• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

No one buys games for graphics.

Joined
Oct 16, 2023
Messages
143 (0.29/day)
System Name -
Processor 5800x3D
Motherboard AsRock Extreme 4
Cooling Air
Memory 32GB
Video Card(s) 7900 XT
Storage 7.5 TB of SSD storage
Display(s) BenQ XL2746S DyaC+ 240hz . Phillips Momentum 1440P 165hz
Case 4000D AF modded.
Audio Device(s) External Fio K3
Power Supply 850W
Mouse XTRFY MZ1
Keyboard Mechanical
VR HMD -
Software Linux Nobara. Windows 11.
Benchmark Scores A few points.
I mean I do agree, I don't.

But we have a new modern issue... optimization.

Good video.


Ok we can look passed all the visuals, but games are just not really much better than N64, it's not that I am right in an objective sense, it's just the fact I am seeing how much we are regressing gameplay wise.

Forza, it looks amazing in the right conditions and like absolute anus everywhere else all because they wanted RT...



Again though there is no soul to Forza... it lost it.

FM2 is technically inferior not just visually, but it has the fun factor.


GT has also gone the wrong way too.

Technically inferior... massively even.. still way more fun.



Multiplayer games are going downhill fast.

BF is on a big downwards slope due to design and not listening to what people want.

COD is... unfun and braindead.


CS is a cheat fest.

Honestly stuck playing older games because nothing new really is... good


Just an opinion, share yours and talk about the topic.
 
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
1,380 (0.20/day)
Location
Noir York
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard Gigabyte B450M S2H
Cooling Scythe Kotetsu Mark II
Memory 2 x 16GB SK Hynix CJR OEM DDR4-3200 @ 4000 20-22-20-48
Video Card(s) Colorful RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB GDDR6
Storage 250GB WD BLACK SN750 M.2 + 4TB WD Red Plus + 4TB WD Purple
Display(s) AOpen 27HC5R 27" 1080p 165Hz curved VA
Case AIGO Darkflash C285
Audio Device(s) Creative SoundBlaster Z + Kurtzweil KS-40A bookshelf / Sennheiser HD555
Power Supply Great Wall GW-EPS1000DA 1kW
Mouse Razer Deathadder Essential
Keyboard Cougar Attack2 Cherry MX Black
Software Windows 10 Pro x64 22H2
Graphics always important, and those game graphics considered as state-of-the-art back then. It's just which direction the devs made, did they put only graphics into focus or struck balance between graphics and good story and gameplay. Talking about racing games I play A LOT of GT2 back then and I still play it today, emulated on PC. Here's a screenshot. That video you posted, if you play the game a lot you know which race gives a very good car that you can either sell for tons of money (and he did pointed that out), or you can use one straight (especially race cars that don't need tuneups). It's not a grind as long as you buy the RIGHT first car and play the right few race, just do all the license and youre good to go. Nowadays I just either download savegames that gives rare cars, or I just use cheats to stop timer so I get gold in each license so I get the prized car for each test, and some of those are great car you can use straight for races. Yeah back then everybody and their grandma buy Escudo to win races, now I use hardest car to drive to win races, TVR Speed 12 and Espace F1 are two of such cars. Also I set challenges to put as little horsepower as possible and try to win races purely by skills. It's fun this way to me IMO rather than use OP cars to win races, also it hones driving skills. I also play GT4 as well as I haven't get time to really invested playing it back then (went to college to take my Diploma and Degree). It's a spiritual successor to GT2 IMO, and I finally can play on Nurburgring. I also noticed GT3 and GT4 was easier than GT2, later found out both game have ASM ON by default (Active Stabilty Management) so when you go around corner and press accelerator hard (PS2/PS3 have pressure sensitive buttons) it won't make the tires spin either by slowing doown or limiting the throttle input so you can tackle any corner with any sort of drivetrain with ease. I disable them (and reduce or disable traction control too) and made driving much more fun.

gt2.jpg


I can always put shader effects and mod the hell out of it on emulator but I could say I'm a purist, I rarely mod any games I play, at least graphically (upscaling is another story so it won't look pixelated on FHD screen) except for certain occasion, I tried to mod GTAIV with ENBmods graphics back then in 2012 I still have screenshot of it. Doesn't look too bad but it's more of a curiosity. I didn't play GTAIV as much as San Andreas because for me overall story was worse. One of reason I hate Cyberpunk2077 is because of its crappy ending, and overall story is just meh, there are few great moments but those are far between and some events seems rushed. Still playing San Andreas till this day, from start to finish, without cheat and only mods I use it the one that fixed the bugs in-game, yep replaying those so-called hard missions like Wrong Side of The Tracks and flying RC missions.

