Cinebench "Extreme Edition" MOD by HwGeek

[Wavetrex]

Silent reader for long, but felt like joining now

Welcome on TPU forums Silent reader !
Your score also added, and boy, that 1 point. Give it another push ;-)

Anyway... all updated until this point.
@dj-electric I could not find anywhere at what frequency that CPU runs with all-core turbo. Also no information about your memory or cooling, so please fill that in.

 

[er557]

that i9 proc is definitely overclocked, it cant provide such results at stock.
(@dj-electric 's)

@racer243l : you can beat him, just use a clean windows account and elevate priority of cinema4d cinebench in task manager details tab from normal to real time

 

[Wavetrex]

elevate priority of cinema4d cinebench in task manager details tab from normal to real time

Ha ! That worked:

9 points more on my 6800K, with just this, no other tweaks or changes.

I could try overclocking it more, voltage, fans on max on my H115i, that stuff, but no point, this CPU is old by now and have no chance not even against a basic Ryzen 7.

that i9 proc is definitely overclocked, it cant provide such results at stock.

Used a derivation of my "IPC" forumla and using a similar value for same generation in the CB/C (14.8) resulted in 4.7 Ghz on the clock.
Quite highly overclocked indeed !

 

[Tomgang]

You guys are really making my old cpu cry its ass of with its score of 261. It gets a god beating from the new ones.

Infact its so depressed, that it jumped out of its socket and refuse to get back in. Might be time for and upgrade when intel/amd comes with the next gen chips.

Dont get me wrong, x58 is still awesome. Its just i dont like to be so low in the food chain on a benchmark chart

 

[lexluthermiester]

Its just i dont like to be so low in the food chain on a benchmark chart

Don't worry about "keeping up with the Jone's". If that CPU does what you need it to and does it well, it doesn't matter what else is out there. If you need/want to do something and that CPU is too slow or can't do the job, then it's time to upgrade. Tech envy is a pricey vice, resist it.

 

[Wavetrex]

You guys are really making my old cpu cry its ass of with its score of 261.

Have you checked the bottom of the chart?

I wish my Duron 600 board would still boot, but unfortunately something gave up the ghost and now it just short-circuits the PSU half a second after powering on.

But if a Celly (Core µarch ) @ 2.2 takes over 80 minutes to complete this test, I wonder how much the Duron would take ? 4 hours ? 10 ??

(Actually, none at all, because I just realized Cinebench R15 is 64bit only, so my "record" of 8 points could as well be the lowest number possible)

... or maybe not? Someone here on TPU ===MUST=== still have an Athlon 64 single core still operating. Please ?

 

[dj-electric]

@dj-electric I could not find anywhere at what frequency that CPU runs with all-core turbo. Also no information about your memory or cooling, so please fill that in.

Cooling is custom H2O, clocks are 4.7Ghz max, memory is Corsair vengeance rgb pro 2666Mhz 8GB X 3 (triple channel, for some issues i still need to solve atm).
Core voltage 1.31V full load, all cores and HT enabled.

 

[Durvelle27]

For mine

RAM was 2666MHz Dual and a Corsair H70 cooling

 

[Wavetrex]

Another computer to test:
"138" Core i5 3570K 4/4 @ 3.8 Ghz (has some issues and it crashes if I try anything higher), DDR3 1800 Dual, Prolimatech Megahalems + 12cm fan

This CPU didn't age well.
Used to be my server until November 2018 when it got replaced by a Ryzen 7 1700. So much faster than the old quad core i5 !

 

[Durvelle27]

Another computer to test:
"138" Core i5 3570K @ 3.8 Ghz (has some issues and it crashes if I try anything higher), DDR3 1800 Dual, Prolimatech Megahalems + 12cm fan

View attachment 116315

This CPU didn't age well.

Could be a motherboard issue

 

[DR4G00N]

Have you checked the bottom of the chart?

I wish my Duron 600 board would still boot, but unfortunately something gave up the ghost and now it just short-circuits the PSU half a second after powering on.

But if a Celly (Core µarch ) @ 2.2 takes over 80 minutes to complete this test, I wonder how much the Duron would take ? 4 hours ? 10 ??

(Actually, none at all, because I just realized Cinebench R15 is 64bit only, so my "record" of 8 points could as well be the lowest number possible)

... or maybe not? Someone here on TPU ===MUST=== still have an Athlon 64 single core still operating. Please ?

I tried a Cele D 347 @ 5GHz but gave up after it crashed twice right before it finished.

