• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

5070 Ti Variants, do they even matter?

CivicDiamond72

New Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2025
Messages
1 (0.06/day)
I have been considering a big upgrade from my RTX 1060 6GB for a while now. It took me a while to decide whether I wanted to upgrade to a RX 9070 XT or a 5070 Ti, even now I'm not 100% sure on it, but Nvidia's RT and Frame-gen advantage has pushed me towards the 5070 Ti. I doubt you care, so I'll get to the important bit.



I have found a number of cards at, or around, MSRP - I honestly don't mind paying an extra £20 over it. I have narrowed it down to five cards.

  • Gainward Phoenix V1
  • MSI Ventus 3X OC
  • Palit GamingPro Blackwell (non-OC) - OC version is out of stock
  • PNY Epic‑X RGB OC Plus
  • Zotac Solid Core OC


I care about, in order of importance:

  1. Performance
  2. Temperatures/Cooling
  3. Noise levels
  4. Looking cool is the least of my concerns, although all of these do looks cool to me.


I will be getting a new PSU to go along with it, probably 850W? For now, it will be paired with a Ryzen 5 7500f, although that will be my next upgrade (to a 9800x3D hopefully). Thanks.

Edit: I have narrowed it down to PNY Epic‑X RGB OC Plus or Zotac Solid Core OC
 
Last edited:

Zotac cards might be slightly louder as per a few reddit comments I came across.
 
I doubt it matters much. I have the MSRP PNY 5070 Ti and it's quiet but gets up to ~76F when OC'd. Others apparently don't get quite that high, but ones like the Ventus are known for being loud.
 
If you want some flexibility with power limits (default/max) then it's worth doing a little reserach, for example the MSI Ventus is locked at default (300W) where as the PNY Epic X is 300/330W, for me personally, I like the flexibility of a bit more juice in the tank,.
 
1. Performance. Forget about it, they're impossible to tell in a blind test. Max discrepancy is like 2.5% and it depends more on silicon lottery than on anything else.
2. Temperatures/cooling. Coolers are overengineered for everything on the list. Unless you have some extreme heat in your room (40C/104F upwards) and your PC case has virtually zero ventilation going on, no need to worry about it.
3. Noise levels. Not sure about that but as far as I can tell coil whine is more realistic to bother you anyway since most everyone engineers the cards the way the fans are barely audible. Could be a problem for sensitive ears and/or open case scenarios but if you're like me and you play with headphones on then you don't need to worry about this either.
Which means... Just pick whatever is cheaper or has better warranty terms.
 
I'd buy whatever is cheaper.
 
IDK, I like the idea of going with the card that has the easiest RMA process / best Customer Support.
 
What region are you located in? What resolution and games do you play?

I was looking for a friend the other day and here in the states, the 9070XT is about $150 cheaper than the 5070 Ti in some cases. They are roughly 4-8% apart depending on resolution and game overall.

Do you play a lot of ray-tracing games? Is that performance hit worth it?
 
I have been considering a big upgrade from my RTX 1060 6GB for a while now. It took me a while to decide whether I wanted to upgrade to a RX 9070 XT or a 5070 Ti, even now I'm not 100% sure on it, but Nvidia's RT and Frame-gen advantage has pushed me towards the 5070 Ti. I doubt you care, so I'll get to the important bit.
I care, and I am actually surprised you haven't mentioned DLSS vs FSR support in games. I would've thought that was the deciding factor.
RDNA4 is very competitive in Ray Tracing, it's Path Tracing where nVidia has a clear advantage.
I care about, in order of importance:

  1. Performance
  2. Temperatures/Cooling
  3. Noise levels
  4. Looking cool is the least of my concerns, although all of these do looks cool to me.
Performance is irrelevant when comparing different 5070 Ti cards, and the whole power limit ceiling seems overrated to me, a slightly higher limit won't unlock like a different real world performance tier, plus it can't overcome the silicon lottery and on top of that it's wise to be correlated with a quality PCB and strong VRM. Otherwise for long term use and abuse it might be problematic. But to each their own.

