- Joined
- Dec 17, 2011
- Messages
- 359 (0.08/day)
Link - https://www.anandtech.com/show/17024/apple-m1-max-performance-review/
CPU Performance - M1 Max (and Pro) is a Monster
GPU Performance
Summary - Apple has the therotical processing power but gaming performance is quite poor and not competitive at this juncture.
Andndtech does have fanboyism towards Apple, but I believe that in this case, the numbers don't lie. Bravo Apple (ft. TSMC) for engineering such a processor!
Personally what I find absolutely incredible is that Apple with its 8 cores can go toe to toe with the 8 core 5800X without Hyper Threading and with much lower power consumption. Though to be fair, Apple does have the advantage of being a full node ahead (5nm) of AMD (7nm).
Also please note that M1 Max and M1 Pro should have identical CPU performance.
CPU Performance - M1 Max (and Pro) is a Monster
We also ran the chip with just the 8 performance cores active, as expected, the scores are a little lower at -7-9%, the 2 E-cores here represent a much smaller percentage of the total MT performance than on the M1.
On the SPECint work suite, the M1 Max lies +37% ahead of the best competition, it’s a very clear win here and given the power levels and TDPs, the performance per watt advantages is clear. The M1 Max is also able to outperform desktop chips such as the 11900K, or AMD’s 5800X.
In the SPECfp suite, the M1 Max is in its own category of silicon with no comparison in the market. It completely demolishes any laptop contender, showcasing 2.2x performance of the second-best laptop chip. The M1 Max even manages to outperform the 16-core 5950X – a chip whose package power is at 142W, with rest of system even quite above that. It’s an absolutely absurd comparison and a situation we haven’t seen the likes of.
In ST workloads, performance/W difference here is around 2.5x to 3x in favour of Apple’s silicon.
In MT workloads, the perf/W differences here are 4-6x in favour of the M1 Max, all whilst posting significantly better performance, meaning the perf/W at ISO-perf would be even higher than this.
The 11980HK isn’t a very efficient chip, as we had noted it back in our May review, and AMD’s chips should fare quite a bit better in a comparison, however the Apple Silicon is likely still ahead by extremely comfortable margins.
The chips here aren’t only able to outclass any competitor laptop design, but also competes against the best desktop systems out there, you’d have to bring out server-class hardware to get ahead of the M1 Max – it’s just generally absurd.
GPU Performance
Summary - Apple has the therotical processing power but gaming performance is quite poor and not competitive at this juncture.
Games are still in a very weird place for macOS and the ecosystem, maybe it’s a chicken-and-egg situation, maybe gaming is still something of a niche that will take a long time to see make use of the performance the new chips are able to provide in terms of GPU. What’s clearer, is that the new GPU does allow immense leaps in performance for content creation and productivity workloads which rely on GPU acceleration.
Andndtech does have fanboyism towards Apple, but I believe that in this case, the numbers don't lie. Bravo Apple (ft. TSMC) for engineering such a processor!
Personally what I find absolutely incredible is that Apple with its 8 cores can go toe to toe with the 8 core 5800X without Hyper Threading and with much lower power consumption. Though to be fair, Apple does have the advantage of being a full node ahead (5nm) of AMD (7nm).
Also please note that M1 Max and M1 Pro should have identical CPU performance.