• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Regarding DDR5 Specs

Joined
Mar 5, 2012
Messages
298 (0.06/day)
Location
Dubai, UAE
System Name RTX 5090 Machine-to-be....
Processor AMD Ryzen™ 7 9800X3D - Hopefully order won't be cancelled :D
Motherboard Asus B650E-E ROG Strix
Cooling Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120 SE
Memory Acer Predator Vesta II 32GB (16GB * 2) DDR5 6000MT/s CL30-38-38-76
Video Card(s) HP GT730 2GB DDR3 Mighty Edition!!
Display(s) Acer Predator X35 G-Sync Ultimate
Case Lian-Li O11 Air Mini Black-Mesh
Power Supply Toughpower GF3 1200W Gold - TT Premium Edition
Mouse Logitech G502 Hero wired
Keyboard Corsair K70 RGB PRO
VR HMD Nope NOpe NOPE
Software Windows 11 Pro
Benchmark Scores Nothing special...Yet.
Hi All,
I got a small curious question... since the release of DDR5 we are getting silly CL timings, like 40 40 40 190 and weird numbers compared to the more mature DDR4 since it has been there in the market for a longer while.
Looking at the market now, We get DDR5 Kits running at 6000MHz - this is what AMD recommended for their new platform AM5 as a sweet spot - and with CAS like 30 and I didn't even dig it's T1 or T2.

I am just wondering, why manufacturers are blasting the roof with 7500MHz and 8500Mhz with weird so slow CAS latencies! let me re-phrase my question, why can't we get a 6000MHz kit that runs cool 16-16-16-32 CAS for example? what's holding back the process? or this is a milking process like Intel and nVidia doing differently with their products? I am kinda new to that so apologies if my question looks naive.

I have seen OC3D doing an amazing experience for DDR4 vs current DDR5 with different speeds, I would say from my findings that moving to the new DDR5 platform, you don't need a whooping thing, a kit that runs 4800MHz will do you justice compared to the prices of higher speed ones, the differences are so minor and the gains in games doesn't justify the increase in price, what do you think all?

Again apoligies if my thoughts are naive or so but I know that RAM Gurus know a lot about these details, thank you all in advance.
 
Joined
Nov 11, 2010
Messages
310 (0.06/day)
System Name Uzuki Toune
Processor AMD RYZEN 7 7700X (ASUS PBO 90C Mode)
Motherboard Asus ROG Strix X670E-E Gaming WIFI
Cooling Thermalright Frostspirit 140 White V3 ARGB
Memory 32GB DDR6000 CL36 Kingston (EXPO)(16GBx2)
Video Card(s) Zotac GTX 1050TI
Storage 2TB Kingston KC3000 + 1TB Crucial P2 + 480GB Samsung Evo 850 + 480GB Kingston A400
Display(s) Dell U2723QE + Philips 221V8 (Portrait)
Case NZXT H510
Audio Device(s) Auzen X-FI Forte + Onboard Realtek 4080 -> Creative Gigaworks T40II
Power Supply EVGA G+ 650W
Mouse Logitech MX Master 3 (Work) & G103 (Play)
Keyboard iRocks K71M
Software Windows 11 Professional
Because RAM makers know that gamers is not where the money is coming from nowadays with everything going up, including the games themselves. They have shifted markets, and maybe you should shift your point of view too instead being stuck in the mindset that computer gaming is what drives its innovation. (hint: it hasn't for a quite a long time)
 
Joined
Feb 22, 2022
Messages
631 (0.56/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Motherboard Asus Crosshair VIII Dark Hero
Cooling Custom Watercooling
Memory G.Skill Trident Z Royal 2x16GB
Video Card(s) MSi RTX 3080ti Suprim X
Storage 2TB Corsair MP600 PRO Hydro X
Display(s) Samsung G7 27" x2
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Be Quiet! Dark Power Pro 12 1500W
Mouse Logitech G903
Keyboard Steelseries Apex Pro
Latencies are just part of the story. For one, they are directly related to the MHz of the ram. Similarly to how DDR4 first released with higher CL than you can get now., you will see lower latency DDR5 modules in the future.