GTAIV 2012-08-17 16-40-25-79.jpg


I never invested in any multiplayer games, I only play Planetside 2 (F2P games) with my friends, that collects about over 1000 hours but it was fun sometimes (especially double XP weekend) I haven't played one in 4 years. I buy Battlefield V to play with friends but finds out it littered with cheaters/hackers, worse than San Andreas Multiplayer so I only play like 5 hours of it before quitting.

I also play A LOT of Ace Combat series, I started playing from AC3 Electrosphere, and I continue playing the holy trinity in PS2; AC04, AC5 and Zero. I love every singe one of it, gameplay mechanics was amazing, the planes and superplanes were astonishing and each of them comes with truly amazing and unique story that really makes you invested in the whole game and genre. So when Ace Combat 7 was announced and coming for PC I'm VERY HAPPY to hear and I even pre-order it. When it comes out the graphics were simply amazing, some planes were great but storyline was major dogshit. I only replay it 3 times before I put it into rest. I never pre-order anything after this and I'm glad, as I dodged pre-ordering Doom Eternal (for me is dogshit, too arena-like and it's no longer fun for me though I did finished it in Ultra Violence but only once) Doom 2016 struck best balance for me as not being too monkey-on-acid-trip.

Nowadays I never viewed any games as interesting, seeing Starfield made boredface as I know the game will be buggy so it will be a year or two, seeing those remasters/remakes makes me yawn harder than late-nights playing Planetside 2. San Andreas remaster using mobile ports is just UTTER BULLSHIT and an insult to excellent original game. I can wait for games to mature as it become a trend, I play Witcher 3 like 3-4 years after it releases and buy the GOTY version.

Where DirectX 12 being so good that it laid out certain feature levels, lower level of hardware abstract that it would make game devs knows what to do with huge amount of graphics card in the market, but doesn't seem it headed that way either. Just read what Alan Wake 2 requirements you can see how lazy devs are, requiring DLSS/FSR as a requirement to get smooth gameplay. They just relased the game in what I called early Alpha stage and patch them as they go through like nothing. It's better back then when game comes in physical copy where game properly optimized out of the box and fit in CD/DVD thus doesn't require exabyte of data just to properly render sandwiches in 4K.

So the original question; nobody buys games for graphics. That is true, at least for me. I do enjoy Crysis, Metro 2033 but the graphics just compliments the great game it was.
 
Joined
Jun 19, 2008
Messages
350 (0.06/day)
Location
India
System Name Home
Processor Ryzen 5700X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte Aorus B550 Pro
Cooling Bykski Ryzen Waterblock + BlackIce Pro 360 radiator + 120mm + D5 variable pump + Corsair HD120 x 4
Memory 32 GB GSKILL ARES @ 3800Mhz 15-15-15
Video Card(s) ASUS Strix 1080Ti with Bykski Waterblock
Storage 2x 970 EVO Plus 1tb + 960GB Sandisk Extreme Pro SSD + 4TB WD Black
Display(s) Samsung 40KU6300 UHD TV
Case CoolerMaster HAF-X
Audio Device(s) Logitech Z906
Power Supply Corsair RM850
Mouse Logitech G602 + Razer Goliathus Speed mouse pad
Keyboard Razer BlackWidow Chroma RGB
VR HMD Oculus Rift CV1
Software Windows 11
Not me, I love good graphics. I hate pixie graphics. Only "non-graphics" game I like is Factorio.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
23,269 (6.12/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
System Name Tiny the White Yeti
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI MAG Mortar b650m wifi
Cooling CPU: Thermalright Peerless Assassin / Case: Phanteks T30-120 x3
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengeance 30CL6000
Video Card(s) ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming
Storage Lexar NM790 4TB + Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 980 1TB + Crucial BX100 250GB
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case Lian Li A3 mATX White
Audio Device(s) Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Steelseries Aerox 5
Keyboard Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II
VR HMD HD 420 - Green Edition ;)
Software W11 IoT Enterprise LTSC
Benchmark Scores Over 9000
In the end all games that stick with me are the ones with replay value and strong gameplay. Everything else... perhaps memorable, but not replayable. Anything linear falls under that category for me. Linear with choices is different, it has replay value.

