• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NVIDIA and Broadcom Testing Intel 18A Node for Chip Production

AleksandarK

News Editor
Staff member
Joined
Aug 19, 2017
Messages
2,834 (1.03/day)
TSMC appears to be in for a competitive period, as sources close to Reuters note that both NVIDIA and Broadcom have tested Intel's 18A node with initial test chips. These tests are early indicators of whether Intel can successfully pivot into the contract manufacturing sector currently dominated by TSMC. Intel's 18A technology—featuring RibbonFET transistors and PowerVia backside power delivery—continues progressing through its development roadmap. The technology's performance characteristics reportedly sit between TSMC's current and next-generation nodes, creating a narrow window of competitive opportunity that Intel must capitalize on. What makes these particular tests significant is their positioning relative to actual production commitments. Chip designers typically run multiple test phases before allocating high-volume manufacturing contracts, with each progression reducing technical risk.

Reuters also reported that a six-month qualification delay for third-party IP blocks, which represents a critical vulnerability in Intel's foundry strategy, potentially undermining its ability to service smaller chip designers who rely on these standardized components. However, when this IP (PHY, controller, PCIe interface, etc.) is qualified for the 18A node, it is expected to go into many SoCs that will equal in millions of shipped chips. Additionally, the geopolitical dimensions of Intel's foundry efforts ease concerns of US-based chip designers as they gain a valuable manufacturing partner in their supply chain. Nonetheless, the 18A node is competitive with TSMC, and Intel plans only to evolve from here. Intel's current financial trajectory is the number one beneficiary if it proves good. With foundry revenues declining 60% year-over-year and profitability pushed beyond 2027, the company must demonstrate commercial viability to investors increasingly skeptical of its capital-intensive manufacturing strategy. Securing high-profile customers like NVIDIA could provide the market validation necessary to sustain continued investment in its foundry infrastructure.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site | Source
 

TheLostSwede

News Editor
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
18,209 (2.45/day)
Location
Sweden
System Name Overlord Mk MLI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X670E Aorus Master
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 SE with offsets
Memory 32GB Team T-Create Expert DDR5 6000 MHz @ CL30-34-34-68
Video Card(s) Gainward GeForce RTX 4080 Phantom GS
Storage 1TB Solidigm P44 Pro, 2 TB Corsair MP600 Pro, 2TB Kingston KC3000
Display(s) Acer XV272K LVbmiipruzx 4K@160Hz
Case Fractal Design Torrent Compact
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply be quiet! Pure Power 12 M 850 W
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed
Keyboard Corsair K70 Max
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/yfsd9w
If and that's a big if, these companies move to Intel, it means they're going to have to re-do their entire chip designs for Intel's production lines. This would maybe be doable for a new chip, but moving foundry is otherwise a 12-18 month process to get the two processes to align. This doesn't include any tuning needed to optimise for yields or performance, which could be another 6-12 months.
This is why companies don't like moving to a new foundry partner, as it could be a huge waste of time and money.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2021
Messages
442 (0.34/day)
I hope the 18A node works out TSMC nodes are under huge load an alternative is good and will hopefully keep prices down but given the times we live in I'm doubtful.
 
Joined
May 19, 2011
Messages
198 (0.04/day)
If and that's a big if, these companies move to Intel, it means they're going to have to re-do their entire chip designs for Intel's production lines. This would maybe be doable for a new chip, but moving foundry is otherwise a 12-18 month process to get the two processes to align. This doesn't include any tuning needed to optimise for yields or performance, which could be another 6-12 months.
This is why companies don't like moving to a new foundry partner, as it could be a huge waste of time and money.

nVidia has already shown a great interest in alternative manufacturers. Them using Samsung for the 30 series is a great example of this. And 12-18 months is plenty of time for them to test and launch their 60 series on 18A.
 
Joined
Feb 15, 2018
Messages
269 (0.10/day)
TSMC will just give discounts for their customers .
first intel needs to manufacture their own CPUs+GPUS+ server processors in their 18A facility.

and secondly, they should be competing with samsung nodes for sub 3nm nodes. not TSMC.
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
3,603 (0.86/day)
Location
Athens, Greece
System Name 3 desktop systems: Gaming / Internet / HTPC
Processor Ryzen 5 7600 / Ryzen 5 4600G / Ryzen 5 5500
Motherboard X670E Gaming Plus WiFi / MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (1) / MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (2)
Cooling Aigo ICE 400SE / Segotep T4 / Νoctua U12S
Memory Kingston FURY Beast 32GB DDR5 6000 / 16GB JUHOR / 32GB G.Skill RIPJAWS 3600 + Aegis 3200
Video Card(s) ASRock RX 6600 / Vega 7 integrated / Radeon RX 580
Storage NVMes, ONLY NVMes / NVMes, SATA Storage / NVMe, SATA, external storage
Display(s) Philips 43PUS8857/12 UHD TV (120Hz, HDR, FreeSync Premium) / 19'' HP monitor + BlitzWolf BW-V5
Case Sharkoon Rebel 12 / CoolerMaster Elite 361 / Xigmatek Midguard
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Chieftec 850W / Silver Power 400W / Sharkoon 650W
Mouse CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / CoolerMaster Devastator / Logitech
Keyboard CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / CoolerMaster Devastator / Logitech
Software Windows 10 / Windows 10&Windows 11 / Windows 10
Moving to Intel some of their chips (AMD wake up), might be challenging, but it could also help Nvidia, especially, with demand. A company that has managed to be making over 30 billions per quarter, would probably be willing to find more fabs to cover demand now that the demand is still extremely high. Throwing a few hundred millions and building in Intel fabs the models that will end up in China, could make financial sense.