It depends on the person but for me size and weight are important now after getting a 5070 Ti Gamerock.
This is one of the big and heavy ones. And I would say that if I could go back in time I would choose differently.
Precisely the PNY Epic-X you are considering. I would gladly give away a couple of degrees for having a slimmer, less tall and lighter card.
I would trade the Gamerock in a heartbeat but no one would be that stupid to give away his Epic-X for a cinder block sized card. :laugh:
But as I said it depends, if you mount the card vertically and use a riser cable then weight isn't an issue anymore, maybe size as well, at least it doesn't block areas on the mobo.
If it's very thick though it limits the case options. The Epic-X isn't SFF sized by any means but to me is very reasonable so it gets my vote.

Good luck.
 
I disagree with most of the things said.

I had three 5070 Ti, so I know the importance of a good quality card.

Gigabyte Gaming OC
+ at least mine was golden sample, OC is a dream, max OC 2588 MHz +410 MHz (3000 MHz)
+ fans are whisper quiet. Of course like on every card, up to 1500 rpm, maybe 1700 rpm.
+ barely hearable coil whine
- card has some unpleasant odor, probably lessens in a year or 2
- visually Gigabyte doesn't care much, some fins come damaged from the factory

MSI Vanguard SOC
+ OC was quite good, 50 MHz worse than Gigabyte, 2588 MHz +360 MHz (2950 MHz)
+ it is the coolest card out there, good if you want to run highest OC on 350W instead of undervolting
- rightmost fan was wobbling since the first start, and was already producing some noise from time to time and I had to adjust the fan with my hands to make it stop. I was very disappointed that new card had bad fan bearings and this alone made me return the card.
- some unpleasant fan noise from bearings from 1200 to 2000 rpm, I was quite disappointed in this
- loud coil whine from 200 to 300 FPS
- again some fins came damaged from the factory

Gainward Phantom
+ voltage curve is way more steep at the beginning, that means you can set 800 mV 2580 MHz. On MSI best I could set without moving every voltage point one by one (like I have so much time on my hands, better to just use 850 mV then), was +1000 = 2227 MHz
+ card is better aesthetically as it has a plastic shroud surrounding the fins, so even if some fins are damaged, you can't see it. Please don't tell me you don't look at the card when installed. I know, this is just an observation and it makes for a more pleasant experience during installation, nothing more, nothing less.
- 10°C hotter than MSI Vanguard, Memory 16°C. Compared to Gigabyte +5.5 and +8.5°C. Average room temperatures Gigabyte, MSI, Gainward were 22.4°C, 23.7°C and 24.9°C. +1°C room temperature is roughly +1°C GPU and +1°C Memory, so you can adjust accordingly. I was so disappointed in this as my kitchen scale errors out, it is so heavy. According to Techpowerup around 2200 g. It should be cooler.
- fans have some annoying bearing noise, even more so than MSI Vanguard. But here it is no matter the rpm, from 1150 to 3600 rpm.
- coil whine is as loud as on MSI
- it OCs 200 MHz less than Gigabyte and 150 MHz less than MSI. Though 900 mV is only 75 MHz worse than MSI which is actually pretty good for a non-OC card.


It's actually quite funny that you have to check all kinds of noises and odors on a video card, but here we are.

It was impossible to get MSI Vanguard SOC and Gainward Phantom GS and both Palit GameRock since 3rd June when I bought the Gainward Phantom. Then few weeks later you couldn't even get that.

I for sure will look at better cards than Palit/Gainward when 5070 Ti SUPER 24 GB releases. Fan noise is just atrocious. But they should at least last a long time.
As Gigabyte has gel problems, ASUS Strix will be the first on my list. Though MSI Vanguard should also be on my list as it is one heck of a card, it just screams quality. I think I was just unlucky with that one fan. By my experience ASUS is also not immune to fan bearing problems. So it's more down to luck than manufacturer, unless someone would buy 1000 cards of each model and make statistics. But even then new cards are not same as 2 or 4 year old cards, so it is impossible to say which would fair better in the long run.
 
Last edited:
mine msi rtx 5070ti gaming oc + is 330w, max gpu overclock on drivers 572.83 was +425 ingame but on these new drivers it sank to +390 which is still good i guess
but if i had to pick one from them all it would be ASUS Rog Strix 5070ti, this card has it all: looks, quality vrms, cooling, 350w and again, LOOKS
maybe when super releases ill switch to strix 5080 super 24gb vram

h525.png
 
I always worry about fans failing. Would these TUF fans work on Strix?
What I like on ASUS are self replaceable fans.

