Post your Cinebench R23 Score

[usmc362]

Both at 4.5GHz.

 

[Tomgang]

In this bench my old I7 920 is beginning to showing its age can i see. But after 7 years there shut also be a difference compared to newer intel Quad-cores.

So this is how my old devilish (se the score number and you will understand) junk handels this bench.

 

[cdawall]

Got a couple need to get my water running on the opterons to see what they can actually do.

 

[rtwjunkie]

for best results only run the test, turn your browser off and any background apps.

Hmmmmm....you know how much crap is running on modern systems? How exactly do I determine what is performance sapping on a W10 machine?

Besides, shouldn't it be more accurate to show the CPU's computing power in normal conditions, which is how most people run programs? Of course, I DO understand, you need a common ground in order to do comparisons. But I don't think everyone will turn off all the same things in order to have a balanced comparison.

Just some random thoughts. I'm still going to run and post my pitiful score tonight.

 

[CAPSLOCKSTUCK]

Hmmmmm....you know how much crap is running on modern systems? How exactly do I determine what is performance sapping on a W10 machine?

Besides, shouldn't it be more accurate to show the CPU's computing power in normal conditions, which is how most people run programs? Of course, I DO understand, you need a common ground in order to do comparisons. But I don't think everyone will turn off all the same things in order to have a balanced comparison.

Just some random thoughts. I'm still going to run and post my pitiful score tonight.

As an example, if i run Cinebench (or anything like it) i open GPUZ and HWMonitor to check on temps and performance throttling. Turning them off for a "proper" test will add between 20-30 points to my score.

Some boards, like my ASUS turn off all unneccesary processes for you in BIOS.

 

[P4-630]

 

[chuck216]

One suggestion:

In Cinebench R15 click File, Check Advanced Benchmark, then click Run All tests, let's see all 3 scores and MP ratios.

 

[cdawall]

HA that's a bit worse than I expected.

 

[Caring1]

HA that's a bit worse than I expected.

Is that because it is overclocked?

 

[damric]

 

[Fouquin]

<<< Click to expand.

Was having fun with an older system that hasn't been assembled in a few years. Overclocking the memory was the goal, but I went with a CPU OC on top just for giggles. Gotta say I'm impressed that it almost matches the stock Athlon, but I have to wonder if the platform is the bottleneck in that system since it's ITX.

Regardless, this is not bad for an OG Phenom.

 

[TheHunter]

A little older test, kept it in archive, I still had my old 780GTX here..

"best off" Gpu score: 1st one @ 194.86fps

post image

Cpu score:

uploading pictures

 

[MrGenius]

3570K + 280X

Not too shabby.

 

[Batou1986]

because why not

 

[broken pixel]

I ran some R15 test a few days ago, I will post some scores when I get back home.

 

[FYFI13]

Not pushing to the max.

 

[CAPSLOCKSTUCK]

Xeon X5670

Xeon X5650

Xeon E5620

Xeon E5640

 

[broken pixel]

Almost got 1400 cb

 

[chuck216]

Here's my Fx-8320 @3.5 (stock) and @4.7 Ghz

 

[GelatanousMuck]

Some of those 6 core CPUs and beyond are very impressive!

 

[sn2x]

 

[F-Zero]

4.8 Ghz

 

[Shou Miko]

my stock i7-6700k Skylake for more details check system specs...

 

[studioproz]

Hey guys I've been contemplating on selling my machine but then i realized that i may be ok for running cinema 4d, are these scores good enough for me? please help

 

[dorsetknob]

puma99dk|
869cb for a new generation 4 Ghz Skylake Meh bet your disapointed !