TSMC will just give discounts for their customers
The problem for TSMC is that it doesn't have enough capacity for it's customers.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2005
Messages
6,179 (0.84/day)
Location
Ikenai borderline!
System Name Firelance.
Processor Threadripper 3960X
Motherboard ROG Strix TRX40-E Gaming
Cooling IceGem 360 + 6x Arctic Cooling P12
Memory 8x 16GB Patriot Viper DDR4-3200 CL16
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Ventus 2X OC
Storage 2TB WD SN850X (boot), 4TB Crucial P3 (data)
Display(s) Dell S3221QS(A) (32" 38x21 60Hz) + 2x AOC Q32E2N (32" 25x14 75Hz)
Case Enthoo Pro II Server Edition (Closed Panel) + 6 fans
Power Supply Fractal Design Ion+ 2 Platinum 760W
Mouse Logitech G604
Keyboard Razer Pro Type Ultra
Software Windows 10 Professional x64
What would be news was if fabless companies were not looking at using Intel to produce their chips. And none of those companies are going to even consider using, let alone committing, to 18A until Panther Lake is out in volume and conclusively demonstrates that it's not complete junk. Lack of foundry capacity hurts when you aren't able to produce stock to sell... but defective product recalls due to a buggy node, would hurt a lot more.
 

TheLostSwede

News Editor
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
18,209 (2.45/day)
Location
Sweden
System Name Overlord Mk MLI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X670E Aorus Master
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 SE with offsets
Memory 32GB Team T-Create Expert DDR5 6000 MHz @ CL30-34-34-68
Video Card(s) Gainward GeForce RTX 4080 Phantom GS
Storage 1TB Solidigm P44 Pro, 2 TB Corsair MP600 Pro, 2TB Kingston KC3000
Display(s) Acer XV272K LVbmiipruzx 4K@160Hz
Case Fractal Design Torrent Compact
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply be quiet! Pure Power 12 M 850 W
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed
Keyboard Corsair K70 Max
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/yfsd9w
nVidia has already shown a great interest in alternative manufacturers. Them using Samsung for the 30 series is a great example of this. And 12-18 months is plenty of time for them to test and launch their 60 series on 18A.
I think you mean a terrible disaster of that? There was a reason why they went straight back to TSMC.
I'm not saying it wouldn't be possible to move to a different foundry, but it's a lot of hard work for both parties, if one party is using tooling that isn't entirely compatible.
Also keep in mind that TSMC has worked with Nvidia so long that they have a very tight relationship in terms of knowhow of how both parties work, as every chip design company have their own little quirks that the foundries have to work with or work around or adapt to somehow. Sometimes the chip designers have to adjust their way of doing things as well.
Making chips is not a simple process.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 18, 2005
Messages
6,179 (0.84/day)
Location
Ikenai borderline!
System Name Firelance.
Processor Threadripper 3960X
Motherboard ROG Strix TRX40-E Gaming
Cooling IceGem 360 + 6x Arctic Cooling P12
Memory 8x 16GB Patriot Viper DDR4-3200 CL16
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Ventus 2X OC
Storage 2TB WD SN850X (boot), 4TB Crucial P3 (data)
Display(s) Dell S3221QS(A) (32" 38x21 60Hz) + 2x AOC Q32E2N (32" 25x14 75Hz)
Case Enthoo Pro II Server Edition (Closed Panel) + 6 fans
Power Supply Fractal Design Ion+ 2 Platinum 760W
Mouse Logitech G604
Keyboard Razer Pro Type Ultra
Software Windows 10 Professional x64
The problem for TSMC is that it doesn't have enough capacity for it's customers.
Nobody has enough capacity for the chips being gobbled up for the "AI" craze.

I think you mean a terrible disaster of that? There was a reason why they went straight back to TSMC.
I don't know if I'd consider Samsung's 8nm a "disaster". It wasn't great, sure, but it produced highly complex functioning chips - which is more than Intel can say for 18A right now.

