Post your glmark2 1080p score

[SchumannFrequency]

testing method:
glmark2 -s 1920x1080

Hardware: Intel 12600KF (stock) -- Kingston 6200 MHz CL36 -- Sapphire RX 7600 -- BIOSTAR B760MZ-E PRO -- Antec P6 -- Xilence XP550 -- ARCTIC i35 -- 980 PRO 500GB
Software: OpenBSD, bspwm, open-source GPU driver, picom, UFS file system

1080p result: 16009
Linux results (outdated): https://openbenchmarking.org/test/pts/glmark2

This benchmark is not intended for windows10/11 users but for persons using a Unix-like system (BSD, Linux, macOS, ChromeOS, illumos)

 

[SchumannFrequency]

1080p result: 16909

Hardware: Intel 12700KF (stock) -- G.SKILL RIPJAWS @3600 CL18 (stock) -- Sapphire RX 7600 -- ASRock B760M-ITX/D4 WiFi -- fractal design DEFINE NANO S -- bequiet! SYSTEM POWER 10 550W -- DeepCool AG500BK ARGB -- EVO 850 500GB
Software: Artix Linux, LXQt, Mesa open-source driver, F2FS file system, OpenRC init

 

[:D:D]

 

[SchumannFrequency]

1080p result: 16445

Hardware: Intel 12700KF (stock) -- G.SKILL RIPJAWS @3600 CL18 (stock) -- Sapphire RX 7600 -- ASRock B760M-ITX/D4 WiFi -- fractal design DEFINE NANO S -- bequiet! SYSTEM POWER 10 550W -- DeepCool AG500BK ARGB -- Samsung EVO 850 500GB
Software: OpenBSD -current, bspwm, Mesa open-source driver, UFS file system

The difference between OpenBSD and Artix Linux is 2.8% according to this latest result.
Artix Linux and OpenBSD use different Mesa versions and other Mesa versions often have different performance.
It seems Linux and OpenBSD perform almost exactly the same in this test.