As a more extreme example than yours, we used to have CL2 memory back when we used DDR. Then that jumped to CL4 for DDR2 (we had different quality ram back then to. So there was a spread, but you get the idea). And I can guarantee you that they were not faster than the current DDR5 offerings.
 
Joined
Mar 5, 2012
Messages
298 (0.06/day)
Location
Dubai, UAE
System Name RTX 5090 Machine-to-be....
Processor AMD Ryzen™ 7 9800X3D - Hopefully order won't be cancelled :D
Motherboard Asus B650E-E ROG Strix
Cooling Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120 SE
Memory Acer Predator Vesta II 32GB (16GB * 2) DDR5 6000MT/s CL30-38-38-76
Video Card(s) HP GT730 2GB DDR3 Mighty Edition!!
Display(s) Acer Predator X35 G-Sync Ultimate
Case Lian-Li O11 Air Mini Black-Mesh
Power Supply Toughpower GF3 1200W Gold - TT Premium Edition
Mouse Logitech G502 Hero wired
Keyboard Corsair K70 RGB PRO
VR HMD Nope NOpe NOPE
Software Windows 11 Pro
Benchmark Scores Nothing special...Yet.
Because RAM makers know that gamers is not where the money is coming from nowadays with everything going up, including the games themselves. They have shifted markets, and maybe you should shift your point of view too instead being stuck in the mindset that computer gaming is what drives its innovation. (hint: it hasn't for a quite a long time)

I totally see your point here!! and agree with it.... so they can release us now 6000MHz at CL14 if they wanted to not the weak half cooked CL30 they are putting now...

Is it true that not all motherboards running DDR5 can work with any CL below 20 also? like is someone released a ram at 6000MHz with CL19, not all motherboards can work on that XMP?

Latencies are just part of the story. For one, they are directly related to the MHz of the ram. Similarly to how DDR4 first released with higher CL than you can get now., you will see lower latency DDR5 modules in the future.

As a more extreme example than yours, we used to have CL2 memory back when we used DDR. Then that jumped to CL4 for DDR2 (we had different quality ram back then to. So there was a spread, but you get the idea). And I can guarantee you that they were not faster than the current DDR5 offerings.
they are milking us Badly!! I was aiming to update my desktop and I am not buying any fancy ram with cooling on it!!! I don't mind losing 4 frames in favor for saving more than 200USD!
 
Joined
Feb 22, 2022
Messages
631 (0.56/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Motherboard Asus Crosshair VIII Dark Hero
Cooling Custom Watercooling
Memory G.Skill Trident Z Royal 2x16GB
Video Card(s) MSi RTX 3080ti Suprim X
Storage 2TB Corsair MP600 PRO Hydro X
Display(s) Samsung G7 27" x2
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Be Quiet! Dark Power Pro 12 1500W
Mouse Logitech G903
Keyboard Steelseries Apex Pro
I totally see your point here!! and agree with it.... so they can release us now 6000MHz at CL14 if they wanted to not the weak half cooked CL30 they are putting now...

Is it true that not all motherboards running DDR5 can work with any CL below 20 also? like is someone released a ram at 6000MHz with CL19, not all motherboards can work on that XMP?
Another important note here. You should not compared latencies between generations, since there are so many other differences in the technology. If you dig into the improvements from DDR4 to 5 you'd be amazed (at least I hope so). For one, DDR5 is always multi-rank. So there is no single rank vs dual rank performance difference anymore.

I am sure we will see that CL30 drop to something in the ~CL26 range within a few years, maybe even lower. But you will never see a 6000MHz DDR5 kit at CL14, that is just not physically possible. Look at DDR4 as a guide, you can have CL22 down to CL16 for the same speed rating depending on the ram modules used. So DDR5 might be something like CL26-CL34 for the same speeds. (hypothetical numbers here)

Now regarding the bling, I agree. I don't need it either. Save me some bucks by removing all that nonsense. I prefer a non-windowed case anyways.
 