I'm not saying it wouldn't be possible to move to a different foundry, but it's a lot of hard work for both parties, if one party is using tooling that isn't entirely compatible.
Also keep in mind that TSMC has worked with Nvidia so long that they have a very tight relationship in terms of knowhow of how both parties work, as every chip design company have their own little quirks that the foundries have to work with or work around or adapt to somehow. Sometimes the chip designers have to adjust their way of doing things as well.
Making chips is not a simple process.
Yeah, but NVIDIA is greedy and wants to sell as many compute chips as possible before the "AI" bubble inevitably implodes and their stock price drops like a rock. And let's be honest, TSMC N4/4N has not been great.
 

TheLostSwede

News Editor
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
18,209 (2.45/day)
Location
Sweden
System Name Overlord Mk MLI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X670E Aorus Master
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 SE with offsets
Memory 32GB Team T-Create Expert DDR5 6000 MHz @ CL30-34-34-68
Video Card(s) Gainward GeForce RTX 4080 Phantom GS
Storage 1TB Solidigm P44 Pro, 2 TB Corsair MP600 Pro, 2TB Kingston KC3000
Display(s) Acer XV272K LVbmiipruzx 4K@160Hz
Case Fractal Design Torrent Compact
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply be quiet! Pure Power 12 M 850 W
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed
Keyboard Corsair K70 Max
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/yfsd9w
I don't know if I'd consider Samsung's 8nm a "disaster". It wasn't great, sure, but it produced highly complex functioning chips - which is more than Intel can say for 18A right now.
The issue was that Samsung made a lot of claims that from what we sort of know now, weren't true.
Samsung claimed better power efficiency and performance than TSMC on the "same" node, which clearly wasn't the case and on top of that, how long did it take until they got the yields up to an acceptable level?
Yeah, but NVIDIA is greedy and wants to sell as many compute chips as possible before the "AI" bubble inevitably implodes and their stock price drops like a rock. And let's be honest, TSMC N4/4N has not been great.
Sure and as I said, it's not impossible, it's just very time and cost consuming to move to a different foundry partner, even for a new chip. I don't know what design tools any of the involved parties use, but I would assume Intel is used to work with their own, most likely in-house and highly customised design tools, whereas Nvidia has their own tools that TSMC have gotten used to working with over the past 25+ years they've been making chips for Nvidia. Intel is inexperienced when it comes to not only making chips for, but also working with third parties and I can see this being a big issue when it comes to communications between the two. TSMC on the other hand has done nothing but making chips for third parties, since the "product" is chip making.

I guess we'll just have to wait and see what happens, but my point still stands, it's not easy to change foundry partner and as the article points out, this is why these companies are making test chips to see if it's even something they're going to attempt.
 
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
3,904 (2.57/day)
Location
Slovenia
Processor i5-6600K
Motherboard Asus Z170A
Cooling some cheap Cooler Master Hyper 103 or similar
Memory 16GB DDR4-2400
Video Card(s) IGP
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 250GB
Display(s) 2x Oldell 24" 1920x1200
Case Bitfenix Nova white windowless non-mesh
Audio Device(s) E-mu 1212m PCI
Power Supply Seasonic G-360
Mouse Logitech Marble trackball, never had a mouse
Keyboard Key Tronic KT2000, no Win key because 1994
Software Oldwin
nVidia has already shown a great interest in alternative manufacturers. Them using Samsung for the 30 series is a great example of this. And 12-18 months is plenty of time for them to test and launch their 60 series on 18A.
They also have the funds to develop their designs for both foundries in parallel for an extended period, until one turns out to be clearly superior for them.
 
Joined
May 19, 2011
Messages
198 (0.04/day)
I think you mean a terrible disaster of that? There was a reason why they went straight back to TSMC.
I'm not saying it wouldn't be possible to move to a different foundry, but it's a lot of hard work for both parties, if one party is using tooling that isn't entirely compatible.
Also keep in mind that TSMC has worked with Nvidia so long that they have a very tight relationship in terms of knowhow of how both parties work, as every chip design company have their own little quirks that the foundries have to work with or work around or adapt to somehow. Sometimes the chip designers have to adjust their way of doing things as well.
Making chips is not a simple process.

Maybe Samsung's 8N didn't *quite* meet journalists' expectations, but nVidia had the thermal, performance, and efficiency figures well in advance and stuck with it anyways. So maybe it wound up a tiny bit less efficient than the later-launching RX 6000 series. Big whoop. It's not like the 30 series weren't still selling like hotcakes. Nor can I recall a mass of 30-series failures linked specifically to the manufacturing process. Calling it a "terrible disaster" is bold hyperbole.

The fact of the matter is, TSMC is becoming extremely expensive to hire, no matter who you are. Everybody and their dog knows this. They are also practically joined at the hip with Apple when it comes to their latest and greatest nodes. You can't tell me that doesn't rub nVidia (who hate Apple more than they hate everybody else, combined, by a factor of 10 to 100) the wrong way. That's why Intel's 18A is getting attention from nVidia. Period.
 
Top