• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

MX500 - SMART's "pending sectors" (0xC5) goes up, then down

Joined
Feb 11, 2015
Messages
73 (0.02/day)
There's an odd behavior people have encountered with Crucial MX500 drives.

Sometimes, or under the triggering conditions, SMART's "pending sectors" (0xC5 / 197) goes up gradually, then down quickly (like, a minute).
There's no increase in "reallocation event count" (0xC4).

In another forum someone suggested "the problem could be the cable", but that makes no sense, as the pending sector count is a completely internal state.

Anyone reached any conclusions on what causes the following, and any practical implications?


Here's the pending sector count over a span of some 2 hours, reading the same 50GB area 3 times, with some idle time after each cycle.
The pending sector count goes up from 0, up to 51 while reading, then down quickly during idle. Then, more read/idle rounds. (The time axis isn't linear.)

smart_c5c.png



The drive I tested was only lightly used, and spent most of its time unpowered.
The files I read during testing were written more than 6 months prior, maybe even a year.

Main drive stats:
500 GB, half empty (but probably not actively TRIMmed because of a USB enclosure)
150 powered hours
1.4 TB written
6 average block-erases (0xAD)
1.65 WAF (1 + 0xF8 / 0xF7)
M3CR043 firmware

I'm theorizing, maybe it's related to flash cell charges that dissipating while unpowered, which leads to sectors requiring more error correction. Then, during idle, the drive rechecks or rewrites.
If the theory is correct, an open question is why do pending sectors still collect after the first test round. Though the peak is lower each time.

FWIW, 0xF8 "Background program page count" did increase while doing the reads, but I think less so in later rounds (didn't check carefully).
It also continued increasing slowly during idle time.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 29, 2012
Messages
6,881 (1.47/day)
Location
Florida
System Name natr0n-PC
Processor Ryzen 5950x-5600x | 9600k
Motherboard B450 AORUS M | Z390 UD
Cooling EK AIO 360 - 6 fan action | AIO
Memory Patriot - Viper Steel DDR4 (B-Die)(4x8GB) | Samsung DDR4 (4x8GB)
Video Card(s) EVGA 3070ti FTW
Storage Various
Display(s) Pixio PX279 Prime
Case Thermaltake Level 20 VT | Black bench
Audio Device(s) LOXJIE D10 + Kinter Amp + 6 Bookshelf Speakers Sony+JVC+Sony
Power Supply Super Flower Leadex III ARGB 80+ Gold 650W | EVGA 700 Gold
Software XP/7/8.1/10
Benchmark Scores http://valid.x86.fr/79kuh6
Dont bother with this. If it works without issue dont worry. The smart data is bugged on these.
 
Joined
Feb 11, 2015
Messages
73 (0.02/day)
"If it works don't worry" kinda beats the whole idea of SMART, which is to get indications before there's trouble. :)

I'm not sure it's bugged. It might actually be exposing internal workings more than other drives do, and people aren't used to it.
I've since rewritten the whole drive, and been watching it more. The behavior hasn't reappeared (though didn't test thoroughly, just trying to watch it during normal use).

My current theory is still:
0xC5 can show a very dynamic count of sectors that needed more error correction than usual, as judged during read.
When idle, even briefly, the drive rechecks the flagged sectors to decide if they're really suspect. If not, they're unflagged.

I'm not sure about the repeat reads that still flagged some sectors, though less each time.
It could be the same sectors, which suggests that the drive doesn't always rewrite (maybe variability in read "quality" changes the verdict).
Alternatively, it could be different sectors, and they just happened not to cross the threshold the last time they were read.

The drive's background:
Not new, but hasn't been used much at all.
Data was written many months ago, maybe more than a year.
Spent most time unpowered.
Was just occasionally powered, let's say a few minutes to an hour at a time.

Firmware M3CR04* is, I guess, the 3rd hardware generation. The older ...02* and ...03* are separate branches.
Too bad they don't spell it out explicitly in the model name. Would've been better: MX500, MX501, MX502...
 