Joined
Mar 5, 2012
Messages
298 (0.06/day)
Location
Dubai, UAE
System Name RTX 5090 Machine-to-be....
Processor AMD Ryzen™ 7 9800X3D - Hopefully order won't be cancelled :D
Motherboard Asus B650E-E ROG Strix
Cooling Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120 SE
Memory Acer Predator Vesta II 32GB (16GB * 2) DDR5 6000MT/s CL30-38-38-76
Video Card(s) HP GT730 2GB DDR3 Mighty Edition!!
Display(s) Acer Predator X35 G-Sync Ultimate
Case Lian-Li O11 Air Mini Black-Mesh
Power Supply Toughpower GF3 1200W Gold - TT Premium Edition
Mouse Logitech G502 Hero wired
Keyboard Corsair K70 RGB PRO
VR HMD Nope NOpe NOPE
Software Windows 11 Pro
Benchmark Scores Nothing special...Yet.
Another important note here. You should not compared latencies between generations, since there are so many other differences in the technology. If you dig into the improvements from DDR4 to 5 you'd be amazed (at least I hope so). For one, DDR5 is always multi-rank. So there is no single rank vs dual rank performance difference anymore.

I am sure we will see that CL30 drop to something in the ~CL26 range within a few years, maybe even lower. But you will never see a 6000MHz DDR5 kit at CL14, that is just not physically possible. Look at DDR4 as a guide, you can have CL22 down to CL16 for the same speed rating depending on the ram modules used. So DDR5 might be something like CL26-CL34 for the same speeds. (hypothetical numbers here)

Now regarding the bling, I agree. I don't need it either. Save me some bucks by removing all that nonsense. I prefer a non-windowed case anyways.
you hyped me to dig in the improvements from DDR4 to DDR5, if you have any recommended materials displaying it please feel free to post it or PM me.
I am not comparing them but like, the idea itself, if we have the same speed let's say DDR5 at 4800MHz with a CL 15 is definitely better than the same speed at CL40 for example.. the tighter these times the better I believe, right?
I am just curious, why can't we get a 6000MHz kit running at CL14, apologies if missed the answer to that in your last message.

this is the kit I am aiming for :D if you have any better suggestion, please do!
 
Joined
Feb 22, 2022
Messages
631 (0.56/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Motherboard Asus Crosshair VIII Dark Hero
Cooling Custom Watercooling
Memory G.Skill Trident Z Royal 2x16GB
Video Card(s) MSi RTX 3080ti Suprim X
Storage 2TB Corsair MP600 PRO Hydro X
Display(s) Samsung G7 27" x2
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Be Quiet! Dark Power Pro 12 1500W
Mouse Logitech G903
Keyboard Steelseries Apex Pro
Yes, they are called latencies for a reason. Lower latencies are always better, given identical specs otherwise.

VERY oversimplified: Latencies are how many clock cycles you have to wait between reading from, or writing to the memory. Half the speed rating is how many clock cycles are available per second. Basically as speed goes up, you need higher latencies to handle the extra speed. A performance increase is gained by having a better speed:latency ratio within the same DDR generation. From generation to generation you see larger increases due to, for example, being able to do more operations in parallel. Again, this is the very very short version. I could probably write a thousand lines and still only cover the basics.

Anyways... Go watch some of Buildzoids memory timing videos on Youtube (Actually Hardcore Overclocking) if you want an overload of technical information. Or just start at Wikipedia and look at the technical sources linked from there.

I would not recommend diving to deep into this unless you have a technical need to. The most important detail is that DDR4 and DDR5 latencies/speed rating is not comparable apples-to-apples. So, buy the best speed/latency memory you can get for your money.

Why can't we get a 6000MHz kit running at CL14? Shortest answer: Physics
 

ir_cow

Staff member
Joined
Sep 4, 2008
Messages
4,848 (0.80/day)
Location
USA
Even the best binned kits with a ton of voltage can't go below CL26. Like DDR5-4800 with 1.65V can't go below 24.

