap headstrap, mate.
While I can't be of any help wrt 3rd party sources, am I the only one that doesn't understand why they don't just go elastic (I'll just use the
old Arctis 7 as an example, which I could/have happily worn all day)?
Perhaps there is one available I don't know about, or perhaps eventually somebody will make one? Maybe you could make one yourself (not that you should have to do that)?
So many times I've looked at the Ananda (which are similar to the He400; indeed the cheaper model is a very good bargain if bass isn't a huge concern [it is for me]) and the XS with complete puzzlement:
On one hand you have (while I understand your plight about it being cheaply constructed, it is better imho) the strap on the Ananda/He400i, but you can't really EQ out that loss of bass on the He400 (arguably you can on the Ananda) but certainly not the slightly veiled 3-6/7(/8)khz range (same on many Audeze products IMHO). OTOH, you really can EQ the XS to *almost* perfection AFAICT, but the fixed headband is built for an ogre, which is a travesty wrt how good of a bargain the actual electronics are for that set. The more-expensive Arya(s) *is* slightly better at stock, but the much cheaper XS is totally 'fixable' in EQ assuming there is a decent noise floor.
Many like Sundara; it does (somewhat) fix the high-end vs he400, as well as mellow out the HFM 1-3khz scoop; but still lacks bass. Not for me, but I get why people like it (compared to others in that range).
If one were wireless (PS-compat?), elastic band, and mb similar tuning of the XS (which isn't *perfect*, but certainly workable) you could have a cheap(ish), popular gamerphile™/audiophile head(set/phone).
I don't know which Audeze you have, but here are a few examples (using rtings for simplicity) between the XS, Ananda, 400 models, and Maxwell:
XS vs Ananda
XS vs 400i
XS vs 400se
XS vs Maxwell
XS vs Sundara
He400i vs Maxwell?
Perhaps you may notice WHY you prefer one sound over the other. Everybody is different.
TLDR: Yeah, the straps/headbands could certainly use some work (or aftermarket love), but I think cramming more bass into a (especially open-back) planar is impressive (which the Audeze does as well, but is closed-back [which is a deal-breaker in my case bc soundstage is a big deal to me]; loses some forwardness on the main vocals as well). Also, I don't want to lose the full embodiement of someone actually PLAYING a piano, breathing into a sax, striking a snare, or especially the emotive part of a human voice (which is, perhaps oddly, extremely important to me). I *think* many tone that area down because people complain about the high-end ('sibilance', but actually sizzle) of cymbals/hi-hats (or if a singer sounds 'nasally'/whatever in a mix), but to me it's a ridiculous reason to lose the soul of a sax, snare, the fact a bass guitar is in-fact a string instrument and not just a thing that makes a tone, or most importantly those A4/5 singers (if they are mixed well). Heck, many (if not most) headphones do it to the gentlemen as well, which also bums me out.
There is a thing called negative gain; both producers AND YOU (in eq) can use it (even beyond -6db!), hopefully with a good mic and/or DSP! Instead, most users (often have to) increase frequency volume.
That's fine, except innate distortion (less than ideal noise floor and/or too much gain [even per channel/instrument/frequency] in a recording is difficult to fix, especially on-the-fly.
I get that some recording situations/setups are less than ideal, some is artistic choice, and some of it is probably to hide auto-tune, but still.
Should headphones (generally) be created to auto-compensate for that? I don't think so. I think that's the point of good production, ever-growing state-of-the-art recording setups, and HD audio.
There are certainly those more experienced/knowledgable in those areas than myself, and perhaps there are better solutions, but that's just my how I go about it/my feelings on the sitch, as one consumer.