JSBench.Me test results

[SchumannFrequency]

I score 1.1 Md ops/s (Md or Mrd = milliard and M = million)

Hardware: Intel i3-3240 + 8GB RAM @1600MHz DDR3 dual-channel + NVIDIA GTX 650 1GB + EVO 850 500GB
Software: Epiphany browser 44.2 (WebKit version 605.1) + NixOS + Cinnamon
Meanwhile, version 44.3 of the Epiphany browser is now available for nixos-unstable but I haven't had time to update the system yet.

AMD R5 PRO 3400G, dual-channel DDR4 @2666MHz, windows11 and Firefox

AMD R5 PRO 3400G, dual-channel DDR4 @2666MHz, windows11 and Chrome 113.0.5672.129 (64-bits)

You can take the test on this page. https://jsbench.me/

When you post, please include your specific hardware and software.

 

[HD64G]

Ryzen5600@80W, 2x8GB RAM@3733MT/s, RX6750XT, Win10 & Opera

 

[SchumannFrequency]

View attachment 299747
Ryzen5600@80W, 2x8GB RAM@3733MT/s, RX6750XT, Win10 & Opera

I score (almost) as high as your Ryzen 5600 with the Intel i3-3240 and the Epiphany browser.

It is only with Epiphany that I can get this result on the Intel i3-3240.
Here are two additional results from this Intel i3-3240 and NixOS, but with a different browser.

Vivaldi 6.0.2979.22 (Stable channel) stable (64 bits)

Firefox 113.0.2 (64-bit)

 

[SchumannFrequency]

Result: 2.2 Md ops/s (Md or Mrd = milliard and M = million)

Hardware: AMD R5 PRO 3400G, dual-channel DDR4 @2666MHz
Software: Epiphany browser 44.3 (WebKit version 605.1) + NixOS + Cinnamon

 

[SchumannFrequency]

Result: 2.2 Md ops/s
Software: NixOS and Nyxt browser

 

[Nuckles56]

stock 5900x, 64GB @2666 (I need to start tweaking it but just haven't had time), firefox 111

 

[SchumannFrequency]

Result: 4.5 Md ops/s (Md or Mrd = milliard and M = million)
Software: Archcraft -- Nyxt 3.8.0-1 -- bspwm -- Nvidia proprietary GPU driver
Hardware: Intel i5-12600KF -- Kingston Fury dual-channel 6000 MHz CL40 -- Nvidia GTX 650 -- BIOSTAR B760MZ-E PRO -- Antec P6 -- Xilence XP550 -- ARCTIC Freezer i35 -- Samsung EVO 850 500GB

 

[SchumannFrequency]

Result: 4.7 Md ops/s (Md or Mrd = milliard and M = million)

Software: ROSA Fresh Desktop 12.4 -- LXQt -- Nvidia proprietary driver -- XFS as root -- Nyxt 3.10.0
Hardware: Intel 12600KF (stock) -- Kingston 6000 MHz CL40 -- GTX 650 1GB -- BIOSTAR B760MZ-E PRO -- Antec P6 -- Xilence XP550 -- ARCTIC i35 -- EVO 850 500GB

 

[SchumannFrequency]

CPU: Intel i3 M 370 @ 2.394GHz
Launch date CPU: Q3'10

Software: Void Linux and Nyxt browser

 

[SchumannFrequency]

Result: 4.8 B ops/s
Hardware: Intel 12600KF (stock) -- Kingston 6000 MHz CL36 -- Sapphire RX 7600 -- BIOSTAR B760MZ-E PRO -- Antec P6 -- Xilence XP550 -- ARCTIC i35 -- EVO 850 500GB
Software: OpenBSD -- epiphany version 45.2 -- bspwm -- open source GPU driver

 

[SchumannFrequency]

Result: 4.9 B ops/s

Hardware: Intel 12700KF (stock) -- G.SKILL RIPJAWS @3600 CL18 (stock) -- Sapphire RX 7600 -- ASRock B760M-ITX/D4 WiFi -- fractal design DEFINE NANO S -- bequiet! SYSTEM POWER 10 550W -- DeepCool AG500BK ARGB -- EVO 850 500GB
Software: Calculate Linux, PeKWM, Mesa open-source driver, XFS file system, Nyxt browser

 

[SchumannFrequency]

Result: 4.9 Md ops/s

Hardware: Intel 12700KF (stock) -- G.SKILL RIPJAWS @3600 CL18 (stock) -- Sapphire RX 7600 -- ASRock B760M-ITX/D4 WiFi -- fractal design DEFINE NANO S -- bequiet! SYSTEM POWER 10 550W -- DeepCool AG500BK ARGB -- EVO 850 500GB
Software: OpenBSD -current, bspwm, Mesa open-source driver, UFS file system, Epiphany 47.4

 

[W1zzard]

You do realize that this way you're testing how long it takes to execute "nothing" repeatedly?

You actually have to fill in the fields to provide two workloads, so you can compare them, to find out which is faster

Example: https://jsbench.me/ehizltusdj
This uses three methods to find and change a specific element, and will measure how each of them performs

 

[SchumannFrequency]

You do realize that this way you're testing how long it takes to execute "nothing" repeatedly?

I was aware of that and my impression from tests was that it scores higher on faster hardware if you use the same browser and the same operating system.
For example, if you let all the other factors be the same with the exception of the CPU, it will give an indication of how fast the CPU is.
It seems to me that the browsers that use webkit are faster in this particular procedure than browsers that use the blink or gecko engine.
Whether this can be useful in real worloads, however, I do not know.

In the test you have built, Firefox turns out to be faster than Epiphany and Chromium.

What result do you get in your own test with a fast CPU on Windows?

 

[W1zzard]

I was aware of that and my impression from tests was that it scores higher on faster hardware if you use the same browser and the same operating system.

Yeah, that's probably true, but wouldn't it make more sense to test something that performs useful work?