This is just the cycle. It's like asking why DDR4 can't do CL1 like DDR-400 could.

I think a lot of people confused about how memory works. system memory is just dumb and operates at a static frequency. So it's up to the memory controller to send commands and that can only send commands so fast and receive data without errors. The higher you go in frequency the looser the timings have to be. Some of that can be countered with more voltage but generally it's a fairly linear process.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
3,981 (2.59/day)
Location
Slovenia
Processor i5-6600K
Motherboard Asus Z170A
Cooling some cheap Cooler Master Hyper 103 or similar
Memory 16GB DDR4-2400
Video Card(s) IGP
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 250GB
Display(s) 2x Oldell 24" 1920x1200
Case Bitfenix Nova white windowless non-mesh
Audio Device(s) E-mu 1212m PCI
Power Supply Seasonic G-360
Mouse Logitech Marble trackball, never had a mouse
Keyboard Key Tronic KT2000, no Win key because 1994
Software Oldwin
If you want to make any meaningful comparison between generations, you need to calculate latencies in nanoseconds. For any DDR memory, it's CL times 2000 divided by speed. You'll see that it has remained basically the same since ... ever. The underlying technology of memory cells is as slow as it has ever been. DDR5 chips do far, far more internal operations in parallel than the original DDR, actually the number doubles with each generation, and that's why speed went up and keeps going up.

Now to be fair, there was some regression with DDR5, which remains to this day. I bought a fairly low end and cheap DDR4-2400 CL16 kit, one without heatsinks, in July 2016, about a year after DDR4 was introduced to consumer PCs. The CL is 13.3 nanoseconds. DDR5 is now a year old, and everything that can be described as fairly low end and cheap (and some may take it as an insult) is still DDR5-5200 CL40, which amounts to 15.4 nanoseconds.
 

ir_cow

Staff member
Joined
Sep 4, 2008
Messages
4,848 (0.80/day)
Location
USA
The primary timings are less important to the frequency and sub-timimgs. The "latency" calculation isn't that helpful in comparison. This assumes all memory has identical timings and the frequency is the only changing value.

I can gain 5 fps just by changing the sub-timimgs. Which is why when I get a 6000 CL40 kit, it can still preform decent to a CL30 kit. Just depends on what you're doing with the subtimings and of course games matter as well. Some games are more memory sensitive than others.
 
Joined
Aug 21, 2015
Messages
1,831 (0.52/day)
Location
North Dakota
System Name Office
Processor Ryzen 5600G
Motherboard ASUS B450M-A II
Cooling be quiet! Shadow Rock LP
Memory 16GB Patriot Viper Steel DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RX 5600 XT
Storage PNY CS1030 250GB, Crucial MX500 2TB
Display(s) Dell S2719DGF
Case Fractal Define 7 Compact
Power Supply EVGA 550 G3
Mouse Logitech M705 Marthon
Keyboard Logitech G410
Software Windows 10 Pro 22H2
Latency is limited in part by how fast the individual transistor gates can switch. This is a physical limit regardless of how many MHz you're running. "Good" memory runs CAS at 10ns or less, which works out to the DDR rating divided by 200. So back in the DDR1 days, decent sticks were DDR-400 CAS 2. Then DDR2-800 CAS 4, 1600/8 and 3200/16. DDR5 works slightly differently than previous generations, so we may not see 200:1 CL ratios for DDR5.
 

ir_cow

Staff member
Joined
Sep 4, 2008
Messages
4,848 (0.80/day)
Location
USA
Latency is limited in part by how fast the individual transistor gates can switch. This is a physical limit regardless of how many MHz you're running. "Good" memory runs CAS at 10ns or less, which works out to the DDR rating divided by 200. So back in the DDR1 days, decent sticks were DDR-400 CAS 2. Then DDR2-800 CAS 4, 1600/8 and 3200/16. DDR5 works slightly differently than previous generations, so we may not see 200:1 CL ratios for DDR5.
That's a good description of what the best CAS value should be for each generation. But it does not factory in any of the subtimings that play a role in the performance of the memory kit. Adding things like CPU frequency, being GPU bound for it given resolution, makes it very very hard to say this is better than that. Unless you have set parameters to work with.