Joined
Jan 29, 2012
Messages
6,881 (1.47/day)
Location
Florida
System Name natr0n-PC
Processor Ryzen 5950x-5600x | 9600k
Motherboard B450 AORUS M | Z390 UD
Cooling EK AIO 360 - 6 fan action | AIO
Memory Patriot - Viper Steel DDR4 (B-Die)(4x8GB) | Samsung DDR4 (4x8GB)
Video Card(s) EVGA 3070ti FTW
Storage Various
Display(s) Pixio PX279 Prime
Case Thermaltake Level 20 VT | Black bench
Audio Device(s) LOXJIE D10 + Kinter Amp + 6 Bookshelf Speakers Sony+JVC+Sony
Power Supply Super Flower Leadex III ARGB 80+ Gold 650W | EVGA 700 Gold
Software XP/7/8.1/10
Benchmark Scores http://valid.x86.fr/79kuh6
Just backup important stuff and go on using it.

I had a mx 100 series 512 gb sata go bad on me long ago data would just disappear. Happened with/on 3 times/drives.
 
Joined
Jun 20, 2024
Messages
367 (2.51/day)
The assumption there is that the C5 attribute is actually being used for that purpose ;) - we don't actually know what it's measuring.

There have been other threads on other forums about this: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/mx500-ssd-smart-errors.53779/

Long story short... doesn't seem to be something to be worried about unless remapping/reallocation starts to increase and SSD life left decreases.
I've got one of these drives and can't say I've actually ever noticed this but then I don't use it as a main boot drive.
 

rtwjunkie

PC Gaming Enthusiast
Supporter
Joined
Jul 25, 2008
Messages
13,980 (2.35/day)
Location
Louisiana
Processor Core i9-9900k
Motherboard ASRock Z390 Phantom Gaming 6
Cooling All air: 2x140mm Fractal exhaust; 3x 140mm Cougar Intake; Enermax ETS-T50 Black CPU cooler
Memory 32GB (2x16) Mushkin Redline DDR-4 3200
Video Card(s) ASUS RTX 4070 Ti Super OC 16GB
Storage 1x 1TB MX500 (OS); 2x 6TB WD Black; 1x 2TB MX500; 1x 1TB BX500 SSD; 1x 6TB WD Blue storage (eSATA)
Display(s) Infievo 27" 165Hz @ 2560 x 1440
Case Fractal Design Define R4 Black -windowed
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster Z
Power Supply Seasonic Focus GX-1000 Gold
Mouse Coolermaster Sentinel III (large palm grip!)
Keyboard Logitech G610 Orion mechanical (Cherry Brown switches)
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit (Start10 & Fences 3.0 installed)
I have 3 MX-500 drives and have not seen the issue. Admittedly this is anecdotal for me. In fact this is the first time I have heard of it. How widespread are the complaints?
 
Joined
Sep 11, 2013
Messages
117 (0.03/day)
System Name Msi PC
Processor Ryzen 5 5600
Motherboard MSI b550 gaming gen 3
Cooling deepcool gammaxx 200t (deepcool z10 paste)
Memory 32(4x8) gb g.skill 3200 (qvl)
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 3060 8GB Ventus 2X OC
Storage Ssd Crucial mx500 500 gb
Display(s) Philips 222V8LA/00 dp 75 hz freesync
Case Q-Tech Hermes 1004 (4x12cm fans)
Audio Device(s) X-fi titanium pcie (Support Pack 8.0 (Refresh 3))
Power Supply Corsair cv 750w bronze
Mouse PATRIOT PV530OULK VIPER V530 (500hz)
Keyboard Gigabyte force k81
Software Windows 11
You can read more there:
-https://forums.tomshardware.com/threads/crucial-mx500-500gb-sata-ssd-remaining-life-decreasing-fast-despite-only-a-few-bytes-being-written-to-it.3571220/page-5
See post 116 with the logs.
To catch someone this problem he must open a program like hard disk sentinel and see the logs because the smart attribute goes very quick from 0 to 1 and the 0, when the ssd do flt rewrites.

Two bugs that connected to each, other.

Also update your firmware to the latest M3CR046 , because it fix a hang problem.
 
Joined
Feb 11, 2015
Messages
73 (0.02/day)
@Boombastik

Thanks.
Was more than 1 sector pending here, so didn't seem difficult to catch if you're watching it during continuous reads with no idle time.

Not seeing unusual write activity so far. WAF is about +90%.

I'm holding off with the firmware. 045 was buggy, 046 had a problem reported last month.
As far as I'm concerned there's no rush unless it fixes something major.
 
Top