hello there nemesis
LOL, "my nemesis"...
Well, hello to you, also!
my original score is a tad over yours,which was run at my 24/7 settings.
You usually DO score a wee-bit above me (albeit, on SM 2.0, you had to really FIGHT for it to pass me, as did I @ the times you passed me)...
All, except in 1 of the benchmarks tests run here, iirc, you didn't (AquaMark 3?)... but, 2/3 you have so far... that is a good machine you have imo!
Especially for how FAR you can "push it around", mhz/ghz-wise.
(Still, you gotta admit: I do what I do on this CPU, scoring-wise on these tests we have run here this year, using only around 2800mhz (whereas your system has to use 4400++ to achieve only SLIGHTLY HIGHER scores typically)).
This tells me that clock-for-clock? AMD cpu's are more efficient, basically.
i just thought i'd do a max oc test too.
Yea, I figured that... just to see what you could "REALLY DO", & all that!
funny tho' that this needed 1.46 and science(which i'd'a thought was tougher) only needed 1.45.
You're "BURNIN' IT UP" pal... watch it!
APK
P.S.=> And, as per usual, the INTEL CONROE CPU types have "knocked-the-chocolate" out of us all, again... oh well! apk