- Joined
- Mar 5, 2012
- Messages
- 298 (0.06/day)
- Location
- Dubai, UAE
System Name | RTX 5090 Machine-to-be.... |
---|---|
Processor | AMD Ryzen™ 7 9800X3D - Hopefully order won't be cancelled :D |
Motherboard | Asus B650E-E ROG Strix |
Cooling | Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120 SE |
Memory | Acer Predator Vesta II 32GB (16GB * 2) DDR5 6000MT/s CL30-38-38-76 |
Video Card(s) | HP GT730 2GB DDR3 Mighty Edition!! |
Display(s) | Acer Predator X35 G-Sync Ultimate |
Case | Lian-Li O11 Air Mini Black-Mesh |
Power Supply | Toughpower GF3 1200W Gold - TT Premium Edition |
Mouse | Logitech G502 Hero wired |
Keyboard | Corsair K70 RGB PRO |
VR HMD | Nope NOpe NOPE |
Software | Windows 11 Pro |
Benchmark Scores | Nothing special...Yet. |
Hi All,
I got a small curious question... since the release of DDR5 we are getting silly CL timings, like 40 40 40 190 and weird numbers compared to the more mature DDR4 since it has been there in the market for a longer while.
Looking at the market now, We get DDR5 Kits running at 6000MHz - this is what AMD recommended for their new platform AM5 as a sweet spot - and with CAS like 30 and I didn't even dig it's T1 or T2.
I am just wondering, why manufacturers are blasting the roof with 7500MHz and 8500Mhz with weird so slow CAS latencies! let me re-phrase my question, why can't we get a 6000MHz kit that runs cool 16-16-16-32 CAS for example? what's holding back the process? or this is a milking process like Intel and nVidia doing differently with their products? I am kinda new to that so apologies if my question looks naive.
I have seen OC3D doing an amazing experience for DDR4 vs current DDR5 with different speeds, I would say from my findings that moving to the new DDR5 platform, you don't need a whooping thing, a kit that runs 4800MHz will do you justice compared to the prices of higher speed ones, the differences are so minor and the gains in games doesn't justify the increase in price, what do you think all?
Again apoligies if my thoughts are naive or so but I know that RAM Gurus know a lot about these details, thank you all in advance.
I got a small curious question... since the release of DDR5 we are getting silly CL timings, like 40 40 40 190 and weird numbers compared to the more mature DDR4 since it has been there in the market for a longer while.
Looking at the market now, We get DDR5 Kits running at 6000MHz - this is what AMD recommended for their new platform AM5 as a sweet spot - and with CAS like 30 and I didn't even dig it's T1 or T2.
I am just wondering, why manufacturers are blasting the roof with 7500MHz and 8500Mhz with weird so slow CAS latencies! let me re-phrase my question, why can't we get a 6000MHz kit that runs cool 16-16-16-32 CAS for example? what's holding back the process? or this is a milking process like Intel and nVidia doing differently with their products? I am kinda new to that so apologies if my question looks naive.
I have seen OC3D doing an amazing experience for DDR4 vs current DDR5 with different speeds, I would say from my findings that moving to the new DDR5 platform, you don't need a whooping thing, a kit that runs 4800MHz will do you justice compared to the prices of higher speed ones, the differences are so minor and the gains in games doesn't justify the increase in price, what do you think all?
Again apoligies if my thoughts are naive or so but I know that RAM Gurus know a lot about these details, thank you all in advance.