Not a single game has replay value based on graphics. Graphically great but gameplay wise shit games are games I tend to not play for long - bad gameplay is such a huge detractor for me, it even places good graphics in a whole other perspective: I feel lied to.
 

freeagent

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 16, 2018
Messages
9,760 (4.16/day)
Location
Winnipeg, Canada
Processor AMD R7 5800X3D
Motherboard Asus Crosshair VIII Dark Hero
Cooling Thermalright Frozen Edge 360, 3x TL-B12 V2, 2x TL-B12 V1
Memory 2x8 G.Skill Trident Z Royal 3200C14, 2x8GB G.Skill Trident Z Black and White 3200 C14
Video Card(s) Zotac 4070 Ti Trinity OC
Storage WD SN850 1TB, SN850X 2TB, SN770 1TB
Display(s) LG 50UP7100
Case Fractal Torrent Compact
Audio Device(s) JBL Bar 700
Power Supply Seasonic Vertex GX-1000, Monster HDP1800
Mouse Logitech G502 Hero
Keyboard Logitech G213
VR HMD Oculus 3
Software Yes
Benchmark Scores Yes
I love me some top end graphics.. always have :)
 
Joined
Aug 14, 2023
Messages
310 (0.56/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 7900X
Motherboard MSI MPG X670E Carbon WiFi
Cooling Custom Loop (Watercool/HWLabs)
Memory G.Skill Trident Z5 DDR5-6000 64GB (F5-6000J3040G32GX2-TZ5K)
Video Card(s) Gainward RTX 4090 Phantom GS
Storage 7 x M.2, 4 x SSD, 2 x HDD.
Display(s) Alienware AW3423DW
Case Corsair 7000D Airflow
Audio Device(s) Logitech Z207, Shanling UA1 Plus
Power Supply Corsair HX1200
Mouse Logitech MX Master
Keyboard Logitech k360
Software Windows 11 Pro
Benchmark Scores None, but I think they'd be fairly decent.
I too love me some top notch graphics. That can't be the only thing a game has to offer, but then that's very rarely the case in my experience and an attempt to frame it as an either/or choice is clearly disingenuous.
 
Joined
Nov 9, 2010
Messages
5,695 (1.09/day)
System Name Space Station
Processor Intel 13700K
Motherboard ASRock Z790 PG Riptide
Cooling Arctic Liquid Freezer II 420
Memory Corsair Vengeance 6400 2x16GB @ CL34
Video Card(s) PNY RTX 4080
Storage SSDs - Nextorage 4TB, Samsung EVO 970 500GB, Plextor M5Pro 128GB, HDDs - WD Black 6TB, 2x 1TB
Display(s) LG C3 OLED 42"
Case Corsair 7000D Airflow
Audio Device(s) Yamaha RX-V371
Power Supply SeaSonic Vertex 1200w Gold
Mouse Razer Basilisk V3
Keyboard Bloody B840-LK
Software Windows 11 Pro 23H2
No one thing will ever be the be all, end all, or what breaks a game. Good game development requires a balance of many skills, a team that knows how to put it all together and polish it, and a publisher that gives them enough time and funding to do that, AND test it properly before release.

One thing that worries me lately is whether AI will be overused and abused to the point of shortcuts on writing and voice acting. It's good to see that the movie industry at least is making progress toward SOME protection against that with the strike, but I'd like to see the same done for game writers and voice actors.

On a different note, I can't help but worry what will happen with game hardware manufacturing if China invades and takes Taiwan.
 
Last edited:

freeagent

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 16, 2018
Messages
9,760 (4.16/day)
Location
Winnipeg, Canada
Processor AMD R7 5800X3D
Motherboard Asus Crosshair VIII Dark Hero
Cooling Thermalright Frozen Edge 360, 3x TL-B12 V2, 2x TL-B12 V1
Memory 2x8 G.Skill Trident Z Royal 3200C14, 2x8GB G.Skill Trident Z Black and White 3200 C14
Video Card(s) Zotac 4070 Ti Trinity OC
Storage WD SN850 1TB, SN850X 2TB, SN770 1TB
Display(s) LG 50UP7100
Case Fractal Torrent Compact
Audio Device(s) JBL Bar 700
Power Supply Seasonic Vertex GX-1000, Monster HDP1800
Mouse Logitech G502 Hero
Keyboard Logitech G213
VR HMD Oculus 3
Software Yes
Benchmark Scores Yes
Just be thankful it’s not the early 2000s anymore. Performance came in leaps and bounds and each new Gen quickly destroyed the last.
 
Joined
Oct 16, 2023
Messages
143 (0.29/day)
System Name -
Processor 5800x3D
Motherboard AsRock Extreme 4
Cooling Air
Memory 32GB
Video Card(s) 7900 XT
Storage 7.5 TB of SSD storage
Display(s) BenQ XL2746S DyaC+ 240hz . Phillips Momentum 1440P 165hz
Case 4000D AF modded.
Audio Device(s) External Fio K3
Power Supply 850W
Mouse XTRFY MZ1
Keyboard Mechanical
VR HMD -
Software Linux Nobara. Windows 11.
Benchmark Scores A few points.
Just be thankful it’s not the early 2000s anymore. Performance came in leaps and bounds and each new Gen quickly destroyed the last.
No we have games doing that now from developers.
 
