- Joined
- Oct 26, 2016
- Messages
- 1,773 (0.61/day)
- Location
- BGD
System Name | Minotaur |
---|---|
Processor | Intel I9 7940X |
Motherboard | Asus Strix Rog Gaming E X299 |
Cooling | BeQuiet/ double-Fan |
Memory | 192Gb of RAM DDR4 2400Mhz |
Video Card(s) | 1)RX 6900XT BIOSTAR 16Gb***2)MATROX M9120LP |
Storage | 2 x ssd-Kingston 240Gb A400 in RAID 0+ HDD 500Gb +Samsung 128gbSSD +SSD Kinston 480Gb |
Display(s) | BenQ 28"EL2870U(4K-HDR) / Acer 24"(1080P) / Eizo 2336W(1080p) / 2x Eizo 19"(1280x1024) |
Case | NZXT H5 Flow |
Audio Device(s) | Realtek/Creative T20 Speakers |
Power Supply | F S P Hyper S 700W |
Mouse | Asus TUF-GAMING M3 |
Keyboard | Func FUNC-KB-460/Mechanical Keyboard |
VR HMD | Oculus Rift DK2 |
Software | Win 11 |
Benchmark Scores | Fire Strike=23905,Cinebench R15=3167,Cinebench R20=7490.Passmark=30689,Geekbench4=32885 |
Not long ago PassMark software presented NEW PerformanceTest 10 well I downloaded just recently and notice significant difference in results compared to the their PerformanceTest 9
Both results are with the same CPU(2650V2)on EXACTLY same CPU&memory speeds...........guys from passMark software claimed that this is due to the major changes in the CPU test algorithms and that's for sure and it will be OK If the newer CPU's that have those instructions gain even more points but instead of that newer CPU's gain more points compared with the their older PerformanceTest 9 results but older CPU's get punished and lost points compared to the older PerformanceTest 9...... here some more comparison results that I found on net that some other people collected:
i7-2600---8181 5655 -----------around 30%
x5670 ----7800 7795 ---------------------0%
e5-2670--12374 10506----------around 20%
e5-1650--11736 11733--------------------0%
q9500-----3960 2961------------around 30%
i3-4130---4801 4196------------around 15%
i7-960-----5230 3858------------around 30%
and some more....
PT9 results (CPUMark, Single threaded result)
Intel Core i7-3820QM @ 2.70GHz 8,397, 1,844
Intel Core i7-3840QM @ 2.80GHz 8,759, 1,914
Intel Core i7-3920XM @ 2.90GHz 8,983, 1,963
Intel Core i7-3940XM @ 3.00GHz 9,133, 1,982
PT 10 results as at 14/Mar/2020, 3pm. (CPUMark, Single threaded result)
Intel Core i7-3820QM @ 2.70GHz 5,701, 1878
Intel Core i7-3840QM @ 2.80GHz 5,694, 1914
Intel Core i7-3920XM @ 2.90GHz 5,839, 1963
Intel Core i7-3940XM @ 3.00GHz 5,937, 1982
Also guys from Passmark posted this list:
Well I always liked performance tests from Passmark and I been using them for benchmark comparison for years....version changed in the past but results was never drastically different like this.... Is this something that you guys expected?What's your take on this?
If you want(for FUN sake)you can also DOWNLOAD and check both test and then post in here your results...THX....
Both results are with the same CPU(2650V2)on EXACTLY same CPU&memory speeds...........guys from passMark software claimed that this is due to the major changes in the CPU test algorithms and that's for sure and it will be OK If the newer CPU's that have those instructions gain even more points but instead of that newer CPU's gain more points compared with the their older PerformanceTest 9 results but older CPU's get punished and lost points compared to the older PerformanceTest 9...... here some more comparison results that I found on net that some other people collected:
i7-2600---8181 5655 -----------around 30%
x5670 ----7800 7795 ---------------------0%
e5-2670--12374 10506----------around 20%
e5-1650--11736 11733--------------------0%
q9500-----3960 2961------------around 30%
i3-4130---4801 4196------------around 15%
i7-960-----5230 3858------------around 30%
and some more....
PT9 results (CPUMark, Single threaded result)
Intel Core i7-3820QM @ 2.70GHz 8,397, 1,844
Intel Core i7-3840QM @ 2.80GHz 8,759, 1,914
Intel Core i7-3920XM @ 2.90GHz 8,983, 1,963
Intel Core i7-3940XM @ 3.00GHz 9,133, 1,982
PT 10 results as at 14/Mar/2020, 3pm. (CPUMark, Single threaded result)
Intel Core i7-3820QM @ 2.70GHz 5,701, 1878
Intel Core i7-3840QM @ 2.80GHz 5,694, 1914
Intel Core i7-3920XM @ 2.90GHz 5,839, 1963
Intel Core i7-3940XM @ 3.00GHz 5,937, 1982
Also guys from Passmark posted this list:
Well I always liked performance tests from Passmark and I been using them for benchmark comparison for years....version changed in the past but results was never drastically different like this.... Is this something that you guys expected?What's your take on this?
If you want(for FUN sake)you can also DOWNLOAD and check both test and then post in here your results...THX....
Last edited: