• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

RTX 4090: 98% Performance at 80% Power Target

Joined
Sep 15, 2016
Messages
484 (0.16/day)
From Der8auer's video on his English channel:


1665525656358.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joined
Dec 31, 2020
Messages
1,023 (0.70/day)
Processor E5-4627 v4
Motherboard VEINEDA X99
Memory 32 GB
Video Card(s) 2080 Ti
Storage NE-512
Display(s) G27Q
Case DAOTECH X9
Power Supply SF450
Strange, In order to get that kind of power saving voltage should drop to 900mV, which is 2300 Mhz according to the
1665528632423.png

The strange part is not the fact, but asking this question of power target not making sense after basically a life time of this being the case for all GPus ever made.

And whats with the wobbling fans.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 25, 2020
Messages
7,184 (4.87/day)
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
System Name "Icy Resurrection"
Processor 13th Gen Intel Core i9-13900KS Special Edition
Motherboard ASUS ROG Maximus Z790 Apex Encore
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S upgraded with 2x NF-F12 iPPC-3000 fans and Honeywell PTM7950 TIM
Memory 32 GB G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB F5-6800J3445G16GX2-TZ5RK @ 7600 MT/s 36-44-44-52-96 1.4V
Video Card(s) ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX™ 4080 16GB GDDR6X White OC Edition
Storage 500 GB WD Black SN750 SE NVMe SSD + 4 TB WD Red Plus WD40EFPX HDD
Display(s) 55-inch LG G3 OLED
Case Pichau Mancer CV500 White Edition
Audio Device(s) Apple USB-C + Sony MDR-V7 headphones
Power Supply EVGA 1300 G2 1.3kW 80+ Gold
Mouse Microsoft Classic Intellimouse
Keyboard IBM Model M type 1391405
Software Windows 10 Pro 22H2
Benchmark Scores I pulled a Qiqi~
Strange, In order to get that kind of power saving voltage should drop to 900mV, which is 2300 Mhz according to the
View attachment 265082
The strange part is not the fact, but asking this question of power target not making sense after basically a life time of this being the case for all GPus ever made.

And whats with the wobbling fans.

If this works anything like Ampere, the v/f curve is not necessarily fixed, i.e. 900 mV does not necessarily mean 2300 MHz, and this should be adjustable using MSI Afterburner.

By default, NVIDIA tends to overshoot maximum voltage in order to get an extra few MHz momentarily at the top end, but the performance is thoroughly unsustainable due to their strict power and thermal controls which the user cannot override without a BIOS editor (so, you can't do it since they are signed and you cannot edit them), especially when the graphics processor is under heavy load.

The sweet spot for my standard-power (2x8 pin, 375W) RTX 3090 is at 1800 MHz at 793 mV, this way it will run any workload including full tilt raytracing within its power limit without undesirable clock fluctuations. By default, it will hit ~1980-2025 MHz at 1.07 V momentarily and then throttle down, and given enough time well into the low 1400s under raytracing loads for extended periods of time, usually averaging the clock around the 1740 MHz that ASUS advertises as the boost clock for this model.

It's frankly terrible and the truth is, it's done this way because it tends to inflate benchmark scores (short/bursty workloads) and gives the illusion to the average joe buyer that their hardware is smart and always at its best no matter the situation, by tweaking itself constantly. I hate GPU boost, but alas, NVIDIA offers no way to disable it or any first-party performance control features. The best you can do is disable p-state control but the driver will override it regardless if power limit is reached.
 
Top