 

[storm-chaser]

Here's another slow rig submission. This is my Lenovo ThinkPad T61p with Intel Core 2 Extreme X9000 CPU overclocked slightly to 3.0Ghz and undervolted to 1.1500 vcore. Stock cooling however I have the fan cranked up to full throttle (4500 rpm)

 

[psyko12]

@Wavetrex sorry forgot to include my cooler. It's with a Noctua NH-D15

 

[storm-chaser]

Here is the last of my "Red Lantern" submissions. Backup laptop (running windows 10) Toshiba Satellite Turion II Ultra X2 @ 2.5Ghz (SSD of course) - still good for video streaming / email / forums / etc

 

[SoNic67]

Dell Precision T5500 with Xeon X5675 (6c/12t). Stock frequency, stock cooler, 48GB DDR3 triple channel NB Frequency 2660MHz (665Mhz):
https://valid.x86.fr/pngq1x

 

[xtreemchaos]

im going to test the 8350 today the house needs warming

 

[racer243l]

Welcome on TPU forums Silent reader !
Your score also added, and boy, that 1 point. Give it another push ;-)

Anyway... all updated until this point.
@dj-electric I could not find anywhere at what frequency that CPU runs with all-core turbo. Also no information about your memory or cooling, so please fill that in.

that i9 proc is definitely overclocked, it cant provide such results at stock.
(@dj-electric 's)

@racer243l : you can beat him, just use a clean windows account and elevate priority of cinema4d cinebench in task manager details tab from normal to real time

I did, but she also lost a couple points in regular CB.
Maybe this evening or sometime by the weekend. It´ s bugging me though, had a bad sleep last night
In the meantime I have a second PC to contribute.
Behold my mighty i3 6100 2133Mhz 8GB single channel RAM stock cooler work PC. Also the reason half of CPU-Z is blank. Stupid network options...

 

[phill]

You guys are really making my old cpu cry its ass of with its score of 261. It gets a god beating from the new ones.

Infact its so depressed, that it jumped out of its socket and refuse to get back in. Might be time for and upgrade when intel/amd comes with the next gen chips.

Dont get me wrong, x58 is still awesome. Its just i dont like to be so low in the food chain on a benchmark chart

Don't worry about "keeping up with the Jone's". If that CPU does what you need it to and does it well, it doesn't matter what else is out there. If you need/want to do something and that CPU is too slow or can't do the job, then it's time to upgrade. Tech envy is a pricey vice, resist it.

X58 is awesome and you don't need to upgrade!! As @lexluthermiester says and I agree with him fully, why do it?

Have you checked the bottom of the chart?

I wish my Duron 600 board would still boot, but unfortunately something gave up the ghost and now it just short-circuits the PSU half a second after powering on.

But if a Celly (Core µarch ) @ 2.2 takes over 80 minutes to complete this test, I wonder how much the Duron would take ? 4 hours ? 10 ??

(Actually, none at all, because I just realized Cinebench R15 is 64bit only, so my "record" of 8 points could as well be the lowest number possible)

... or maybe not? Someone here on TPU ===MUST=== still have an Athlon 64 single core still operating. Please ?

I've got some older CPUs, I'll see what I can do.. Had such a busy last week sorting things out on the house and for the new arrival, I've had no time at all for PC's whatsoever!! I'm sure I have some spare SSDs to do a bit of testing with.. Wonder if it works in Linux.....??

 

[biffzinker]

Got a small bump in the score.

Also ran it on a Xeon E3-1240 v2 with stock clocks, stock cooler, and DDR3-1866 in dual channel. Scored 170 cb, lost the screenshot though so I have no proof.
https://ark.intel.com/products/65730/Intel-Xeon-Processor-E3-1240-v2-8M-Cache-3-40-GHz-

 

[racer243l]

So I made it. Got 586 second run but wasen´t satisfied. So upped Cache a bit here we go now, 591

 

[lexluthermiester]

So I made it. Got 586 second run but wasen´t satisfied. So upped Cache a bit here we go now, 591
View attachment 116376

Wow, this really is an extreme test! Less than 600 for 9900k.

 

[storm-chaser]

Here is my Phenom II 1600T clocked at 3.8Ghz and cooled by a Hyper 212.

 

[MrGenius]

Tweaked my memory sub-timings and gained a point. Which I don't care what you say...as brutal as this bench is...I'll take every point I can get.

i7-3770K(4C/8T) @ 5.1GHz Dual Channel 2400 Enermax Liqmax II 240

https://hwbot.org/submission/4072378_mrgenius_cinebench_r15_extreme_core_i7_3770k_241_cb?

 

[MrGenius]

Swapped my memory and tweaked the timings a bit more. Got 1 more point.

i7-3770K(4C/8T) @ 5.1GHz, Dual Channel 2400, Enermax Liqmax II 240

https://hwbot.org/submission/4075059_

Got the slow rollers a rollin' too.

Core 2 Duo E8600(2C/2T) @ 3.33GHz, Dual Channel 800, Stock Cooler

Pentium Dual E2180(2C/2T) @ 2.0GHz, Dual Channel 800, Stock Cooler

 

[Bones]

Here's one I did earlier today with an FX chip.