3440x1440 or stick with 2560 x1080

[EdInk]

Haven had the chance to play with the Asus PB287Q 4K 28 inches PC monitor, I think it's not very useful. Don't get me wrong it's a great looking monitor, very crisp picture quality and all the trimmings but I just have this one, just one thing I don't like.

Coming from a 2560x1080 21:9 aspect ratio monitor, on the 4K monitor with text size at 100%, it's very difficult to read the text displayed on the monitor which means it has to magnified to a 150%. Okay, here's where the problem lies, 50% off 3840 x 2160 is 1920 x 1080 so that means that although the monitor has a higher native resolution text is rendered at 1920 x 1080 to make it readable. I seem to think that it's better to stick with the 2560x1080 or perhaps move to a 3440x1440 monitor or am I doing my maths wrong?

 

[Ferrum Master]

You are doing it wrong.

I can suggest to try my panel. It has native 100 scale and large pixel, thus really great for reading.

2560x1440 for me at 32inches is the sweet spot. Or 4K at 38-40 if you wish to preserve the scale.

Otherwise... there are no options. Windows will do scaling if you wish bigger fonts.

 

[Unter_Dog]

Haven had the chance to play with the Asus PB287Q 4K 28 inches PC monitor, I think it's not very useful. Don't get me wrong it's a great looking monitor, very crisp picture quality and all the trimmings but I just have this one, just one thing I don't like.

Coming from a 2560x1080 21:9 aspect ratio monitor, on the 4K monitor with text size at 100%, it's very difficult to read the text displayed on the monitor which means it has to magnified to a 150%. Okay, here's where the problem lies, 50% off 3840 x 2160 is 1920 x 1080 so that means that although the monitor has a higher native resolution text is rendered at 1920 x 1080 to make it readable. I seem to think that it's better to stick with the 2560x1080 or perhaps move to a 3440x1440 monitor or am I doing my maths wrong?

Right now i'm working with a 40 inch 4k and a 27 1440p, looking back i wish i'd have bought 2 more 1440's vs one 4k.

 

[EdInk]

You are doing it wrong.

I can suggest to try my panel. It has native 100 scale and large pixel, thus really great for reading.

2560x1440 for me at 32inches is the sweet spot. Or 4K at 38-40 if you wish to preserve the scale.

Otherwise... there are no options. Windows will do scaling if you wish bigger fonts.

That's right, I wasn't sure how to word it..but that's what make me think 4K isn't necessary, considering how much more expensive they are to a native 1080p monitor. With the UI scaled at 100%, things aren't legible. When working, I have several apps running simultaneously so whilst at 100% I can have more viewed than the 2560x1080 once I scale to 150% I'm no more better off than using my 2560x1080p monitor.

 

[MxPhenom 216]

my roommate has an acer 3440x1440 with FreeSync using a r9 390x and its easily one of the most beautiful monitors i have sat in from of. But gaming doesnt seem to be your main worry.

 

[EdInk]

Right now i'm working with a 40 inch 4k and a 27 1440p, looking back i wish i'd have bought 2 more 1440's vs one 4k.

Thanks, I think I'll move to a 3440x1440 and forget about getting a 4K PC monitor..

 

[EdInk]

my roommate has an acer 3440x1440 with FreeSync using a r9 390x and its easily one of the most beautiful monitors i have sat in from of.

Ask if he has to scale windows UI and by how much... I can understand for gaming it's ace..the 4K monitor I've had a play around with paired with the GTX1070 is very good but I only game occasionally.

 

[MxPhenom 216]

Ask if he has to scale windows UI and by how much.

He doesnt have to scale at all.

 

[Ferrum Master]

That LG panel needs 125 scale. Too thin for me.

 

[EdInk]

Thanks guys, I think I'll settle for the 3440x1440... appreciate your prompt responses

 

[qubit]

I think you should try a 4K monitor and see what you think. There's nothing like sitting in front of something to help you decide. Play around with scaling factors and see what feels comfortable.

There's so much detail and real estate available at 4K that I think it's worth considering.

 

[EdInk]

I think you should try a 4K monitor and see what you think. There's nothing like sitting in front of something to help you decide. Play around with scaling factors and see what feels comfortable.

There's so much detail and real estate available at 4K that I think it's worth considering.

I have the Asus PB287Q in front of me..and I can't view anything at 100% or 125% scaling. At 100% the real estate is great but once scaled to 150% all that is lost...it becomes the same as using the 2560x1080 ultrawide monitor also in front of me.

 

[qubit]

I have the Asus PB287Q in front of me..and I can't view anything at 100% or 125% scaling. At 100% the real estate is great but once scaled to 150% all that is lost...it becomes the same as using the 2560x1080 ultrawide monitor also in front of me.

On a 4K monitor you can view 4K content and super high res pictures in all their glory.

Look, I'm only suggesting for you to try it and see what you think of it. Even the scaling factors will feel different. Trust me. If you don't like it then you've lost nothing.

 

[Unter_Dog]

Yeah, i'd say if you live close to a microcenter go play around. A lot of personal preference in vertical resolution as i'm in my 30's and the eyes aren't what they used to be.

 

[EdInk]

Yeah, i'd say if you live close to a microcenter go play around. A lot of personal preference in vertical resolution as i'm in my 30's and the eyes aren't what they used to be.

I've got both monitors on my desk as we speak

 

[Recon-UK]

You are doing it wrong.

I can suggest to try my panel. It has native 100 scale and large pixel, thus really great for reading.

2560x1440 for me at 32inches is the sweet spot. Or 4K at 38-40 if you wish to preserve the scale.

Otherwise... there are no options. Windows will do scaling if you wish bigger fonts.

Windows 10 auto scales, can that be stopped?

 

[Ferrum Master]

Windows 10 auto scales, can that be stopped?

In display settings just adjust your size slider to the minimum.

 

[Unter_Dog]

my roommate has an acer 3440x1440 with FreeSync using a r9 390x and its easily one of the most beautiful monitors i have sat in from of. But gaming doesnt seem to be your main worry.

My original thought was 4 corners on my 4k, but in practice its 3 things open with too much height to be productive to

I've got both monitors on my desk as we speak

I'd say use each for a day for their intended purpose if you can and do a quick pros/cons list.......but from my perspective 28 inch is too small for 4k

 

[erocker]

Thanks guys, I think I'll settle for the 3440x1440... appreciate your prompt responses

Probably a good choice. It will keep the aspect ratio you're used to and it isn't as taxing as full 4K.

 

[EdInk]

Massive thanks to all you wonderful guys. Settled for the 3440x1440 ultrawide and found an exceptional deal on Gumtree for a BNIB Acer XR341CK for £450.. 33% less than RRP..what a steal!

 

[Unter_Dog]

Massive thanks to all you wonderful guys. Settled for the 3440x1440 ultrawide and found an exceptional deal on Gumtree for a BNIB Acer XR341CK for £450.. 33% less than RRP..what a steal!

ENJOY!

 

[GamerGuy]

Massive thanks to all you wonderful guys. Settled for the 3440x1440 ultrawide and found an exceptional deal on Gumtree for a BNIB Acer XR341CK for £450.. 33% less than RRP..what a steal!

'Grats on the buy, and at an awesome discount to boot!

I'd first experimented with 21:9 with an AOC Q2963PM and loved the experience, that aspect ratio is exceptional for gaming and watching wdiescreen movies (I believe it's 2.35:1 aspect ratio). I have just gotten that monitor as well, but the Freesync version since it's for the rig in my profile.