Corsair Xeneon 34WQHD240-C

[Inle]

The Corsair Xeneon 34WQHD240-C is an ultrawide gaming beast equipped with a 240 Hz QD-OLED panel, offering lightning-fast response times, low input lag, but also a host of attractive productivity-focused features.

Show full review

 

[Maxiaid]

I have the Corsair Xeneon 27QHD240, which is fairly similar both in design and features. It's an overall phenomenal display, but worse than some of its direct competitors using the same LG panel (namely the ASUS PG27AQDM). Way overpriced in my opinion, but I made the debatable choice to go with the full Corsair theme for my setup.

Minor drawbacks to look out for:

• Subtle banding across the image (apparently a limitation of current OLED panels)
• Quite pronounced flicker if using VRR (G-Sync); worse of its class

This new one does NOT have the same panel, so none of what I just said probably applies, but I'd still be curious to compare the two to see if it's any better.

 

[R-T-B]

Quite pronounced flicker if using VRR (G-Sync); worse of its class

Sad to see that's still a thing with LG's WOLED panels even 5 years after I bought my B9.

Mind you this review is about a Samsung QD-OLED design, and it looks like they've come a long way in their old achiles heel (burn in). Bravo.

 

[Dahita]

Thank you for reminding some of the risks of burn-ins in a static environment. I've gotten into endless discussions on this topic here, hopefully that will put the baby to rest for a while. However, you mention "if you're looking for a monitor solely for productivity, you might want to avoid OLEDs altogether."

Two questions about it:
- Is this screen a fourth generation, or another third one?
- If fringing isn't a concern, why avoiding this one? for the burn-ins risk? Or because it's not an issue unless you're looking at a VScode screen all day?

I'm not trying to nit-pick, I'm on the market for a wide curved screen for both coding and gaming, and unfortunately the mini-led I dream of doesn't seem to be in the pipe!

 

[Maxiaid]

Sad to see that's still a thing with LG's WOLED panels even 5 years after I bought my B9.

Mind you this review is about a Samsung QD-OLED design, and it looks like they've come a long way in their old achiles heel (burn in). Bravo.

My plan is to get a 4K OLED when I upgrade my 4090 to a proper native 4K card and my current display develops undeniable burn-in, both of which I assume will happen around 5 years from now. We'll see how long a way they'll have come by then, or if they keep struggling with the same old problems.

"If you're looking for a monitor solely for productivity, you might want to avoid OLEDs altogether."

I've been using OLED panels both in my laptop and desktop PC for a while now, and I can tell you I've never been bothered by fringing at all. In my Corsair display it's noticeable in certain contexts, but not obvious enough to be annoying or distracting, even if you frequently work with text. Greatly blown out of proportion as an issue, in my opinion; I find the flickering while using VRR way more distracting, and it's rarely even discussed. As for burn-in, yes, you're gonna have it to some extent if you use the display as a daily driver, for long periods of time and with mostly static images (e.g. taskbars). That's just a bullet that you'll have to bite.

 

[_roman_]

I don't like the power consumption. Especially with low nits.

Too many issues for 3 times the price. It's 2025 - burn in prevention for a display.
My calibrated proart monitor is according to the factory sheet below Delta e 1. I see here delta e over 7. I'm not so much in the monitor segment. I expect calibrated screens at a certain price point, regardless of the screen size. I expect several dedicated dp connectors in the form factor dp connector. I do expect a usb hub with 20gbps, not a 5gbps one. I do not want to see hdmi 2.1 but only dp 1.4 on a new monitor.

As I already mentioned earlier in the review Orbit is a feature that automatically shifts the image by one pixel per minute in a circular pattern while you're using the monitor. This is a way to fight against static UI elements. I usually find this feature distracting and undesirable, but I barely noticed it on the Corsair Xeneon 34WQHD240-C. Corsair found a good balance between how often the picture shifts, and by how much. There are also no issues with some Windows UI elements shifting away from sight, which I ran into on several previous occasions, for example, while testing the absurd INNOCN 48Q1V.