EDIT: As far as I can see there is a reason you can only buy ASUS TUF fans as you can't remove just the fan shroud on Strix.
 
Last edited:
mine msi rtx 5070ti gaming oc + is 330w, max gpu overclock on drivers 572.83 was +425 ingame but on these new drivers it sank to +390 which is still good i guess
but if i had to pick one from them all it would be ASUS Rog Strix 5070ti, this card has it all: looks, quality vrms, cooling, 350w and again, LOOKS
maybe when super releases ill switch to strix 5080 super 24gb vram

View attachment 406323

They brought the strix back eh, for a minute I thought you were talking about the Astral.

Glad it's back.
 
I always worry about fans failing. Would these TUF fans work on Strix?
What I like on ASUS are self replaceable fans.
i had rog strix 3090 for 1,5 year and the fans were perfect, asus really builds astral/strix series with great care, idk about tuf but i am guessing the same

They brought the strix back eh, for a minute I thought you were talking about the Astral.

Glad it's back.
yeah me too, 4 months ago i read that asus will postpone strix series 5070ti for later time (idk why) but i wasn't in the mood for waiting
so i pulled the trigger and bought msi gaming which is fine but asus is better hehe
 
I have been considering a big upgrade from my RTX 1060 6GB for a while now. It took me a while to decide whether I wanted to upgrade to a RX 9070 XT or a 5070 Ti, even now I'm not 100% sure on it, but Nvidia's RT and Frame-gen advantage has pushed me towards the 5070 Ti. I doubt you care, so I'll get to the important bit.

I started building PCs in the early around 1990, not many years later most of the performance needs related to AutoCAD for vector GFX were also well suited to gaming,and it was have to say I loved being able to write off my "CAD Builds" as a business expense. After 2000, the CAD boxes got handed down to the kids. As they got older at the age when doing anything with ya parents was "embarrassing", building PCs became a bonding experience. Soon all their friends were coming over and asking for advice and they'd build their boxes in my conference room (aka what my wife calls the dining room table) with me helping them thru it. Now we have a neighborhood full of "puter nerds" building their own and other than a telephone call when selecting parts, don't see them much. We built a few lappies, buying a chassis and adding the rest of the components but got away from that as it can void the warranty. And it didn't save money really to make it worth it. Now I have the laptops built buy a custom builder

One of the tenets of our instruction .... be a "Hardware Whore" ! What's the best brand ? the one who has the best performance (fps,cooling, overclockability, etc.) In the 2000s, wewere pretty much an Asus Shop ... amost every build we did had an Asus MoBo and GFX card. We had a string of troubles w/Asus using their premium boards which they'd sent a replacement BEFORE sending the old one back) .. one arrived bent like a banana and it took weeks to sendout a 2nd replacement as the "computers show you already got one"... that was when Asus tech Support was being handled by AS Rock's parent company. At the same time, Asus was not longer showing up as Editors Choice here on TPU and toping the testing comparisons. In the 2000-teens,It was mostly MSI (Titanium MoBos and Gaming X Cards forexample) ..they were killin it here on TPU in the reviews,

Personally, I built my last desktop in 2013, (thread here on the topic) I am typing this message on it .... water cooled, dual pumps w/ less about 8.4C Delta T. I use it every day for AutoCAD tho mostly use the laptop as I am out and round. It still does 80+ fps in Witcher 3 Not much time for gaming however these days. The kids of course are builing or upgrading their boxes and as far as brand selection ... there all whores like their Dad. No brand loyalty ... andmuch to my chagrin,color or LEDs often factor into .

Dropped that to give a perspective on component selection proces sover the last 35 years ... thanfully today we're not paying wgat we paid then .... in 1990 I paid $2k for a 1200 x 1600 monitor and $1k for a 1 GB SCSI HD.

Today, I see TPU likes the MSI Vanguard based upon the performance specs. If I can hear my PC when running benchmarks with the monitor off, I'm not happy. That's my main reason for water cooling, tho do enjoy the huge overclocks. The Gaming Trio and Vanguard would definitely be on my short list for performance sound and cooling. If I was doing air cooling ... 28 dba would be about my tolerance level, but over 25 dbA makesme from a bit.

Of course,especially when they 1st drop,the ones topping the charts are hard to find and carry a significant price penalty .... I usually wait till the fervor dies down which is about the time reviewers needing something to talk about start writing about the next gen.
 
Back
Top