- Joined
- Feb 15, 2024
- Messages
- 239 (0.64/day)
- Location
- Bulgaria
System Name | Mid-Range |
---|---|
Processor | Ryzen 7 5800X3D |
Motherboard | ASUS TUF Gaming B550 Plus WiFi II |
Cooling | AiO LS 520 White edition(MX-6 thermal paste applied) |
Memory | 2x16GB DDR4 3600Mhz CL18 Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO SL |
Video Card(s) | RX 7700 XT ASRock Steel Legend 12GB |
Storage | Kingston FURY Renegade 2TB /TeamGroup Cardea A440 1TB |
Display(s) | MSI G272QPF 27 inch 2560x1440p 170hz + Technika 1080p 24'' 60hz |
Case | NZXT H6 Flow ARGB + 2x140mm Lian Li Uni infinity mirror |
Audio Device(s) | RGB Kogaion Speakers/Naraka bladepoint MR720 headset |
Power Supply | EVGA Supernova G2 650Watts 80 plus Gold |
Mouse | A4 Tech Bloody Naraka W95 MAX |
Keyboard | A4 Tech Bloody Naraka S98 Mechanical |
VR HMD | no |
Software | Windows 10 Home SL |
Well , today I needed to install something different from AMD overlay which in my case was CapFrameX to see some extended graphs of my pc performance and guess what. No difference in CapFrameX with AMFF on/off... In AMD overlay it shows double the frames while in CapFrame it shows something like ''real % FPS'' ? Is that normal and why CapFrame would show me something different than it actually is ? Or the AMD is showing me something not right ? I know for sure that AMD overlay doesn't show me the real CPU power ,okay... but the frames !?!? For example in Squad I have 90-110-120 fps without AMFF , when I turn it on I have usually 220-230 accodring to AMD Overlay.But when I do this with CapFrameX overlay it show me the 90-110-120fps. Do I miss something ? Definitely the gameplay feels smoother but ,ughh ? Which one should I believe more - AMD Overlay or CapFrameX ?