I can setup a system with identical hardware and beat out 6000 CL32 memory with a CL40 kit. This is because the CAS value isn't the only number that matters.
 
Joined
Aug 21, 2015
Messages
1,831 (0.52/day)
Location
North Dakota
System Name Office
Processor Ryzen 5600G
Motherboard ASUS B450M-A II
Cooling be quiet! Shadow Rock LP
Memory 16GB Patriot Viper Steel DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RX 5600 XT
Storage PNY CS1030 250GB, Crucial MX500 2TB
Display(s) Dell S2719DGF
Case Fractal Define 7 Compact
Power Supply EVGA 550 G3
Mouse Logitech M705 Marthon
Keyboard Logitech G410
Software Windows 10 Pro 22H2
That's a good description of what the best CAS value should be for each generation. But it does not factory in any of the subtimings that play a role in the performance of the memory kit. Adding things like CPU frequency, being GPU bound for it given resolution, makes it very very hard to say this is better than that. Unless you have set parameters to work with.

I can setup a system with identical hardware and beat out 6000 CL32 memory with a CL40 kit. This is because the CAS value isn't the only number that matters.

Right, but I don't understand secondary and beyond timings, so focused on CAS because that's relatively straightforward and kind of acts as standard bearer for a module's rating.
 
Joined
Jun 26, 2022
Messages
252 (0.25/day)
Processor 7950X, PBO CO -15
Motherboard Gigabyte X670 AORUS Elite AX (rev. 1.0)
Cooling EVGA CLC 360 w/Arctic P12 PWM PST A-RGB fans
Memory 64GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB F5-6000J3040G32GA2-TZ5RK
Video Card(s) ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070
Storage 970 EVO Plus 2TB x2, 970 EVO 1TB; SATA: 850 EVO 500GB (HDD cache), HDDs: 6TB Seagate, 1TB Samsung
Display(s) ASUS 32" 165Hz IPS (VG32AQL1A), ASUS 27" 144Hz TN (MG278Q)
Case Corsair 4000D Airflow
Audio Device(s) Razer BlackShark V2 Pro
Power Supply Corsair RM1000x
Mouse Logitech M720
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R MX
Software Win10 Pro, PrimoCache, VMware Workstation Pro 16
Latency is limited in part by how fast the individual transistor gates can switch. This is a physical limit regardless of how many MHz you're running. "Good" memory runs CAS at 10ns or less, which works out to the DDR rating divided by 200. So back in the DDR1 days, decent sticks were DDR-400 CAS 2. Then DDR2-800 CAS 4, 1600/8 and 3200/16. DDR5 works slightly differently than previous generations, so we may not see 200:1 CL ratios for DDR5.
We already have sub 10ns DDR5
Screenshot_20221112-063012_Firefox.jpg
 
Joined
Aug 21, 2015
Messages
1,831 (0.52/day)
Location
North Dakota
System Name Office
Processor Ryzen 5600G
Motherboard ASUS B450M-A II
Cooling be quiet! Shadow Rock LP
Memory 16GB Patriot Viper Steel DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RX 5600 XT
Storage PNY CS1030 250GB, Crucial MX500 2TB
Display(s) Dell S2719DGF
Case Fractal Define 7 Compact
Power Supply EVGA 550 G3
Mouse Logitech M705 Marthon
Keyboard Logitech G410
Software Windows 10 Pro 22H2

Count von Schwalbe

Nocturnus Moderatus
Staff member
Joined
Nov 15, 2021
Messages
3,373 (2.76/day)
Location
Knoxville, TN, USA
IMHO the first word latency is a better measure, because it can be compared across various frequencies.