D

Deleted member 229121

Guest
^ Excellent case and point for that, Legend of Zelda: The Windwaker.
That game got completely blasted for its graphics when it came out and look how well it has stood the test of time almost 11 years later.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
11,880 (2.18/day)
Location
Manchester uk
System Name RyzenGtEvo/ Asus strix scar II
Processor Amd R5 5900X/ Intel 8750H
Motherboard Crosshair hero8 impact/Asus
Cooling 360EK extreme rad+ 360$EK slim all push, cpu ek suprim Gpu full cover all EK
Memory Gskill Trident Z 3900cas18 32Gb in four sticks./16Gb/16GB
Video Card(s) Asus tuf RX7900XT /Rtx 2060
Storage Silicon power 2TB nvme/8Tb external/1Tb samsung Evo nvme 2Tb sata ssd/1Tb nvme
Display(s) Samsung UAE28"850R 4k freesync.dell shiter
Case Lianli 011 dynamic/strix scar2
Audio Device(s) Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup, corsair void pro headset
Power Supply corsair 1200Hxi/Asus stock
Mouse Roccat Kova/ Logitech G wireless
Keyboard Roccat Aimo 120
VR HMD Oculus rift
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores laptop Timespy 6506
I think there is room for it all, I certainly like a good looking game, including new features etc.
But I am open to alternatives or less graphical games IF the game is good and fun little else matters.

I got schooled early on with Rise of the Machines I think it was.


Real world graphics until you moved , then realised it was no Street fighter, utter shit in fact.

Nuanced point some low graphics games look better for that.

Like Limbo , the RTX version of that would be ass imho

But to be clear a percentage of every generation of playstation and GT got bought by me, because of the graphics, at least in part.
 
Joined
Mar 25, 2020
Messages
1,788 (1.00/day)
Location
Over the Hill UK
System Name AMDWeapon
Processor Ryzen 7 7800X3D -20 CO
Motherboard X670E MSI Tomahawk WiFi
Cooling Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120 ARGB with Silverstone Air Blazer 2200rpm fans
Memory G-Skill Trident Z Neo RGB 6000 CL30 32GB@EXPO
Video Card(s) Powercolor 7900 GRE Red Devil minor undervolt
Storage Samsung 870 QVO 1TB x 2, Lexar 256 GB, TeamGroup MP44L 2TB, Crucial T700 1TB, Seagate Firecuda 2TB
Display(s) 32" LG UltraGear GN600-B
Case Montech 903 MAX AIR
Audio Device(s) SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Wireless + Wicked Cushions Gel earpads
Power Supply MSI MPG AGF 850 watt gold
Mouse SteelSeries AeroX 5 l Forza Pad GameSir G7 SE l Power A OPS V3 for FPS (paddles)
Keyboard SteelSeries Apex 9 TKL
VR HMD -
Software Windows 11 Pro 24H2
Benchmark Scores Enough for me
I think there is room for it all, I certainly like a good looking game, including new features etc.
But I am open to alternatives or less graphical games IF the game is good and fun little else matters.

I got schooled early on with Rise of the Machines I think it was.


Real world graphics until you moved , then realised it was no Street fighter, utter shit in fact.

Nuanced point some low graphics games look better for that.

Like Limbo , the RTX version of that would be ass imho

But to be clear a percentage of every generation of playstation and GT got bought by me, because of the graphics, at least in part.
It was Rise of the Robots and every magazine hyped it up in a serious manner, only for it to become one of the biggest turds in gaming. Up there with Atari's E.T.
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
11,880 (2.18/day)
Location
Manchester uk
System Name RyzenGtEvo/ Asus strix scar II
Processor Amd R5 5900X/ Intel 8750H
Motherboard Crosshair hero8 impact/Asus
Cooling 360EK extreme rad+ 360$EK slim all push, cpu ek suprim Gpu full cover all EK
Memory Gskill Trident Z 3900cas18 32Gb in four sticks./16Gb/16GB
Video Card(s) Asus tuf RX7900XT /Rtx 2060
Storage Silicon power 2TB nvme/8Tb external/1Tb samsung Evo nvme 2Tb sata ssd/1Tb nvme
Display(s) Samsung UAE28"850R 4k freesync.dell shiter
Case Lianli 011 dynamic/strix scar2
Audio Device(s) Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup, corsair void pro headset
Power Supply corsair 1200Hxi/Asus stock
Mouse Roccat Kova/ Logitech G wireless
Keyboard Roccat Aimo 120
VR HMD Oculus rift
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores laptop Timespy 6506
It was Rise of the Robots and every magazine hyped it up in a serious manner, only for it to become one of the biggest turds in gaming. Up there with Atari's E.T.
Worse imho , I bought in.

Rise of the robot's, indeed Ty.

The extreme lack of move's, and point, put me as close as I've ever been to Fisting a TV.
 
Joined
Dec 25, 2020
Messages
7,550 (4.99/day)
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
System Name "Icy Resurrection"
Processor 13th Gen Intel Core i9-13900KS
Motherboard ASUS ROG Maximus Z790 Apex Encore
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S upgraded with 2x NF-F12 iPPC-3000 fans and Honeywell PTM7950 TIM
Memory 32 GB G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB F5-6800J3445G16GX2-TZ5RK @ 7600 MT/s 36-44-44-52-96 1.4V
Video Card(s) NVIDIA RTX A2000
Storage 500 GB WD Black SN750 SE NVMe SSD + 4 TB WD Red Plus WD40EFPX HDD
Display(s) 55-inch LG G3 OLED
Case Pichau Mancer CV500 White Edition
Power Supply EVGA 1300 G2 1.3kW 80+ Gold
Mouse Microsoft Classic IntelliMouse (2017)
Keyboard IBM Model M type 1391405
Software Windows 10 Pro 22H2
Benchmark Scores I pulled a Qiqi~
You just have to ask the specific questions:

Do I buy games specifically for graphics? No.
Are games with basic graphics necessarily boring? No.
Is it true that advanced graphics make a game more enjoyable? It depends.
Is it true that a few games require advanced graphics to be fully enjoyable? Yes!
Do you enjoy games with advanced graphics? Hell yes!
Do you like games that depend on such advanced graphics to fully flesh themselves out? YES.
Is it true that the average gamer considers graphical fidelity a generational marker? And the answer to that is absolutely.

The reason this generation feels "underwhelming" is that system requirements are about to shoot up to insane heights due to the use of ray and path tracing, very high resolution textures and general assets (which are increasingly unique with more and more variety), advanced positional audio, etc. - all the while simultaneously, in real life we're in an economic rut with people unwilling to spend money to throw hardware at the problem; all the while game developers got really good at mastering the traditional raster-based techniques make games look more than reasonably realistic, they look pretty much amazing as it is. This presents an ugly development reality, because a LOT of time and resources are spent to make games look this good with traditional technology.

Add all of that to the fact that desktop panels have not really advanced in resolution in the past 10 years whatsoever and the bulk majority of displays is still 1080p/Full HD standard with a few 1440p's at the higher end, and there's just no point in software developed with UHD/4K and beyond in mind, leading to this illusion that things haven't really advanced despite the increase in requirements.

Enter Alan Wake 2, the game that's triggering all this discussion. It gave the boot to the ancient Nvidia Maxwell and Pascal GPUs as well as AMD's underqualified RDNA 1 hardware and is requesting DX12 Ultimate, people seem to be upset by it dropping downlevel hardware but you have to remember, Nvidia's Turing is 6 years old and already offered DX12U support from day one. The upper settings aren't supported on AMD because again, it's making extensive use of raytracing which their hardware and/or drivers is simply balls at. This conflicts with "gamer pride" and "latest generation cards must always run ultra high settings". End of the day, yes, the problem is you, the gamer, and not "optimization". Is asking for a RTX 2060 6 years later really too much? IMHO, no, it is not.

But that's just how I personally see things.
 
Joined
Oct 16, 2023
Messages
143 (0.29/day)
System Name -
Processor 5800x3D
Motherboard AsRock Extreme 4
Cooling Air
Memory 32GB
Video Card(s) 7900 XT
Storage 7.5 TB of SSD storage
Display(s) BenQ XL2746S DyaC+ 240hz . Phillips Momentum 1440P 165hz
Case 4000D AF modded.
Audio Device(s) External Fio K3
Power Supply 850W
Mouse XTRFY MZ1
Keyboard Mechanical
VR HMD -
Software Linux Nobara. Windows 11.
Benchmark Scores A few points.
You just have to ask the specific questions:

Do I buy games specifically for graphics? No.
Are games with basic graphics necessarily boring? No.
Is it true that advanced graphics make a game more enjoyable? It depends.
Is it true that a few games require advanced graphics to be fully enjoyable? Yes!
Do you enjoy games with advanced graphics? Hell yes!
Do you like games that depend on such advanced graphics to fully flesh themselves out? YES.
Is it true that the average gamer considers graphical fidelity a generational marker? And the answer to that is absolutely.

The reason this generation feels "underwhelming" is that system requirements are about to shoot up to insane heights due to the use of ray and path tracing, very high resolution textures and general assets (which are increasingly unique with more and more variety), advanced positional audio, etc. - all the while simultaneously, in real life we're in an economic rut with people unwilling to spend money to throw hardware at the problem; all the while game developers got really good at mastering the traditional raster-based techniques make games look more than reasonably realistic, they look pretty much amazing as it is. This presents an ugly development reality, because a LOT of time and resources are spent to make games look this good with traditional technology.

Add all of that to the fact that desktop panels have not really advanced in resolution in the past 10 years whatsoever and the bulk majority of displays is still 1080p/Full HD standard with a few 1440p's at the higher end, and there's just no point in software developed with UHD/4K and beyond in mind, leading to this illusion that things haven't really advanced despite the increase in requirements.

Enter Alan Wake 2, the game that's triggering all this discussion. It gave the boot to the ancient Nvidia Maxwell and Pascal GPUs as well as AMD's underqualified RDNA 1 hardware and is requesting DX12 Ultimate, people seem to be upset by it dropping downlevel hardware but you have to remember, Nvidia's Turing is 6 years old and already offered DX12U support from day one. The upper settings aren't supported on AMD because again, it's making extensive use of raytracing which their hardware and/or drivers is simply balls at. This conflicts with "gamer pride" and "latest generation cards must always run ultra high settings". End of the day, yes, the problem is you, the gamer, and not "optimization". Is asking for a RTX 2060 6 years later really too much? IMHO, no, it is not.

But that's just how I personally see things.
Except it's not what is triggering it.. this is...


Game runs bad on recommended 4K hardware even at 1080P and don't look great either.
 
Joined
Sep 29, 2020
Messages
175 (0.11/day)
Graphics always important,
Tell that to classic text-based games like Zork or MUD, or 4-color block graphic classics like MULE, Missile Command, or Centipede. No one bought those games for the fancy visuals -- meaning the developers knew -- knew -- the gameplay had to be outstanding.

Today? Developers will spend 90% of their time on the visuals, and 8 of the remaining 10% trying to optimize performance so the thing even runs properly. Gameplay is a belated afterthought.
 
Joined
Nov 29, 2022
Messages
854 (1.06/day)
Processor Intel i7 77OOK
Motherboard Gigabyte Aorus something
Cooling Noctua NH-U12S dual fan
Memory Ballistix 32 Go
Video Card(s) MSI 3060 Gaming X
Storage Mixed bag of M2 SSD and SATA SSD
Display(s) MSI 34" 3440x1440 Artimys 343CQR
Case Old Corsair Obsidian something
Audio Device(s) Integrated
Power Supply Old Antec HCG 620 still running good
Mouse Steelseries something
Keyboard Steelseries someting too
Benchmark Scores bench ? no time to lose with bench ! :)
Do I buy a game for it's graphic ?
Hell no !
Do graphics are important for me ?
No and I don't care about graphics

All I care is gameplay.

A good gameplay make you forgot graphics everytime.
If not, the game is not good.
Simple as that.
 
Joined
Nov 24, 2018
Messages
2,260 (0.99/day)
Location
south wales uk
System Name 1.FortySe7en VR rig 2. intel teliscope rig 3.MSI GP72MVR Leopard Pro .E-52699, Xeon play thing
Processor 1.3900x @stock 2. 5950x undervolted . 3. i7 7700hq 4 E5-2699 V3
Motherboard 1.aorus x570 ultra 2. Rog b550 f,4 MR9A PRO ATX X99
Cooling 1.Hard tube loop, cpu and gpu 2. Hard loop cpu and gpu 4 360 AIO
Memory 1.Gskill neo @3600 32gb 2.corsair ven 32gb @3200 3. 16gb hyperx @2400 4 64GB 2133 in quad channel
Video Card(s) 1.GIGABYTE RTX 3080 WaterForce WB 2. Aorus RTX2080 3. 1060 3gb. 4 Arc 770LE 16 gb
Storage 1 M.2 1tb +1tb , 2 3tb HDs 2. 1tb m.2 3tbHD 3. 256 m.2. 1tb ssd 4. 2gb ssd
Display(s) 1.LG 50" UHD , 2 MSI Optix MAG342C UWHD. 3.17" 120 hz display 4. Acer Preditor 144hz 32inch.z
Case 1. Thermaltake P5 2. Thermaltake P3 4. montech king 65
Audio Device(s) 1 Onboard 2 Onboard 3 Onboard 4. onboard.
Power Supply 1.seasonic gx 850w 2. seasonic gx 750w. 4 RM850w
Mouse 1 ROG Gladius 2 Corsair m65 pro
Keyboard 1. ROG Strix Flare 2. Corsair F75 RBG 3. steelseries RBG
VR HMD rift and rift S and Quest 2. rog ally 2tb m.2 1tb SD.
Software 1. win11 pro 2. win11 pro 3, win11 home 4 win11 pro
Benchmark Scores 1.7821 cb20 ,cb15 3442 1c 204 cpu-z 1c 539 12c 8847
i dont know, its going in a good way for VR more realistic but as for flat games i like a game that looks like a game if ya know what i mean. but over all im happy "i think".
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
8,768 (4.01/day)
System Name Bragging Rights
Processor Atom Z3735F 1.33GHz
Motherboard It has no markings but it's green
Cooling No, it's a 2.2W processor
Memory 2GB DDR3L-1333
Video Card(s) Gen7 Intel HD (4EU @ 311MHz)
Storage 32GB eMMC and 128GB Sandisk Extreme U3
Display(s) 10" IPS 1280x800 60Hz
Case Veddha T2
Audio Device(s) Apparently, yes
Power Supply Samsung 18W 5V fast-charger
Mouse MX Anywhere 2
Keyboard Logitech MX Keys (not Cherry MX at all)
VR HMD Samsung Oddyssey, not that I'd plug it into this though....
Software W10 21H1, barely
Benchmark Scores I once clocked a Celeron-300A to 564MHz on an Abit BE6 and it scored over 9000.
The graphics need to be good enough to not be an issue.

I feel like we hit the point of diminishing returns with game engines and art assets half a decade ago. There are games that were launched in 2016 that still look fresh. Not cutting-edge, no, but given the terrible graphics quality of some 100GB games that stomp shameful 8GB GPUs into the dirt, it's really hard to argue that these huge 5-10x increases in texture size and hardware requirements are really giving us much extra eye candy for all the additional performance cost. Doom 2016, Battlefield 1, Dark Souls 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Horizon Zero Dawn, Destiny 2 - These are all "old" games that look fine. Arguably better than many newer games because they were released when they were finished, not 6-12 months before they were finished which seems to be 2022's and 2023's main problem.

The push for RT in everything annoys me. It tanks performance and it's subtle at best. Very few games truly look better with RT enabled, and that's because RT is just an approximation of lighting much like the raster-based approximation. Full scene, full everything, realtime path tracing of all lighting, period, is well beyond current technology, CP2077 is 3 years old now, and the path-tracing completely decimates a $1200 RTX 4080, despite leaning heavily on every crutch available from upscaling, frame-gen, temporal noise filtering etc. We are so far away from having true path-traced games and the focus on it is hurting the industry. By 2027 the RTX 6070 might be able to play today's AAA games with path-tracing, but that makes the bold assumption that Nvidia hasn't just quit the gaming GPU market to focus exclusively on the more lucrative crypto mining AI accelerator card market instead.
 
Joined
Nov 10, 2020
Messages
22 (0.01/day)
Processor Core i9 10900k @ 5.1 Ghz
Motherboard Asus ROG Strix Z490-E
Cooling DH15 3x fans
Memory 4x16 Crucial 3600 CL16
Video Card(s) 3090 FE
Storage 2x 970 Evo Plus 2Tb + WD Gold 14Tb 2x
Display(s) Dell AW3418DW + BenQ PD2700Q
Case BeQuiet Dark Pro 900v² + 2 fans
Audio Device(s) Ext
Power Supply Be Quiet Dark Power 13 1000w
Mouse Zowie FK2 for Quake/Logitech G600 + Artisan Hien soft XL
Fun and soul are often sacrificed on the altar of graphics and it's disturbing.
Even though I have the necessary hardware to run the demanding ones, I still find myself enjoying old games much more than the latter
Here's a small list of games I recently played :

Caesar 3
Jedi Knight 2 Jedi Outcast
Tony Hawk Pro Skater 2
Mafia 1, City of Lost Heaven
Age of Empires 2
Warcraft 3
Re-Volt

So yeah, I'm one of those who do not buy games for graphics

Also, games and hardware are a market. Consumerism at it's finest, some games aren't even beautiful to begin with, but require a monster to only run QHD properly
Sometimes I wonder if devs wouldn't be like :
"let's honor this partnership with "insert any" and throw a random volumetric fog on top of this game, so that your fps can drop so much you'll need to buy our cards/cpu/whatever to run it properly"
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 25, 2020
Messages
7,550 (4.99/day)
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
System Name "Icy Resurrection"
Processor 13th Gen Intel Core i9-13900KS
Motherboard ASUS ROG Maximus Z790 Apex Encore
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S upgraded with 2x NF-F12 iPPC-3000 fans and Honeywell PTM7950 TIM
Memory 32 GB G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB F5-6800J3445G16GX2-TZ5RK @ 7600 MT/s 36-44-44-52-96 1.4V
Video Card(s) NVIDIA RTX A2000
Storage 500 GB WD Black SN750 SE NVMe SSD + 4 TB WD Red Plus WD40EFPX HDD
Display(s) 55-inch LG G3 OLED
Case Pichau Mancer CV500 White Edition
Power Supply EVGA 1300 G2 1.3kW 80+ Gold
Mouse Microsoft Classic IntelliMouse (2017)
Keyboard IBM Model M type 1391405
Software Windows 10 Pro 22H2
Benchmark Scores I pulled a Qiqi~
Except it's not what is triggering it.. this is...


Game runs bad on recommended 4K hardware even at 1080P and don't look great either.

Forza Motorsport, another brand new release. And unsurprisingly, AMD hardware is involved in the poor experience. Ryzen and Radeon, no less. Though I blame the Ryzen bit a little less.

Do I buy a game for it's graphic ?
Hell no !
Do graphics are important for me ?
No and I don't care about graphics

All I care is gameplay.

A good gameplay make you forgot graphics everytime.
If not, the game is not good.
Simple as that.

And now suppose you have my specs (which is only an inch away from absolute fastest a 2023 gaming PC gets, with the most exotic OLED panel you can buy for HDR gaming). Do you still feel that way? Will you really not enjoy the latest generation games with the most advanced graphics around if budget wasn't an issue?

Fun and soul are often sacrificed on the altar of graphics and it's disturbing.
Even though I have the necessary hardware to run the demanding ones, I still find myself enjoying old games much more than the latter
Here's a small list of games I recently played :

Caesar 3
Jedi Knight 2 Jedi Outcast
Tony Hawk Pro Skater 2
Mafia 1, City of Lost Heaven
Age of Empires 2
Warcraft 3
Re-Volt

So yeah, I'm one of those who do not buy games for graphics

Also, games and hardware are a market. Consumerism at it's finest, some games aren't even beautiful to begin with, but require a monster to only run QHD properly
Sometimes I wonder if devs wouldn't be like :
"let's honor this partnership with "insert any" and throw a random volumetric fog on top of this game, so that your fps can drop so much you'll need to buy our cards/cpu/whatever to run it properly"

Hard disagree, it looks like you're letting nostalgia of simpler times cloud your judgment. All of these are PS1 era games from the 1990's and early 2000's.
 
Joined
Oct 16, 2023
Messages
143 (0.29/day)
System Name -
Processor 5800x3D
Motherboard AsRock Extreme 4
Cooling Air
Memory 32GB
Video Card(s) 7900 XT
Storage 7.5 TB of SSD storage
Display(s) BenQ XL2746S DyaC+ 240hz . Phillips Momentum 1440P 165hz
Case 4000D AF modded.
Audio Device(s) External Fio K3
Power Supply 850W
Mouse XTRFY MZ1
Keyboard Mechanical
VR HMD -
Software Linux Nobara. Windows 11.
Benchmark Scores A few points.
Forza Motorsport, another brand new release. And unsurprisingly, AMD hardware is involved in the poor experience. Ryzen and Radeon, no less. Though I blame the Ryzen bit a little less.



And now suppose you have my specs (which is only an inch away from absolute fastest a 2023 gaming PC gets, with the most exotic OLED panel you can buy for HDR gaming). Do you still feel that way?
You are funny with your stupid bias as this is the game on the same hardware after the first game update.



I purposely separated these vids to catch some folks out, you fell.

Still it shows just how bad it is, some Nvidia users just prop up their own purchases to continue saying it's not a game or dev issue. We would expect a 4080 to be faster, I mean it's 500 more than my 7900 XT.
 
Joined
Jan 29, 2012
Messages
6,881 (1.44/day)
Location
Florida
System Name natr0n-PC
Processor Ryzen 5950x-5600x | 9600k
Motherboard B450 AORUS M | Z390 UD
Cooling EK AIO 360 - 6 fan action | AIO
Memory Patriot - Viper Steel DDR4 (B-Die)(4x8GB) | Samsung DDR4 (4x8GB)
Video Card(s) EVGA 3070ti FTW
Storage Various
Display(s) Pixio PX279 Prime
Case Thermaltake Level 20 VT | Black bench
Audio Device(s) LOXJIE D10 + Kinter Amp + 6 Bookshelf Speakers Sony+JVC+Sony
Power Supply Super Flower Leadex III ARGB 80+ Gold 650W | EVGA 700 Gold
Software XP/7/8.1/10
Benchmark Scores http://valid.x86.fr/79kuh6
Well Tetris is addicting and was built with a lack of graphics.

Game play is what matters. If it looks good then you can enjoy it even more.
 
Joined
Oct 6, 2021
Messages
1,700 (1.39/day)
System Name Raspberry Pi 7 Quantum @ Overclocked.
I agree with the idea conveyed in the title, and I invite you to look for the best-selling and most played games of all time. Ponder with yourself, and find the answer.

While graphics can undoubtedly enhance immersion, it is essential to remember that the primary factors contributing to a game's appeal are fun, storytelling, gameplay etc...
 
Top