I would love to see a comparison of generations with identical frequency and timings and see if any of the other changes (such as subdividing the bus) actually affects performance.
 
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
3,981 (2.59/day)
Location
Slovenia
Processor i5-6600K
Motherboard Asus Z170A
Cooling some cheap Cooler Master Hyper 103 or similar
Memory 16GB DDR4-2400
Video Card(s) IGP
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 250GB
Display(s) 2x Oldell 24" 1920x1200
Case Bitfenix Nova white windowless non-mesh
Audio Device(s) E-mu 1212m PCI
Power Supply Seasonic G-360
Mouse Logitech Marble trackball, never had a mouse
Keyboard Key Tronic KT2000, no Win key because 1994
Software Oldwin
We already have sub 10ns DDR5
Good news for those who are planning to build an Epyc server with ECC DDR5: you can get twice as many gigabytes for the same amount of money.
 

ir_cow

Staff member
Joined
Sep 4, 2008
Messages
4,848 (0.80/day)
Location
USA
IMHO the first word latency is a better measure, because it can be compared across various frequencies.

I would love to see a comparison of generations with identical frequency and timings and see if any of the other changes (such as subdividing the bus) actually affects performance.
Only one you can do that with is Intel DDR4 vs DDR5. Also you would have to raise the DDR4 timings since DDR5 cannot go as low.
 
Joined
Jan 5, 2006
Messages
18,584 (2.65/day)
System Name AlderLake
Processor Intel i7 12700K P-Cores @ 5Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte Z690 Aorus Master
Cooling Noctua NH-U12A 2 fans + Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme + 5 case fans
Memory 32GB DDR5 Corsair Dominator Platinum RGB 6000MT/s CL36
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio
Storage Samsung 980 Pro 1TB + 970 Evo 500GB + 850 Pro 512GB + 860 Evo 1TB x2
Display(s) 23.8" Dell S2417DG 165Hz G-Sync 1440p
Case Be quiet! Silent Base 600 - Window
Audio Device(s) Panasonic SA-PMX94 / Realtek onboard + B&O speaker system / Harman Kardon Go + Play / Logitech G533
Power Supply Seasonic Focus Plus Gold 750W
Mouse Logitech MX Anywhere 2 Laser wireless
Keyboard RAPOO E9270P Black 5GHz wireless
Software Windows 11
Benchmark Scores Cinebench R23 (Single Core) 1936 @ stock Cinebench R23 (Multi Core) 23006 @ stock
Joined
Mar 21, 2021
Messages
5,393 (3.70/day)
Location
Colorado, U.S.A.
System Name CyberPowerPC ET8070
Processor Intel Core i5-10400F
Motherboard Gigabyte B460M DS3H AC-Y1
Memory 2 x Crucial Ballistix 8GB DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) MSI Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Super
Storage Boot: Intel OPTANE SSD P1600X Series 118GB M.2 PCIE
Display(s) Dell P2416D (2560 x 1440)
Power Supply EVGA 500W1 (modified to have two bridge rectifiers)
Software Windows 11 Home
Don't forget that the faster the RAM runs the CAS latency (in clock cycles) increases for the same delay...
for example, for my DDR3 RAM

FrequencyCAS# Latency
381.0 MHz5
457.1 MHz6
533.3 MHz7
609.5 MHz8
685.7 MHz9
761.9 MHz10
800.0 MHz11

the latency is basically staying the same

So, if one gets faster RAM (DDR5) the CAS may look like it is worse

You want really good CAS number, run the RAM really, really slow...
 
Last edited:

ir_cow

Staff member
Joined
Sep 4, 2008
Messages
4,848 (0.80/day)
Location
USA
@Shrek Okay, but if CL24 is the lowest DDR5 goes even at DDR5-1600, that kinda breaks that idea of slower memory being better. Also I want to point out once again, while the CAS value will determine the the "theoretical" performance, it accounts for nothing else that plays a equally important role.
 
Top